反刍与草食动物营养与饲料 RUMINANT AND HERBIVORE NUTRITION AND FEED

饲喂方式对德州驴生长性能、营养物质消化率和盲肠微生物多样性的影响

  • 刘桂芹 ,
  • 格尔乐其木格 ,
  • 张心壮 ,
  • 邢敬亚 ,
  • 曲洪磊 ,
  • 王涛 ,
  • 苏少锋 ,
  • 刘明丽 ,
  • 赵一萍 ,
  • 芒来
展开
  • 1. 内蒙古农业大学动物科学学院, 马属动物研究中心, 内蒙古自治区马属动物遗传育种与繁殖重点实验室, 农业农村部马属动物遗传育种与繁殖科学观测实验站, 呼和浩特 010018;
    2. 聊城大学农学院, 山东省黑毛驴高效繁育与生态饲养工程技术研究中心, 山东省驴产业科技协同创新中心, 聊城 252059;
    3. 国家胶类中药工程技术研究中心, 东阿阿胶股份有限公司, 东阿 252201
刘桂芹(1975-),女,山东聊城人,副教授,博士研究生,研究方向为动物科学。E-mail:guiqinliu@lcu.edu.cn

收稿日期: 2019-07-31

  网络出版日期: 2020-02-21

基金资助

山东省现代农业产业技术体系驴产业创新团队项目资助(SDAIT-27);山东省高等学校科技计划项目(J16LF10)

Effects of Feeding Mode on Growth Performance, Nutrient Digestibility and Cecal Microbial Diversity of Dezhou Donkeys

  • LIU Guiqin ,
  • Gerelchimeg ,
  • ZHANG Xinzhuang ,
  • XING Jingya ,
  • QU Honglei ,
  • WANG Tao ,
  • SU Shaofeng ,
  • LIU Mingli ,
  • ZHAO Yiping ,
  • Manglai
Expand
  • 1. Equine Research Center, Inner Mongolia Key Laboratory of Equine Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Scientific Observing and Experimental Station of Equine Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, College of Animal Science, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010018, China;
    2. Shandong Engineering Technology Research Center for Efficient Breeding and Ecological Feeding of Black Donkey, Shandong Donkey Industry Technology Collaborative Innovation Center, Agricultural College, Liaocheng University, Liaocheng 252059, China;
    3. National Engineering Research Center for Gelatin-Based Traditional Chinese Medicine, Dong-E-E-Jiao Co., Ltd., Donge 252201, China

Received date: 2019-07-31

  Online published: 2020-02-21

摘要

本试验旨在研究饲喂方式对德州驴生长性能、营养物质消化率和盲肠微生物多样性的影响。选择体重[(215±10)kg]相近、2周岁左右的健康德州公驴15头,随机分为C1组(饲喂方式为先粗后精)、C2组(饲喂方式为先精后粗)、C3组[饲喂方式为全混合日粮(TMR)],每组5头,预试期7 d,正试期75 d。结果显示:1)C2组平均日增重极显著高于C1和C3组(P≤0.01),C1组干物质和酸性洗涤纤维消化率以C1组最高,C3组次之,C2组最低,C1组与C2组间存在显著差异(P≤0.05)。2)饲喂方式对德州驴盲肠微生物组成有一定影响。在门水平上,各组盲肠微生物均以厚壁菌门(Firmicutes)和拟杆菌门(Bacteroidetes)为主(二者占比>75%),其次为螺旋体菌门(Spirochaetes)、变形菌门(Proteobacteria)和纤维杆菌门(Fibrobacteres),且C2组厚壁菌门相对丰度高于C1组和C3组;在属水平上,将401个属中相对丰度低于1%的属聚为其他(占比>75%)后,各组均以其他为优势菌属;随后,C1组以螺旋体科未定义属(unidentified-Spirochaetaceae)和厌氧孤菌属(Anaerovirbrio)为主,C2组以厌氧孤菌属、链球菌属(Streptococcus)和螺旋体科未定义属为主,C3组则以乳酸杆菌属(Lactobacillus)和螺旋体科未定义属为主。3)通过UPGMAA聚类树、主成分分析和物种差异性分析发现,3组德州驴盲肠微生物组成不同,且C2组与其他2组差别较大,C1组和C3组可聚为一类。综上可知,饲喂方式可极显著影响德州驴的平均日增重,显著影响干物质和酸性洗涤纤维消化率,并可改变盲肠微生物组成。

