研究简报 Short communications

基于瘤胃模拟技术的马铃薯茎叶混合青贮料体外瘤胃发酵特性研究

展开
  • 甘肃农业大学动物科学技术学院, 兰州 730070
雒瑞瑞(1992-),女,甘肃天水人,硕士研究生,动物营养与饲料科学专业。E-mail:1217300526@qq.com

收稿日期: 2017-09-12

  网络出版日期: 2018-03-05

基金资助

甘肃省财政厅高校基本科研业务费项目(033-041025)

A Study on in Vitro Rumen Fermentation Characteristics of Potato Vines and Leaves Mixed Silage Based on Rumen Simulation Technique

Expand
  • College of Animal Science and Technology, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China

Received date: 2017-09-12

  Online published: 2018-03-05

摘要

本试验采用瘤胃模拟技术(Rusitec)研究了马铃薯茎叶混合青贮料饲粮体外瘤胃发酵特性。采用单因素完全随机设计,将Rusitec系统的8个发酵罐分为2组,分别采用玉米秸青贮料、马铃薯茎叶混合青贮料(马铃薯茎叶与玉米秸按40:60混合青贮)配制发酵绵羊饲粮,2组分别以此为发酵底物,每组4个重复,每个重复1个发酵罐。试验包括8 d的预试期和2 d的采样期。结果表明:马铃薯茎叶混合青贮料组的产气量,全期发酵液总氮、氨氮(除了换料后3 h)和微生物氮含量,换料后6、9 h的发酵液丙酸含量均显著高于玉米秸青贮料组(P<0.05),甲烷产量、换料后3 h的发酵液pH、换料后9 h的发酵液乙酸含量、换料后6和9 h的发酵液乙酸/丙酸显著低于玉米秸青贮料组(P<0.05)。2组的营养物质降解率和其他瘤胃发酵指标无显著差异(P>0.05)。由此可以看出,马铃薯茎叶混合青贮料对绵羊瘤胃体外发酵没有产生不良影响,且有利于减少瘤胃甲烷对环境的污染,同时还促进了反刍动物对能量和氮的利用。

本文引用格式

雒瑞瑞, 郭艳丽, 韩海珠, 李讨讨, 隋景巍, 冯培功 . 基于瘤胃模拟技术的马铃薯茎叶混合青贮料体外瘤胃发酵特性研究[J]. 动物营养学报, 2018 , 30(3) : 1185 -1191 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2018.03.045

Abstract

This study was conducted to investigate the in vitro rumen fermentation characteristics of potato vines and leaves mixed silage using rumen simulation technique (Rusitec). A complete one-factor randomized design was used. Eight fermentation tanks of Rusitec system were divided into two groups with 4 replicates per group and 1 tank per replicate. Corn stalk silage and potato vines and leaves mixed silage[potato vines and leaves and corn stalk (40:60) were mixed for silage] were used to prepare diets for sheep, respectively, and the two groups used the diets as fermentation substrates, respectively. The study consisted of an 8 d pre-test period and a 2 d sampling period. The results showed as follows:compared with corn stalk silage group, potato vines and leaves mixed silage group had significantly higher gas production, contents of total nitrogen, ammonia nitrogen (except 3 h after substrate replacement) and microbial nitrogen in fermentation fluid for whole period, and propionic acid content in fermentation fluid at 6 and 9 h after substrate replacement (P<0.05), and had significantly lower methane production, fermentation fluid pH at 3 h after substrate replacement, acetic acid content in fermentation fluid at 9 h after substrate replacement, and acetic acid/propionic acid in fermentation fluid at 6 and 9 h after substrate replacement (P<0.05). There were no significant effects on nutrients degradation rate and other rumen fermentation parameters (P>0.05). These results indicate that potato vines and leaves mixed silage has no negative effects on in vitro rumen fermentation, can reduce methane pollution, and promote the utilization of energy and nitrogen in ruminants.

参考文献

[1] MUCK R E,WEINBERG Z G,ROUSE D I,et al.Ensiling of potato vines[J].Transactions of the Asae,1999,42(3):565-572.  

[2] 何玉鹏.不同添加剂对马铃薯茎叶青贮特性和发酵品质的影响[D].硕士学位论文.兰州:甘肃农业大学,2015.

[3] 杨闻文,付晓悦,杨彪,等.不同物料对马铃薯茎叶青贮特性和发酵品质的影响[J].动物营养学报,2015,27(11):3643-3648.

[4] 徐亚姣,李长慧.不同生物制剂对青贮马铃薯茎叶品质的影响[J].安徽农业科学,2009,37(27):13010-13012,13066.

