动物营养学报 >

2017 , Vol. 29 >Issue 8: 2931 - 2942

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2017.08.038

研究简报 Short communications

不同饲粮对泌乳奶牛乳脂前体物的摄取和利用的影响

展开
  • 内蒙古农业大学动物科学学院, 呼和浩特 010018
宋利文(1981—),男,内蒙古呼伦贝尔人,博士研究生,从事反刍动物营养与饲料研究。E-mail:tasrsfall@163.com

收稿日期: 2017-01-22

  网络出版日期: 2017-08-02

基金资助

国家奶业973计划（2011CB100803）

收起

Effects of Different Diets on Uptake and Utilization of Milk Fat Precursor of Lactating Dairy Cows

Expand
  • College of Animal Science and Technology, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010018, China

Received date: 2017-01-22

  Online published: 2017-08-02

Fold

摘要

本试验旨在研究不同饲粮条件下泌乳奶牛对乳脂前体物的摄取和利用规律。选取体重为（617±21） kg、泌乳天数为（120±20） d的9头健康泌乳荷斯坦奶牛为试验动物，采用3重复3×3拉丁方设计，随机分为3组，其中2组饲粮的精饲料配方不同，粗饲料相同均为秸秆，精粗比均为6 ： 4（分别称之为CSA和CSB组），余下1组以羊草、苜蓿干草、全株玉米青贮为混合粗饲料，精粗比为4 ： 6（MF组），每组3头；试验期84 d，分为3期，每期28 d，包括21 d的预试期及7 d的正试期。结果表明：1）各组产奶量及乳成分差异不显著（P>0.05），但MF组的泌乳效率显著高于CSA和CSB组（P<0.05）。2）各组饲粮C16 ： 0和C18 ： 0摄取量差异不显著（P>0.05）；MF组饲粮C18 ： 1 c9摄取量显著低于CSA和CSB组（P<0.05）。3）MF组动脉血浆中长链脂肪酸和总脂肪酸含量均高于CSA和CSB组，特别是C18 ： 3 n3含量显著高于CSA和CSB组（P<0.05）。4）MF和CSB组乳腺C18 ： 3 n3摄取量（日平均值）显著高于CSA组（P<0.05）；各组乳腺对其他长链脂肪酸的摄取量差异不显著（P>0.05）。5）最终体现在乳中，表现为MF组的C18 ： 3 n3产量较CSA和CSB组有升高的趋势（0.05≤P<0.10），而原本乳腺摄取量无显著差异的C18 ： 2 n6（P>0.05），在乳中产量显著低于CSA和CSB组（P<0.05）。由此可见，相同粗饲料、不同精饲料饲粮对泌乳奶牛生产性能无显著影响，而优质的粗饲料即使在精饲料比例降低的前提下，对乳中脂肪酸的组成及产量仍可以产生影响，使其更倾向于有利人体健康。

关键词： 泌乳奶牛; 粗饲料; 乳脂; 脂肪酸; 乳腺摄取

本文引用格式

宋利文, 敖长金, 哈斯额尔敦, 张航, 刘帅旺 . 不同饲粮对泌乳奶牛乳脂前体物的摄取和利用的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2017 , 29(8) : 2931 -2942 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2017.08.038

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine uptake and utilization of milk fat precursor of lactating dairy cows under different diets conditions. Nine healthy Holstein cows with body weight of (617±21) kg, lactation days of (120±20) d were selected as experimental animals. Cows were divided into 3 groups with 3 cows per group using a 3 repeated 3×3 Latin square design. Two groups was designed with different concentrates, but the same roughage of corn straw, and the concentrate to roughage ratio was 6: 4 (named CSA and CSB groups, respectively); the rest group used Chinese wildrye, alfalfa hay and corn silage as mixing roughage (MF group), and the concentrate to roughage ratio was 4: 6. The experiment lasted for 84 d consisting of 3 periods with 28 d per period, and each period consisted of 21 d for pretest and 7 d for test. The results showed as follows: 1) no significant differences in milk yield and milk composition were observed among groups (P>0.05), MF group had significantly higher dairy efficiency compared with CSA and CSB groups (P<0.05). 2) Dietary C16: 0 and C18: 0 intakes were not significantly different among groups (P>0.05); dietary C18: 1 c9 intake in MF group was significantly lower than that in CSA and CSB groups (P<0.05). 3) The intake of long chain fatty acids and total fatty acids contents in arterial and venous plasma in MF group were higher than those in CSA and CSB groups, especially C18: 3 n3 content was significantly higher than that in CSA and CSB group (P<0.05). 4) C18: 3 n3 intake of mammary gland (daily mean) in MF and CSB groups were significantly higher than that in CSA group; intakes of the other long chain fatty acids of mammary gland were not significantly different among groups (P>0.05). 5) Ultimately reflected in milk, C18: 3 n3 yield in MF group tended to be higher than that in CSA and CSB groups (0.05≤P<0.10), and C18: 2 n6 yield in MF group was significantly lower than that in CSA and CSB group (P<0.05), mammary gland intake of which was formerly had no significant difference (P>0.05). In conclusion, diet with different roughages and the same concentrate has no significant effects on performance of lactating dairy cows, while even under the condition of decreased concentrate proportion, high quality roughages can affect milk fatty acid composition and yield, and adjusts it to be better for human health.

Key words： lactating dairy cow; roughage; milk fat; fatty acid; mammary gland uptake

参考文献

[1] BAUMAN D E,GRⅡNARI J M.Nutritional regulation of milk fat synthesis[J].Annual Review of Nutrition,2003,23(1):203-227.  

