实验方法 Experimental Methods

粉碎粒度对氧弹式量热法测定全混合日粮总能的影响

  • 蔡阿敏 ,
  • 李鹏涛 ,
  • 范逸婷 ,
  • 李改英 ,
  • 高腾云
展开
  • 河南农业大学牧医工程学院, 郑州 450046
蔡阿敏(1992-),女,河南永城人,硕士研究生,研究方向为动物营养与饲料科学。E-mail:546341793@qq.com

收稿日期: 2019-03-06

  网络出版日期: 2019-09-17

基金资助

现代奶牛产业技术体系建设专项资金(CARS-36);中南地区奶牛粪尿及特性产生系数和主要水污染源普查项目(30900292)

Effects of Grinding Particle Size on Gross Energy of Total Mixed Ration Measured by Oxygen Bomb Calorimetry

  • CAI Amin ,
  • LI Pengtao ,
  • FAN Yiting ,
  • LI Gaiying ,
  • GAO Tengyun
Expand
  • College of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450046, China

Received date: 2019-03-06

  Online published: 2019-09-17

摘要

本试验旨在比较粉碎粒度对氧弹式量热法测定全混合日粮(TMR)总能的影响。试验选取奶牛TMR样品15个,分别粉碎至18、40、60、100目,采用氧弹式量热仪分别测定各样品的总能,同时采用国标法测定样品的干物质、粗脂肪、粗灰分、粗纤维含量,参照NY/T 34-2004方法计算总能,比较不同粉碎粒度的TMR样品所测得的总能的差异,确定采用氧弹式量热法测定TMR总能时最适的粉碎粒度。结果显示:18、40目粉碎组的总能较低,极显著低于60、100目粉碎组及国标法计算所得总能(P<0.01);60、100目粉碎组的总能较高,与国标法计算所得总能接近,无显著差异(P>0.05);18和40目粉碎组的相对平均偏差高于60和100目粉碎组。上述结果表明,对TMR进行60或100目粉碎时,采用氧弹式量热法测定的总能更为准确,精确度更高,与国标法计算所得总能可互为替代;综合分析认为,采用氧弹式量测法测定奶牛TMR总能时,粉碎至60目即可满足测定需要。

本文引用格式

蔡阿敏 , 李鹏涛 , 范逸婷 , 李改英 , 高腾云 . 粉碎粒度对氧弹式量热法测定全混合日粮总能的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2019 , 31(9) : 4194 -4199 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2019.09.032

Abstract

This experiment was to study the effect of grinding particle size on gross energy (GE) of total mixed ration (TMR) measured by oxygen bomb calorimetry. Fifteen samples of total mixed ration (TMR) for dairy cow were selected and pulverized to 18, 40, 60 and 100 mesh, respectively. The GE of each sample was determined by oxygen bomb calorimeter, the contents of nutrients such as dry matter (DM), crude fat (EE), ash (Ash) and crude fiber (CF) were determined by national standard method, and the GE was calculated reference to the NY/T 34-2004 method, to compare the difference in GE with different degrees of comminution and to determine the optimum grinding particle size for the determination of GE of TMR by the oxygen bomb calorimetry. The results showed that the GE of the 18 and 40 mesh grinding groups was lower, which was significantly lower than that of the 60, 100 mesh grinding groups and the GE calculated by national standard method (P<0.01); the GE of 60 and 100 mesh grinding groups was higher, compared with the GE calculated by the national standard method, there was no significant difference (P>0.05); the relative average deviation of the 18 and 40 mesh grinding groups was higher than that of the 60 and 100 mesh grinding groups. It is shown that when the measured TMR is subjected to 60 or 100 mesh pulverization, the GE measured by oxygen bomb calorimetry is more accurate and has higher precision, and GE which is calculated by the national standard method can be substituted for each other. Comprehensive analysis reveals that the TMR for dairy cow is pulverized to 60 mesh can meet the need of GE determination by oxygen bomb calorimetry.

参考文献

[1] 孙国祥,豆小文,李利锋.紫外和红外光谱指纹谱与燃烧热谱联合定量评价人参归脾丸质量[J].中南药学,2012,10(7):543-548.
[2] 赵丽娜,刘春玲,姜大雨.三种主食热量的测定——燃烧热测定实验的应用[J].广州化工,2013,41(16):132-134,201.
[3] 蔡艳萍,高锦红.抗菌类药物的热值测定[J].湖北农业科学,2017,56(8):1547-1549.
[4] 冯然军,粟智.几种食用植物油发热量的测定[J].光谱实验室,2013,30(6):3322-3325.
[5] 马艳,谭卫红,沈娟章,等.新型氧弹量热仪测定谷物的热值[J].生命科学仪器,2013,11(3):42-44.
[6] 梁伟.氧弹量热仪的检定及使用中常见的误差原因及处理方法[J].现代测量与实验室管理,2016,24(2):20-22,65.
[7] 韩文军.浅谈饲料样品的制备及样品的保存[J].新疆畜牧业,2013(3):42-43.
[8] 中华人民共和国农业部.NY/T 34-2004奶牛饲养标准[S].北京:中国农业出版社,2004.
[9] 王洪荣.饲料检测与分析实验技术[M].南京:东南大学出版社,2014:97-98.
[10] 李仲玉,徐良梅,王洪亮.PARR 6300氧弹量热仪故障排除及使用中应注意的问题[J].饲料博览,2009(9):28-30.
[11] 周根来,殷洁鑫,张蕾,等.苜蓿的来源及粉碎粒度对其草粉营养成分的影响[J].粮食与饲料工业,2018(5):43-45,52.
[12] 张愉佳,张伟,佟庆龙.进口大豆粉碎细度对索氏抽提法测粗脂肪含量的影响[J].粮食储藏,2017,46(1):52-53.
[13] 钱文熙.不同粉碎细度对饲料常规营养成分分析结果的影响[J].畜牧与饲料科学,2010,31(1):28-30.
[14] 任慧玲,李永刚,张志娟.不同粉碎粒度对饲料游离棉酚测定结果的影响[J].粮食与饲料工业,2016(5):69-70.
[15] 刘庆华,聂芙蓉,毛秋月.粉碎粒度对CP测定结果影响的研究[J].郑州牧业工程高等专科学校学报,2007,27(2):11-13.
文章导航

/