反刍与草食动物营养 Ruminant and herbivore nutrition

不同粗饲料分级指数与碳水化合物平衡指数组合饲粮对泌乳中期奶牛产奶性能及血清生化指标的影响

展开
  • 1. 黑龙江八一农垦大学动物科技学院, 大庆 163319;
    2. 中国农业科学院北京畜牧兽医研究所, 北京 100193
管鹏宇(1994-),男,黑龙江东宁人,硕士研究生,从事动物营养与饲料科学的研究。E-mail:bynd_guan@126.com

收稿日期: 2018-08-01

  网络出版日期: 2019-03-18

基金资助

国家科技支撑计划项目(2012BAD12B02,2013BAD21B01);黑龙江省农垦总局科技攻关项目(HNK125B-11-05,HNK135-07-03)

Effects of Different Roughage Grading Index and Carbohydrate Balance Index Combinational Diets on Milk Performance and Serum Biochemical Indexes of Mid-Lactating Dairy Cows

Expand
  • 1. College of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Heilongjiang Bayi Agricultural University, Daqing 163319, China;
    2. Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China

Received date: 2018-08-01

  Online published: 2019-03-18

摘要

本试验在相同能量和蛋白质水平下,研究不同粗饲料分级指数(GI)与碳水化合物平衡指数(CBI)组合饲粮对泌乳中期奶牛产奶性能及血清生化指标的影响。通过GI筛选粗饲料最佳组合,以谷物的种类和含量改变CBI[CBI=物理有效中性洗涤纤维(peNDF)/谷物瘤胃可降解淀粉(RDSG)]。试验采用2×2双因素析因设计,饲粮GI分别为10.83和10.33,CBI分别为1.48和1.62。选24头胎次、体重接近的泌乳中期荷斯坦奶牛,随机分为4组(每组6头),分别饲喂不同GI与CBI组合饲粮。结果显示:1)GI和CBI对奶牛的干物质采食量及主要营养物质采食量均无显著影响(P>0.05),且两者的交互作用不显著(P>0.05)。GI对各时间点(正试期第6、13、20、27、34天)及平均产奶量无显著影响(P>0.05),CBI对除第6天外的各时间点及平均产奶量均有显著影响(P<0.05)。同一GI下,随着CBI的减小,产奶量增大,以GI=10.83、CBI=1.48组产奶量相对较高。GI和CBI以及两者的交互作用对乳脂率、乳蛋白率、乳尿素氮含量和乳体细胞数均没有显著影响(P>0.05)。GI=10.33、CBI=1.48组乳脂率相对较高,GI=10.83、CBI=1.62组乳尿素氮含量相对较高,GI=10.33、CBI=1.62组乳体细胞数相对较低。2)GI和CBI对奶牛各时间点(正试期第6、13、20、27、34天)及平均血清总蛋白、白蛋白、尿素氮、总胆固醇、甘油三酯、葡萄糖、β-羟丁酸含量与谷丙转氨酶、谷草转氨酶活性均无显著影响(P>0.05),且两者的交互作用不显著(P>0.05)。由此得出,饲粮GI=10.83、CBI=1.48时泌乳中期奶牛的产奶量相对较高,GI=10.33、CBI=1.48时泌乳中期奶牛的乳品质相对较好。在饲粮CBI=1.48的条件下,蛋白质和脂类消化利用情况以GI=10.83时较优,在糖类代谢方面以GI=10.33时较优。

本文引用格式

管鹏宇, 叶明, 姜宁, 卜登攀, 张爱忠 . 不同粗饲料分级指数与碳水化合物平衡指数组合饲粮对泌乳中期奶牛产奶性能及血清生化指标的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2019 , 31(3) : 1152 -1162 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2019.03.020

