应用康奈尔净碳水化合物-蛋白质体系评价粗饲料脂质的营养价值

李真真; 哈斯; 刘庆华; 侯玉芳

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2019.12.053

动物营养学报 >

2019 , Vol. 31 >Issue 12: 5873 - 5880

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2019.12.053

研究简报 Short communications

应用康奈尔净碳水化合物-蛋白质体系评价粗饲料脂质的营养价值

李真真 ,
哈斯 ,
刘庆华 ,
侯玉芳

展开

河南牧业经济学院动物科技学院, 郑州 450046

李真真(1995-),女,河南禹州人,硕士研究生,从事动物营养与饲料学研究。E-mail:1845996492@qq.com

收稿日期: 2019-05-15

网络出版日期: 2019-12-13

基金资助

河南省科技攻关项目（182102110227）；河南省重大科技专项计划项目（161100510200）；河南省动物营养与饲料重点学科培育资助项目

收起

Evaluation of Nutritional Value of Roughage Lipids by Using Cornell Net Carbohydrate-Protein System

LI Zhenzhen ,
HA Si ,
LIU Qinghua ,
HOU Yufang

Expand

College of Animal Science and Technology, Henan University of Animal Husbandry and Economy, Zhengzhou 450046, China

Received date: 2019-05-15

Online published: 2019-12-13

Fold

摘要

为准确评价粗饲料脂质的营养价值，测定玉米秸秆、红薯蔓、花生蔓、大豆秧、西瓜秧等10个样品的粗脂肪（EE）及其脂肪酸含量，应用康奈尔净碳水化合物-蛋白质体系（CNCPS 6.5）剖分脂质组成，评价总脂肪酸（TFA）及EE小肠消化率。结果表明：1）粗饲料EE含量变异范围为8.42~28.04 g/kg DM，TFA含量变异范围为1.84~15.39 g/kg DM，色素含量变异范围为3.47~21.96 g/kg DM，大豆秧的EE和色素以及玉米秸秆的TFA含量分别显著高于其他粗饲料（P<0.05）；2）红薯茎和叶的中链脂肪酸（MCFA）分别占TFA的34.40%和18.00%，显著高于其他粗饲料（P<0.05），其他粗饲料的长链脂肪酸（LCFA）占TFA的94.68%~100.00%，差异不显著（P>0.05）；3）玉米茎亚油酸（LA）含量显著高于玉米叶（P<0.05），但红薯茎、叶之间无显著差异（P>0.05）；红薯叶和玉米叶中亚麻酸含量均较茎高；4）粗饲料TFA和EE小肠消化率变异范围分别为76.85%~85.15%和13.92%~59.64%，玉米秸秆EE和红薯茎TFA小肠消化率分别显著高于其他粗饲料（P<0.05）。结果提示，粗饲料脂质的色素含量高，脂肪酸含量低，导致EE小肠消化率低。

关键词： 粗饲料; 脂质; 脂肪酸; 色素; 反刍动物; 小肠消化率

本文引用格式

李真真 , 哈斯 , 刘庆华 , 侯玉芳 . 应用康奈尔净碳水化合物-蛋白质体系评价粗饲料脂质的营养价值[J]. 动物营养学报, 2019 , 31(12) : 5873 -5880 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2019.12.053

Abstract

The objective of this study was to systematically evaluate the nutritional value of roughage lipids. The ether extract (EE) and fatty acid contents of 10 samples including corn straw, sweet potato vine, peanut vine, soybean seedling and watermelon seedling were determined. The Cornell net carbohydrate-protein system (CNCPS 6.5) was applied to dissect lipid composition, and evaluate the intestinal digestibility of total fatty acid (TFA) and EE. The results showed as follows:1) the range of variation of roughage EE contents were 8.42 to 28.04 g/kg DM, the range of variation of TFA contents were 1.84 to 15.39 g/kg DM, and the range of variation of pigment contents were 3.47 to 21.96 g/kg DM; EE and pigment contents of soybean seedling and TFA content of corn straw were significantly higher than those of other roughages, respectively (P<0.05). 2) The medium chain fatty acids (MCFA) of sweet potato stems and sweet potato leaf accounted for 34.40% and 18.00% of TFA, respectively. It was significantly higher than that of other roughages (P<0.05). The long chain fatty acids (LCFA) of other roughages accounted for 94.68% to 100.00% of TFA, but there were no significant difference (P>0.05). 3) Linoleic acid (LA) content of corn stems was significantly higher than that of corn leaves (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference between sweet potato stems and leaves (P>0.05). Linolenic acid contents of leaves of sweet potato and corn were higher than those of stems. 4) The range of variation of small intestine digestibility of roughage TFA and EE were 76.85% to 85.15% and 13.92% to 59.64%, respectively. The small intestine digestibility of corn stalk EE and sweet potato stalk TFA were significantly higher than those of other roughages (P<0.05). The results show that the pigment content of roughage lipid is high and the fatty acid content is low, resulting in low intestinal digestibility of EE.