[5] 张敏,史静,刘建荣,等.不同水分和甲酸添加量对马铃薯茎叶青贮品质的影响[J].青海草业,2014,23(2):10-14,39.

[6] 杨永在,王长水,梁艺洵,等.不同添加物对马铃薯茎叶青贮品质的影响[J].中国草食动物科学,2015,35(5):34-38,49.

[7] 谢婉,杨喜珍,杨利,等.添加物料和菌剂对日喀则地区马铃薯茎叶青贮品质的影响[J].草业科学,2017,34(1):173-185.

[8] 雒瑞瑞,郭艳丽.马铃薯茎叶制作青贮饲料的研究进展[J].中国饲料,2017(4):34-37.

[9] 何玉鹏.不同添加剂对马铃薯茎叶青贮特性和发酵品质的影响[D].硕士学位论文.兰州:甘肃农业大学,2015.

[10] WINKLER A,WEBER F,RINGSEIS R,et al.Determination of polyphenol and crude nutrient content and nutrient digestibility of dried and ensiled white and red grape pomace cultivars[J].Archives of Animal Nutrition,2015,69(3):187-200.  

[11] NICHOLSON J W G,YOUNG D A,MCQUEEN R E,et al.The feeding value potential of potato vines[J].Canadian Journal of Animal Science,1978,58(4):559-569.  

[12] MALECKY M,GHADBEIGI M,ALIARABI H,et al.Effect of replacing alfalfa with processed potato vines on growth performance,ruminal and total tract digestibility and blood metabolites in fattening lambs[J].Small Ruminant Research,2017,146:13-22.

[13] MCDOUGALL E I.Studies on ruminant saliva.1.The composition and output of sheep's saliva[J].Biochemical Journal,1948,43(1):99-109.  

[14] GRESNER N,WICHERN A,LUMPP L,et al.Effects of grass silages with two levels of free amino acids on degradation of amino acids and fixation of nitrogen in bacterial protein in bovine ruminal fluid using the rumen simulation technique (Rusitec)[J].Animal Feed Science and Technology,2015,202:1-11.

[15] 鞠九洲.应用Rusitec系统研究壳聚糖对瘤胃甲烷产生及发酵特性的影响[D].硕士学位论文.兰州:甘肃农业大学,2013.

[16] 何玉鹏,郭艳丽,鞠九洲,等.不同精粗比饲粮中添加壳聚糖对体外瘤胃发酵甲烷产量和发酵特性的影响[J].动物营养学报,2014,26(11):3433-3442.

[17] 韩海珠,郭艳丽,郑琛,等.用Rusitec系统研究两种粒度日粮对绵羊瘤胃发酵特性的影响[J].中国畜牧兽医,2017,44(5):1375-1381.

[18] 冯宗慈,高民.通过比色测定瘤胃液氨氮含量方法的改进[J].畜牧与饲料科学,2010(6):40-41.

[19] 郑琛.外源添加甘露寡糖对绵羊养分消化代谢、瘤胃发酵、消化道食糜流通量及免疫的影响[D].博士学位论文.兰州:甘肃农业大学,2012.

[20] 杨胜.饲料分析及饲料质量检测技术[M].北京:中国农业大学出版社,1993:19-61.

[21] VAN SOEST P J,ROBERTSON J B,LEWIS B A.Methods for dietary fiber,neutral detergent fiber,and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition[J].Journal of Dairy Science,1991,74(10):3583-3597.  

[22] 雷冬至,金曙光,乌仁塔娜.用体外产气法评价不同粗饲料与相同精料间的组合效应[J].饲料工业,2009,30(3):30-33.

[23] 冯仰廉.反刍动物营养学[M].北京:科学出版社,2004:328-336.

[24] MOULD F L,ØRSKOV E R.Manipulation of rumen fluid pH and its influence on cellulolysis in sacco,dry matter degradation and the rumen microflora of sheep offered either hay or concentrate[J].Animal Feed Science and Technology,1983,10(1):1-14.  

[25] 郝正里.反刍动物营养学[M].兰州:甘肃民族出版社,2000:65-130.

[26] SATTER L D,ROFFLER R E.7-Influence of nitrogen and carbohydrate inputs on rumen fermentation[M]//HARESIGN W,COLE D J A.Recent Developments in Ruminant Nutrition.Amsterdam:Elsevier,1981:115-139.

[27] 韩正康,陈杰.反刍动物瘤胃的消化和代谢[M].北京:科学出版社,1988:86.
文章导航

/