动物营养学报 >

2020 , Vol. 32 >Issue 6: 2911 - 2920

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2020.06.052

研究简报 SHORT COMMUNICATION

外源纤维素酶对断奶羔羊瘤胃体外发酵特性的影响

  • 孟芳 ,
  • 刘立山 ,
  • 郎侠 ,
  • 王彩莲 ,
  • 吴建平 ,
  • 周瑞
展开
  • 1. 甘肃省农业科学院畜草与绿色农业研究所, 甘肃省牛羊种质与秸秆饲料化重点实验室, 兰州 730070;
    2. 西北师范大学新农村发展研究院, 兰州 730070;
    3. 西北民族大学生命科学与工程学院, 兰州 730030
孟芳(1990-),女,河北邢台人,硕士研究生,动物营养与饲料科学专业。E-mail:2603142028@qq.com

收稿日期: 2019-11-03

  网络出版日期: 2020-06-16

基金资助

国家自然科学基金地区基金项目（31760683）；动物遗传育种与草食畜生产体系（2017GAAS30）

收起

Effects of Exogenous Cellulose on in Vitro Rumen Fermentation Characteristics of Weaner Lambs

  • MENG Fang ,
  • LIU Lishan ,
  • LANG Xia ,
  • WANG Cailian ,
  • WU Jianping ,
  • ZHOU Rui
Expand
  • 1. Key Laboratory for Sheep, Goat and Cattle Germplasm and Straw Feed in Gansu Province, Institute of Animal and Pasture Science and Green Agricultural, Gansu Academy of Agricultural Science, Lanzhou 730070, China;
    2. Institute of Rural Development of Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou 730070, China;
    3. Life Science and Engineering College of Northwest Minzu University, Lanzhou 730030, China

Received date: 2019-11-03

  Online published: 2020-06-16

Fold

摘要

本试验旨在研究外源纤维素酶对断奶羔羊瘤胃体外发酵参数及消化酶活性的影响。采用单因素完全随机试验设计，在精料中分别添加0（CON组，作为对照）、280 000（T1组）、300 000（T2组）、320 000 U/kg纤维素酶（T3组），按照精粗比为36.45：63.55制成基础饲粮作为发酵底物，分别测定在不同发酵时间（0、1、2、4、8、12、24、48和72 h）的干物质降解率、发酵参数及消化酶活性。结果表明：与CON组相比，T2组干物质降解率、微生物蛋白浓度显著升高（P<0.05），氨氮浓度显著降低（P<0.05），但处理和发酵时间对上述指标无显著互作效应（P>0.05）。随着发酵时间的延长，DMD呈现逐渐升高趋势，NH3-N和MCP浓度变化趋势相反，NH3-N浓度在发酵2、8 h时出现峰值，而MCP浓度在发酵2、8 h时出现谷值。处理和发酵时间对各挥发性脂肪酸浓度及乙丙比均无显著影响（P>0.05），但T2组总挥发性脂肪酸浓度显著高于CON组（P<0.05），处理和发酵时间对上述指标均无显著的互作效应（P>0.05）。T2组α-淀粉酶、纤维素酶活性均显著高于CON组（P<0.05），且处理和发酵时间对α-淀粉酶活性有显著的互作效应（P<0.05）。随着发酵时间的延长，各组α-淀粉酶活性呈现波动变化趋势，在发酵4、12 h出现峰值，在发酵2、8、24 h时出现谷值；蛋白酶活性在发酵前4 h呈逐渐降低趋势，之后呈现波动变化趋势；T3组纤维素酶在发酵4 h低于其他组，T2组在发酵8 h高于其他组，T1组在发酵24 h低于其他组。综上所述，精料中添加300 000 U/kg外源纤维素酶能够提高断奶羔羊饲粮体外DMD，促进体外瘤胃发酵，增强MCP的合成，提高NH3-N的利用率，并能提高纤维素酶、α-淀粉酶活性，但对蛋白酶活性无显著影响。

关键词： 外源纤维素酶; 体外发酵特性; 干物质降解率; 消化酶活性

本文引用格式

孟芳 , 刘立山 , 郎侠 , 王彩莲 , 吴建平 , 周瑞 . 外源纤维素酶对断奶羔羊瘤胃体外发酵特性的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2020 , 32(6) : 2911 -2920 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2020.06.052

