动物营养学报 >

2020 , Vol. 32 >Issue 7: 3282 - 3290

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2020.07.038

反刍与草食动物营养与饲料 RUMINANT AND HERBIVORE NUTRITION AND FEED

青贮时间对再生稻头季全株青贮品质和体外瘤胃发酵特性的影响

  • 邹诗雨 ,
  • 陈东 ,
  • 唐启源 ,
  • 陈元伟 ,
  • 邓攀 ,
  • 黄胥莱 ,
  • 李付强
展开
  • 1. 湖南农业大学, 长沙 410128;
    2. 湖南舜天恒禾农业科技发展有限公司, 宁远 425600;
    3. 湖南天华实业有限公司, 娄底 417000
邹诗雨(2000-),女,湖南长沙人,本科生,动物科学专业。E-mail:zoushiyu0227@outlook.com

收稿日期: 2020-02-12

  网络出版日期: 2020-07-15

基金资助

国家水稻产业技术体系（CARS-01）；湖南省草食动物产业技术体系；国家肉牛牦牛产业技术体系（CARS-37）

收起

Effects of Silage Time on Quality and in Vitro Rumen Fermentation Characteristics of First Season Ratoon Rice Whole Silage

  • ZOU Shiyu ,
  • CHEN Dong ,
  • TANG Qiyuan ,
  • CHEN Yuanwei ,
  • DENG Pan ,
  • HUANG Xulai ,
  • LI Fuqiang
Expand
  • 1. Hunan Agriculture University, Changsha 410128, China;
    2. Hunan Shuntian Henghe Agricultural Science and Technology Development Co., Ltd., Ningyuan 425600, China;
    3. Hunan Tianhua Industrial Co., Ltd., Loudi 417000, China

Received date: 2020-02-12

  Online published: 2020-07-15

Fold

摘要

本试验旨在探究青贮时间对再生稻头季全株青贮品质和体外瘤胃发酵特性的影响。以再生稻头季全株为青贮原料，对不同青贮时间（45、53和60 d，分别记为S45组、S53组和S60组）开包取样，分析其青贮品质和体外瘤胃发酵特性。结果表明：1）青贮结束后，S53组的干物质含量显著高于S60组（P<0.05），S53组和S60组的粗蛋白质含量显著高于S45组（P<0.05），S53组和S60组的中性洗涤纤维和酸性洗涤纤维含量显著低于S45组P<0.05），S53组和S60组的相对饲用价值显著高于S45组（P<0.05），S45组的丙酸含量显著高于S53组和S60组（P<0.05）。各组之间pH、氨态氮/总氮及乙酸、丁酸、异戊酸、正戊酸含量无显著差异（P>0.05）。2）体外发酵24 h后，S60组的24 h累积产气量和慢速降解部分的产气速率显著高于S45组和S53组（P<0.05），S60组的pH显著低于S45组和S53组（P<0.05），S60组的乙酸、丙酸、丁酸、异戊酸、总挥发性脂肪酸和氨态氮含量显著高于S45组和S53组（P<0.05），S60组的干物质、有机物和粗蛋白质降解率显著高于S45组和S53组（P<0.05）。由此可见，延长青贮时间可以改善再生稻头季全株青贮的品质以及体外瘤胃发酵特性，在生产实际中，建议青贮时间延长至60 d以上再饲用，营养价值更佳。

关键词： 再生稻头季; 青贮时间; 青贮品质; 体外瘤胃发酵特性

本文引用格式

邹诗雨 , 陈东 , 唐启源 , 陈元伟 , 邓攀 , 黄胥莱 , 李付强 . 青贮时间对再生稻头季全株青贮品质和体外瘤胃发酵特性的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2020 , 32(7) : 3282 -3290 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2020.07.038

Abstract

This experiment was conducted to investigate effects of silage time on quality and in vitro rumen fermentation characteristics of first season ratoon rice whole silage. First season whole ratoon rice as silage raw materials, which were sampled at different silage time (45, 53 and 60 days, which were recorded as S45, S53 and S60 groups), and analyzed the silage quality and in vitro rumen fermentation characteristics. The results showed as follows:1) after silage, the dry matter content of S53 group was significantly higher than that of S60 group (P<0.05), the crude protein content of S53 and S60 groups was significantly higher than that of S45 group (P<0.05), the contents of neutral detergent fiber and acid detergent fiber of S53 and S60 groups were significantly lower than those of S45 group (P<0.05), the relative feed value of S53 and S60 groups was significantly higher than that of S45 group (P<0.05), and the propionate content of S45 group was significantly higher than that of S53 and S60 groups (P<0.05). There were no significant differences in pH, ammonia nitrogen/total nitrogen and contents of acetate, butyrate, isovalerate and valerate among all groups (P>0.05). 2) After 24 h in vitro fermentation, the 24 h cumulative gas production and gas production rate of slow degradation component of S60 group were significantly higher than those of S45 and S53 groups (P<0.05), the pH of S60 group was significantly lower than that of S45 and S53 groups (P<0.05), the contents of acetate, propionate, butyrate, isovalerate, total volatile fatty acid and ammonia nitrogen of S60 group were significantly higher than those of S45 and S53 groups (P<0.05), and the degradation rates of dry matter, organic matter and crude protein of S60 group were significantly higher than those of S45 and S53 groups (P<0.05). It is concluded that prolonging silage time can improve the quality and in vitro rumen fermentation characteristics of first season ratoon rice whole silage, and it suggests that prolonging silage time to more than 60 days which has better nutrition value in actual production.

