研究简报 Short communications

海带渣添加比例及其酶解产物对凡纳滨对虾生长、消化和非特异性免疫力的影响

展开
  • 1. 上海海洋大学水产与生命学院, 上海 201306;
    2. 农业部海洋渔业资源可持续利用重点开放实验室, 中国水产科学研究院黄海水产研究所, 青岛 266071
彭素晓(1991—),女,山东临沂人,硕士研究生,研究方向为动物营养与微生物发酵。E-mail:836553017@qq.com

收稿日期: 2016-12-26

  网络出版日期: 2017-07-05

基金资助

国家虾现代产业技术体系(CARS-47);青岛海洋科学与技术国家实验室鳌山科技创新计划子任务“海水池塘健康养殖技术研发”(2015ASKJ02-03)

Effects of Kelp Meal Adding Proportion and Its Enzymatic Hydrolysates on Growth, Digestion and Non-Specific Immunity of Litopenaeus vannamei

Expand
  • 1. College of Fishers and Life Sciences, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China;
    2. Key Laboratory for Sustainable Utilization of Marine Fisheries Resource, Yellow Sea Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Qingdao 266071, China

Received date: 2016-12-26

  Online published: 2017-07-05

摘要

为探究海带渣添加比例及其酶解产物对凡纳滨对虾生长、消化和非特异性免疫力的影响,本试验进行了如下2个试验:海带渣适宜添加比例试验和海带渣酶解产物应用效果试验。海带渣适宜添加比例试验(试验1):采用单因素试验设计,配制海带渣添加比例分别为0(对照组)、0.5%、1.0%、2.0%、3.0%、5.0%的6种饲料(分别记为D1~D6组),投喂初始体重为(1.00±0.10) g的凡纳滨对虾49 d后,对对虾的生长性能指标以及胃消化酶、血清非特异性免疫酶的活性进行测定。每组3个重复,每个重复35尾对虾。海带渣酶解产物应用效果试验(试验2):在试验1得出海带渣适宜添加比例为3.0%的基础上,以试验1中添加3.0%海带渣饲料作为海带渣对照组(A组),再分别用β-葡聚糖酶酶解海带渣(B组)和蛋白酶酶解海带渣(C组)等量替代A组饲料中的海带渣,投喂初始体重为(1.00±0.1) g的凡纳滨对虾56 d,试验结束后测定对虾的生长性能指标以及胃消化酶、血清非特异性免疫酶的活性。每组3个重复,每个重复35尾对虾。试验1结果显示:D4、D5组对虾的特定生长率、增重率显著高于对照组(P<0.05),D5组对虾的饲料系数显著低于对照组(P<0.05);随着海带渣添加比例的增加,胃中胃蛋白酶及血清中酚氧化酶、超氧化物歧化酶的活性呈现先升高后下降的趋势,上述3种酶的活性均以D5组最高,且D5组血清中酚氧化酶、超氧化物歧化酶的活性显著高于对照组(P<0.05)。试验2结果显示:与未经酶解的海带渣相比,海带渣经β-葡聚糖酶酶解后可显著提高对虾的增重率和特定生长率(P<0.05),并能显著降低饲料系数(P<0.05),海带渣经蛋白酶酶解后可显著提高对虾的成活率(P<0.05);B和C组对虾的胃中纤维素酶活性较A组显著降低(P<0.05);B和C组血清中酸性磷酸酶、酚氧化物酶活性以及C组血清中超氧化物歧化酶活性显著高于A组(P<0.05)。由此得出,凡纳滨对虾饲料中海带渣的适宜添加比例为3.0%。海带渣经β-葡聚糖酶酶解后可促进凡纳滨对虾生长,提高其非特异性免疫力;而海带渣经蛋白酶酶解后可提高凡纳滨的非特异性免疫力,对其生长无促进作用。

本文引用格式

彭素晓, 常志强, 马骊, 李健 . 海带渣添加比例及其酶解产物对凡纳滨对虾生长、消化和非特异性免疫力的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2017 , 29(7) : 2587 -2596 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2017.07.044

