动物营养学报 >

2018 , Vol. 30 >Issue 3: 953 - 962

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2018.03.019

反刍与草食动物营养 Ruminant and herbivore nutrition

干玉米纤维饲料与羊草组合替代苜蓿干草对体外瘤胃发酵的影响

展开
  • 1. 东北农业大学动物科学技术学院, 哈尔滨 150030;
    2. 山西农业大学动物科技学院, 太谷 030801
郝小燕(1990-),女,内蒙古乌兰察布人,讲师,博士,研究方向为反刍动物营养。E-mail:haoxiaoyan1990@sina.com

收稿日期: 2017-08-29

  网络出版日期: 2018-03-05

基金资助

国家奶牛产业技术体系项目（CARS-37）

收起

Effects of Replacing Alfalfa Hay with Dry Corn Fiber Feed and Chinese leymus on in Vitro Rumen Fermentation

Expand
  • 1. College of Animal Science and Technology, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China;
    2. College of Animal Science and Technology, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taigu 030801, China

Received date: 2017-08-29

  Online published: 2018-03-05

Fold

摘要

本试验旨在研究干玉米纤维饲料（DCFF）与羊草组合替代饲粮中的部分苜蓿干草对奶牛体外瘤胃发酵的影响。以奶牛饲粮为发酵底物，采用DCFF与羊草组合后分别等比替代底物中0、5.00%、10.50%、17.50%、22.90%的苜蓿干草，其中DCFF在底物中比例分别为0、3.00%、7.00%、11.00%和15.00%，分别命名为0DCFF、3DCFF、7DCFF、11DCFF、15DCFF组。测定体外发酵24 h的发酵参数、微生物区系及48 h的产气参数。结果表明：1）DCFF与羊草组合替代苜蓿干草对体外发酵产气量、潜在产气量和产气速率影响显著（P<0.05），均随着替代比例的增加而先升高后下降，其中11DCFF组最高；DCFF与羊草组合替代苜蓿干草对体外发酵干物质消失率的影响显著（P<0.05），11DCFF和15DCFF组显著高于其他各组（P<0.05）。2）DCFF与羊草组合替代苜蓿干草对发酵液微生物蛋白、氨态氮、乙酸、丙酸、丁酸和总挥发性脂肪酸浓度影响显著（P<0.05），均随着替代比例的增加而呈先升高后平缓的趋势；DCFF与羊草组合替代苜蓿干草对发酵液pH影响显著（P<0.05），随着替代比例的增加而呈先下降后平缓的趋势。3）DCFF与羊草组合替代苜蓿干草对发酵液黄色瘤胃球菌、产琥珀酸丝状杆菌、溶纤维丁酸弧菌的相对数量影响显著（P<0.05），均随着替代比例的增加呈先升高后平缓的趋势；发酵液牛链球菌、溶淀粉琥珀酸单胞菌、嗜淀粉瘤胃杆菌、白色瘤胃球菌的相对数量各组间无显著差异（P>0.05）。综上所述，利用DCFF与羊草组合替代奶牛饲粮中部分苜蓿干草有利于体外瘤胃发酵，其中替代17.50%和22.90%苜蓿干草的体外发酵效果较好，此时饲粮中DCFF的比例分别为11.00%和15.00%。

关键词： 干玉米纤维饲料; 苜蓿干草; 产气量; 瘤胃发酵; 微生物区系

本文引用格式

郝小燕, 张广宁, 么恩悦, 刘岩, 孙凯晶, 张永根 . 干玉米纤维饲料与羊草组合替代苜蓿干草对体外瘤胃发酵的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2018 , 30(3) : 953 -962 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2018.03.019