Abstract

This study aimed to observe the effects of exogenous cellulose on in vitro rumen fermentation parameters and digestive enzyme activities of weaner lambs. A single-factor experimental design was used in this study. Exogenous cellulose was supplemented in concentrate at the levels of 0 (CON group, as control), 280 000 (T1 group), 300 000 (T2 group) and 320 000 U/kg (T3 group), respectively. According to the forage-concentrate ratio of 36.45:63.55, basal diets were formulated and used as fermentation substrates, and the dry matter degradability (DMD), fermentation parameters and digestive enzyme activities were measured after fermented different time (0, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 48 and 72 h). The results showed as follows: compared with the CON group, the DMD, microprotein (MCP) concentration of T2 group was significantly increased (P<0.05), and the ammonia nitrogen (NH3-N) concentration was significantly decreased (P<0.05), but the treatment and fermentation time had no significant interaction on above indices (P>0.05). With the fermentation time extension, the DMD was gradually increased, the change tendency of NH3-N and MCP concentrations was opposite, NH3-N concentration reached peak values at 2 and 8 h after fermentation, but MCP concentration reached valley values at 2 and 8 h after fermentation. Treatment and fermentation time had no significant effects on each volatile fatty acid (VFA) concentration and acetate/propionate (A/P), but total VFA concentration of T2 group was significantly higher than that of CON group (P<0.05), moreover, the treatment and fermentation time had no significant interaction on above indices (P>0.05). The α-amylase and cellulose activities of T2 group were significantly higher than those of CON group (P<0.05), and the interaction of treatment and fermentation time on α-amylase activity was significant (P<0.05). With the fermentation time extension, the α-amylase activity of each group showed a fluctuation change tendency, it reached peak values at 4 and 12 h and valley values at 2, 8 and 24 h after fermentation. The protease activity was gradually decreased at 0 to 4 h after fermentation, and then it fluctuated. For cellulose activity, T3 group was lower than other groups at 4 h after fermentation, T2 group was higher than other groups at 8 h after fermentation, T1 group was higher than other groups at 24 h after fermentation. In summary, supplementation of 300 000 U/kg exogenous cellulose in the concentrate can improve the in vitro DMD of diet, enhance the synthesis of MCP, increase the utilization of NH3-N, and increase the activities of α-amylase and cellulose, but do not affect the protease activity of weaner lambs.

Key words： exogenous cellulose; in vitro fermentation characteristics; dry matter degradability; digestive enzyme activities

