常规与非常规粗饲料在奶牛瘤胃中的降解特性

刘艳芳, 马健, 都文, 王雅晶, 曹志军, 李胜利, 余雄

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2018.04.045

动物营养学报 >

2018 , Vol. 30 >Issue 4: 1592 - 1602

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2018.04.045

研究简报 Short communications

常规与非常规粗饲料在奶牛瘤胃中的降解特性

展开

1. 新疆农业大学动物科学学院, 乌鲁木齐 830052;
2. 中国农业大学动物科技学院, 动物营养学国家重点实验室, 北京市生鲜乳质量安全工程技术研究中心, 北京 100193

刘艳芳(1992-),女,山东德州人,硕士研究生,研究方向为反刍动物营养。E-mail:13611235024@163.com

收稿日期: 2017-09-30

网络出版日期: 2018-04-03

基金资助

现代农业（奶牛）产业技术体系建设专项资金（CARS-37）

收起

Degradation Characteristics of Common Roughage and Roughage Forage in the Rumen of Dairy Cows

Expand

1. College of Animal Science and Technology, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China;
2. State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Beijing Engineering Technology Research Center of Raw Milk Quality and Safety Control, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China

Received date: 2017-09-30

Online published: 2018-04-03

Fold

摘要

本试验旨在研究苜蓿青贮、全株小麦青贮、全株玉米青贮、苜蓿干草、燕麦草（2种）、稻草、花生秧、谷子秸秆和小麦秸秆共10种粗饲料在奶牛瘤胃中的降解特性，为科学配制奶牛饲粮提供数据参考。采用尼龙袋法评定其干物质（DM）、粗蛋白质（CP）、中性洗涤纤维（NDF）和酸性洗涤纤维（ADF）的72 h动态降解率和有效降解率。结果表明，苜蓿青贮的DM有效降解率最高，达到58.24%，小麦秸秆的最低，为34.20%；CP有效降解率最高的是苜蓿干草，与依次降低的全株小麦青贮、苜蓿青贮、全株玉米青贮、燕麦草、稻草、小麦秸秆、谷子秸秆和花生秧差异显著（P<0.05）；全株小麦青贮的NDF有效降解率与全株玉米青贮、苜蓿干草、燕麦草差异不显著（P>0.05），但显著高于其他粗饲料（P<0.05）；全株小麦青贮的ADF有效降解率显著高于其他粗饲料（P<0.05）。综上所述，苜蓿干草和苜蓿青贮的瘤胃降解率较高，营养价值较高，小麦秸秆和谷子秸秆品质相对较差，花生秧与上述秸秆饲料比具有一定的优势。

关键词： 奶牛; 粗饲料; 瘤胃; 有效降解率

本文引用格式

刘艳芳, 马健, 都文, 王雅晶, 曹志军, 李胜利, 余雄 . 常规与非常规粗饲料在奶牛瘤胃中的降解特性[J]. 动物营养学报, 2018 , 30(4) : 1592 -1602 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2018.04.045

Abstract

In order to provide references when making formulas for dairy cows, this experiment was conducted to investigate the rumen degradation characteristics of 10 roughages including alfalfa silage, whole wheat silage, whole corn silage, alfalfa hay, oat hay (2 kinds), rice straw, peanut vine, millet straw and wheat straw. Nylon-bag technique was used to evaluate the degradation rates and effective degradability of dry matter, crude protein, neutral detergent fiber and acid detergent fiber in 72 h. The results showed as follows:dry matter effective degradability of alfalfa silage (58.24%) was the highest, and to the contrary, that of wheat straw (34.20%) was the minimum. Crude protein effective degradability of alfalfa hay was the highest, and was significantly higher than that of whole wheat silage, alfalfa silage, whole corn silage, oat hay, rice straw, wheat straw, millet straw and peanut vine (P<0.05), which was decreased in the above order. Neutral detergent fiber effective degradability of whole wheat silage was not significantly different from whole corn silage,alfalfa hay and oat hay (P>0.05), but was significantly higher than that of other roughages (P<0.05). Acid detergent fiber effective degradability of whole wheat silage was significantly higher than that of other roughages (P<0.05). It is concluded that the rumen degradation rate of alfalfa hay and alfalfa silage is higher, so they have better nutritional value; wheat straw and millet straw had low nutritional quality, and compared with them, peanut vine possesses certain advantages.

