动物营养学报 >

2020 , Vol. 32 >Issue 7: 3412 - 3419

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2020.07.051

研究简报 SHORT COMMUNICATION

不同添加量的发酵饲料对1~55日龄肉鹅生长性能、血清生化指标及免疫指标的影响

  • 牛自康 ,
  • 叶成智 ,
  • 张鑫蕊 ,
  • 宦海琳 ,
  • 林勇 ,
  • 周维仁 ,
  • 黄健 ,
  • 王胜 ,
  • 刘艳玲 ,
  • 闫俊书 ,
  • 张忠远
展开
  • 1. 东北农业大学动物科学技术学院, 哈尔滨 150030;
    2. 江苏省农业科学院畜牧研究所, 南京 210014;
    3. 南京宝辉生物饲料有限公司, 南京 211100
牛自康(1994-),男,河南洛阳人,硕士研究生,研究方向为动物营养与饲料科学。E-mail:niuzikang233@163.com

收稿日期: 2020-01-16

  网络出版日期: 2020-07-15

基金资助

江苏省农业科技自主创新资金[CX（18）3024]；江苏省博士后研究基金（2018K060B）；现代农业产业技术体系建设专项资金（CARS-42-20）

收起

Effects of Fermentation Diets of Different Supplementation on Growth Performance, Serum Biochemical Indexes and Immune Indexes of Meat Geese at 1 to 55 Days of Age

  • NIU Zikang ,
  • YE Chengzhi ,
  • ZHANG Xinrui ,
  • HUAN Hailin ,
  • LIN Yong ,
  • ZHOU Weiren ,
  • HUANG Jian ,
  • WANG Sheng ,
  • LIU Yanling ,
  • YAN Junshu ,
  • ZHANG Zhongyuan
Expand
  • 1. Institute of Animal Science and Technology, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China;
    2. Institute of Animal Husbandry, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing 210014, China;
    3. Nanjing Baohui Biological Feed Co., Ltd., Nanjing 211100, China

Received date: 2020-01-16

  Online published: 2020-07-15

Fold

摘要

本试验旨在研究不同添加量的发酵饲料对1~55日龄肉鹅生长性能、血清生化指标及免疫指标的影响。采用完全随机试验设计，选取1日龄、健康的肉鹅720只，随机分为4组，每组6个重复，每个重复30只。对照组饲喂基础饲粮，试验组饲喂在基础饲粮中分别添加2.5%、5.0%和7.5%发酵饲料的试验饲粮。试验期共55 d，分为1~15日龄和16~55日龄2个阶段。结果表明：在生长性能方面，与对照组相比，3个试验组的末重、平均日增重（ADG）、平均日采食量（ADFI）和料重比（F/G）均没有显著差异（P>0.05），其中2.5%、5.0%和7.5%组末重分别提高了1.94%、1.79%和2.56%，2.5%、5.0%和7.5%组ADG分别提高了1.97%、1.82%和2.57%。在血清生化指标方面，与对照组相比，2.5%组血清中碱性磷酸酶（AKP）和酸性磷酸酶（ACP）活性以及甘油三酯（TG）含量差异不显著（P>0.05），5.0%和7.5%组的血清中AKP和ACP活性以及TG含量显著降低（P<0.05），血清AKP活性分别降低了55.48%和59.59%，血清ACP活性分别降低了37.28%和43.79%，血清TG含量分别降低了30.25%和16.67%。在血清免疫指标方面，对照组与试验组血清免疫相关指标均无显著差异（P>0.05）。综合各项指标，在1~55日龄肉鹅饲粮中添加7.5%发酵饲料的饲喂效果优于添加2.5%和5.0%发酵饲料。

关键词： 发酵饲料; 生长性能; 血清生化指标; 鹅

本文引用格式

牛自康 , 叶成智 , 张鑫蕊 , 宦海琳 , 林勇 , 周维仁 , 黄健 , 王胜 , 刘艳玲 , 闫俊书 , 张忠远 . 不同添加量的发酵饲料对1~55日龄肉鹅生长性能、血清生化指标及免疫指标的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2020 , 32(7) : 3412 -3419 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2020.07.051

Abstract

This study was designed to investigate the effects of fermented diets of different supplementation on the growth performance and serum biochemical indexes and immune indexes of meat geese at 1 to 55 days of age. A total of 720 healthy, 1-day-old meat geese were randomly divided into 4 groups with 6 replicates and 30 replicates each in a completely randomized trial design. Meat geese in the control group fed a basal diet, and those in the experimental groups fed the basal diet added with 2.5%, 5.0% and 7.5% fermented diets, respectively. The experiment lasted for 55 d, which included 2 stages of 1 to 15 days of age and 16 to 55 days of age. The results showed that compared with control group, there were no significant differences in final weight, average daily gain (ADG), average daily feed intake (ADFI) and feed/gain (F/G) in the three test groups (P>0.05), final weight in 2.5%, 5.0% and 7.5% groups increased by 1.94%, 1.79% and 2.56%, respectively; ADG in 2.5%, 5.0% and 7.5% groups increased by 1.97%, 1.82% and 2.57%, respectively. In terms of serum biochemical indexes, compared with the control group, the activities of alkaline phosphatase (AKP) and acid phosphatase (ACP) and the content of triglyceride (TG) in serum in 2.5% group were not significantly different (P>0.05). Serum AKP and ACP activities and the content of TG in 5.0% and 7.5% groups were significantly reduced (P<0.05), the activity of AKP in serum decreased by 55.48% and 59.59%, and the activity of ACP decreased by 37.28% and 43.79%, and the content of TG decreased by 30.25% and 16.67%, respectively. There was no significant difference between the control group and the test groups in serum immune indexes (P>0.05). Combined with each index, the feeding effects of adding 7.5% fermented diet in the diets of geese at 1 to 55 days of age are better than those of adding 2.5% and 5.0% fermented diets.

