反刍与草食动物营养 Ruminant and herbivore nutrition

玉米皮对生长肉兔的营养价值评定

  • 曾绘锦 ,
  • 田刚 ,
  • 鲁院院 ,
  • 曾亭轩 ,
  • 蔡景义
展开
  • 1. 四川农业大学动物营养研究所, 成都 611130;
    2. 动物抗病营养教育部重点实验室, 成都 611130
曾绘锦(1997-),女,四川内江人,硕士研究生,从事家兔营养与饲料高效利用研究。E-mail:795731548@qq.com

收稿日期: 2019-01-29

  网络出版日期: 2019-08-19

基金资助

成都市农业技术研发项目(2015-NY02-00271-NC);四川省科技支撑计划项目(2016NZ0002);四川农业大学“双支计划”项目

Nutritional Value Evaluation of Corn Bran for Growing Rabbits

  • ZENG Huijin ,
  • TIAN Gang ,
  • LU Yuanyuan ,
  • ZENG Tingxuan ,
  • CAI Jingyi
Expand
  • 1. Animal Nutrition Institute, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China;
    2. Key Laboratory for Animal Disease-Resistance Nutrition of Ministry of Education, Chengdu 611130, China

Received date: 2019-01-29

  Online published: 2019-08-19

摘要

本试验旨在评定玉米皮在生长肉兔上的营养价值。选取32只35日龄体重相近[(760.33±48.29)g]的断奶新西兰白兔,随机等分为4组,每组8个重复,每个重复1只。各组分别饲喂基础饲粮和3种测试饲粮。测试饲粮分别由20%的3种不同来源的玉米皮与80%的基础饲粮混合而成。消化试验共15 d,其中预试期11 d,收粪期4 d。结果表明:1)不同来源对3种玉米皮总能(GE)和主要养分含量均有极显著影响(P<0.01)。3种不同来源玉米皮的GE及粗蛋白质(CP)、粗纤维(CF)、中性洗涤纤维(NDF)、酸性洗涤纤维(ADF)、酸性洗涤木质素(ADL)、粗脂肪(EE)、粗灰分(Ash)、钙(Ca)、总磷(TP)和无氮浸出物(NFE)含量平均值分别为19.84 MJ/kg、10.54%、16.32%、75.32%、20.23%、2.18%、5.54%、1.12%、0.49%、0.05%和66.48%。除半胱氨酸(Cys)、赖氨酸(Lys)和酪氨酸(Tyr)外,不同来源对3种玉米皮的其他氨基酸含量也有显著或极显著影响(P<0.05或P<0.01),3种不同来源玉米皮的精氨酸(Arg)、组氨酸(His)、异亮氨酸(Ile)、亮氨酸(Leu)、Lys、蛋氨酸(Met)、苯丙氨酸(Phe)、苏氨酸(Thr)和缬氨酸(Val)含量平均值分别为0.45%、0.43%、0.37%、1.31%、0.40%、0.12%、0.53%、0.52%和0.58%。2)不同来源对3种玉米皮的GE、DM、CP、ADL、Ca、TP、NFE的表观消化率有极显著影响(P<0.01)。3种不同来源玉米皮的GE、DM、CP、CF、NDF、ADF、ADL、EE、Ash、Ca、TP和NFE表观消化率平均值分别为33.32%、34.01%、70.54%、13.53%、20.07%、10.48%、-0.74%、85.49%、47.42%、29.02%、26.48%和23.81%。除Thr、Val、天冬氨酸(Asp)、甘氨酸(Gly)和丝氨酸(Ser)外,不同来源对3种玉米皮的其余氨基酸的表观消化率均有显著或极显著影响(P<0.05或P<0.01),氨基酸的表观消化率平均值均超过60%。由此可见,对于生长肉兔,玉米皮具有较高的营养价值,但不同来源玉米皮的营养价值有一定差异。

本文引用格式

曾绘锦 , 田刚 , 鲁院院 , 曾亭轩 , 蔡景义 . 玉米皮对生长肉兔的营养价值评定[J]. 动物营养学报, 2019 , 31(8) : 3674 -3681 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2019.08.028