Abstract

The effects of different roughage grading index(GI) and carbohydrate balance index (CBI) combinational diets were studied on milk performance and serum biochemical indexes of mid-lactating dairy cows under the same dietary energy and protein levels in this experiment. The optimal combination of roughage was screened by GI, and the CBI[CBI=physically effective neutral detergent fiber (peNDF)/ruminal degradable starch from grain (RDSG)] was changed by the type and content of the grain. A 2×2 two-factor factorial design was used with dietary GI of 10.83 and 10.33 and CBI of 1.48 and 1.62, respectively. Twenty-four mid-lactating Holstein dairy cows were selected and randomly divided into 4 groups with 6 cows per group, and the cows in the 4 groups were fed different GI and CBI combinational diets. The results showed as follows:1) GI and CBI had no significant effects on dry matter intake and main nutrient intakes of dairy cows (P>0.05), and there were no significant interactions between GI and CBI (P>0.05). GI had no significant effects on average milk yield and the milk yield at different time points (the 6th, 13th, 20th, 27th and 34th day of the trial period) (P>0.05), and CBI had significant effects on average milk yield and the milk yield at different time points except the 6th day (P<0.05). At the same GI, the milk yield increased with the CBI decreasing, and the group of GI=10.83 and CBI=1.48 had the relatively higher milk yield. The milk fat percentage, milk protein percentage, milk urea nitrogen content and milk somatic cell count were not significantly affected by GI, CBI and their interaction (P>0.05). The milk fat percentage of group GI=10.33 and CBI=1.48 was relatively higher, the milk urea nitrogen content of group GI=10.83 and CBI=1.62 was relatively higher, and the milk somatic cell count of group GI=10.33 and CBI=1.62 was relatively lower. 2) GI and CBI had no significant effects on the contents of total protein (TP), albumin (ALB), urea nitrogen (UN), total cholesterol (TC), triglyceride (TG), glucose (GLU), β-hydroxybutyrate (BHBA) and the activities of alanine transaminase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) in serum at different time points (the 6th, 13th, 20th, 27th and 34th day of the trial period) and their average values (P>0.05), and there were no significant interactions between GI and CBI (P>0.05). It is concluded that the milk yield is relatively higher when dairy cows fed the diets with GI=10.83 and CBI=1.48 in the mid-lactation period, and the milk quality is relatively well when dairy cows fed the diet with GI=10.33 and CBI=1.48 in the middle lactation. Under the condition of dietary CBI=1.48, the digestion and absorption of protein and lipids are better when GI=10.83, and the carbohydrate metabolism is better when GI=10.33.

参考文献

[1] 雷冬至,金曙光,乌仁塔娜.用体外产气法评价不同粗饲料与相同精料间的组合效应[J].饲料工业,2009,30(3):30-33.

[2] VANDERWERFF L M,FERRARETTO L F,SHAVER R D.Brown midrib corn shredlage in diets for high-producing dairy cows[J].Journal of Dairy Science,98(8):5642-5652.

[3] MANTHEY A K,KALSCHEUR K F,GARCIA A D,et al.Lactation performance of dairy cows fed yeast-derived microbial protein in low-and high-forage diets[J].Journal of Dairy Science,2016,99(4):2775-2787.  

[4] 张骞,赵国琦,邬彩霞.peNDF水平对泌乳中后期奶牛产奶性能的影响[J].饲料工业,2010,31(9):33-35.

[5] BEHGAR M,VALIZADEH R,MIRZAEE M,et al.The impact of alfalfa hay particle size on the utilization of soy hull by early lactating dairy cows[J].Livestock Science,2011,247(1/2/3):147-154.

[6] 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局.GB/T 6436-2002饲料中钙的测定[S].北京:中国农业出版社,2002.

[7] 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局.GB/T 6437-2002饲料中总磷的测定分光光度法[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2002.

[8] 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局,中国国家标准化管理委员会.GB/T 20806-2006饲料中中性洗涤纤维(NDF)的测定[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2007.

[9] 中华人民共和国农业部.NY/T 1459-2007饲料中酸性洗涤纤维的测定[S].北京:农业出版社,2008.