Abstract

This study focused on evaluating the effects of kelp meal adding proportion and enzymatic hydrolysates on growth, digestion and non-specific immunity of Litopenaeus vannamei. There were two experiments in this study: the optimal adding proportion experiment of kelp meal and the effect experiment of kelp meal enzymatic hydrolysates. The optimal adding proportion experiment of kelp meal (experiment one): according to a single factor experimental design, six diets were formulated to contain 0, 0.5%, 1.0%, 2.0%, 3.0% and 5.0% kelp meal (named as groups D1 to D6, respectively), respectively, fed the shrimps [initial body weight was (1.00±0.10) g] for 49 days, and then the growth performance indices, activities of digestive enzymes in stomach and non-specific immune enzymes in serum of Litopenaeus vannamei were measured. There were 3 replicates per group with 35 shrimps per replicate. The effect experiment of kelp meal enzymatic hydrolysates (experiment two): a diet with 3.0% kelp meal was kelp meal control group (group A) that based on the experiment one had the optimal adding proportion, and then 3.0% kelp meal after β-glucanase (group B) and protease treatment (group C) were used to replace an equal amount of kelp meal, respectively. The Litopenaeus vannamei with the initial body weight of (1.00±0.10) g were fed those diets for 56-day, the growth performance indices, activities of digestive enzymes in stomach and non-specific immune enzymes in serum of Litopenaeus vannamei were measured. There were 3 replicates per group with 35 shrimps per replicate. The results of experiment one showed as follows: the weight gain rate (WGR) and specific growth rate (SGR) in groups D4 and D5 were significantly higher than those in control group (P<0.05). In addition, the feed conversion ratio (FCR) in D5 group was significantly lower than that in control group (P<0.05). With the kelp meal adding proportion increasing, the activities of pepsin (PP) in stomach, and superoxide dismutase (SOD) and phenoloxidase (PO) in serum were firstly increased and then decreased. The activities of those three kinds of enzymes reached the maximum in D5 group, and the activities of serum PO and SOD in D5 group were significantly higher than those in control group (P<0.05). The results of experiment two showed as follows: compared with kelp meal treated without enzyme, kelp meal treated by β-glucanase had significant influence on improving WGR, SGR and reducing FCR (P<0.05), and kelp meal treated by protease can significantly increase survival rate (SR) (P<0.05). The cellulase activity in stomach of groups B and C was significantly decreased compared with group A (P<0.05). The activities of acid phosphatase (ACP) and PO in serum of groups B and C and the serum SOD activity of group C were significantly higher than those of group A (P<0.05). It is suggested that the optimal adding proportion of kelp meal in the diet of Litopenaeus vannamei is 3.0%. Kelp meal treated by β-glucanase can improve the growth performance and non-specific immunity of Litopenaeus vannamei, and treated by protease can improve non-specific immunity, but has no enhancement on growth of Litopenaeus vannamei.

参考文献

[1] 王彩理,刘丛力,滕瑜.南美白对虾的营养需求及饲料配制[J].天津水产,2008(增刊1):7-12.

[2] 杨小强.新一代活性饲料——大型海藻饲料[J].饲料研究,2000(1):22-25.

[3] 葛蕾蕾.海藻加工废弃物的复合降解及乙醇转化[D].硕士学位论文.青岛:中国海洋大学,2010:10-11.

[4] 孟昭聚.用海带粉作肉鸡饲料添加剂的研究[J].中兽医医药杂志,1996(6):11-12.

[5] 孟昭聚.用海带粉作肉猪饲料添加剂研究[J].当代畜牧,1994(4):10-11.

[6] 周歧存,赵华超.海藻在罗氏沼虾饲料中的应用研究[J].饲料研究,2001(8):5-6.

[7] 甘纯玑,谢苗,钟剑霞,等.褐藻渣的开发利用[J].中国食物与营养,2001(3):18-20.

[8] SMIT A J.Medicinal and pharmaceutical uses of seaweed natural products:a review[J].Journal of Applied Phycology,2004,16(4):245-262.  

[9] YILDIRIM Ö,ERGÜN S,YAMAN S,et al.Effects of two seaweeds (Ulva lactuca and Enteromorpha linza) as a feed additive in diets on growth performance,feed utilization,and body composition of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss)[J].Kafkas Vniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi,2009,15(3):455-460.  

[10] 张俊杰,段蕊,许可,等.海带工业中海带渣应用的研究及展望[J].水产科学,2010,29(10):620-623.

[11] 王昌义,单守水,徐世艾.预消化法酶解饲用海藻粉中非淀粉多糖的初步研究[J].饲料工业,2012,33(2):44-48.

[12] 刘立鹤,董爱华,周永奎,等.饲料中不同水平海带粉对凡纳对虾生长及饲料表观消化率的影响[J].广东农业科学,2006(2):72-74.

[13] INDRAYAN A K,SHARMA S,DURGAPAL D,et al.Determination of nutritive value and analysis of mineral elements for some medicinally valued plants from Uttaranchal[J].Current Science,2005,89(7):1252-1255.

[14] 周歧存,肖风波.海藻在南美白对虾饲料中的应用研究[J].海洋科学,2003,27(3):66-69.

[15] 李猛,廖梅杰,王印庚,等.浒苔添加比例与微生物发酵对幼刺参生长、消化和非特异性免疫的影响[J].动物营养学报,2015,27(10):3270-3278.