[2] 刘峰.不同品质粗饲料(GI)与精料给量对奶牛生产性能及营养物质消化代谢影响的研究[D].硕士学位论文.呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2012.

[3] 林志鹏,杨广林,林广宇,等.饲喂不同比例全株玉米青贮对泌乳奶牛产奶量及乳成分的影响[J].现代畜牧兽医,2016(11):5-11.

[4] 张福全,敖长金,哈斯额尔顿,等.阴外动脉灌注氨基酸对泌乳奶牛乳中主要脂肪酸组成的影响[J].畜牧兽医学报,2016,47(3):529-535.

[5] KALACP,SAMKOVÁ E.The effects of feeding various forages on fatty acid composition of bovine milk fat:a review[J].Czech Journal of Animal Science,2010,55(12):521-537.

[6] ANNISON E F,LINZELL J L,FAZAKERLEY S,et al.The oxidation and utilization of palmitate,stearate,oleate and acetate by the mammary gland of the fed goat in relation to their overall metabolism,and the role of plasma phospholipids and neutral lipids in milk-fat synthesis[J].Biochemical Journal,1967,102(3):637-647.  

[7] ENJALBERT F,NICOT M C,BAYOURTHE C,et al.Duodenal infusions of palmitic,stearic or oleic acids differently affect mammary gland metabolism of fatty acids in lactating dairy cows[J].The Journal of Nutrition,1998,128(9):1525-1532.

[8] COPPOCK C E,LANHAM J K,HORNER J L.A review of the nutritive value and utilization of whole cottonseed,cottonseed meal and associated by-products by dairy cattle[J].Animal Feed Science andTechnology,1987,18(2):89-129.  

[9] KADEGOWDA A K G,PIPEROVA L S,ERDMAN R A.Principal component and multivariate analysis of milk long-chain fatty acid composition during diet-induced milk fat depression[J].Journal of Dairy Science,2008,91(2):749-759.  

[10] BREMMER D R,RUPPERT L D,CLARK J H,et al.Effects of chain length and unsaturation of fatty acid mixtures infused into the abomasum of lactating dairy cows[J].Journal of Dairy Science,1998,81(1):176-188.  

[11] HANSEN W P,OTTERBY D E,LINN J G,et al.Influence of forage type,ratio of forage to concentrate,and methionine hydroxy analog on performance of dairy cows[J].Journey of Dairy Science,1991,74(4):1361-1369.  

[12] KAWAS J R,JORGENSCA N A,JARDIE A R,et al.Cbange in feeding value of alfalfa with stage of maturity and concentrate level[J].Journey of Dairy Science,1983,66(Suppl.1):181.  

[13] LUNDQUIST R G,LINN J G,OLTABY D E.Influence of dietary energy and protein on yield and composition of milk from cows fed methionine hydroxy analog[J].Journal of Dairy Science,1983,66(3):475-491.  

[14] MACLEOD G K,GRIEVE D G,MCMILLAN I,et al.Effect of varying protein and energy densities in complete rations fed to cows in first lactation[J].Journey of Dairy Science,1984,67(7):1421-1429.  

[15] ZIMMERMAN C A,RAKES A H,JAQUETTE R D,et al.Effects of protein level and forage source on milk production and composition in early lactation dairy cows[J].Journal of Dairy Science,1991,74(3):980-990.  

[16] WALDO D R.Effect of forage quality on intake and forage-concentrate interactions[J].Journal of Dairy Science,1986,69(2):617-631.  

[17] 康蓉.不同日粮模式对泌乳中期奶牛生产性能、血液生化指标及泌乳相关激素的影响[D].硕士学位论文.呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2014.

[18] 宋利文.粗饲料品质对泌乳奶山羊及奶牛乳腺摄取利用脂肪酸的影响及机制[D].博士学位论文.呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2014.

[19] 张鑫,丁洛阳,王梦芝,等.奶牛乳腺血流量主要测定技术及其应用[J].动物营养学报,2015,27(6):1665-1671.

[20] ANNISON E F,BRYDEN W L.Perspectives on ruminant nutrition and metabolism Ⅰ.Metabolism in the rumen[J].Nutrition Research Reviews,1998,11(2):173-198.  

[21] SHINGFIELD K J,SALO-VÄÄNÄNEN P,PAHKALA E,et al.Effect of forage conservation method,concentrate level and propylene glycol on the fatty acid composition and vitamin content of cows' milk[J].Journal of Dairy Research,2005,72(3):349-361.  

[22] YANG G,BU D P,WANG J Q,et al.Duodenal infusion of α-linolenic acid affects fatty acid metabolism in the mammary gland of lactating dairy cows[J].Journal of Dairy Science,2012,95(10):5821-5830.  

[23] 刘帅旺.不同日粮模式下泌乳奶牛乳腺对脂肪酸的摄取和利用规律[D].博士学位论文.呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2014.

[24] DE LORGERIL M,RENAUD S,SALEN P,et al.Mediterranean alpha-linolenic acid-rich diet in secondary prevention of coronary heart disease[J].The Lancet,1994,343(8911):1454-1459.  

[25] NICOLOSI R J,WOOLFREY B,WILSON T A,et al.Decreased aortic early atherosclerosis and associated risk factors in hypercholesterolemic hamsters fed a high-or mid-oleic acid oil compared to a high-linoleic acid oil[J].The Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry,2004,15(9):540-547.  
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉

    联系我们

  • 地址：北京市海淀区圆明园西路2号
    　　　中国农业大学动科动医大楼153室
  • 邮编：100193
  • 电话：010－62817823
  • 网址：http://www.chinajan.com
  • E-mail：cjan@chinajan.com
京公网安备 11010802041926号    京ICP备17050989号-2