动物营养学报 >

2018 , Vol. 30 >Issue 12: 5023 - 5031

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2018.12.030

反刍动物营养 Ruminant nutrition

饲粮类型对育肥湖羊生长性能、屠宰性能和肉品质的影响

展开
  • 1. 浙江大学动物科学学院, 杭州 310058;
    2. 湖州市畜牧兽医局, 湖州 330500
侯川川(1993-),男,江苏徐州人,硕士研究生,研究方向为动物营养与饲料科学。E-mail:18114168872@163.com

收稿日期: 2018-05-15

  网络出版日期: 2018-12-19

基金资助

湖州市农业科技创新团队项目（2014HN01）

收起

Effects of Different Diet Types on Growth Performance, Slaughter Performance and Meat Quality of Fattening Hu Sheep

Expand
  • 1. College of Animal Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China;
    2. Huzhou Bureau of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary, Huzhou 330500, China

Received date: 2018-05-15

  Online published: 2018-12-19

Fold

摘要

在饲粮能量及粗蛋白质水平基本相同的条件下，本试验研究了饲粮类型对育肥湖羊生长性能、屠宰性能、血清生化指标和肉品质的影响。试验选用90只体重相近[（24.67±2.53） kg]的90日龄健康公湖羊，随机分为3组，每组3个重复，每个重复10只羊。3组分别饲喂传统精粗饲粮（对照组，CK组）、全混合日粮（TMR组）、粗料+精料颗粒料（CP组）。试验期120 d。结果表明：1）从育肥全期来看，与CK组相比，CP组和TMR组平均日增重分别显著提高了19.81%和16.09%（P<0.05），TMR组和CP组之间差异不显著（P>0.05）；CP组和TMR组料重比较CK组分别显著降低了8.46%和13.39%（P<0.05）。2）TMR组屠宰率较CK组和CP组分别显著提高了5.78%和6.08%（P<0.05），CP组与CK组差异不显著（P>0.05）；各组间胴体重和眼肌面积无显著差异（P>0.05）。3）CP组血清中总蛋白的含量显著高于TMR组和CK组（P<0.05），TMR组显著高于CK组（P<0.05）；TMR组和CP组血清尿素氮含量显著低于CK组（P<0.05）；各组间血清中白蛋白、总胆固醇和甘油三酯的含量均无显著差异（P>0.05）。4）与CK组相比，TMR组肌肉的失水率和剪切力显著降低（P<0.05），但与CP组相比变化不显著（P>0.05）；3种饲粮类型对肌肉的肉色、pH和熟肉率均无显著影响（P>0.05）。结果提示，与传统精粗饲粮相比，TMR和精料颗粒料均可显著提高育肥湖羊的平均日增重，降低料重比，改善肉品质，且TMR组的效果优于CP组。

关键词： 饲粮类型; 湖羊; 生长性能; 屠宰性能; 肉品质

本文引用格式

侯川川, 马莲香, 邱家凌, 鲁鑫涛, 何俊娜, 郭阳, 刘兵, 吴阿团, 余东游 . 饲粮类型对育肥湖羊生长性能、屠宰性能和肉品质的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2018 , 30(12) : 5023 -5031 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2018.12.030

Abstract

Under diets with the same energy and crude protein level conditions, this experiment was aimed to investigate the effects of different diet types on growth performance, slaughter performance, serum biochemical indices and meat quality of fattening Hu sheep. Ninety 90-days-old healthy male sheep with similar weight of (24.67±2.53) kg were randomly divided into 3 groups with 3 replicates per group and 10 sheep per replicate. The three groups were fed traditional concentrate and coarse diets (control group, CK group), total mixed ration (TMR group) and coarse material+concentrate pellets (CP group), respectively. The experimental lasted for 120 days. The results showed as follows: 1) in the whole fattening period, compared with the CK group, the average daily gain (ADG) in CP group and TMR group was significantly increased by 19.81% and 16.09% (P<0.05), respectively, and there was no significant difference between TMR group and CP group (P>0.05). Compared with CK group, the ratio of feed to gain in CP group and TMR group was significantly reduced by 8.46% and 13.39% (P<0.05), respectively. 2) The slaughter rate in TMR group was significantly increased by 5.78% and 6.08% (P<0.05) compared with CK group and CP group, respectively. There was no significant difference between CP group and CK group (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in body weight and eye muscle area among groups (P>0.05). 3) The serum total protein content in CP group was significantly higher than that in TMR group and CK group (P<0.05), and that in TMR group was significantly higher than that in CK group (P<0.05). The content of serum urea nitrogen content in TMR group and CP group was significantly lower than that in CK group (P<0.05). Serum albumin, total cholesterol and triglyceride contents were not significantly different among groups (P>0.05). 4) Compared with CK group, the water loss rate and shear force in TMR group were significantly decreased (P<0.05), but there was no significant change compared with CP group (P>0.05). The three dietary types had no significant effect on meat color, pH and cooked meat rate of muscle (P>0.05). The results suggest that compared with the traditional coarse diet, TMR and CP diets can significantly increase the daily gain of fattening Hu sheep, reduce the ratio of feed to gain and improve meat quality, and the effect of TMR group is better than that of CP group.