参考文献

[1] ROY B K,CHOWDHURY S A,HUQUE K S,et al.Development of protein concentrate for poultry feeding from unconventional feed resources[J].Indian Journal of Animal Nutrition,2011,16(2):1052-1055.
[2] 杨在宾,刘丽,杜明宏.我国饲料业的发展及饲料资源供求现状浅析[J].饲料工业,2008,29(19):45-49.
[3] 杨永明,卢德勋,卢媛.微生物发酵秸秆饲料的研究现状及展望[J].饲料工业,2002,23(2):14-18.
[4] 饶辉.国内外秸秆类微生物发酵饲料的研究及应用进展[J].安徽农业科学,2009,37(1):159-161,179.
[5] 张文杰,李琦华,柴艳.秸秆处理方法的研究进展[J].中国畜牧兽医,2011,38(7):30-33.
[6] 郭建来,魏红芳.酸性蛋白酶对仔猪生产性能及养分表观消化率的影响[J].饲料博览,2007(3):10-12.
[7] 蒋涛,梁景乐,张成,等.饲用木聚糖酶的应用研究进展[J].安徽农业科学,2008,36(11):4547-4549.
[8] 凌宝明,冯定远,左建军.饲用蛋白酶的研究进展[J].饲料工业,2009,30(22):7-10.
[9] 刘瑞玲.酶制剂及其在奶牛养殖中的应用[J].中国奶牛,2009(3):19-22.
[10] 辛总秀.外源消化酶对羔羊营养物质消化率及生产性能的影响[J].粮食与饲料工业,2012(9):53-55.
[11] 沈水宝,冯定远.外源酶对仔猪消化道发育及消化系统酶活性的影响[C]//酶制剂在饲料工业中的应用.北京:中国畜牧兽医学会,2005.
[12] MENKE K H,STEINGASS H.Estimation of the energetic feed value obtained from chemical analysis and in vitro gas production using rumen fluid[J].Animal Research and Development,1988,28:7-55.
[13] TILLEY J M A,TERRY R A.A two-stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops[J].Grass and Forage Science,2010,18(2):104-111.
[14] 冯宗慈,高民.通过比色测定瘤胃液氨氮含量方法的改进[J].内蒙古畜牧科学,1993(4):37.
[15] ZHOU Z M,MENG Q X,YU Z T.Effects of methanogenic inhibitors on methane production and abundances of methanogens and cellulolytic bacteria in in vitro ruminal cultures[J].Applied and Environmental Microbiology,2011,77(8):2634-2639.  
[16] SON K N,KIM Y K K,LEE S K,et al.The effects of processing methods of corn on in vitro DM digestability and in sacco degradability in rumen[J].Journal of Animal Science & Technology,2003,45(3):433-442.  
[17] HOLDEN L A.Comparison of methods of in vitro dry matter digestibility for ten feeds[J].Journal of Dairy Science,1999,82(8):1791-1794.  
[18] 刘星.复合益生菌制剂对奶牛瘤胃体外发酵特性及生产性能的影响[D].硕士学位论文.哈尔滨:东北农业大学,2012.
[19] GIRALDO L A,RANILLA M J,TEJIDO M L,et al.Influence of exogenous fibrolytic enzymes and fumarate on methane production,microbial growth and fermentation in Rusitec fermenters[J].The British Journal of Nutrition,2007,98(4):753-761.
[20] KUNG L,Jr.,TREACHER R J,NAUMAN G A,et al.The effect of treating forages with fibrolytic enzymes on its nutritive value and lactation performance of dairy cows[J].Journal of Dairy Science,2000,83(1):115-122.  
[21] ARRIOLA K G,OLIVEIRA A S,MA Z X,et al.A Meta-analysis on the effect of dietary application of exogenous fibrolytic enzymes on the performance of dairy cows[J].Journal of Dairy Science,2017,100(6):4513-4527.  
[22] WALLACE R J,WALLACE S J A,MCKAIN N,et al.Influence of supplementary fibrolytic enzymes on the fermentation of corn and grass silages by mixed ruminal microorganisms in vitro[J].Journal of Animal Science,2001,79(7):1905-1916.  
[23] 张苏江,孙俊奇.纤维素酶对棉花秸秆发酵的影响[J].安徽农业科学,2007,35(4):976-977.
[24] MORGAVI D P,BEAUCHEMIN K A,NSEREKO V L,et al.Synergy between ruminal fibrolytic enzymes and enzymes from Trichoderma longibrachiatum[J].Journal of Dairy Science,2000,83(6):1310-1321.  
[25] 冀一伦.实用养牛科学[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2001.
[26] 韩奇鹏,张佩华,罗玲,等.不同来源吸附载体大豆糖蜜对奶牛瘤胃内环境的影响[J].草业科学,2016,33(12):2559-2564.
[27] CHURCH D C.The ruminant animal:digestive physiology and nutrition[M].Englewood Cliffs,New Jersey:Prentice Hall,1988.
