实验方法与实验动物 EXPERIMENTAL METHOD AND ANIMAL

2株羊源芽孢杆菌的筛选及其对小鼠肠道生化指标和肠道菌群的影响

  • 张楠驰 ,
  • 王利 ,
  • 魏勇
展开
  • 1. 西南民族大学, 青藏高原动物遗传资源保护与利用教育部和四川省重点实验室, 成都 610041;
    2. 四川省畜牧科学研究院, 动物遗传育种四川省重点实验室, 成都 610066
张楠驰(1993-),男,满族,辽宁抚顺人,硕士研究生,研究方向为微生物遗传学。E-mail:zhangnanchi@126.com

收稿日期: 2020-02-11

  网络出版日期: 2020-07-15

基金资助

四川省肉羊创新团队防疫岗位(sccxtd-2020-14);农业农村部农业重大技术协同推广计划试点"四川省肉羊高效生产配套技术推广应用"

Screen of Two Bacterial Strains of Bacillus Isolated from Goat and Their Effects on Intestinal Biochemical Indexes and Intestinal Microflora of Mice

  • ZHANG Nanchi ,
  • WANG Li ,
  • WEI Yong
Expand
  • 1. Key Laboratory of Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau Animal Genetic Resource Reservation and Utilization, Ministry of Education and Sichuan Province, Southwest Minzu University, Chengdu 610041, China;
    2. Animal Genetics and Breeding Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Animal Science Academy of Sichuan Province, Chengdu 610066, China

Received date: 2020-02-11

  Online published: 2020-07-15

摘要

本试验旨在从川中黑山羊粪便中筛选具有广谱抑菌作用的菌株,并探究其对小鼠肠道生化指标和肠道菌群的影响。试验采用牛津杯法从粪便中筛选出具有广谱抑菌作用的菌株,分别命名为菌株fsznc-06和fsznc-09。选取60只健康的小鼠,随机分为5组,每组3个重复,每个重复4只。JD1组和JD2组分别灌服1×108和1×1010 CFU/mL菌株fsznc-06,DX1组和DX2组分别灌服1×108和1×1010 CFU/mL菌株fsznc-09,对照组(DZ组)灌服0.9%氯化钠溶液。每2 d灌服1次,灌服量均为0.3 mL/只。饲养28 d后测定小肠组织总超氧化物歧化酶(T-SOD)、碱性磷酸酶(AKP)和溶菌酶(LZM)活性,并取小肠内容物进行微生物测序和多样性分析。结果表明:本试验筛选出2株具有广谱抑菌作用的菌株,经鉴定并分别命名为解淀粉芽孢杆菌(Bacillus amyloliquefaciens)fsznc-06和短小芽孢杆菌(Bacillus pumilus)fsznc-09。与DZ组相比,JD1和DX1组小肠组织T-SOD、AKP和LZM活性显著或极显著提高(P<0.05或P<0.01),JD2组小肠组织T-SOD活性极显著提高(P<0.01),DX2组小肠组织AKP活性极显著提高(P<0.01)。各试验组小肠肠道菌群多样性均高于DZ组。各组优势物种分别为:JD1组,约氏乳杆菌(53.54%);JD2组,罗伊氏乳杆菌(44.56%);DX1组,约氏乳杆菌(45.21%);DX2组,约氏乳杆菌(41.38%);DZ组,约氏乳杆菌(44.51%)。JD1和JD2组肠道菌群主要提高了遗传信息处理方面的功能,DX1和DX2组肠道菌群主要提高了环境信息处理、新陈代谢和生物体系统方面的功能。由此可见,解淀粉芽孢杆菌fsznc-06和短小芽孢杆菌fsznc-09能提高小鼠小肠组织T-SOD、AKP和LZM活性,增加小鼠肠道菌群多样性和有益菌群相对丰度。

本文引用格式

张楠驰 , 王利 , 魏勇 . 2株羊源芽孢杆菌的筛选及其对小鼠肠道生化指标和肠道菌群的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2020 , 32(7) : 3374 -3385 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2020.07.047