Key words： diet type; Hu sheep; growth performance; slaughter performance; meat quality

参考文献

[1] 胡琳,王定发,周汉林,等.全混合日粮(TMR)在养羊产业中的应用前景[J].养殖与饲料,2015(7):25-29.



[2] 柴君秀,李颖康,丁伟,等.肉羊全混合日粮技术与传统精粗分饲技术效果对比试验[J].黑龙江畜牧兽医,2014(1):76-77.



[3] 王勇.颗粒饲料养羊效果好[J].中国畜牧兽医文摘,2016,32(12):220.



[4] 吴新忠,李桉,丑武江.肉羊杂交一代TMR饲喂技术的应用试验[J].黑龙江畜牧兽医,2015(24):66-67.



[5] 李纪委,赵俊,赵本领,等.TMR饲喂技术在肉羊养殖中的应用[J].安徽农业科学,2016,44(9):124-125,179.



[6] 林嘉,俞坚群,李建芬,等.不同处理的全混合日粮对幼龄湖羊的饲喂效果[J].中国畜牧杂志,2001,37(6):36-38.



[7] 孙振国,费明锋.稻草复合羊颗粒饲料饲喂湖羊增重效果试验[J].养殖与饲料,2017(11):36-37.



[8] 周玉香,吕玉玲,保灵燕,等.TMR对滩羊采食量和生产性能影响的研究[J].畜牧与兽医,2015,47(7):55-57.



[9] 范占炼,王光文.奶牛全混合日粮的应用[J].当代畜牧,2000(6):11-12.



[10] 殷雨洋,李玉峰,李江涛,等.湖羊哺乳羔羊补饲颗粒料的效果[J].浙江农业科学,2017,58(7):1257-1259.



[11] 李长春,成启明,王志军,等.饲草型FTMR对羔羊生产性能的影响[J].中国草地学报,2017,39(2):90-95.



[12] 刘庭玉,贾玉山,格根图,等.饲草型全混合日粮对羔羊肉品质的影响[J].草地学报,2012,20(2):378-382.



[13] 王婕姝,韩向敏,王毅.秸秆颗粒型日粮对育肥羔羊屠宰指标及肉品质的影响[J].畜牧与饲料科学,2017,38(6):41-44.



[14] 马美蓉,金凤花,董迪,等.大叶枸草粉替代部分豆粕对舍饲羔羊生长、屠宰性能与肉质特性的影响[J].中国畜牧杂志,2014,50(7):40-43.



[15] 宋晓雯,朱风华,王利华,等.日粮能量水平对育成期崂山奶山羊屠宰性能的研究[J].中国畜牧杂志,2016,52(7):55-60.



[16] 周世卫,代立霞,田春丽,等.4-8月龄滩羊日粮能蛋比相同条件下分阶段育肥的效果研究[J].中国畜牧杂志,2016,52(23):44-52.



[17] 宋晓雯,朱风华,王利华,等.饲粮能量水平对育成期崂山奶山羊生长性能和血清生化指标的影响[J].动物营养学报,2016,28(2):609-617.



[18] 汤继顺,贾玉堂,李立冰,等.不同饲喂模式对大别山黄牛育肥性能与生化指标的影响[J].中国草食动物,2011,31(6):31-33.