Abstract

The experiment was carried out to evaluate the nutritional value of corn bran for growing rabbits. Thirty-two New Zealand rabbits at 35 days of age with an average weight of (760.33±48.29) g were randomly divided into 4 groups with 8 replicates in each group and 1 rabbit in each replicate. Rabbits in the 4 group were fed the basal diet and 3 kinds of experimental diets. The experimental diets were formulated by 20% of corn bran from different sources and 80% basal diet. The digestion experiment lasted for 15 days, with 11 days for pre-test period, and 4 days for fecal collection period. The results showed as follows:1) different sources had significant effects on gross energy (GE) and major nutrient contents of 3 kinds of corn bran (P<0.01). The means of GE and crude protein (CP), crude fiber (CF), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), acid detergent fiber (ADF), acid detergent lignin (ADL), ether extract (EE), crude ash (Ash), calcium (Ca), total phosphorus (TP) and nitrogen-free extract (NFE) contents of 3 kinds of corn bran from different sources were 19.84 MJ/kg, 10.54%, 16.32%, 75.32%, 20.23%, 2.18%, 5.54%, 1.12%, 0.49%, 0.05% and 66.48%, respectively. Except for cysteine (Cys), lysine (Lys) and tyrosine (Tyr), different sources had significant effects on other amino acid contents of 3 kinds of corn bran (P<0.05 or P<0.01). The mean contents of arginine (Arg), histidine (His), isoleucine (Ile), leucine (Leu), Lys, methionine (Met), phenylalanine (Phe), threonine (Thr) and valine (Val) of 3 kinds of corn bran from different sources were 0.45%, 0.43%, 0.37%, 1.31%, 0.40%, 0.12%, 0.53%, 0.52% and 0.58%, respectively. 2) Different sources had significant effects on apparent digestibilities of GE, DM, CP, ADL, Ca, TP and NFE of 3 kinds of corn bran (P<0.01). The means of apparent digestibility of GE, DM, CP, CF, NDF, ADF, ADL, EE, Ash, Ca, TP and NFE of 3 kinds of corn bran from different sources were 33.32%, 34.01%, 70.54%, 13.53%, 20.07%, 10.48%, -0.74%, 85.49%, 47.42%, 29.02%, 26.48% and 23.81%. Except for Thr, Val, asparagic acid (Asp), glycine (Gly) and serine (Ser), different sources had significant effects on other amino acid apparent digestibilities of 3 kinds of corn bran (P<0.05 or P<0.01), and the means of apparent digestibility of amino acids were all above 60%. In conclusion, the nutritional value of corn bran is high for growing rabbits, but the nutritional values of corn bran from different sources are different.

参考文献

[1] 秦应和,武拉平.2017年兔产业发展情况、未来发展趋势及建议[J].中国畜牧杂志,2018,54(3):149-154.
[2] ANDERSON P V,KERR B J,WEBER T E,et al.Determination and prediction of digestible and metabolizable energy from chemical analysis of corn coproducts fed to finishing pigs[J].Journal of Animal Science,2012,90(4):1242-1254.  
[3] 谢飞.不同体重阶段猪常用饲料原料有效能比较研究[D].博士学位论文.北京:中国农业大学,2017.
[4] 王菲.肉牛饲料有效能值预测模型的建立与评价[D].博士学位论文.北京:中国农业大学,2016.
[5] 王伟,刘佳,龚月生,等.尼克粉鸡饲料能量和粗蛋白代谢的研究[J].饲料研究,2011(10):7-9.
[6] 王照群.玉米及加工副产品加酶前后黄羽肉鸡有效能和可利用氨基酸评定[D].硕士学位论文.长沙:湖南农业大学,2012.
[7] 章世元,谢月华,李燕舞,等.玉米深加工副产品饲料营养价值的确定[J].中国畜牧杂志,2007,47(5):59-61.
[8] 王芳,徐元君,牛俊丽,等.体外产气法评价反刍动物饲料营养价值的研究[J].中国畜牧兽医,2016,43(1):76-83.
[9] 曹香林,陈建军,郑琛.反刍动物常用饲料的体外消化率[J].贵州农业科学,2012,40(3):150-152.
[10] 韩晓洁,李凌云,莘海亮,等.体外产气法评定黔北麻羊常用饲料营养价值研究[J].家畜生态学报,2014,35(4):40-44.
[11] DE BLAS C D,WISEMAN J.Nutrition of the rabbit[M].Cambridge:CABI,2010:222-230.
[12] PEREZ J M,LEBAS F,GIDENNE T,et al.European reference method for in vivo determination of diet digestibility in rabbits[J].World Rabbit Science,1995,3(1):41-43.
[13] 张丽英.饲料分析及饲料质量检测技术[M].3版.北京:中国农业大学出版社,2007.
[14] VILLAMIDE M J,MAERTENS L,CERVERA C,et al.A critical approach of the calculation procedures to be used in digestibility determination of feed ingredients for rabbits[J].World Rabbit Science,2001,9(1):19-25.
[15] 林谦,戴求仲,蒋桂韬,等.玉米及其加工副产品的营养价值评定[J].中国饲料,2013(4):18-21.
[16] 程宗佳,郝波.来自饲料生产第一线的技术问答[M].北京:中国农业科学技术出版社,2013.
[17] HEUZÉ V,TRAN G,SAUVANT D,et al.Maize bran and hominy feed[DB/OL].(2016-12-14).https://feedipedia.org/node/712.
[18] 冯平.肥育猪对不同类型纤维消化适应性及其后肠发酵与微生物菌群变化研究[D].硕士学位论文.北京:中国农业科学院,2013.
[19] 李冲,吴峰洋,陈宝江,等.套算法与直接法测定家兔饲料表观消化率的对比分析[J].饲料研究,2017(15):18-23.
[20] 陈丹丹.四种家兔非常规能量饲料营养价值评定[D].硕士学位论文.保定:河北农业大学,2014.
[21] OSO O A,SOBAYO R,JEGEDE V,et al.Effect of dietary inclusion of sorghum milling waste on growth response,nutrient utilisation,gut characteristics and cecal microflora of weaner rabbits[J].Animal Science Journal,2011,82(3):468-474.  
[22] 齐大胜.四种非常规粗饲料在家兔上的营养价值评定[D].硕士学位论文.保定:河北农业大学,2014.
文章导航

/