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to screen bacterial strains with antibacterial activity from goat droppings, and explore their effects on the intestinal biochemical indexes and intestinal microflora of mice. In this study, the strains with antibacterial activity were screened from the goat droppings using the Oxford cup method and named bacterial strains fsznc-06 and fsznc-09, respectively. Sixty healthy mice were randomly divided into 5 groups with 3 replicates per group and 4 mice per replicate. JD1 and JD2 groups were administered orally with bacterial strain fsznc-06 with concentrations of 1×108 and 1×1010 CFU/mL, respectively; DX1 and DX2 groups were administered orally with bacterial strain fsznc-09 with concentrations of 1×108 and 1×1010 CFU/mL, respectively; the control group (DZ group) was administered orally with 0.9% sodium chloride solution. Every 2 days administered orally once, the dosage was 0.3 mL per mouse. After feeding 28 days, the activities of total superoxide dismutase (T-SOD),alkaline phosphatase (AKP) and lysozyme (LZM) in small intestine tissue were determined, and the contents of small intestine were taken for microbial sequencing and diversity analysis. The results showed that two bacterial strains with antibacterial activity were screened in this experiment, they were identified and named as Bacillus amyloliquefaciens fsznc-06 and Bacillus pumilus fsznc-09. Compared with the DZ group, the activities of T-SOD, AKP and LZM in small intestine tissue of JD1 and DX1 groups were significantly increased (P<0.05 or P<0.01), the small intestine tissue T-SOD activity of JD2 group was significantly increased (P<0.01), and the small intestine tissue AKP activity in DX2 group was significantly increased (P<0.01). The diversities of intestinal microflora in small intestine of JD1, JD2, DX1 and DX2 groups were higher than those of DZ group. The dominant species in JD1, JD2, DX1, DX2 and DZ groups were Lactobacillus johnsonii (53.54%), Lactobacillus reuteri (44.56%), Lactobacillus johnsonii (45.21%), Lactobacillus johnsonii (41.38%), Lactobacillus johnsonii (44.51%), respectively. The intestinal microflora of JD1 and JD2 groups mainly improved the functions of genetic information processing, and the intestinal microflora of DX1 and DX2 groups mainly improved the functions of environmental information processing, metabolism and organismal systems. In conclusion, Bacillus amyloliquefaciens fsznc-06 and Bacillus pumilus fsznc-09 can improve the activities of T-SOD, AKP and LZM in small intestine tissue, and increase the diversity of small intestinal microflora and the relative abundance of beneficial microflora of mice.

