复合益生菌制剂对舍饲山羊育肥性能和血清生化指标的影响

彭涛; 郭贝贝; 张水印; 游金明; 张彩英; 陈蓉蓉; 宋小珍

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2020.01.051

动物营养学报 >

2020 , Vol. 32 >Issue 1: 440 - 446

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2020.01.051

研究简报 SHORT COMMUNICATION

复合益生菌制剂对舍饲山羊育肥性能和血清生化指标的影响

彭涛 ,
郭贝贝 ,
张水印 ,
游金明 ,
张彩英 ,
陈蓉蓉 ,
宋小珍

展开

1. 江西农业大学动物科技学院, 南昌 330045;
2. 江西科技师范大学生命科学学院, 南昌 330013;
3. 江西农业大学理学院, 南昌 330045

彭涛(1996-),男,江西鹰潭人,硕士研究生,研究方向为反刍动物营养与饲料科学。E-mail:ptisasb2333@163.com

收稿日期: 2019-06-27

网络出版日期: 2020-01-19

基金资助

江西省科技支撑重大项目（20161ACF60006）

收起

Effects of Complex-Probiotic-Preparation on Fattening Performance and Serum Biochemical Indexes of Captive Goats

PENG Tao ,
GUO Beibei ,
ZHANG Shuiyin ,
YOU Jinming ,
ZHANG Caiying ,
CHEN Rongrong ,
SONG Xiaozhen

Expand

1. College of Animal Science and Technology, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang 330045, China;
2. College of Life Sciences, Jiangxi Science and Technology Normal University, Nanchang 330013, China;
3. Institute of Science, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang 330045, China

Received date: 2019-06-27

Online published: 2020-01-19

Supported by

Fold

摘要

本试验旨在研究饲粮中添加不同水平的复合益生菌制剂对舍饲山羊育肥性能和血清生化指标的影响。选取80只年龄和体重相近的健康努比亚母山羊，随机分为5组，每组4个重复，每个重复4只羊。各组在基础饲粮中分别添加0（对照组）、0.1%、0.2%、0.4%和0.8%的复合益生菌制剂（由植物乳杆菌、酵母菌组成，两者活菌数分别为2.0×10⁶、1.0×10⁶ CFU/mL）。预试期7 d，正试期60 d。结果显示：与对照组比较，0.2%、0.4%和0.8%益生菌组的平均日增重分别提高了20.00%、22.46%和15.79%（P>0.05），料重比分别降低了17.65%、20.68%和15.36%（P>0.05）；0.2%、0.4%和0.8%益生菌组的血清总蛋白和球蛋白含量均显著提高（P<0.05）；0.4%益生菌组的血清总抗氧化能力、总超氧化物歧化酶活性显著提高（P<0.05），丙二醛含量显著降低（P<0.05）；0.4%益生菌组的血清免疫球蛋白G、免疫球蛋白A和免疫球蛋白M含量显著提高（P<0.05）。以上结果表明，在饲粮中添加0.4%的复合益生菌制剂可提高舍饲山羊的血清免疫球蛋白含量，改善其抗氧化功能，并具有提高其育肥性能的趋势。

关键词： 复合益生菌制剂; 舍饲山羊; 育肥性能; 血清生化指标; 血清抗氧化指标; 免疫球蛋白

本文引用格式

彭涛 , 郭贝贝 , 张水印 , 游金明 , 张彩英 , 陈蓉蓉 , 宋小珍 . 复合益生菌制剂对舍饲山羊育肥性能和血清生化指标的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2020 , 32(1) : 440 -446 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2020.01.051

Abstract

This experiment was conducted to investigate the effects of complex-probiotic-preparation on fattening performance and serum biochemical indexes of captive goats. Eighty healthy Nubian female goats of similar age and body weight were selected and randomly divided into 5 groups with 4 replicates in each group and 4 goats in each replicate. Goats in 5 groups were fed basal diets supplemented with 0 (control group), 0.1%, 0.2%, 0.4% and 0.8% complex-probiotic-preparation (it was composed of Lactobacillus plantarum and yeast, and the viable numbers of them were 2.0×10⁶ and 1.0×10⁶ CFU/mL, respectively), respectively. The pre-feeding period of 7 days and the trial period was 60 days. The results showed as follows:compared with the control group, the average daily gain (ADG) in 0.2%, 0.4% and 0.8% probiotics groups were increased by 20.00%, 22.46% and 15.79% (P>0.05), respectively, and the feed/gain was decreased by 17.65%, 20.68% and 15.36% (P>0.05), respectively; the contents of serum total protein and globulin in 0.2%, 0.4% and 0.8% probiotics groups were significantly increased (P<0.05); and also, in the 0.4% probiotics group, the serum total antioxidant capacity and total superoxide dismutase activity were significantly increased (P<0.05), and the serum malondialdehyde (MDA) content was significantly decreased (P<0.05); in addition, the contents of serum immunoglobulin G (IgG), immunoglobulin A (IgA) and immunoglobulin M (IgM) in 0.4% probiotic group were significantly increased (P<0.05). The results indicate that adding 0.4% complex-probiotic-preparation to the diet can increase the contents of serum immunoglobulins, improve the antioxidative function, and has the trend of improving the fattening performance of captive goats.