Key words： fermented diet; growth performance; serum biochemical index; geese

参考文献

[1] 常寨成,黄海龙,施维.发酵饲料原料的特点及发酵优势[J].粮食与饲料工业,2019(1):44-48.
[2] 张铮,朱坤,朱伟云,等.发酵饲料对生长育肥猪结肠微生物发酵及菌群组成的影响[J].微生物学报,2019,59(1):93-102.
[3] KHAN R U,NAZ S.The applications of probiotics in poultry production[J].World's Poultry Science Journal,2013,69(3):621-632.  
[4] YAN J S,ZHOU B,XI Y M,et al.Fermented feed regulates growth performance and the cecal microbiota community in geese[J].Poultry Science,2019,98(10):4673-4684.  
[5] 丁小青,侯艳彬,姚垒,等.生物发酵饲料对仙居鸡产蛋性能、蛋品质及血清生化指标的影响[J/OL].中国畜牧杂志:1-12[2020-03-17].https://doi.org/10.19556/j.0258-7033.20191030-07.
[6] SHARMA N K,CHOCT M,WU S,et al.Nutritional effects on odour emissions in broiler production[J].World's Poultry Science Journal,2017,73(2):257-280.  
[7] SONG Y S,PÉREZ V G,PETTIGREW J E,et al.Fermentation of soybean meal and its inclusion in diets for newly weaned pigs reduced diarrhea and measures of immunoreactivity in the plasma[J].Animal Feed Science and Technology,2010,159(1/2):41-49.
[8] SHI C Y,ZHANG Y,LU Z Q,et al.Solid-state fermentation of corn-soybean meal mixed feed with Bacillus subtilis and Enterococcus faecium for degrading antinutritional factors and enhancing nutritional value[J].Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology,2017,8:50.
[9] 宁艳春,陈希海,杜宝军,等.微生物发酵饲料的技术调研及关键技术分析[J].饲料博览,2019(1):23-26.
[10] 黄竹,姜丹,王丽娟,等.发酵饲料对海兰褐蛋鸡生产性能及蛋品质的影响[J].畜牧与饲料科学,2019,40(10):14-18.
[11] 周露,罗利龙,吴科榜.混合发酵饲料对文昌鸡肥育期生产性能及肉品质的影响[J].黑龙江畜牧兽医,2019(8):123-126.
[12] 阿布都如苏力·艾尔肯,张文举,聂存喜.嗜酸乳杆菌发酵豆粕对黄羽肉鸡生长性能和屠宰性能的影响[J].黑龙江畜牧兽医,2014(23):12-16.
[13] 廉俊红.多糖对益生菌体外生长的影响及发酵饲料对雪峰乌骨鸡肉品质的影响[D].硕士学位论文.广州:华南农业大学,2016.
[14] 张秀江,胡虹,王秋菊,等.乳酸菌液体发酵饲料对育肥猪养分表观消化率、粪样菌群、血液生化指标和生产性能的影响[J].饲料工业,2019,40(20):28-33.
[15] SUDRE K,CASSAR-MALEK I,LISTRAT A,et al.Biochemical and transcriptomic analyses of two bovine skeletal muscles in Charolais bulls divergently selected for muscle growth[J].Meat Science,2005,70(2):267-277.  
[16] 顾静,陈祖涛,孙蔚,等.乙型肝炎相关慢加急性肝衰竭患者血清碱性磷酸酶的变化及意义[J].肝脏,2019,24(11):1234-1236,1239.
[17] POUPON R.Liver alkaline phosphatase:a missing link between choleresis and biliary inflammation[J].Hepatology,2015,61(6):2080-2090.  
[18] 康怀艳.益生菌发酵饲料对奶山羊血清生化指标和产奶性能的影响[D].硕士学位论文.咸阳:西北农林科技大学,2019.
[19] 周红妹.两种发酵饲料对育肥猪生长性能及免疫机能的影响[D].硕士学位论文.沈阳:沈阳农业大学,2016.
[20] 何海琪,孙凤.中国对虾酸性和碱性磷酸酶的特性研究[J].海洋与湖沼,1992,23(5):555-560.
[21] 徐之勇.银杏叶提取物对雏鸭血清生化指标的影响[J].黑龙江畜牧兽医,2014(9):149-150.
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉

    联系我们

  • 地址：北京市海淀区圆明园西路2号
    　　　中国农业大学动科动医大楼153室
  • 邮编：100193
  • 电话：010－62817823
  • 网址：http://www.chinajan.com
  • E-mail：cjan@chinajan.com
京公网安备 11010802041926号    京ICP备17050989号-2