饲料科学与技术 Feed science and technology

犬源复合益生菌对脾气虚犬盲肠菌群的影响

  • 曹护群 ,
  • 贺濛初 ,
  • 舒迎霜 ,
  • 夏晓东 ,
  • 冯士彬 ,
  • 李玉 ,
  • 王希春 ,
  • 吴金节
展开
  • 安徽农业大学动物科技学院, 合肥 230036
曹护群(1994-),女,安徽芜湖人,硕士研究生,从事兽医临床诊疗技术研究。E-mail:a18365268564@163.com

收稿日期: 2019-01-29

  网络出版日期: 2019-08-19

基金资助

国家重点研发项目(2016YFD0501009)

Effects of Canine-Derived Compound Probiotics on Cecal Microflora in Splenic Qi Asthenia Canines

  • CAO Huqun ,
  • HE Mengchu ,
  • SHU Yingshuang ,
  • XIA Xiaodong ,
  • FENG Shibin ,
  • LI Yu ,
  • WANG Xichun ,
  • WU Jinjie
Expand
  • College of Animal Science and Technology, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China

Received date: 2019-01-29

  Online published: 2019-08-19

摘要

本试验旨在通过高通量测序技术研究犬源复合益生菌对脾气虚犬盲肠菌群的影响。选取24只1岁龄比格犬,随机分成4组:对照组、脾气虚组、自然恢复组和益生菌治疗组,每组6只。其中,对照组饲喂基础饲粮;脾气虚组、自然恢复组和益生菌治疗组在饲喂基础饲粮的同时每天按照10 mL/kg BW的剂量灌喂番泻叶水煎液,连续灌喂7 d,建立脾气虚模型。在试验第7天,采集脾气虚组犬盲肠内容物;对照组和自然恢复组犬继续饲喂基础饲粮7 d,益生菌治疗组犬在饲喂基础饲粮的基础上每天按照1×109 CFU/只的剂量灌服犬源复合益生菌7 d。在试验第14天,随机从对照组、自然恢复组和益生菌治疗组各选4只犬采集盲肠内容物。利用Illumina HiSeq 2500平台及QⅡME测序软件对各组犬盲肠内容物进行生物信息学分析。结果显示:1)对照组与益生菌治疗组盲肠菌群的ACE指数、Chao1指数、Shannon指数均高于脾气虚组与自然恢复组,而Simpson指数则低于脾气虚组与自然恢复组。2)益生菌治疗组盲肠菌群中拟杆菌门、纲、目、科以及芽孢杆菌纲、属的相对丰度均显著高于对照组和脾气虚组(P<0.05),其他菌群在不同分类水平上的相对丰度均与对照组无显著差异(P>0.05)。综上所述,犬源复合益生菌不仅能够使番泻叶诱导的脾气虚犬盲肠菌群多样性恢复至正常犬水平,而且还能够提高盲肠菌群中有益菌拟杆菌、芽孢杆菌的占比,对脾气虚犬盲肠菌群结构有良好的调节作用。

本文引用格式

曹护群 , 贺濛初 , 舒迎霜 , 夏晓东 , 冯士彬 , 李玉 , 王希春 , 吴金节 . 犬源复合益生菌对脾气虚犬盲肠菌群的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2019 , 31(8) : 3810 -3820 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2019.08.043

Abstract

The objective of this study was to analyze the effects of canine-derived probiotics on cecal microflora in splenic qi asthenia canines using Illumina HiSeq sequencing technology. Twenty-four Beagle canines, aged 1-year-old, were randomly divided into 4 groups, which were control group, splenic qi asthenia group, natural recovery group and probiotic treatment group. The canines in control group were fed a basal diet; the canines in splenic qi asthenia group, natural recovery group and probiotics treatment group were fed the basal diet and were gavaged with 10 mL/(kg BW·d) senna decoction for 7 days to establish splenic qi asthenia model. On the day 7 of trial, the canines in splenic qi asthenia group were dissected for collecting cecal contents; the canines in control group and natural recovery group still continue to fed the basal diet for 7 days; the canines in probiotics treatment group still continue to fed the basal diet and were gavaged with 1×109 CFU/d of canine-derived compound probiotic per canine for 7 days. On the day 14 of trial, four canines of each group were randomly selected to collect the cecal contents from the control group, the natural recovery group and the probiotic treatment group. The bioinformatics analysis of cecal contents for canines of each group was performed using the Illumina HiSeq sequencing platform and QⅡME sequencing software. The results showed as follows:1) the ACE index, Chao1 index and Shannon index of the cecal microflora in the control group and the probiotics treatment group were higher than those in the splenic qi asthenia group and the natural recovery group, while the Simpson index was lower than that in the splenic qi asthenia group and the natural recovery group. 2) Bacteroides at different classification levels such as phylum, class, order and family, and bacillus at class and genus levels, their relative abundances in the probiotics treatment group were significantly higher than those in the control group and the splenic qi asthenia group (P<0.05), while the relative abundances of other microflora at different classification levels were not significantly different compared with the control group (P>0.05). In summary, canine-derived probiotics can not only restore the cecal microflora diversity in splenic qi asthenia canines to the level of normal canines, but also increase the proportions of beneficial bacteria such as bacteroides and bacillus, and it has a good regulatory effect on the cecal microflora structure of splenic qi asthenia canines.

