反刍与草食动物营养 Ruminant and herbivore nutrition

构树不同部位与奶牛常用粗饲料瘤胃降解特性对比研究

  • 刘祥圣 ,
  • 王琳 ,
  • 宁丽丽 ,
  • 冯宝宝 ,
  • 林淼 ,
  • 赵国琦
展开
  • 扬州大学动物科学与技术学院, 扬州 225009
刘祥圣(1995-),男,江苏扬州人,硕士研究生,动物营养与饲料科学专业。E-mail:1157873319@qq.com

收稿日期: 2019-01-24

  网络出版日期: 2019-08-19

基金资助

现代农业产业技术体系专项资金资助(CARS-36)

Comparison of Rumen Degradation Characteristics among Different Parts of Paper Mulberry and Commonly Used Roughages for Dairy Cows

  • LIU Xiangsheng ,
  • WANG Lin ,
  • NING Lili ,
  • FENG Baobao ,
  • LIN Miao ,
  • ZHAO Guoqi
Expand
  • College of Animal Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China

Received date: 2019-01-24

  Online published: 2019-08-19

摘要

本试验旨在研究构树不同部位(构树叶、构树枝叶、构树枝)与奶牛常用粗饲料(苜蓿干草、燕麦草)的瘤胃降解特性。选用3只装有永久性瘤胃瘘管的中国荷斯坦奶牛,采用尼龙袋法测定5种饲料的干物质(DM)、粗蛋白质(CP)、中性洗涤纤维(NDF)和酸性洗涤纤维(ADF)瘤胃降解规律。结果表明:1)构树叶的CP含量显著高于苜蓿干草(P<0.05),NDF含量显著低于苜蓿干草(P<0.05);构树枝叶的CP含量与苜蓿干草差异不显著(P>0.05),NDF含量显著低于苜蓿干草(P<0.05);构树枝的CP含量与燕麦草差异不显著(P>0.05),NDF含量显著高于燕麦草(P<0.05)。2)5种饲料的DM有效降解率差异显著(P<0.05),由高到低依次为构树叶、构树枝叶、苜蓿干草、燕麦草和构树枝。5种饲料的CP有效降解率差异显著(P<0.05),由高到低依次为苜蓿干草、构树叶、构树枝叶、燕麦草和构树枝。构树叶的NDF有效降解率最高,显著高于其他4种饲料(P<0.05),其中构树枝叶与燕麦草差异不显著(P>0.05)。5种饲料的ADF有效降解率差异显著(P<0.05),由高到低依次为构树叶、燕麦草、苜蓿干草、构树枝叶和构树枝。综上所述,构树不同部位具有作为奶牛非常规饲料资源的潜力。

本文引用格式

刘祥圣 , 王琳 , 宁丽丽 , 冯宝宝 , 林淼 , 赵国琦 . 构树不同部位与奶牛常用粗饲料瘤胃降解特性对比研究[J]. 动物营养学报, 2019 , 31(8) : 3612 -3620 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2019.08.022

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the rumen degradation characteristics of different parts of paper mulberry (paper mulberry leaves, paper mulberry twigs and leaves and paper mulberry twigs) and commonly used roughage (alfalfa hay and oat hay) for dairy cows. Three Chinese Holstein cows with permanent ruminal cannulas were used to evaluate the ruminal degradability of dry matter (DM), crude protein (CP), neutral detergent fiber (NDF) and acid detergent fiber (ADF) by nylon-bag technique. The results showed as follows:1) the CP content in paper mulberry leaves was significantly higher than that in alfalfa hay (P<0.05), while the NDF content was significantly lower than that in alfalfa hay (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in CP content between paper mulberry twigs and leaves and alfalfa hay (P>0.05), while the NDF content in paper mulberry twigs and leaves was significantly lower than that in alfalfa hay (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in CP content between paper mulberry twigs and oat hay (P>0.05), while the NDF content in paper mulberry twigs was significantly higher than that in oat hay (P<0.05). 2) There was significant difference in the DM effective degradability among five kinds of feedstuffs (P<0.05), and from high to low were paper mulberry leaves, paper mulberry twigs and leaves, alfalfa hay, oat hay and paper mulberry twigs. There was significant difference in the CP effective degradability among five kinds of feedstuffs (P<0.05), and from high to low were alfalfa hay, paper mulberry leaves, paper mulberry twigs and leaves, oat hay and paper mulberry twigs. The NDF effective degradability of paper mulberry leaves was the highest, and significantly higher than that of other four feedstuffs (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference in NDF effective degradability between paper mulberry twigs and leaves and oat hay (P>0.05). There was significant difference in the ADF effective degradability among five kinds of feedstuffs (P<0.05), and from high to low were paper mulberry leaves, oat hay, alfalfa hay, paper mulberry twigs and leaves and paper mulberry twigs. In conclusion, different parts of paper mulberry have potential value for unconventional feed resources in dairy cows.

