动物营养学报 >

2020 , Vol. 32 >Issue 2: 806 - 814

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2020.02.036

反刍与草食动物营养与饲料 RUMINANT AND HERBIVORE NUTRITION AND FEED

安静型和紧张型湖羊行为和生长及屠宰性能指标的比较和关联分析

  • 王嘉盛 ,
  • 于翔 ,
  • 茆建昱 ,
  • 丁洛阳 ,
  • 王梦芝
展开
  • 1. 扬州大学动物科学与技术学院, 扬州 225009;
    2. 西澳大学动物科学系, 佩斯 6009
王嘉盛(1998-),男,江苏常熟人,本科生,动物营养与草业科学专业。E-mail:2568617804@qq.com

收稿日期: 2019-08-27

  网络出版日期: 2020-02-21

基金资助

国家自然科学基金面上项目（31672446）；国家重点研发计划（2018YFD0502100）；江苏省优势学科（PAPD）

收起

Comparison and Correlation Analysis of Behavior and Growth and Slaughter Performance Indexes between Calm and Nervous Hu Sheep

  • WANG Jiasheng ,
  • YU Xiang ,
  • MAO Jianyu ,
  • DING Luoyang ,
  • WANG Mengzhi
Expand
  • 1. College of Animal Science and Technology, Yangzhou 225009, China;
    2. Department of Animal Science, University of Western Australia, Perth 6009, Australia

Received date: 2019-08-27

  Online published: 2020-02-21

Fold

摘要

本研究旨在比较安静型和紧张型湖羊在行为和生长及屠宰性能上的差异，并进行生长及屠宰性能和行为指标的关联分析。试验通过Pen Score法筛选安静型和紧张型各5只湖羊进行试验。结果表明：安静型湖羊的采食时间（3.17 h/d）显著高于紧张型湖羊（2.63 h/d）（P<0.05），但舔毛次数（0.33次/d）却显著低于紧张型湖羊（0.73次/d）（P<0.05）。安静型湖羊的胴体重（21.68 kg）显著高于紧张型湖羊（19.44 kg）（P=0.05），且眼肌面积（21.11 cm2）也显著高于紧张型湖羊（14.63 cm2）（P<0.05）。进一步相关性分析发现，试验羊的采食时长与胴体重、干物质采食量、眼肌面积、平均日增重均存在显著正相关关系（P<0.05）；而料重比与舔毛次数存在显著负相关关系（P<0.05）。综上所述，安静型湖羊较紧张型湖羊具有更好的生长及产肉潜力，而且采食时长和舔毛次数等行为与生长及屠宰性能有一定的关联，可用于进一步探究动物性情与生长及屠宰性能的关联。

关键词： 湖羊; 安静型; 紧张型; 动物行为

本文引用格式

王嘉盛 , 于翔 , 茆建昱 , 丁洛阳 , 王梦芝 . 安静型和紧张型湖羊行为和生长及屠宰性能指标的比较和关联分析[J]. 动物营养学报, 2020 , 32(2) : 806 -814 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2020.02.036

Abstract

In this paper, the differences of behavior and performance were compared between calm and nervous Hu sheep, and the correlation between growth and slaughter performance and behavior was analyzed. Ten Hu sheep with calm and nervous temperament, 5 for each group, were selected using Pen Score method for feeding experiment. The results showed as follows:eating time of the calm sheep (3.17 h/d) was significantly higher than that of nervous sheep (2.63 h/d), but licking hair times (0.33 time/d) was significantly lower than that of nervous sheep (0.73 time/d) (P<0.05). Besides, the carcass weight of calm sheep (21.68 kg) was significantly higher than that of nervous sheep (19.44 kg) (P=0.05) and the area of eye muscle (21.11 cm2) was also significantly higher than that of nervous sheep (14.63 cm2) (P<0.05). By analyzing the correlation between the main growth and slaughter performance and behavior indexes of Hu sheep, positive correlations were detected between eating time and the carcass weight, dry matter intake, eye muscle area and average daily gain (P<0.05); just the reverse, negative correlation was found between the feed to meat ratio and the licking hair times (P<0.05). In summary, calm Hu sheep have better performance and meat producing potential than nervous Hu sheep; moreover, the behavior like feeding time and licking times are related to the performance to a certain extent, which provides some information to deepen the study on the relationship between behavior and performance.