[19] 王志明,王婕姝,王毅,等.秸秆颗粒饲料冬春补饲对甘肃‘高山细毛羊’生长性能和血液生化指标的影响[J].甘肃农业大学学报,2016,51(5):14-19.



[20] STANLEY C C,WILLIAMS C C,JENNY B F,et al.Effects of feeding milk replacer once versus twice daily on glucose metabolism in Holstein and Jersey calves[J].Journal of Dairy Science,2002,85(9):2335-2343.  



[21] 董志岩,叶鼎承,李忠荣,等.理想蛋白质氨基酸模式对生长猪生产性能、血清尿素氮及游离氨基酸的影响[J].家畜生态学报,2010,31(5):30-34.



[22] 邱玉朗,罗斌,于维,等.发酵全混合日粮对肉羊生长性能与血液生化指标的影响[J].饲料研究,2013(12):46-48.



[23] 周振峰,王晶,王加启,等.裹包TMR饲喂对泌乳中期奶牛生产性能、养分表观消化率及血液生化指标的影响[J].草业学报,2010,19(5):31-37.



[24] 王毅.育肥肉牛用玉米秸秆型颗粒饲料的研究[D].硕士学位论文.兰州:甘肃农业大学,2014.



[25] ABDEL-SALAM A M,ZEITOUN M M,ABDELSALAM M M.Effect of synbiotic supplementation on growth performance,blood metabolites,insulin and testosterone and wool traits of growing lambs[J].Journal of Biological Sciences,2014,14(4):292-298.  



[26] 王婕姝,赵芳芳,王毅,等.秸秆颗粒型日粮对育肥羔羊生长性能和血液生化指标的影响[J].甘肃农业大学学报,2014,49(5):51-57.



[27] 刘圈炜,魏立民,王峰,等.全价颗粒饲料对育肥海南黑山羊血清生化指标的影响[J].饲料研究,2017(2):37-39,43.



[28] MANCINI R A,HUNT M C.Current research in meat color[J].Meat Science,2005,71(1):100-121.  



[29] 王永辉,马俪珍.肌肉颜色变化的机理及其控制方法初探[J].肉类工业,2006(4):18-21.



[30] ROUSSET-AKRIM S,YOUNG O A,BERDAGUÉ J L.Diet and growth effects in panel assessment of sheep meat odour and flavour[J].Meat Science,1997,45(2):169-181.  



[31] ALEXANDROVA N,BANSKALIEVA V,ANGELOV A,et al.Meat quality characteristics and fatty acid composition of triacylglicerols in out-of-season born lambs[C]//42th International Congress of Meat Science and Technology.Lillehammer:[s.n.],1996:204-205.



[32] WATANABE A,DALY C C,DEVINE C E.The effects of the ultimate pH of meat on tenderness changes during ageing[J].Meat Science,1996,42(1):67-78.  



[33] 王莉梅.全混合发酵饲料对羊肉品质的影响[D].硕士学位论文.呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2013.



[34] 王晓光.饲草型全混日粮饲用价值评价研究[D].博士学位论文.呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2011.



[35] 王永超,郭江鹏,姜成钢,等.添加颗粒料对小牛肉用奶公犊牛生长性能、血液指标及肉品质的影响[J].饲料研究,2014(21):4-10.



[36] 马铁伟,王强,王锋,等.营养水平对湖羊生长性能、血清生化指标、屠宰性能和肉品质的影响[J].南京农业大学学报,2016,39(6):1003-1009.



[37] 周光宏.畜产品加工学[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2002.



[38] 苗海明,高爱武,杨金丽,等.动物肌内脂肪沉积对肉嫩度影响的研究进展[J].中国农学通报,2012,28(11):51-54.



[39] 苏日古嘎.育肥模式对绒山羊成年母羊肉品质的影响及其与羔羊肉品质比较研究[D].硕士学位论文.呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2013.
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉

    联系我们

  • 地址：北京市海淀区圆明园西路2号
    　　　中国农业大学动科动医大楼153室
  • 邮编：100193
  • 电话：010－62817823
  • 网址：http://www.chinajan.com
  • E-mail：cjan@chinajan.com
京公网安备 11010802041926号    京ICP备17050989号-2