Key words： complex-probiotic-preparation; captive goats; fattening performance; serum biochemical indexes; serum antioxidant indexes; immunoglobulin

参考文献

[1] 张坤,周全州,王宏伟.动物微生态制剂的研究进展[J].中国饲料添加剂,2014(4):4-7.
[2] 秦康乐,赵振华,王杏龙.复合益生菌对肉仔鸡生长性能和肠道形态的影响[J].当代畜牧,2017(18):26-28.
[3] 刘凤美,张磊,黄彬.日粮添加益生菌对肉鸡生产性能、免疫功能和肠道菌群的影响[J].中国饲料,2018(24):39-43.
[4] 曾秀玲,熊力,华莹,等.复合益生菌对早期断奶仔猪生长性能和体液免疫水平的影响研究[J].畜牧与饲料科学,2019,40(2):20-24.
[5] 宋献艺,刘洋,周胜花.复合益生菌制剂对断奶仔猪生长性能、腹泻率和营养物质消化率的影响[J].饲料工业,2018,39(15):27-31.
[6] TITI H H,DMOUR R O,ABDULLAH A Y.Growth performance and carcass characteristics of Awassi lambs and Shami goat kids fed yeast culture in their finishing diet[J].Animal Feed Science and Technology,2008,142(1/2):33-43.
[7] HADDAD S G,GOUSSOUS S N.Effect of yeast culture supplementation on nutrient intake,digestibility and growth performance of Awassi lambs[J].Animal Feed Science and Technology,2005,118(3/4):343-348.
[8] 杨华,张韩杰,吴信明,等.微生态制剂对肉羊生长性能和免疫功能的影响[J].家畜生态学报,2015,36(10):27-32.
[9] 尚含乐,郭贝贝,彭涛,等.饲粮中添加益生菌制剂对舍饲山羊生长性能及血清生化指标的影响[J].动物营养学报,2019,31(2):699-704.
[10] 王金合,邓代君,王居强.微生态饲料添加剂对肉牛增重的影响[J].安徽农业科学,2009,37(11):5001-5002.
[11] 李春艳,孙小明.利用富生源微生态活性补充料饲喂育肥肉牛的对比试验[J].畜牧与饲料科学,2007,28(3):4.
[12] 肖怡.三种益生菌对肉羊甲烷排放、物质代谢和瘤胃发酵的影响[D].硕士学位论文.塔里木:塔里木大学,2016.
[13] 董佳琦,金三俊,汪晶晶,等.复合益生菌发酵液对哺乳母猪生产性能、血清生化及免疫指标的影响[J].动物营养学报,2018,30(1):343-349.
[14] 谢文惠,姜宁,张爱忠.复合益生菌制剂对肉鸡生长性能、屠宰性能和免疫指标的影响[J].动物营养学报,2018,30(1):360-367.
[15] 柴建民,魏荣贵,刘希峰,等.植物乳杆菌和非淀粉多糖复合酶对断奶仔猪生长性能、粪便微生物菌群及血清指标的影响[J].动物营养学报,2016,28(6):1859-1866.
[16] 郭欣怡,张曼,韩飞,等.不同益生菌制剂对肉鸡生产性能、免疫功能和肠道菌群的影响[J].家畜生态学报,2016,37(11):79-83.
[17] 王兴勇,王伟伟.复合益生菌对双A肉鸡免疫功能调节及机理研究[J].吉林畜牧兽医,2019(09):78-80.
[18] 范利霞.复合微生态制剂的研制及其对反刍动物免疫机能的影响[D].硕士学位论文.呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2010.
[19] JIN L H,BAHN J H,EUM W S,et al.Transduction of human catalase mediated by an HIV-1 TAT protein basic domain and arginine-rich peptides into mammalian cells[J].Free Radical Biology and Medicine,2001,31(11):1509-1519.

[20] LANDIS G N,TOWER J.Superoxide dismutase evolution and life span regulation[J].Mechanisms of Ageing and Development,2005,126(3):365-379.

[21] 徐俊杰,佘宁.添加饲用益生菌对初生仔猪生长、抗氧化性能及免疫功能的影响[J].四川畜牧兽医,2018,45(12):22-24.
[22] 梁金逢,文信旺,周晓情,等.TMR日粮添加寡糖和复合益生菌对育成牛生长性能、免疫功能及抗氧化功能的影响[J].饲料工业,2019,40(15):41-44.

Options

文章导航

摘要

本文引用格式

Abstract

参考文献

关于本刊

在线期刊

作者中心

相关单位

联系我们

模态框（Modal）标题

摘要

本文引用格式

Abstract

参考文献

关于本刊

在线期刊

作者中心

相关单位

联系我们