Key words： Hu sheep; calm; nervous; animal behavior

参考文献

[1] MÜLLER R,VON KEYSERLINGK M A G.Consistency of flight speed and its correlation to productivity and to personality in Bos taurus beef cattle[J].Applied Animal Behaviour Science,2006,99(3/4):193-204.
[2] CAFE L M,ROBINSON D L,FERGUSON D M, et al.Cattle temperament:persistence of assessments and associations with productivity,efficiency,carcass and meat quality traits[J].Journal of Animal Science,2011,89(5):1452-1465.  
[3] NJISANE Y Z,MUCHENJE V.Farm to abattoir conditions, animal factors and their subsequent effects on cattle behavioural responses and beef quality-A review[J].Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences,2017,30(6):755-764.
[4] 周占琴,武和平,陈小强,等.布尔山羊的性格行为[J].西北农业学报,2008,17(4):10-13.
[5] BROWN D J,FOGARTY N M,IKER C L,et al.Genetic evaluation of maternal behaviour and temperament in Australian sheep[J].Animal Production Science,2015,56(4):767-774.
[6] 茆建昱,李浩,王梦芝,等.安静型和紧张型湖羊屠宰性能、复胃发育和组织形态结构的比较[J].动物营养学报,2018,30(2):606-612.
[7] 白慧琴,周卫东,姜俊芳,等.湖羊肉用系选育初报[J].浙江畜牧兽医,2010,35(04):1-3.
[8] HAMMOND A C,OLSON T A,CHASE C C,Jr,et al.Heat tolerance in two tropically adapted Bos taurus breeds,Senepol and Romosinuano,compared with Brahman,Angus,and Hereford cattle in Florida[J].Journal of Animal Science,1996,74(2):295-303.  
[9] 侯海良.山羊舍饲的饲养管理[J].吉林畜牧兽医,2017,38(11):69,72.
[10] 刘洁.肉用绵羊饲料代谢能与代谢蛋白质预测模型的研究[D].博士学位论文.北京:中国农业科学院,2012.
[11] 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局,中国国家标准化管理委员会.GB/T 6435-2014饲料中水分的测定[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2015.
[12] 国家市场监督管理总局,国家标准化管理委员会.GB/T 6432-2018饲料中粗蛋白的测定凯氏定氮法[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2018.
[13] 林春健, 冯仰廉.尼龙袋法评定饲料在反刍动物瘤胃内蛋白质降解率[J].北京农业大学学报, 1987, 13(3):375-380.
[14] 国家市场监督管理总局,中国国家标准化管理委员会.GB/T 6436-2018饲料中钙的测定[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2018.
[15] 国家市场监督管理总局,国家标准化管理委员会.GB/T 6437-2018饲料中总磷的测定分光光度法[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2018.
[16] 杜秉全,黄永宏,李拥军,等.海门山羊的行为观察[J].上海农业科技,2012(4):73-74.
[17] 陈新.山羊颈静脉采血技术要点[J].湖北畜牧兽医,2015,36(3):40-42.
[18] 郭真.酶联免疫吸附技术(ELISA)和线性免疫印迹技术(LIA)应用于系统性红斑狼疮患者血清中的抗核抗体(ANA)检测中的诊断价值对比[J].中外女性健康研究,2019(10):181-182.
[19] 赵有璋,王玉琴.现代中国养羊[M].北京:金盾出版社,2005.
[20] 王维春.认识南江黄羊[J].农民科技培训,2004(3):30-11.
[21] 王玉琴,田志龙,施会彬,等.对舍饲母湖羊维持行为的观察研究[J].畜牧与兽医,2018,50(3):48-52.