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of replacing alfalfa hay with dry corn fiber feed (DCFF) and Chinese leymus on in vitro rumen fermentation of dairy cows. A diet for dairy cows was used as a fermentation substrate. Different proportions (0, 5.00%, 10.50%, 17.50% and 22.90%) of alfalfa hay in the substrate were replaced with combinations of DCFF and Chinese leymus (DCFF proportion in the fermentation substrate was 0, 3.00%, 7.00%, 11.00% and 15.00%, respectively), which were named 0DCFF, 3DCFF, 7DCFF, 11DCFF, 15DCFF groups, respectively. Fermentation parameters and microflora after fermented for 24 h, and gas production parameters after fermented for 48 h were determined. The results showed as follows:1) replacing alfalfa hay with DCFF and Chinese leymus had significant effects on gas production (GP), potential gas production and gas production rate of in vitro fermentation (P<0.05), which showed firstly increased and then decreased tendency with the increase of replacing proportion, and 11DCFF group had the highest values; replacing alfalfa hay with DCFF and Chinese leymus had significant effects on dry matter disappearance rate of in vitro fermentation (P<0.05), 11DCFF and 15DCFF groups were significantly higher than the other groups (P<0.05). 2) Replacing alfalfa hay with DCFF and Chinese leymus had significant effects on the concentrations of microbial protein (MCP), ammonia nitrogen, acetic acid, propionic acid, butyric acid and total volatile fatty acids (TVFA) in fermentation fluid (P<0.05), which showed firstly increased and then gentle tendency; replacing alfalfa hay with DCFF and Chinese leymus had significant effects on pH in fermentation fluid (P<0.05), which showed firstly decreased and then gentle tendency. 3) Replacing alfalfa hay with DCFF and Chinese leymus had significant effects on the relative counts of R. flavefaciens, F. succinogenes and B. fibrisolvens in fermentation fluid (P<0.05), which showed firstly increased and then gentle tendency; there were no significant difference of the relative counts of S. bovis, S. amylolytica, R. amylophilus, R. albus in fermentation fluid among groups (P>0.05). It is concluded that replacing alfalfa hay in diet for dairy cows with DCFF and Chinese leymus can improve in vitro rumen fermentation, when the replacing proportions are 17% and 23%, the effects are better, and the proportions of DCFF are 11.00% and 15.00% at this time, respectively.

Key words： dry corn fiber feed; alfalfa hay; gas production; rumen fermentation; microflora

参考文献

[1] 韩成伟,安载学,王玮,等.1992-2016年我国苜蓿进出口变化及成因分析[J].农业网络信息,2016(12):16-20.

[2] HAO X Y,GAO H,WANG X Y,et al.Replacing alfalfa hay with dry corn gluten feed and Chinese wild rye grass:effects on rumen fermentation,rumen microbial protein synthesis,and lactation performance in lactating dairy cows[J].Journal of Dairy Science,2017,100(4):2672-2681.  

[3] SARWAR M,FIRKINS J L,EASTRIDGE M L.Effect of replacing neutral detergent fiber of forage with soyhulls and corn gluten feed for dairy heifers[J].Journal of Dairy Science,1991,74(3):1006-1017.  

[4] KELZER J M,KONONOFF P J,TEDESCHI L O,et al.Evaluation of protein fractionation and ruminal and intestinal digestibility of corn milling co-products[J].Journal of Dairy Science,2010,93(6):2803-2815.  

[5] MACLEOD G K.Wet corn gluten feed for dairy cows[J].Highlights of Agricultural Research in Ontario,1984,7(1):12-14.

[6] MONTGOMERY S P,DROUILLARD J S,SINDT J J,et al.Combinations of alfalfa hay and wet corn gluten feed in limit-fed growing diets for beef cattle[J].Journal of Animal Science,2003,81(7):1671-1682.  

[7] FIRKINS J L,EASTRIDGE M L,PALMQUIST D L.Replacement of corn silage with corn gluten feed and sodium bicarbonate for lactating dairy cows[J].Journal of Dairy Science,1991,74(6):1944-1952.  

[8] 中华人民共和国农业部.NY/T 34-2004奶牛饲养标准[S].北京:中国农业出版社,2004.

[9] AOAC International.Official methods of analysis[M].17th ed.Gaithersburg:AOAC International,2000.

[10] VAN SOEST P J,ROBERTSON J B,LEWIS B A.Methods for dietary fiber,neutral detergent fiber,and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition[J].Journal of Dairy Science,1991,74(10):3583-3597.  

[11] BRODERICK G A,KANG J H.Automated simultaneous determination of ammonia and total amino acids in ruminal fluid and in vitro media[J].Journal of Dairy Science,1980,63(1):64-75.  

[12] MAKKAR H P S,BECKER K.Purine quantification in digesta from ruminants by spectrophotometric and HPLC methods[J].British Journal of Nutrition,1999,81(2):107-112.

[13] 刘凯玉.不同方法处理稻秸对瘤胃降解及其体外甲烷产生量的影响[D].硕士学位论文.哈尔滨:东北农业大学,2014.

