饲料营养 Feed science and technology

不同精油与酸化剂组合对肉仔鸡肠炎沙门氏菌感染的控制效果研究

展开
  • 1. 山东农业大学动物科技学院, 山东省动物生物工程与疾病防治重点实验室, 泰安 271018;
    2. 上海美农生物科技股份有限公司, 上海 201807
赵景鹏(1981-),男,山东泰安人,讲师,博士,从事家禽健康养殖技术研究。E-mail:zjp1299@163.com

收稿日期: 2018-01-03

  网络出版日期: 2018-07-20

基金资助

国家重点研发计划(2016YFD0500510);国家自然科学基金(31672442);山东省"双一流"建设奖补资金;上海美农生物科技股份有限公司委托项目

Effects of Different Combinations of Essential Oil and Organic Acid on Salmonella enteritidis Infection of Broiler Chickens

Expand
  • 1. Shandong Key Laboratory of Animal Biotechnology and Disease Control, College of Animal Science and Technology, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an 271018, China;
    2. Shanghai Menon Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Shanghai 201807, China

Received date: 2018-01-03

  Online published: 2018-07-20

摘要

本试验旨在研究不同精油与酸化剂组合对肉仔鸡肠炎沙门氏菌感染的控制效果。选择840只无肠炎沙门氏菌感染的1日龄爱拔益加肉仔鸡,随机分为7组,分别饲养在7个构造相同但互不相通的房间内,每组6个重复,每个重复20只鸡,公母各占1/2。1组(对照组)饲喂基础饲粮,2组(抗生素组)饲喂在基础饲粮中添加40 g/t盐酸恩诺沙星的试验饲粮,3~7组(精油与酸化剂组)饲喂在基础饲粮中分别添加800 g/t不同有机酸与精油组合(组合A、B、C、D、E)的试验饲粮。14日龄时,每只鸡灌服200 μL SDBL-1肠炎沙门氏菌菌液(5×107 CFU/mL)。攻毒后2、7和14 d,即16、21和28日龄时,每个重复随机选2只鸡,采血、屠宰、取样。试验期28 d,分1~21日龄和22~28日龄2个饲养阶段。结果发现:1)在攻毒前、后,与对照组相比,组合A显著降低肉仔鸡的料重比(P<0.05),而组合D和E分别仅在攻毒后和攻毒前改善生产性能(P<0.05)。2)基于组织载菌量,组合A和D对肉仔鸡肠炎沙门氏菌感染表现出良好的控制效果。3)感染肠炎沙门氏菌后,与对照组相比,组合A显著降低28日龄肉仔鸡的血清肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)含量(P<0.05),显著增加16日龄血清免疫球蛋白G(IgG)含量(P<0.05),而组合E正好相反。由此表明,组合A和D均能抑制肉仔鸡肠炎沙门氏菌,其中组合A适合长期饲喂,而组合D仅推荐在感染状态下使用。

本文引用格式

赵景鹏, 李培勇, 王红玉, 宋益贞, 孙淑红, 林海 . 不同精油与酸化剂组合对肉仔鸡肠炎沙门氏菌感染的控制效果研究[J]. 动物营养学报, 2018 , 30(7) : 2672 -2682 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2018.07.027

Abstract

This experiment was conducted to investigate the effects of different combinations of essential oil and organic acid on Salmonella enteritidis (SE) infection of broiler chickens. A total of 840 1-day-old Arbor Acres broiler chickens hatchlings without SE infection were randomly allotted into 7 groups and housed in separate rooms with the same configuration, and with 6 replicates per group and 20 birds (males and females in half) per replicate. The broiler chickens in group 1 (control group) were fed a basal diet, those in group 2 (antibiotic group) were fed the basal diet supplemented with 40 g/t enrofloxacin HCl, and those in groups 3 to 7 (essential oil and organic acid groups) were fed the basal diet supplemented with 800 g/t different combinations of essential oil and organic acid (combinations A, B, C, D, E), respectively. At 14 days of age, each bird was orally inoculated with 200 μL SDBL-1 SE bacterial fluid (5×107 CFU/mL). Two birds randomly selected from each replicate were taken blood, slaughtered and sampled at 2, 7 and 14 days post-challenge (16, 21 and 28 days of age, respectively). The experiment lasted for 28 days, including 2 feeding stages of 1 to 21 days of age and 22 to 28 days of age. The results showed as follows:1) compared with control group, combination A significantly decreased the ratio of feed to gain (F/G) of broiler chickens before and after bacterial inoculation (P<0.05), whereas combinations E and D enhanced growth performance only in pre-and post-challenge period respectively (P<0.05). 2) In terms of bacterial load in tissues, combinations A and D offered a good control effects on SE infection of broiler chickens. 3) After SE infection, compared with control group, combination A significantly decreased the contents of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) in serum of broiler chickens at 28 days of age (P<0.05), and significantly increased the content of immunoglobulin G (IgG) in serum at 16 days of age (P<0.05). The reverse trend was observed for combination E. In conclusion, combinations A and D have great inhibitory effect on SE of broiler chickens, but combination A is suitable for long-term feeding, and combination D is recommended to be used only after infection.