[22] 程瑞禾,华利文.湖羊采食和反刍行为的观察[J].毛皮动物饲养,1981(1):13-15.
[23] 罗玉柱,赵有璋,王宝山.季节对山羊反刍行为的影响[J].家畜生态,1996(1):15-19.
[24] SQUIRES V.Livestock management in the arid zone[M].Syd-ney and London:Inkata Press Pry,Ltd Melbourne,1981.
[25] 朝鲁孟其其格.混合草颗粒制粒技术及饲用价值评价的研究[D].博士学位论文.呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2010.
[26] 李德允.不同精粗比例日粮对延边半细毛羊的咀嚼与反刍行为的影响[J].延边大学农学学报,2011,33(4):277-280.
[27] 姜怀志,娄玉杰,马宁.辽宁绒山羊舍饲生活规律的研究[J].家畜生态,2000,21(2):28-31.
[28] 毛杨毅,罗惠娣,穆秀梅.舍饲周岁波尔山羊行为习性观察[C]//中国畜牧兽医学会养羊学分会全国养羊生产与学术研讨会议论文集.双流:中国畜牧兽医学会养羊学分会,2005:3.
[29] STAFFORD K.Sheep veterinarians and the welfare of sheep:no simple matter[J].Small Ruminant Research,2014,118(1/2/3):106-109.
[30] 夏欣,胡军勇,倪德斌,等.三个引进品种猪血液生理生化指标分析[J].黑龙江畜牧兽医,2017(12):134-136.
[31] 李小玲,李德炎.五羟色胺影响的行为谱[J].国外医学精神病学分册,1999,26(3):172-175.
[32] 潘桂花,林治光,李华芳,等.抑郁症患者血小板五羟色胺浓度的研究[J].上海精神医学,2005,17(3):145-147,141.
[33] 曹利华,白明,方晓艳,等.基于临床病症特点的抑郁症动物模型分析[J].神经药理学报,2016,6(4):19-23.
[34] NELSON R J,CHIAVEGATTO S.Molecular basis of aggression[J].Trends in Neurosciences,2001,24(12):713-719.  
[35] 姚莉红,成翔,张蕾,等.慢性应激性刺激对大鼠行为的影响——抑郁症模型的建立[J].南通大学学报(医学版),2013,33(1):35-37.
[36] Subcommittee on Dairy Cattle Nutrition.Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle[M].7th ed.Washington,D.C.:National Academies Press,2001.
[37] NKRUMAH J D,CREWS D H,Jr,BASARAB J A,et al.Genetic and phenotypic relationships of feeding behavior and temperament with performance,feed efficiency,ultrasound,and carcass merit of beef cattle[J].Journal of Animal Science,2007,85(10):2382-2390.  
[38] FRANCISCO C L,RESENDE F D,BENATTI J M B,et al.Impacts of temperament on Nellore cattle:physiological responses,feedlot performance,and carcass characteristics[J].Journal of Animal Science,2015,93(11):5419-5429.  
[39] 巴贵,宋天增,张红平,等.扎布耶盐山羊屠宰性能和肉品质研究[J].中国草食动物科学,2017,37(1):15-18.
[40] 王重龙,陶立,张勤,等.B超活体测定猪背膘厚和眼肌面积的研究[J].安徽农业科学,2005,33(3):451-452,495.
[41] 吴霞明.岷县黑裘皮羊产肉性能及肉品质研究[J].畜牧兽医杂志,2019,38(2):20-22,25.
[42] 苏信锋.影响肉猪料肉比的因素[J].中国畜牧兽医文摘,2016,32(6):220.
[43] 高胜锋.肉羊异食行为的原因分析及预防措施[J].现代畜牧科技,2018(8):106.
[44] 赵亦飞.羊异食癖的病因及预防措施[J].中国畜牧兽医文摘,2015,31(5):113.
[45] 王灿军.肉羊异食行为的预防措施[J].畜牧兽医科技信息,2019(1):48.
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉

    联系我们

  • 地址：北京市海淀区圆明园西路2号
    　　　中国农业大学动科动医大楼153室
  • 邮编：100193
  • 电话：010－62817823
  • 网址：http://www.chinajan.com
  • E-mail：cjan@chinajan.com
京公网安备 11010802041926号    京ICP备17050989号-2