参考文献

[1] ABBAS A,KHAN S U,KHAN W U,et al.Antagonist effects of strains of Bacillus spp. against Rhizoctonia solani for their protection against several plant diseases:alternatives to chemical pesticides[J].Comptes Rendus Biologies,2019,342(5/6):124-135.
[2] LARSEN N,THORSEN L,KPIKPI E N,et al.Characterization of Bacillus spp. strains for use as probiotic additives in pig feed[J].Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology,2014,98(3):1105-1118.  
[3] YAN H,YUN J,AI D,et al.Two novel cationic antifungal peptides isolated from Bacillus pumilus HN-10 and their inhibitory activity against Trichothecium roseum[J].World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology,2018,34(2):21.
[4] CHU J,WANG Y,ZHAO B,et al.Isolation and identification of new antibacterial compounds from Bacillus pumilus[J].Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology,2019,103(20):8375-8381.  
[5] DU W,XU H,MEI X,et al.Probiotic Bacillus enhance the intestinal epithelial cell barrier and immune function of piglets[J].Beneficial Microbes,2018,9(5):743-754.  
[6] PRIETO M L,O'SULLIVAN L,TAN S P,et al.Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of a marine-derived Bacillus strain for use as an in-feed probiotic for newly weaned pigs[J].PLoS One,2014,9(2):e88599.
[7] TRUONG THY H T,TRI N N,QUY O M,et al.Effects of the dietary supplementation of mixed probiotic spores of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens 54A,and Bacillus pumilus 47B on growth,innate immunity and stress responses of striped catfish (Pangasianodon hypophthalmus)[J].Fish and Shellfish Immunology,2017,60:391-399.
[8] 秦会平,王学红.小肠菌群与肠道及代谢性疾病[J].世界华人消化杂志,2016,24(03):375-381.
[9] LIU D,LI K,HU J,et al.Biocontrol and action mechanism of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens and Bacillus subtilis in soybean phytophthora blight[J].International Journal of Molecular Sciences,2019,20(12):2908.
[10] BINDIYA E S,TINA K J,SASIDHARAN R S,et al.BaCf3:highly thermostable bacteriocin from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens BTSS3 antagonistic on food-borne pathogens[J].3 Biotech,2019,9(4):136.
[11] HAO K,ULLAH H,QIN X,et al.Effectiveness of Bacillus pumilus PDSLzg-1,an innovative hydrocarbon-degrading bacterium conferring antifungal and plant growth-promoting function[J].3 Biotech,2019,9(8):305.
[12] ZHANG Q X,ZHANG Y,SHAN H H,et al.Isolation and identification of antifungal peptides from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens W10[J].Environmental Science and Pollution Research,2017,24(32):25000-25009.  
[13] GAO X L,KE C H,ZHANG M,et al.Effects of the probiotic Bacillus amyloliquefaciens on the growth,immunity,and disease resistance of Haliotis discus hannai[J].Fish and Shellfish Immunology,2019,94:617-627.
[14] SAGGESE A,CULURCIELLO R,CASILLO A,et al.A marine isolate of Bacillus pumilus secretes a pumilacidin active against Staphylococcus aureus[J].Marine Drugs,2018,16(6):180.
[15] FANG Y Y,LI L L,ZHENG Y L,et al.Extraction,isolation and identification of antimicrobial substances from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens Cmn1308[J].Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-napoca,2017,45(1):308-315.  
[16] PRIETO M L,O'SULLIVAN L,TAN S P,et al.In vitro assessment of marine Bacillus for use as livestock probiotics[J].Marine Drugs,2014,12(5):2422-2445.  
[17] SUN Y Z,YANG H L,MA R L,et al.Probiotic applications of two dominant gut Bacillus strains with antagonistic activity improved the growth performance and immune responses of grouper Epinephelus coioides[J].Fish and Shellfish Immunology,2010,29(5):803-809.  
[18] SAPUTRA F,SHIU Y L,CHEN Y C,et al.Dietary supplementation with xylanase-expressing B. amyloliquefaciens R8 improves growth performance and enhances immunity against Aeromonas hydrophila in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus)[J].Fish and Shellfish Immunology,2016,58:397-405.
[19] KANG J E,KIM H D,PARK S Y,et al.Dietary supplementation with a Bacillus superoxide dismutase protects against γ-radiation-induced oxidative stress and ameliorates dextran sulphate sodium-induced ulcerative colitis in mice[J].Journal of Crohn's and Colitis,2018,12(7):860-869.  
[20] SUN Y Z,YANG H L,MA R L,et al.Molecular analysis of autochthonous microbiota along the digestive tract of juvenile grouper Epinephelus coioides following probiotic Bacillus pumilus administration[J].Journal of Applied Microbiology,2011,110(4),1093-1103.
[21] YANG H L,XIA H Q,YE Y D,et al.Probiotic Bacillus pumilus SE5 shapes the intestinal microbiota and mucosal immunity in grouper Epinephelus coioides[J].Diseases of Aquatic Organisms,2014,111(2),119-127.
[22] HONG Y,CHENG Y,LI Y,et al.Preliminary study on the effect of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens TL on cecal bacterial community structure of broiler chickens[J/OL].BioMed Research International,2019,doi:10.1155/2019/5431354.
[23] YANG H L,SUN Y Z,HU X,et al.Bacillus pumilus SE5 originated PG and LTA tuned the intestinal TLRs/MyD88 signaling and microbiota in grouper (Epinephelus coioides)[J].Fish and Shellfish Immunology,2019,88:266-271.
[24] JIANG Y,WANG Y,ZHANG Z,et al.Responses of microbial community structure in turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) larval intestine to the regulation of probiotic introduced through live feed[J].PLoS One,2019,14(5):e0216590.
[25] HALDAR L,GANDHI D N.Effect of oral administration of Bacillus coagulans B37 and Bacillus pumilus B9 strains on fecal coliforms,Lactobacillus and Bacillus spp. in rat animal model[J].Veterinary World,2016,9(7):766-772.  
文章导航

/