本文引用格式

刘桂芹 , 格尔乐其木格 , 张心壮 , 邢敬亚 , 曲洪磊 , 王涛 , 苏少锋 , 刘明丽 , 赵一萍 , 芒来 . 饲喂方式对德州驴生长性能、营养物质消化率和盲肠微生物多样性的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2020 , 32(2) : 706 -714 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2020.02.026

Abstract

This experiment was conducted to study the effects of feeding mode on the growth performance, nutrient digestibility and cecal microbial diversity of Dezhou donkeys. Fifteen healthy male Dezhou donkeys about the age of 2 years with similar body weight[(215±10) kg] were randomly divided into three groups, which were group C1 (fed concentrate after roughage), group C2 (fed roughage after concentrate) and group C3[fed total mixed ration (TMR)]. Each group had 5 donkeys. The adaptation period lasted for 7 days and the formal period lasted for 75 days. The results showed as follows:1) the average daily gain of group C2 was significantly higher than that of groups C1 and C3 (P ≤ 0.01). The digestibility of dry matter and acid detergent fiber of group C1 was the highest, the group C3 was the second, the group C2 was the lowest, and there was a significant difference between groups C1 and C2 (P ≤ 0.05). 2) Feeding mode had some influences on the composition of cecal microbes of Dezhou donkeys. At the level of phylum, Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes (accounting for more than 75%) were dominant in cecal microbes of each group, followed by Spirochaetes, Proteobacteria, Fibrobacteres. The relative abundance of Firmicutes of group C2 was higher than that of groups C1 and C3. At the level of genus, after clustered the genus which had lower abundance than 1% into other (accounting for more than 75%) during the 401 genera, the other was dominant genus in each group. Subsequently, followed by unidentified-Spirochaetaceae and Anaerovirbrio in group C1, Anaerovirbrio and Streptococcu in group C2, and Lactobacillus and unidentified-Spirochaetaceae in group C3. 3) Through UPGMAA clustering tree, principal component analysis and species difference analysis, it was found that the cecal microbial composition of three groups of Dezhou donkeys was different, and C2 group was obviously different from the other two groups, while groups C1 and C3 could be grouped together. In conclusion, the feeding mode has significant effects on the average daily gain and the digestibility of dry and acid detergent fiber. Also, the feeding mode can change the cecal microbial composition of Dezhou donkeys.