参考文献

[1] RABSCH W,TSCHÄPE H,BÄUMLER A J.Non-typhoidal salmonellosis:emerging problems[J].Microbes and Infection,2001,3(3):237-247.  

[2] ALTEKRUSE S F,BAUER N,CHANLONGBUTRA A,et al.Salmonella enteritidis in broiler chickens,United States,2000-2005[J].Emerging Infectious Disease,2006,12(12):1848-1852.  

[3] SCALLAN E,HOEKSTRA R M,ANGULO F J,et al.Foodborne illness acquired in the United States-major pathogens[J].Emerging Infectious Diseases,2001,17(1):7-15.

[4] PARRY C M.Antimicrobial drug resistance in Salmonella enterica[J].Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases,2003,16(5):467-472.  

[5] CUI S H,GE B L,ZHENG J,et al.Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Campylobacter spp.and Salmonella serovars in organic chickens from Maryland retail stores[J].Applied and Environmental Microbiology,2005,71(7):4108-4111.  

[6] VAN IMMERSEEL F,METHNER U,RYCHLIK I,et al.Vaccination and early protection against non-host-specific Salmonella serotypes in poultry:exploitation of innate immunity and microbial metabolic activity[J].Epidemiology and Infection,2005,133(6):959-978.  

[7] ZHOU F,JI B,ZHANG H,et al.Synergistic effect of thymol and carvacrol combined with chelators and organic acids against Salmonella typhimurium[J].Journal of Food Protection,2007,70(7):1704-1709.  

[8] BORSOI A,SANTOS L R,DINIZ G S,et al.Salmonella fecal excretion control in broiler chickens by organic acids and essential oils blend feed added[J].Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science,2010,13(1):65-69.

[9] ALALI W Q,HOFACRE C L,MATHIS G F,et al.Effect of non-pharmaceutical compounds on shedding and colonization of Salmonella enterica serovar Heidelberg in broilers[J].Food Control,2013,31(1):125-128.  

[10] THOMPSON J L,HINTON M.Antibacterial activity of formic acid and propionic acid in the diet of hens on Salmonellas in the crop[J].British Poultry Science,1997,38(1):59-65.  

[11] VAN IMMERSEEL F,BOYEN F,GANTOIS I,et al.Supplementation of coated butyric acid in the feed reduces colonization and shedding of Salmonella in poultry[J].Poultry Science,2005,84(12):1851-1856.  

[12] ALALI W Q,HOFACRE C L,MATHIS G F,et al.Effect of essential oil compound on shedding and colonization of Salmonella enterica serovar Heidelberg in broilers[J].Poultry Science,2013,92(3):836-841.  

[13] MENCONI A,REGINATTO A R,LONDERO A,et al.Effect of organic acids on Salmonella typhimurium infection in broiler chickens[J].International Journal of Poultry Science,2013,12(2):72-75.  

[14] FERNÁNDEZ-RUBIO C,ORDÍÑEZ C,ABAD-GONZÁLEZ J,et al.Butyric acid-based feed additives help protect broiler chickens from Salmonella enteritidis infection[J].Poultry Science,2009,88(5):943-948.  

[15] EI-GHANY W A A,AWAAD M H,NASEF S A,et al.Effect of sodium butyrate on Salmonella enteritidis infection in broiler chickens[J].Asian Journal of Poultry Science,2016,10(2):104-110.  

[16] VAN IMMERSEEL F,FIEVEZ V,DE BUCK J,et al.Microencapsulated short-chain fatty acids in feed modify colonization and invasion early after infection with Salmonella enteritidis in young chickens[J].Poultry Science,2004,83(1):69-74.  

[17] 刘璐,李建超,刘冉冉,等.不同品种鸡对肠炎沙门氏菌人工感染初期免疫应答反应的差异[J].畜牧兽医学报,2015,46(6):903-910.

[18] RICKE S C.Perspective on the use of organic acids and short chain fatty acids as antimicrobials[J].Poultry Science,2003,82(4):632-639.  

[19] JAMROZ D,WILICZKIEWICZ A,WERTELECKI T,et al.Use of active substances of plant origin in chicken diets based on maize and locally grown cereals[J].British Poultry Science,2005,46(4):485-493.  

[20] MALAYO?LU H B,BAYSAL Ç,MISIRLIO?LU Z,et al.Effects of oregano essential oil with or without feed enzymes on growth performance,digestive enzyme,nutrient digestibility,lipid metabolism and immune response of broilers fed on a wheat-soybean meal diets[J].British Poultry Science,2010,51(1):67-80.  

[21] ZHANG K Y,YAN F,KEEN C A,et al.Evaluation of microencapsulated essential oils and organic acids in diets for broiler chickens[J].International Journal of Poultry Science,2005,4(9):612-619.  

[22] BOZKURT M,KVÇVKYILMAZ K,ÇATLI A U,et al.Effects of administering an essential oil mixture and an organic acid blend separately and combined to diets on broiler performance[J].Archiv für Geflügelkunde,2012,76(2):81-87.  

[23] AK ÇIT M,GÖKSOY E,KÖK F,et al.The impacts of organic acid and essential oil supplementations to diets on the microbiological quality of chicken carcasses[J].Archiv für Geflügelkunde,2006,70(4):168-173.  
文章导航

/