参考文献

[1] 2018年10月国内外大宗饲料原料市场分析[J].中国饲料,2018(22):10-13.
[2] 蔡小艳,曹树威,赖大伟,等.木本饲料的开发利用及研究现状[J].上海畜牧兽医通讯,2016(1):68-71.
[3] 邳植,沈世华.构树作为新兴的蛋白饲料原料的研究[J].饲料工业,2018,39(11):23-28.
[4] 赵峰,刘丹,黄所含,等.构树叶饲喂小白鼠的亚慢性毒性试验[J].粮食与饲料工业,2006(6):30-32.
[5] 王永树,江浩,谢先中.构树叶饲喂巴马香猪的效果试验[J].黑龙江畜牧兽医,2016(20):194-195.
[6] 吴健平,卢雪芬,夏中生,等.饲粮中使用构树叶粉饲喂良凤花肉鸡的效果[J].畜牧与兽医,2010,42(12):51-55.
[7] KAUR R,GARCIA S C,FULKERSON W J,et al.Degradation kinetics of leaves,petioles and stems of forage rape (Brassica napus) as affected by maturity[J].Animal Feed Science and Technology,2011,168(3/4):165-178.
[8] 赵连生,牛俊丽,徐元君,等.6种饲料原料瘤胃降解特性和瘤胃非降解蛋白质的小肠消化率[J].动物营养学报,2017,29(6):2038-2046.
[9] 张微,莫放.原位尼龙袋技术在评价饲料营养价值中的应用与建议方案[J].动物营养学报,2019,31(1):1-14.
[10] 冯仰廉,周建民,张晓明,等.我国奶牛饲料产奶净能值测算方法的研究[J].中国畜牧杂志,1987(1):8-11.
[11] VAN SOEST P J,ROBERTSON J B,LEWIS B A.Methods for dietary fiber,neutral detergent fiber,and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition[J].Journal of Dairy Science,1991,74(10):3583-3597.  
[12] ØRSKOV E R,MCDONALD I.The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighted according to rate of passage[J].The Journal of Agricultural Science,1979,92(2):499-503.  
[13] 颜品勋,冯仰廉,王燕兵,等.青粗饲料通过牛瘤胃外流速度的研究[J].动物营养学报,1994,6(2):20-22.
[14] 左鑫,陈哲,谢强,等.不同产地构树叶粉和构树枝叶粉营养成分及其鹅代谢能的测定[J].动物营养学报,2018,30(7):2823-2830.
[15] 屠焰,刁其玉,田莉,等.杂交构树营养成分瘤胃降解特点的研究[J].中国畜牧杂志,2009,45(11):38-41.
[16] NRC.Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle[S].7th ed.Washington,D.C.:National Academy of Sciences,2001.
[17] 屠焰,刁其玉,张蓉,等.杂交构树叶的饲用营养价值分析[J].草业科学,2009,26(6):136-139.
[18] 马健,刘艳芳,杜云,等.禾王草与奶牛常用粗饲料瘤胃降解特性的对比研究[J].动物营养学报,2016,28(3):816-825.
[19] 刘艳芳,马健,都文,等.常规与非常规粗饲料在奶牛瘤胃中的降解特性[J].动物营养学报,2018,30(4):1592-1602.
[20] 冯仰廉.反刍动物营养学[M].北京:科学出版社,2004.
[21] SATTER L D.Protein supply from undegraded dietary protein[J].Journal of Dairy Science,1986,69(10):2734-2749.  
[22] 郭冬生,彭小兰,夏维福.反刍动物对粗纤维的利用及营养调控[J].饲料广角,2010(10):32-33.
[23] 许浩,李翔.木质素对粗纤维瘤胃降解率的影响及提高木质素瘤胃降解率方法的研究进展[J].中国奶牛,2017(4):1-4.
文章导航

/