[16] 胡喜峰,王成章,张春梅,等.不同水平苜蓿草粉对团头鲂生长性能及肉品质的影响[J].西北农林科技大学学报:自然科学版,2005,33(11):49-56.

[17] 李丹彤,张静,陈国栋,等.裙带菜凝集素对日本对虾非特异性免疫因子的影响[J].大连海洋大学学报,2009,24(3):274-278.

[18] 李继业.养殖刺参免疫学特征与病害研究[D].硕士学位论文.青岛:中国海洋大学,2007:10-11.

[19] 张换,曾艳,管于平,等.响应面法优化海带多糖的酶法提取工艺及其抗氧化研究[J].食品科技,2013(5):197-202.

[20] REGOLI F,CERRANO C,CHIERICI E,et al.Seasonal variability of prooxidant pressure and antioxidant adaptation to symbiosis in the Mediterranean demosponge Petrosia ficiformis[J].Marine Ecology Progress Series,2004,275:129-137.

[21] JI P F,YAO C L,WANG Z Y.Immune response and gene expression in shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) hemocytes and hepatopancreas against some pathogen-associated molecular patterns[J].Fish & Shellfish Immunology,2009,27(4):563-570.  

[22] 张哲,张筠.海带中的生理活性多糖[J].食品科技,1999(3):52-53.

[23] MARUYAMA H,TAMAUCHI H,ⅡZUKA M,et al.The role of NK cells in antitumor activity of dietary fucoidan from Undaria pinnatifida sporophylls(Mekabu)[J].Planta Medica,2006,72(15):1415-1417.  

[24] WANG J,ZHANG Q B, ZHANG Z S,et al.Potential antioxidant and anticoagulant capacity of low molecular weight fucoidan fractions extracted from Laminaria japonica[J].International Journal of Biological Macromolecules,2010,46(1):6-12.  

[25] KANG Y M,LEE B J,KIM J I,et al.Antioxidant effects of fermented sea tangle (Laminaria japonica) by Lactobacillus brevis BJ20 in individuals with high level of γ-GT:a randomized,double-blind,and placebo-controlled clinical study[J].Food & Chemical Toxicology,2012,50(3/4):1166-1169.

[26] 原丽.浒苔多糖降血糖作用及其机制的研究[D].硕士学位论文.福州:福建医科大学,2011:32-33.

[27] 张明,王雷,郭振宇,等.脂多糖和弧菌对中国对虾血清磷酸酶、超氧化物歧化酶和血蓝蛋白的影响[J].海洋科学,2004,28(7):22-25.

[28] RAJALAKSHMI S,MOHANDAS A.Copper-induced changes in tissue enzyme activity in a freshwater mussel[J].Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety,2005,62(1):140-143.  

[29] 张志勇,程宗佳,柏世军,等.海藻β-1,3葡聚糖对南美白对虾(Litopenaeus vannamei)生长性能及体成分的影响[J].饲料工业,2014, 35(24):12-15.

[30] 徐彬.刺参幼参预消化配合饲料的研究[D].硕士学位论文.北京:中国农业科学院2009:17-18.

[31] STEINKRAUS K H.Handbook of indigenous fermented foods[M].New York:CRC Press,1983.

[32] 王吉桥,张坤,姜玉声,等.在无藻粉饲料中添加包膜氨基酸对幼刺参生长、消化和免疫指标的影响[J].海洋科学,2010,34(9):36-43.

[33] 李桂芹.海藻糖的生物学功能及其应用[J].安徽农业科学,2007,35(24):7724-7725.

[34] 刘晋,郭长江,刘嘉喜.海藻多糖免疫调节作用的研究进展[J].中国食物与营养,2007(5):49-51.

[35] 秦搏,常青,陈四清,等.饲料中浒苔添加量以及处理方法对幼刺参生长、消化率、消化酶和非特异性免疫酶的影响[J].水产学报,2015,39(4):547-556.

[36] 李秀群.氨基酸对动物营养免疫的影响[J].现代畜牧科技,2015(1):28-29.

[37] 杨凤.动物营养学[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2004:78-80.

[38] 杨义.酶解蛋白对幼建鲤肠道功能和免疫力的影响[D].硕士学位论文.雅安:四川农业大学,2005:48-52.

[39] 仇哲,孙跃春,吴海歌,等.酶解海带产物的营养成分分析[J].黑龙江八一农垦大学学报,2016,28(2):60-63.

[40] 陶冉,位正鹏,崔蓉,等.藻类色素蛋白的资源开发和应用研究[J].食品工业科技,2010,31(4):377-380.
文章导航

/