研究简报 Short Communications

内源指示剂法结合套算法比较甘蔗副产物的养分表观消化率

  • 周波 ,
  • 韦家周 ,
  • 莫瑞玻 ,
  • 韦志坚 ,
  • 张宇 ,
  • 邹彩霞 ,
  • 何仁春
展开
  • 1. 广西大学动物科技学院, 南宁 530005;
    2. 广西农垦金光乳业有限公司, 南宁 530001;
    3. 广西畜牧研究所, 南宁 530002
周波(1989-),男,贵州六盘水人,硕士研究生,研究方向为反刍动物营养。E-mail:959413675@qq.com

收稿日期: 2019-02-01

  网络出版日期: 2019-09-17

基金资助

国家自然科学基金项目(31860661);广西科技计划项目(桂科AB16380175)

Comparison of Nutrient Apparent Digestibility of Sugarcane By-Products by Endogenous Indicator Method Combining with Substitution Method

  • ZHOU Bo ,
  • WEI Jiazhou ,
  • MO Ruibo ,
  • WEI Zhijian ,
  • ZHANG Yu ,
  • ZOU Caixia ,
  • HE Renchun
Expand
  • 1. College of Animal Science and Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning 530005, China;
    2. Guangxi Nongken Jinguang Dairy Co., Ltd., Nanning 530001, China;
    3. Guangxi Institute of Animal Science, Nanning 530002, China

Received date: 2019-02-01

  Online published: 2019-09-17

摘要

本试验旨在通过内源指示剂法结合套算法比较甘蔗副产物的养分表观消化率。选取约1周岁、体重350 kg左右的西门塔尔公牛36头,随机分为6组,每组6个重复,每个重复1头。试验1:测定甘蔗尾叶青贮的养分表观消化率,分为试验Ⅰ期和试验Ⅱ期,试验Ⅰ期组1饲喂象草为粗饲料的全混合日粮(TMR),组2饲喂30%(干物质基础)的甘蔗尾叶青贮替换象草的TMR;试验Ⅱ期组1饲喂饲喂30%(干物质基础)的甘蔗尾叶青贮替换象草的TMR,组2饲喂象草为粗饲料的TMR;每期持续14 d,包括9 d的预试期和5 d的试验期,整个试验共计28 d。碱化蔗渣(试验2)和膨化蔗渣(试验3)试验设计同甘蔗尾叶青贮。结果表明:甘蔗尾叶青贮、碱化蔗渣和膨化蔗渣的干物质表观消化率分别为83.18%、59.74%和62.22%,有机物表观消化率分别为74.74%、58.96%和61.56%,总能表观消化率分别为70.98%、59.61%和62.72%,粗蛋白质表观消化率分别为66.93%、12.16%和15.69%,中性洗涤纤维表观消化率分别为47.47%、32.65%和38.28%,酸性洗涤纤维表观消化率分别为33.77%、25.70%和22.04%,可消化粗蛋白质含量分别为5.21%、0.21%和0.33%,消化能分别为12.78、10.14和10.76 MJ/kg。甘蔗尾叶青贮的干物质、有机物、粗蛋白质、中性洗涤纤维、酸性洗涤纤维和总能表观消化率显著高于碱化蔗渣和膨化蔗渣(P<0.05),膨化蔗渣的粗蛋白质和中性洗涤纤维表观消化率显著高于碱化蔗渣(P<0.05),膨化蔗渣的酸性洗涤纤维消化率表观显著低于碱化蔗渣(P<0.05)。综合上述结果,3种甘蔗副产物中以甘蔗尾叶青贮饲用价值最高,膨化蔗渣优于碱化蔗渣。

本文引用格式

周波 , 韦家周 , 莫瑞玻 , 韦志坚 , 张宇 , 邹彩霞 , 何仁春 . 内源指示剂法结合套算法比较甘蔗副产物的养分表观消化率[J]. 动物营养学报, 2019 , 31(9) : 4404 -4410 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2019.09.056

