反刍动物营养 Ruminant Nutrition

粗饲料组合效应对斯布牦牛营养物质表观消化率的影响

展开
  • 1. 青稞和牦牛种质资源与遗传改良国家重点实验室, 拉萨 850009;
    2. 西藏自治区农牧科学院草业科学研究所, 拉萨 850009
廖阳慈(1990-),男,四川眉山人,助理研究员,硕士,从事优质草产品加工与高效利用研究。E-mail:janney520120@qq.com

收稿日期: 2018-04-08

  网络出版日期: 2018-11-20

基金资助

国家肉牛牦牛产业技术体系拉萨试验站(CARS-37)

Impact of Roughage Combination Effect on Nutrient Apparent Digestibility of Sibu Yak

Expand
  • 1. State Key Laboratory of Highland Barley and Yak Germplasm Resources and Genetic Improvement, Lhasa 850009, China;
    2. Institute of Pratacultural, Tibet Academy of Agricultural and Animal Husbandry Sciences, Lhasa 850009, China

Received date: 2018-04-08

  Online published: 2018-11-20

摘要

本试验旨在研究3种粗饲料(燕麦草、青贮玉米和苜蓿,其中苜蓿添加比例恒定为10%,青贮玉米+燕麦草添加比例恒定为60%)饲喂斯布牦牛的组合效应,并对不同组合饲粮进行营养物质表观消化率测定,筛选出适宜斯布牦牛采食的组合饲粮。选用体重相近的干奶期斯布牦牛30头,随机分为5组,每组设2个重复,每个重复3头牦牛,进行消化试验。配制5种试验饲粮,其组成如下:Ⅰ组,60%燕麦+10%苜蓿+30%精料;Ⅱ组,45%燕麦+15%青贮玉米+10%苜蓿+30%精料;Ⅲ组,30%燕麦+30%青贮玉米+10%苜蓿+30%精料;Ⅳ组,15%燕麦+45%青贮玉米+10%苜蓿+30%精料;Ⅴ组,60%青贮玉米+10%苜蓿+30%精料。结果显示:Ⅲ组的采食量、总增重最高,料重比最低。Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅲ组粗蛋白质和粗灰分表观消化率显著高于Ⅳ、Ⅴ组(P<0.05);Ⅳ组中性洗涤纤维表观消化率显著高于Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅲ组(P<0.05);Ⅲ组酸性洗涤纤维表观消化率显著高于其他各组(P<0.05);Ⅰ、Ⅱ组钙表观消化率显著高于Ⅴ组(P<0.05);Ⅳ组总磷表观消化率显著高于Ⅱ、Ⅴ组(P<0.05)。以青贮玉米添加比例作为自变量(X),以粗蛋白质和中性洗涤纤维表观消化率分别作为因变量(Y)去拟合模型,得到三次方程,自变量与因变量之间均呈强相关关系,相关系数(R2)分别为0.987和0.937。由此得出,燕麦草与青贮玉米的混合饲喂对斯布牦牛营养物质表观消化率具有组合效应,当青贮玉米添加比例为30%、燕麦草添加比例为30%时,斯布牦牛的料重比、增重及饲粮中各营养物质的表观消化率达到较好的效果,尤其是蛋白质和纤维的利用。

本文引用格式

廖阳慈, 鲍宇红, 陈少峰, 参木友 . 粗饲料组合效应对斯布牦牛营养物质表观消化率的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2018 , 30(11) : 4453 -4459 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2018.11.022