[10] 国家技术监督局.GB/T 6432-1994饲料中粗蛋白测定方法[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2007.

[11] 冯仰廉,陆治年.奶牛营养需要和饲料成分[M].3版.北京:中国农业出版社,2007.

[12] LEONARDI C,ARMENTANO L E.Effect of quantity,quality,and length of alfalfa hay on selective consumption by dairy cows[J].Journal of Dairy Science,2003,86(2):557-564.  

[13] 李然,孙满吉,刘彩娟,等.不同粗饲料分级指数的粗饲料对奶山羊血液指标及产奶性能的影响[J].中国饲料,2010(15):8-13.

[14] 李飞.奶山羊亚急性瘤胃酸中毒模型构建与奶牛日粮CBI的优化[D].博士学位论文.杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2014.

[15] JANICEK B,KONONOFF P J,GEHMAN A M,et al.The effect of feeding dried distillers grains plussolubles on milk production and excretion of urinary purine derivatives[J].Journal of Dairy Science,2008,91(9):3544-3553.  

[16] SILVEIRA C,OBA M,BEAUCHEMIN K A,et al.Effect of grains differing in expected ruminalfermentability on the productivity of lactating dairy cows[J].Journal of Dairy Science,2007,90(6):2852-2859.  

[17] 照日格图,敖长金,卢德勋.不同品质混合粗饲料对奶牛体外发酵指标的影响[J].内蒙古农业大学学报(自然科学版),2013,34(2):1-9.

[18] 王金合,李爱国,赵咏梅.不同粗饲料对奶牛生产性能的影响[J].当代畜牧,2010(8):32-33.

[19] 吴爽,张永根,夏科,等.不同粗饲料组合类型对奶牛瘤胃甲烷产量及氮代谢的影响[J].中国饲料,2014(3):29-34.

[20] 丁玲,永福,索南道吉,等.野血牦犊牛生理指标测定试验[J].中国畜牧兽医,2009,36(8):169-170.

[21] VILLARROEL A,MILLER T B,JOHNSON E D,et al.Factors affecting serum total protein and immunoglobulin G concentration in replacement dairy calves[J].Advances in Dairy Research,2013,1(2):1-5.

[22] WILDMAN C D,WEST J W,BERNARD J K.Effect of dietary cationanion difference and dietary crude protein on performance of lactating dairy cows during hot weather[J].Journal of Dairy Science,2007,90(4):1842-1850.  

[23] 徐明.玉米处理方法对泌乳牛泌乳性能、养分消化和血液指标的影响[D].硕士学位论文.杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2004.

[24] WALES W J,KOLVER E S,EGAN A R,et al.Effects of strain of Holstein-Friesian and concentrate supplementation on the fatty acid composition of milk fat of dairy cows grazing pasture in early lactation[J].Journal of Dairy Science,2009,92(1):247-255.  

[25] BORER K E,BAILEY S R,MENZIES-GOW N J,et al.Effect of feeding glucose,fructose,and inulin on blood glucose and insulin concentrations in normal ponies and those predisposed to laminitis[J].Journal of Animal Science,2012,90(9):3003-3011.  

[26] 康蓉.不同日粮模式对泌乳中期奶牛生产性能、血液生化指标及泌乳相关激素的影响[D].硕士学位论文.呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2014.

[27] DRACKLCY J K.Biology of dairy cows during the transition period:the Final Frontier[J].Journal of Dairy Science,1999,82(11):2259-2273.  

[28] AGLE M,HRISTOV A N,ZAMAN S,et al.Effect of dietary concentrate on rumen fermentation,digestibility,and nitrogen losses in dairy cows[J].Journal of Dairy Science,2010,93(9):4211-4222.  

[29] 侯玉洁,徐俊,熊春贤,等.不同粗饲料对奶牛乳中脂肪酸组成和血液生化指标的影响[J].中国饲料,2016(9):15-18,22.
文章导航

/