Key words： first season ratoon rice; silage time; silage quality; in vitro rumen fermentation characteristics

参考文献

[1] 徐富贤,熊洪,张林,等.再生稻产量形成特点与关键调控技术研究进展[J].中国农业科学,2015,48(9):1702-1717.
[2] 刘佳杰,马兰,周韦,等.不同切碎方式及不同青贮时间对饲用苎麻青贮品质影响[J].江西农业大学学报,2019,41(4):773-780.
[3] 张锦华,许留兴,张俞,等.6种水稻秸秆青贮的适宜性[J].四川农业大学学报,2014,32(2):121-125,147.
[4] 马春晖,夏艳军,韩军,等.不同青贮添加剂对紫花苜蓿青贮品质的影响[J].草业学报,2010,19(1):128-133.
[5] 许能祥,丁成龙,顾洪如,等.稻秸与玉米秸、杂交狼尾草及象草混合青贮的研究[J].中国草地学报,2012,34(2):93-98.
[6] NRC.Nutrient requirements of small ruminants:sheep,goats,cervids,and new world camelids[J].Washington D.C.:The National Academy Press,2007.
[7] 董德宽.饲草的相对饲料值[J].中国奶牛,1990(4):28-29.
[8] MENKE K H,RAAB L,SALEWSLI A,et al.The estimation of the digestibility and metabolizable energy content of ruminant feeding stuffs from the gas production when they are incubated with rumen liquor in vitro[J].The Journal of Agriculture Science,1979,93(1):217-222.  
[9] ØRSKOV E R,MCDONALD I.The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighted according to rate of passage[J].The Journal of Agricultural Science,1979,92(2):499-503.  
[10] ZAHIRODDINI H,BAAH J,MCALLISTER T A.Effects of microbial inoculants on the fermentation,nutrient retention,and aerobic stability of barley silage[J].Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences,2006,19(10):1429-1436.  
[11] HAN K J,COLLINS M,VANZANT E S,et al.Bale density and moisture effects on alfalfa round bale silage[J].Crop Science,2004,44(3):914-919.  
[12] MUETZEL S,HUNT C L,TAVENDALE M H.Brief communication:evaluating rumen fluid from sheep and cattle as inoculum in a newly developed automated in vitro rumen batch culture system[J]. Proceeding of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production,2011,71:240-242.
[13] 王志敬,吴征敏,葛影影,等.发酵时间对凤梨渣青贮品质的影响[J].草业科学,2019,36(6):1668-1673.
[14] 金花,贾玉山,邢旗,等.锡林郭勒天然草地牧草TDN与土壤供氮特性的相关性研究[J].中国草地学报,2008(4):59-63.
[15] 赵雪娇,张立阳,刘帅,等.留茬高度对不同品种全株玉米青贮品质的影响[J].动物营养学报,2018,30(8):3239-3246.
[16] 万学瑞,吴建平,雷赵民,等.优良抑菌活性乳酸菌对玉米青贮及有氧暴露期微生物数量和pH的影响[J].草业学报,2016,25(4):204-211.
[17] WANG F J,NISHINO N.Association of Lactobacillus buchneri with aerobic stability of total mixed ration containing wet brewers grains preserved as a silage[J].Animal Feed Science and Technology,2009,149(3/4):265-274.
[18] DANNER H,HOLZER M,MAYRHUBER E,et al.Acetic acid increases stability of silage under aerobic conditions[J].Applied and Environmental Microbiology,2003,69(1):562-567.  
[19] 刘桂要.玉米秸杆青贮过程中微生物、营养成分及有机酸变化规律的研究[D].硕士学位论文.杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2009.
[20] 王利敏,邢福国,吕聪,等.复合植物精油防霉剂对玉米霉菌及真菌毒素的控制效果[J].核农学报,2018,32(4):732-739.
[21] 张增欣,邵涛.丙酸对多花黑麦草青贮发酵动态变化的影响[J].草业学报,2009,18(2):102-107.
[22] 琚泽亮,赵桂琴,覃方锉,等.青贮时间及添加剂对高寒牧区燕麦-箭筈豌豆混播捆裹青贮发酵品质的影响[J].草业学报,2016,25(6):148-157.
[25] 雒瑞瑞,郭艳丽,韩海珠,等.基于瘤胃模拟技术的马铃薯茎叶混合青贮料体外瘤胃发酵特性研究[J].动物营养学报,2018,30(3):1185-1191.
[24] BLVMMEL M H,MAKKAR H P S,BECKER K.In vitro gas production:a technique revisited[J].Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition,1997,77(1/2/3/4/5):24-34.
[25] ZHANG S J,CHAUDHRY A S,OSMAN A,et al.Associative effects of ensiling mixtures of sweet sorghum and alfalfa on nutritive value,fermentation and methane characteristics[J].Animal Feed Science and Technology,2015,206:29-38.
[26] HRISTOV A N,ROPP J K,HUNT C W.Effect of barley and its amylopectin content on ruminal fermentation and bacterial utilization of ammonia-N in vitro[J].Animal Feed Science and Technology,2002,99(1/2/3/4):25-36.
[27] OWENS F N,BERGEN W G.Nitrogen metabolism of ruminant animals:historical perspective,current understanding and future implications[J].Journal of Animal Science,1983,57 Suppl.2:498-518.
[28] 尉志霞,刘强,霍文婕,等.茬次和一天内不同收获时间对紫花苜蓿青贮发酵质量和体外发酵参数的影响[J].草地学报,2019,27(1):235-242.
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉

    联系我们

  • 地址：北京市海淀区圆明园西路2号
    　　　中国农业大学动科动医大楼153室
  • 邮编：100193
  • 电话：010－62817823
  • 网址：http://www.chinajan.com
  • E-mail：cjan@chinajan.com
京公网安备 11010802041926号    京ICP备17050989号-2