参考文献

[1] KAJANDER K,HATAKKA K,POUSSA T,et al.A probiotic mixture alleviates symptoms in irritable bowel syndrome patients:a controlled 6-month intervention[J].Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics,2005,22(5):387-394.  
[2] 冯文林,伍海涛.从肠道菌群探讨多种疾病从脾论治的机理[J].吉林中医药,2018,38(10):14-17.
[3] ROOKS M G,GARRETT W S.Gut microbiota,metabolites and host immunity[J].Nature Reviews Immunology,2016,16(6):341-352.  
[4] PENG Y,WANG Z,LU Y,et al.Intestinal microflora molecular markers of spleen-deficient rats and evaluation of traditional Chinese drugs[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology,2009,15(18):2220-2227.  
[5] 彭颖,李晓波.脾虚证与肠道微生态[J].世界华人消化杂志,2012,20(34):3287-3291.
[6] SANDERS M E,MERENSTEIN D,MERRIFIELD C A,et al.Probiotics for human use[J].Nutrition Bulletin,2018,43(3):212-225.  
[7] DICKS L M T,GELDENHUYS J,MIKKELSEN L S,et al.Our gut microbiota:a long walk to homeostasis[J].Beneficial Microbes,2018,9(1):3-20.  
[8] SÁNCHEZ B,DELGADO S,BLANCO-MIGUEZ A,et al.Probiotics,gut microbiota,and their influence on host health and disease[J].Molecular Nutrition & Food Research,2017,61(1),doi:10.1002/mnfr.201600240.
[9] 罗云坚,修宗昌,黄穗平,等.脾气虚证免疫相关基因组学机制初探[J].中国中西医结合杂志,2005,25(4):311-314.
[10] HOD K,DEKEL R,AVIV COHEN N,et al.The effect of a multispecies probiotic on microbiota composition in a clinical trial of patients with diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome[J].Neurogastroenterology and Motility,2018,30(12):e13456.
[11] 张云娟,张垚,孙绍美,等.昆明犬肠道中乳杆菌的分离鉴定及16S rRNA同源性分析[J].中国微生态学杂志,2012,24(8):686-690.
[12] 楚渠,彭云武.益生菌菌种特性及主要作用[J].陕西农业科学,2004(1):65-66.
[13] 刘昆.犬源益生芽孢杆菌的筛选及其对攻毒幼犬的保护作用[D].硕士学位论文.雅安:四川农业大学,2009.
[14] 华鹤良.乳酸菌的分离鉴定及其抗菌肽与发酵性能研究[D].博士学位论文.扬州:扬州大学,2014.
[15] 徐海燕,曹斌,辛国芹,等.一株芽孢杆菌的分离鉴定及其益生潜质分析[J].家畜生态学报,2012,33(3):48-54.
[16] 肖新云,邓艳玲,刘又嘉,等.番泻叶所致脾虚泄泻小鼠血常规的研究[J].湖北中医药大学学报,2016,18(6):49-51.
[17] 徐孝平,徐剑钦,黄俊杰,等.WHBE兔与日本大耳白兔腹泻型肠易激综合征模型的肠道菌群研究[J].中国实验动物学报,2018,26(2):165-173.
[18] 武春霞.健康犬与腹泻犬粪便菌群的比较研究[D].硕士学位论文.北京:中国农业大学,2007.
[19] 朱年华,李麟.犬肠道微生物菌群结构与肠道免疫的研究进展[J].犬业科技,2017(1):18-20.
[20] SUCHODOLSKI J S,CAMACHO J,STEINER J M.Analysis of bacterial diversity in the canine duodenum,jejunum,ileum,and colon by comparative 16S rRNA gene analysis[J].FEMS Microbiology Ecology,2008,66(3):567-578.  
[21] MIDDELBOS I S,BOLER B M V,QU A,et al.Phylogenetic characterization of fecal microbial communities of dogs fed diets with or without supplemental dietary fiber using 454 pyrosequencing[J].PLoS One,2010,5(3):doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0009768.
[22] WEXLER A G,GOODMAN A L.An insider's perspective:Bacteroides as a window into the microbiome[J].Nature Microbiology,2017,2(5):17026.
[23] 向亚萍,陈志谊,罗楚平,等.芽孢杆菌的抑菌活性与其产脂肽类抗生素的相关性[J].中国农业科学,2015,48(20):4064-4076.
[24] JANIK R,THOMASON L A M,STANISZ A M,et al.Magnetic resonance spectroscopy reveals oral Lactobacillus promotion of increases in brain GABA,N-acetyl aspartate and glutamate[J].NeuroImage,2016,125:988-995.
[25] LIU X F,CAO S Q,ZHANG X W.Modulation of gut microbiota-brain axis by probiotics,prebiotics,and diet[J].Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry,2015,63(36):7885-7895.  
[26] 陈奕慧,林红燕.Ⅰ、Ⅱ类整合子在变形菌属中的分布及耐药性研究[J].中华医院感染学杂志,2014,24(3):526-528.
[27] CHEN L,LI S,ZHENG J,et al.Effects of dietary Clostridium butyricum supplementation on growth performance,intestinal development,and immune response of weaned piglets challenged with lipopolysaccharide[J].Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology,2018,9(1):62.
文章导航

/