[28] 裴华.不同铜源及水平对肉牛瘤胃营养物质代谢的影响[D].硕士学位论文.晋中:山西农业大学,2005.
[29] 张吉鹍.粗饲料分级指数参数的模型化及粗饲料科学搭配的组合效应研究[D].博士学位论文.呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2005.
[30] OWENS F N,BERGEN W G.Nitrogen metabolism of ruminant animals:historical perspective,current understanding and future implications[J].Journal of Animal Science,1983,57 Suppl 2:498-518.
[31] CLARK J H,KLUSMEYER T H,CAMERON M R.Microbial protein synthesis and flows of nitrogen fractions to the duodenum of dairy cows[J].Journal of Dairy Science,1992,75(8):2304-2323.  
[32] 陈宇.外源酶对湖羊瘤胃发酵的影响[D].硕士学位论文.福州:福建农林大学,2016.
[33] 戈婷婷.不同组合的功能性寡糖对锦江黄牛瘤胃体外发酵的影响[D].硕士学位论文.南昌:江西农业大学,2011.
[34] 程延彬.不同种类铜源及水平对奶牛瘤胃发酵及血液生化指标的影响[D].硕士学位论文.大庆:黑龙江八一农垦大学,2010.
[35] PENNER G B,BEAUCHEMIN K A,MUTSVANGWA T.Severity of ruminal acidosis in primiparous holstein cows during the periparturient period[J].Journal of Dairy Science,2007,90(1):365-375.  
[36] 汪水平,王文娟,王加启,等.日粮精粗比对奶牛瘤胃发酵及泌乳性能的影响[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2007,35(6):44-50.
[37] 杨永明,卢德勋,赵秀英.外源纤维复合酶对绵羊瘤胃代谢的影响[J].饲料工业,2008,29(4):14-15.
[38] 王安,汪洋,王宝.利用纤维素复合酶提高玉米青贮和黄贮饲用价值的研究[J].中国畜牧杂志,1999,35(3):39-40.
[39] WANG C J,WANG S P,ZHOU H.Influences of flavomycin,ropadiar,andsaponin on nutrient digestibility,rumen fermentation,and methane emission from sheep[J].Animal Feed Science and Technology,2009,148(2/3/4):157-166.
[40] 王晓亮,付大波,周樱.饲料中添加外源酶对动物内源酶活性影响的研究进展[J].饲料工业,2012,33(6):41-42.
[41] HRISTOV A N,MCALLISTER T A,CHENG K J.Intraruminal supplementation with increasing levels of exogenous polysaccharide-degrading enzymes:effects on nutrient digestion in cattle fed a barley grain diet[J].Journal of Animal Science,2000,78(2):477-487.  
[42] GIRALDO L A,TEJIDO M L,RANILLA M J,et al.Influence of direct-fed fibrolytic enzymes on diet digestibility and ruminal activity in sheep fed a grass hay-based diet[J].Journal of Animal Science,2008,86(7):1617-1623.  
[43] 奚刚,许梓荣,钱利纯,等.添加外源性酶对猪、鸡内源消化酶活性的影响[J].中国兽医学报,1999,19(3):286-289.
[44] FENG P,HUNT C W,PRITCHARD G T,et al.Effect of enzyme preparations on in situ and in vitro degradation and in vivo digestive characteristics of mature cool-season grass forage in beef steers[J].Journal of Animal Science,1996,74(6):1349-1357.  
[45] RUSSELL J B,WILSON D B.Why are ruminal cellulolytic bacteria unable to digest cellulose at low pH?[J].Journal of Dairy Science,1996,79(8):1503-1509.  
[46] 宋桂经.微生物酶饲料添加剂与加酶饲料和酶化饲料[J].中国饲料,1996(9):17-19.
[47] 蒋正宇,周岩民,王恬.外源α-淀粉酶对21日龄肉鸡消化器官发育、肠道内源酶活性的影响[J].畜牧兽医学报,2007,38(1):12-15.
[48] SCHNEEMAN B O,LYMAN R L.Factors involved in the intestinal feedback regulation of pancreatic enzyme secretion in the rat[J].Experimental Biology and Medicine,1975,148(3):897-903.  
[49] MORAN E T,Jr.Starch digestion in fowl[J].Poultry Science,1982,61(7):1257-1267.  
[50] SOUSA D O,OLIVEIRA C A,VELASQUEZ A V,et al.Live yeast supplementation improves rumen fibre degradation in cattle grazing tropical pastures throughout the year[J].Animal Feed Science and Technology,2018,236:149-158.
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉

    联系我们

  • 地址：北京市海淀区圆明园西路2号
    　　　中国农业大学动科动医大楼153室
  • 邮编：100193
  • 电话：010－62817823
  • 网址：http://www.chinajan.com
  • E-mail：cjan@chinajan.com
京公网安备 11010802041926号    京ICP备17050989号-2