Key words： roughage; lipid; fatty acid; pigment; ruminant; digestibility of small intestine

参考文献

[1] 李秋凤,许蕾蕾,李建国,等.亚麻籽对育肥牛肉品质及脂肪酸的影响[J].草业学报,2013,22(5):272-279.
[2] 卜登攀,王家启,DHIMAN T R,等.植物油来源亚油酸和亚麻酸对乳脂CLA合成的影响[J].畜牧兽医学报,2007,38(7):663-671.
[3] 王建军,王恬.中链脂肪酸的生物学特性及其在动物生产中的应用[J].动物营养学报,2011,23(7):1073-1078.
[4] NRC.Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle[S].7th ed.Washington,D.C.:National Academy Press,2001.
[5] NRC.Nutrient requirements of beef cattle[S].8th ed.Washington,D.C.:National Academy Press,2016.
[6] SNIFFEN C J,O'CONNOR J D,VAN SOEST P J,et al.A net carbohydrate and protein system for evaluating cattle diets:Ⅱ.Carbohydrate and protein availability[J].Journal of Animal Science,1992,70(11):3562-3577.

[7] BOSTON R C,FOX D G,SNIFFEN C J,et al.The conversion of a scientific model describing dairy cow nutrition and production to an industry tool:the CPM dairy project[M]//MCNAMARA J,FRANCE J,BEEVER D.Modelling nutrient utilization in farm animals.Oxford:CABI Publishing,2000:361-377.
[8] VAN AMBURGH M E,COLLAO-SAENZ E A,HIGGS R J,et al.The cornell net carbohydrate and protein system:updates to the model and evaluation of version 6.5[J].Journal of Dairy Science,2015,98(9):6361-6380.

[9] MOATE P J,CHALUPA W,JENKINS T C,et al.A model to describe ruminal metabolism and intestinal absorption of long chain fatty acids[J].Animal Feed Science and Technology,2004,112(1/2/3/4):79-105.
[10] 杨春英,刘学铭,陈智毅.15种食用植物油脂肪酸的气相色谱-质谱分析[J].食品科学,2013,34(6):211-214.
[11] 冯德庆,黄勤楼,李春燕,等.28种牧草的脂肪酸组成分析研究[J].草业学报,2011,20(6):214-218.
[12] 张晓庆,张英俊,闫伟红,等.克氏针茅草原七种植物脂肪酸组分及其变化[J].中国草地学报,2013,35(1):116-120.
[13] 那亚,孙启忠,王红梅.呼伦贝尔草甸草原牧草青贮饲料脂肪酸成分研究[J].草业学报,2017,26(2):215-223.
[14] 中国饲料数据库.中国饲料成分及营养价值表(2017年第28版)(续)[J].中国饲料,2017(22):31-36.
[15] 崔卫东,董朝霞,张建国,等.不同收割时间对甜玉米秸秆的营养价值和青贮发酵品质的影响[J].草业学报,2011,20(6):208-213.
[16] 张亚龙.收获期对寒地青贮玉米营养价值的影响[J].玉米科学,2007,15(4):123-124,132.
[17] 李志强,刘凤珍,卢鹏,等.几种重要饲草的脂肪酸成分分析[J].中国奶牛,2006(10):3-6.
[18] 李凯,周宁,李郝宇,等.共轭亚油酸生理功能研究进展[J].食品研究与开发,2012,33(7):226-228.
[19] 田玉霞,苗榕宸,杨丹白,等.共轭亚油酸甘油酯的研究进展[J].中国油脂,2015,40(6):32-35.
[20] 成亮,刘成国,刘婷婷,等.共轭亚油酸的生理功能及提高其在乳制品中含量的途径[J].食品与机械,2010,26(3):170-173.
[21] GRIINARI J M,CORL B A,LACY S H,et al.Conjugated linoleic acid is synthesized endogenously in lactating dairy cows by △⁹-desaturase[J].The Journal of Nutrition,2000,130(9):2285-2291.

[22] 魏宏阳,王加启.牛乳脂共轭亚油酸含量调控研究进展[J].中国饲料,2003(7):12-13,17.

Options

文章导航

摘要

本文引用格式

Abstract

参考文献

关于本刊

在线期刊

作者中心

相关单位

联系我们

模态框（Modal）标题

摘要

本文引用格式

Abstract

参考文献

关于本刊

在线期刊

作者中心

相关单位

联系我们