Abstract

This experiment was conducted to compare the nutrient apparent digestibility of sugarcane by-products by endogenous indicator method combining with substitution method. Thirty-six 1-year-old Simmental bulls with body weight of about 350 kg were selected and divided into 6 groups with 6 replicates in each group and 1 cattle in each replicate. Test 1:the experimental design was for determining the nutrient apparent digestibility of sugarcane tops silage, which was divided into test Ⅰ phase and test Ⅱ phase, In the test Ⅰ phase, group 1 was fed a total mixed ration (TMR) which was used elephant grassy as roughage, and group 2 was fed a TMR which used 30% (dry matter basis) sugarcane tops silage instead of elephant grass; in the test Ⅱ phase, group 1 was fed a TMR which used 30% (dry matter basis) sugarcane tops silage instead of elephant grass, and group 2 was fed a TMR which was used elephant grassy as roughage. Each phase lasted for 14 days, including 9 days of pre-test period and 5 days of test period, and the total test period was 28 days. The alkalized sugarcane bagasse (test 2) and steam explosion sugarcane bagasse (test 3) were designed to be the same as the sugarcane tops silage. The results showed that the dry matter apparent digestibility of sugarcane tops silage, alkalized sugarcane bagasse and steam explosion sugarcane bagasse was 83.18%, 59.74% and 62.22%, respectively; the organic matter apparent digestibility was 74.74%, 58.96% and 61.56%, respectively; the gross energy apparent digestibility was 70.98%, 59.61% and 62.72%, respectively; the crude protein apparent digestibility was 66.93%, 12.16% and 15.69%, respectively; the neutral detergent fiber apparent digestibility was 47.47%, 32.65% and 38.28%, respectively; the acid detergent fiber apparent digestibility was 33.77%, 25.70% and 22.04%, respectively; the digestible crude protein content was 5.21%, 0.21% and 0.33%, respectively; and the digestible energy was 12.78, 10.14 and 10.76 MJ/kg, respectively. The apparent digestibility of dry matter, organic matter, crude protein, neutral detergent fiber, acid detergent fiber and gross energy of sugarcane tops silage was significantly higher than that of alkalized sugarcane bagasse and steam explosion sugarcane bagasse (P<0.05), the apparent digestibility of crude protein and neutral detergent fiber of steam explosion sugarcane bagasse was significantly higher than that of alkalized sugarcane bagasse (P<0.05), the apparent digestibility of acid detergent fiber of steam explosion sugarcane bagasse was significantly lower than that of alkalized sugarcane bagasse (P<0.05). Based on the above results, among the 3 kinds of sugarcane by-products, the sugarcane top silages have the highest feeding value, and the steam explosion sugarcane bagasse is better than alkalized sugarcane bagasse.

参考文献

[1] 李冲,吴峰洋,陈宝江,等.套算法与直接法测定家兔饲料表观消化率的对比分析[J].饲料研究,2017(15):18-23,30.
[2] 赵明明,马涛,赵江波,等.花生秧作为肉用绵羊单一粗饲料有效能值的测定与估测[J].动物营养学报,2017,29(11):4162-4170.
[3] AHMADI F,ZAMIRI M J,KHORVASH M,et al.Pre-treatment of sugarcane bagasse with a combination of sodium hydroxide and lime for improving the ruminal degradability:optimization of process parameters using response surface methodology[J].Journal of Applied Animal Research,2016,44(1):287-296.  
[4] DE CASTRO F B,MACHADO P F.Feeding value of steam treated sugar cane bagasse in ruminant rations[J].Livestock Research for Rural Development,1990,2(1):47-49.
[5] 王世琴,张乃锋,邓凯东,等.甘蔗梢对肉羊的饲用价值评定[J].动物营养学报,2018,30(3):1146-1154.
[6] AHEMD M H,BABIKER S A,FADEL ELSEED A E M A,et al.Effect of urea-treatment on nutritive value of sugarcane bagasse[J].ARPN Journal of Science and Technology,2013,3(8):834-838.
[7] FREITAS W R,DE ANDRADE FERREIRA M,SILVA J L,et al.Sugarcane bagasse as only roughage for crossbred lactating cows in semiarid regions[J].Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira,2018,53(3):386-393.  
[8] 董国忠.指示剂法和套算法计算饲料养分消化率公式的推导和应用[J].中国饲料,1996(3):31-32.
[9] RUDOLF A,BAUDEL H,ZACCHI G,et al.Simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of steam-pretreated bagasse using Saccharomyces cerevisiae TMB3400 and Pichia stipitis CBS6054[J].Biotechnology and Bioengineering,2008,99(4):783-790.  
[10] BEZERRA T L,RAGAUSKAS A J.A review of sugarcane bagasse for second-generation bioethanol and biopower production[J].Biofuels,Bioproducts and Biorefining,2016,10(5):634-647.  
[11] CARVALHO A F A,MARCONDES W F,NETO P O,et al.The potential of tailoring the conditions of steam explosion to produce xylo-oligosaccharides from sugarcane bagasse[J].Bioresource Technology,2018,250:221-229.
[12] DE ALMEIDA G A P,DE ANDRADE FERREIRA M,DE LIMA SILVA J,et al.Sugarcane bagasse as exclusive roughage for dairy cows in smallholder livestock system[J].Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences,2018,31(3):379-385.  
[13] 唐振华,周玲,邹彩霞,等.青贮甘蔗尾、青贮玉米秸秆对生长水牛生长性能、消化代谢及血液生化指标的影响[J].中国畜牧兽医,2016,43(1):92-100.
[14] 周雄,周璐丽,王定发,等.日粮中青贮甘蔗尾叶替代不同比例王草对海南黑山羊生长性能、养分表观消化率及血清生化指标的影响[J].中国畜牧兽医,2015,42(6):1443-1448.
[15] SULIMAN A I A,AZZA M M B,EBTEHAG I M.Performance of lambs fed on biologically treated silages[J].International Journal of Chemistry Research,2016,9:151-160.
文章导航

/