参考文献

[1] 魏子翔,陈远庆,曲洪磊,等.驴营养需要综述[J].聊城大学学报(自然科学版),2018,31(3):106-110.
[2] 张石蕊,易学武,贺喜,等.不同精粗比全混合日粮饲养技术对南方奶牛采食行为、产奶性能和血清游离氨基酸的影响[J].草业学报,2008,17(3):23-30.
[3] 张峰,吴占军,张新同,等.泌乳后期奶牛干物质及部分营养需要研究[J].天津农业科学,2011,17(2):54-56,63.
[4] 张石蕊,易学武,肖兵南,等.不同饲喂方式对南方奶牛产奶性能、养分消化和代谢的影响[J].家畜生态学报,2008,29(2):51-57.
[5] MOELLER A H,SUZUKI T A,PHIFER-RIXEY M,et al.Transmission modes of the mammalian gut microbiota[J].Science,2018,362(6413):453-457
[6] ERICSSO A C,JOHNSON P J,LOPES M A,et al.A microbiological map of the healthy equine gastrointestinal tract[J].PLoS One,2016,11(11):e0166523,doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0166523.
[7] 赵文静,刘书云,丁金梅,等.小鼠不同肠道段内容物和粪便中微生物的宏基因组测序和比较分析[J].上海交通大学学报(农业科学版),2016,34(3):15-21.
[8] 胡平.不同形态玉米日粮及日龄对鹅肠道微生物区系的影响[D].硕士学位论文.扬州:扬州大学,2010:10-24
[9] 高凤.奶牛肠道微生物群落结构与多样性研究[D].硕士学位论文.邯郸:河北工程大学,2017:23-48.
[10] 范忠原.家养水貂肠道微生物多样性分析[D].硕士学位论文.长春:中国农业科学院,2015:21-30.
[11] ZARRINPAR A,CHAIX A,YOOSEPH S,et al.Diet and feeding pattern affect the diurnal dynamics of the gut microbiome[J].Cell Metabolism,2014,20(6):1006-1017.  
[12] BERENDS H,VAN DEN BORNE J J G C,MOLLENHORST H,et al.Utilization of roughages and concentrates relative to that of milk replacer increases strongly with age in veal calves[J].Journal of Dairy Science,2014,97(10):6475-6484.  
[13] 鲍坤,王凯英,王晓旭,等.不同饲喂方式对梅花鹿生长性能、营养物质消化率及血液生化指标的影响[J].特产研究,2015(3):1-5.
[14] KOLVER E S,MULLER L D.Performance and nutrient intake of high producing Holstein cows consuming pasture or a total mixed ration[J].Journal of Dairy Science,1998,81(5):1403-1411.  
[15] BARGO F,MULLER L D,DELAHOY J E,et al.Performance of high producing dairy cows with three different feeding systems combining pasture and total mixed rations[J].Journal of Dairy Science,2002,85(11):2948-2963.  
[16] 王凯英.不同精粗比全混合日粮(TMR)对梅花鹿消化代谢及生产性能的影响[D].硕士学位论文.北京:中国农业科学院,2008.
[17] 卢玉飞,周凌云,赵圣国,等.近10年瘤胃微生物分离培养研究进展[J].中国微生态学杂志,2012,24(9):856-861.
[18] LIU X F,FAN H L,DING X B,et al.Analysis of the gut microbiota by high-throughput sequencing of the V5-V6 regions of the 16s rRNA gene in donkey[J].Current Microbiology,2014,68(5):657-662.  
[19] 陈根元,周小玲,蒋慧,等.不同年龄驴的后消化道中挥发性脂肪酸含量和组成的分析初探[J].塔里木大学学报,2012,24(4):7-16.
[20] DIBAISE J K,ZHANG H,CROWELL M D,et al.Gut microbiota and its possible relationship with obesity[J].Mayo Clinic Proceedings,2008,83(4):460-469.  
[21] 刘静,曹山川,陈冠希,等.饲喂频率对生长猪饲粮养分消化率的影响[J].中国畜牧杂志,2018,54(2):99-103.
[22] STANLEY D,DENMAN S E,HUGHES R J,et al.Intestinal microbiota associated with differential feed conversion efficiency in chickens[J].Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology,2012,96(5):1361-1369.  
[23] MCCORMACK U M,CURIÃO T,BUZOIANU S G,et al.Exploring a possible link between the intestinal microbiota and feed efficiency in pigs[J].Applied and Environmental Microbiology,2017,83(15):e00380-17.
[24] MYER P R,WELLS J E,SMITH T P L,et al.Microbial community profiles of the colon from steers differing in feed efficiency[J].SpringerPlus,2015,4:454.
[25] KOVATCHEVA-DATCHARY P,NILSSON A,AKRAMI R,et al.Dietary fiber-induced improvement in glucose metabolism is associated with increased abundance of Prevotella[J].Cell Metabolism,2015,22(6):971-982.  
[26] ELLEKILDE M,SELFJORD E,LARSEN C S,et al.Transfer of gut microbiota from lean and obese mice to antibiotic-treated mice[J].Scientific Reports,2014,4:5922.
文章导航

/