[14] KHAFIPOUR E,KRAUSE D O,PLAIZIER J C.A garin-based subacute ruminal acidosis challenge causes translocation of lipopolysaccharide and triggers inflammation[J].Journal of Dairy Science,2009,92(3):1060-1070.  

[15] CERRATO-SÁNCHEZ M,CALSAMIGLIA S,FERRET A.Effect of the magnitude of the decrease of rumen pH on rumen fermentation in a dual-flow continuous culture system[J].Journal of Animal Science,2008,86(2):378-383.  

[16] WANG R F,CAO W W,CERNIGLIA C E.PCR detection of Ruminococcus spp. in humen and animal faecal samples[J].Molecular and Cellular Probes,1997,11(4):259-265.  

[17] STEVEMSON D M,WEIMER P J.Dominance of Prevotella and low abundance of classical ruminal bacterial species in the bovine rumen revealed by relative quantification real-time PCR[J].Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology,2009,75(5):165-174.

[18] KHAFIPOUR E,LI S C,PLAIZIER J C,et al.Rumen microbiome composition determined using two nutritional models of subacute ruminal acidosis[J].Applied and Environmental Microbiology,2009,75(22):7115-7124.  

[19] ØRSKOV E R,MCDONALD I.The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighted according to rate of passage[J].Journal of Agricultural Science,1979,92(2):499-503.  

[20] MENKE K H,RAAB L,SALEWSKI A,et al.The estimation of the digestibility and metabolizable energy content of ruminant feedingstuffs from the gas production when they are incubated with rumen liquor in vitro[J].Journal of Agricultural Science,1979,93(1):217-222.  

[21] 雷冬至,金曙光,乌仁塔娜.用体外产气法评价不同粗饲料与相同精料间的组合效应[J].饲料工业,2009,30(3):30-33.

[22] SILVA A T,GREENHALGH J F D,ØRSKOV E R.Influence of ammonia treatment and supplementation on the intake,digestibility and weight gain of sheep and cattle on barley straw diets[J].Animal Production,1989,48(1):99-108.  

[23] RUSSELL J B.The importance of pH in the regulation of ruminal acetate to propionate ratio and methane production in vitro[J].Journal of Dairy Science,1998,81(12):3222-3230.  

[24] 卢德勋.系统动物营养学导论[M].北京:中国农业大学出版社,2004.

[25] 张吉鹍,李龙瑞,吴文旋,等.稻草补饲苜蓿对山羊瘤胃发酵的组合效应[J].草业科学,2014,31(2):313-320.

[26] HOOVER W H.Chemical factors involved in ruminal fiber digestion[J].Journal of Dairy Science,1986,69(10):2755-2766.  

[27] 郝小燕,高红,张幸怡,等.应用康奈尔净碳水化合物-蛋白质体系和NRC模型比较常用粗饲料和玉米纤维饲料的营养价值[J].动物营养学报,2016,28(3):842-850.

[28] 李炯明,庄苏,王恬,等.海南霉素对人工瘤胃体外发酵调控的影响[J].家畜生态学报,2007,28(1):41-46.

[29] LENG R A,BRETT D J.Simultaneous measurements of the rates of production of acetic,propionic and butyric acids in the rumen of sheep on different diets and the correlation between production rates and concentrations of these acids in the rumen[J].British Journal of Nutrition,1966,20(3):541-552.  

[30] 刘大程,卢德勋,侯先志,等.不同品质粗饲料日粮对瘤胃发酵及主要纤维分解菌的影响[J].中国农业科学,2008,41(4):1199-1206.

[31] ZHU W,FU Y,WANG B,et al.Effects of dietary forage sources on rumen microbial protein synthesis and milk performance in early lactating dairy cows[J].Journal of Dairy Science.2013,96(3):1727-1734.

[32] 张智慧,杨红建,任清长,等.不同粗饲料组合全混合日粮对泌乳奶牛瘤胃液微生物蛋白浓度24h变化和小肠微生物蛋白流量的影响[J].动物营养学报,2013,25(9):2005-2011.

[33] 谭支良,卢德勋.提高粗饲料利用效率的系统组合营养技术及其组合效应的研究进展[J].饲料博览,1999(7):6-10.
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉

    联系我们

  • 地址：北京市海淀区圆明园西路2号
    　　　中国农业大学动科动医大楼153室
  • 邮编：100193
  • 电话：010－62817823
  • 网址：http://www.chinajan.com
  • E-mail：cjan@chinajan.com
京公网安备 11010802041926号    京ICP备17050989号-2