Abstract

In order to seek optimal feed formula that is suitable for Sibu yak, this experiment was conducted to study the combination effect of 3 roughages (oat, silage corn and alfalfa, the adding proportion of alfalfa was fixed 10%, and the adding proportion of oat+silage corn was fixed 60%), and to measure the nutrient apparent digestibility of various combination diets. A total of 30 Sibu yak with similar weight were selected for digestion experiment, and those were divided into 5 groups with 2 replicates per group and 3 yak per replicate. Five experimental diets were formulated, the composition of them were as follows:group Ⅰ, 60% oat+10% alfalfa+30% concentrate; groupⅡ, 45% oat+15% silage corn+10% alfalfa+30% concentrate; group Ⅲ, 30% oat+30% silage corn+10% alfalfa+30% concentrate; group Ⅳ, 15% oat+45% silage corn+10% alfalfa+30% concentrate; groupⅤ, 60% silage corn+10% alfalfa+30% concentrate. The results showed as follows:the feed intake and total body weight gain in group Ⅲ had the highest values, while the feed/gain had the lowest value. The apparent digestibility of crude protein and ash in groups Ⅰ, Ⅱ and Ⅲ was significantly higher than that in groups Ⅳ and Ⅴ (P<0.05), the apparent digestibility of neutral detergent fiber was significantly higher than that in groups Ⅰ, Ⅱ and Ⅲ (P<0.05), the apparent digestibility of acid detergent fiber was significantly higher than that in other groups (P<0.05), the apparent digestibility of calcium in groups Ⅰ and Ⅱ was significantly higher than that in group Ⅴ (P<0.05), and the apparent digestibility of total phosphorus in group Ⅳ was significantly higher than that in groups Ⅱ and Ⅴ (P<0.05). When the adding proportion of silage corn as independent variable (X), the apparent digestibility of crude protein and neutral washing fiber as dependent variables (Y), three regression equations were established and the correlation coefficients (R2) were 0.987 and 0.937, respectively, which indicated a strong correlation between independent variable and dependent variables. In conclusion, silage corn combined with oat has combination effect on nutrient apparent digestibility of Sibu yak, when the adding proportion of silage corn is 30% and the adding proportion of oat is 30%, the indexes of feed/gain, weight gain and nutrient apparent digestibility of Sibu yak can be achieved a better effect, especially the utilization of protein and fiber.

参考文献

[1] 邓由飞,王建,孟庆翔,等.从斯布牦牛的饲养情况及体况指标看西藏牦牛的现状[J].中国畜牧杂志,2015,51(增刊):20-22.

[2] 邓由飞,王建,孟庆翔,等.从斯布村调查数据看西藏牦牛业的问题和发展潜力[J].中国畜牧杂志,2015,51(增刊):15-19.

[3] 郝力壮,吴克选,王万邦,等.牦牛妊娠后期补饲对其失重和犊牛生长发育的影响[J].吉林农业科学,2013,38(4):56-58.

[4] 文勇立,陈智华,陈宇,等.冷季两种简单补饲影响母牦牛性能的系统分析[J].西南民族学院学报(自然科学版),1993,19(3):236-241.

[5] 卢德勋.饲料组合效应研究[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2000:289-294.

[6] 杨胜.饲料分析及饲料质量检测技术[M].北京:中国农业大学出版社,1999.

[7] ZHANG J K,LIU J X.Use of in vitro gas production to evaluate associative effects on gas production of rice straw supplemented with lucerne[J].Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences,2007,16(Suppl.2):156-160.

[8] 史良.奶牛日粮中粗蛋白与中性洗涤纤维间组合效应的研究[D].硕士学位论文.北京:中国农业科学院,2007.

[9] 王威,张建勋,康坤,等.冷季补饲精料对牦牛繁殖性能和生长性能的影响[J].中国畜牧杂志,2013,49(7):78-80.

[10] 马登录,张海滨,胡江,等.冷季补饲精料对不同年龄段甘南牦牛增重的影响[J].畜牧与兽医,2012,44(11):32-34.

[11] 周立业.不同饲养方式对放牧犊牦牛生长发育及肉品品质的影响[D].硕士学位论文.兰州:甘肃农业大学,2007.

[12] 谭支良,卢德勋.提高粗饲料利用效率的系统组合营养技术及其组合效应的研究进展[J].饲料博览,1999,11(7):6-10.

[13] 袁翠林,于子洋,王文丹,等.豆秸、花生秧和青贮玉米秸间的组合效应研究[J].动物营养学报,2015,27(2):647-654.

[14] 孙国强,吕永艳,张杰杰.利用体外瘤胃发酵法研究全株玉米青贮与花生蔓和羊草间的组合效应[J].草业学报,2014,23(3):224-231.

[15] 郭婷,杨雪娇,张越利,等.燕麦品种及其与全株玉米质量比对青贮效果的影响[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2014,42(9):27-32.
文章导航

/