Key words： dairy cow; roughage; rumen; effective degradability

参考文献

[1] 李胜利,姚琨,曹志军,等.2016年奶牛产业技术发展报告[J].中国畜牧杂志,2017,53(1):156-164.

[2] 李洋,窦秀静,张幸怡,等.非常规粗饲料分级指数和相对价值比较研究[J].东北农业大学学报,2016,47(2):54-60.

[3] 马健,刘艳芳,杜云,等.禾王草与奶牛常用粗饲料瘤胃降解特性的对比研究[J].动物营养学报,2016,28(3):816-825.

[4] 黎力之,潘珂,欧阳克蕙,等.6种经济作物副产物的营养价值评定[J].黑龙江畜牧兽医,2016(8):151-153.

[5] DE ANDRADE F L,RODRIGUES J P P,DETMANN E,et al.Nutritional and productive performance of dairy cows fed corn silage or sugarcane silage with or without additives[J].Tropical Animal Health and Production,2016,48(4):747-753.

[6] 冯仰廉,周建民,张晓明,等.我国奶牛饲料产奶净能值测算方法的研究[J].中国畜牧杂志,1987(1):8-11.

[7] 张丽英.饲料分析及饲料质量检测技术[M].2版.北京:中国农业大学出版社,2003.

[8] ØRSKOV E R,MCDONALD I.The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighted according to rate of passage[J].The Journal of Agricultural Science,1979,92(2):499-503.

[9] 宫福臣.平菇菌糠饲料成分的分析及营养价值评定[D].硕士学位论文.哈尔滨:东北农业大学,2013.

[10] 张晓娜.刈割期、品种及青贮方式对苜蓿品质的影响[D].硕士学位论文.杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2016.

[11] 陈晓琳.肉羊常用粗饲料营养价值和瘤胃降解特性研究[D].硕士学位论文.青岛:青岛农业大学,2014.

[12] 裘燕.奶牛常用粗饲料的营养成分及其瘤胃降解率与体外发酵特性[D].硕士学位论文.北京:中国农业大学,2013.

[13] 夏科,姚庆,李富国,等.奶牛常用粗饲料的瘤胃降解规律[J].动物营养学报,2012,24(4):769-777.

[14] 郑向丽,王俊宏,徐国忠,等.4种花生秸秆在奶牛瘤胃中的降解特性[J].草业学报,2016,25(5):149-155.

[15] 冯仰廉.反刍动物营养学[M].北京:科学出版社,2004.

[16] 姚庆.酒精清液发酵玉米秸秆营养价值评定及对奶牛生产性能的影响[D].硕士学位论文.哈尔滨:东北农业大学,2013.

[17] LARRY D S.Protein supply from undegraded dietary protein[J].Journal of Dairy Science,1986,69(10):2734-2749.

[18] 侯玉洁,徐俊,吴春华,等.5种不同牧草在奶牛瘤胃中降解特性的研究[J].中国奶牛,2013(16):4-8.

[19] JUNG H G,ALLEN M S.Characteristics of plant cell walls affecting intake and digestibility of forages by ruminants[J].Journal of Animal Science,1995,73(9):2774-2790.

[20] HOFFMAN P C,SIEVERT S J,SHAVER R D,et al.In stiu dry matter,protein,and fiber degradation of perennial forages[J].Journal of Dairy Science,1993,76(9):2632-2643.

Options

文章导航

摘要

本文引用格式

Abstract

参考文献

关于本刊

在线期刊

作者中心

相关单位

联系我们

模态框（Modal）标题

摘要

本文引用格式

Abstract

参考文献

关于本刊

在线期刊

作者中心

相关单位

联系我们