研究简报 SHORT COMMUNICATION

应用聚酯网袋测定饲料中中性洗涤纤维和酸性洗涤纤维含量的可行性研究

  • 李泽民 ,
  • 张晨 ,
  • 张桂国 ,
  • 张崇玉
展开
  • 山东农业大学动物科技学院, 山东省动物生物工程与疾病防治重点实验室, 泰安 271000
李泽民(1993-),男,山东日照人,硕士研究生,动物营养与饲料科学专业。E-mail:779575896@qq.com

收稿日期: 2020-05-21

  网络出版日期: 2020-12-07

基金资助

国家重点研发计划(2019YFE0107700);国家十三五重大研发计划(子课题)肉羊健康养殖(2018YFD0502104-3);山东省现代农业产业技术体系产业创新团队(SDAIT-27-02,SDAIT-23-05);山东省农业重大应用技术创新项目"粮改饲高产高效生产利用模式与关键技术的集成示范"(SDZD-2017);山东省良种工程(南种北繁,2017LZN036);山东省"双一流"奖补资金(SDSYL2016)

Feasibility Study of Determination of Neutral Detergent Fiber and Acid Detergent Fiber Contents in Feed Using Polyester Mesh Bag

  • LI Zemin ,
  • ZHANG Chen ,
  • ZHANG Guiguo ,
  • ZHANG Chongyu
Expand
  • Key Laboratory of Animal Biotechnology and Disease Control & Prevention of Shandong Province, College of Animal Science and Technology, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an 271000, China

Received date: 2020-05-21

  Online published: 2020-12-07

摘要

本试验旨在探索应用聚酯网袋测定饲料中中性洗涤纤维(NDF)和酸性洗涤纤维(ADF)含量的可行性。本试验采用国标法、聚酯网袋法、Ankom纤维分析仪法和聚酯网袋仪器法4种方法,分别测定了17种饲料中NDF和ADF的含量,比较不同方法的测定结果。结果表明:1)4种方法对饲料中NDF和ADF含量的测定结果基本一致,两两配对分析差异不显著(P>0.05)。2)聚酯网袋法与国标法对NDF含量的测定结果基本一致,2种方法的测定结果呈强正相关:y=0.998 3x+0.130 5(x为国标法测定的饲料中NDF含量,y为聚酯网袋法测定的饲料中NDF含量),n=17,r=0.999 7,P<0.01。3)聚酯网袋法与国标法对ADF含量的测定结果基本一致,2种方法测定结果呈强正相关:y=0.999 0x-0.034 0(x为国标法测定的饲料中ADF含量,y为聚酯网袋法测定的饲料中ADF含量),n=17,r=0.999 9,P<0.01。综上可知,聚酯网袋法测定饲料中NDF和ADF含量的方法具有测定时间短、效率高、成本低、精密度高等特点,可以替代国标法。聚酯网袋可以替代Ankom F57滤袋使用Ankom纤维分析仪测定饲料中NDF和ADF含量。

本文引用格式

李泽民 , 张晨 , 张桂国 , 张崇玉 . 应用聚酯网袋测定饲料中中性洗涤纤维和酸性洗涤纤维含量的可行性研究[J]. 动物营养学报, 2020 , 32(12) : 5967 -5975 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2020.12.051

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of the determination of neutral detergent fiber (NDF) and acid detergent fiber (ADF) contents in feed using polyester mesh bag. Four different methods, including national standard method, polyester mesh bag method, Ankom fiber analyzer method and polyester mesh bag instrument method, were utilized to determine the contents of NDF and ADF contents from 17 different feeds, respectively, and a comprehensive comparison was conducted to evaluate the differentiation of the results among the different methods. The results showed as follows: 1) there were no significant differences in the contents of ADF and NDF in feeds that determined by the four methods (P>0.05). 2) The content of NDF determined by the polyester mesh bag method was similar to that determined by the national standard method, and the determination results of the two methods exhibited a strong positive correlation: y=0.998 3x+0.130 5(x was the content of NDF determined by the national standard method, and y was the content of NDF determined by the polyester mesh bag method), n=17, r=0.999 7, P<0.01. 3) The content of ADF determined by the polyester mesh bag method was similar to that determined by national standard method, and the determination results of the two methods presented a strong positive correlation: y=0.999 0x-0.034 0 (x was the content of ADF determined by the national standard method, and y was the content of ADF determined by the polyester mesh bag method), n=17, r=0.999 9, P<0.01. In conclusion, the polyester mesh bag method for determining the contents of NDF and ADF contents in feed has some advantages such as shorter analysis time, higher efficiency, lower cost, and improved precision, thus it can replace the national standard method. In addition, the Ankom F57 filter-bag can be replaced by polyester mesh bag when using the Ankom fiber analyzer to determine the contents of NDF and ADF contents in feed.

参考文献

[1] VOGEL K P,PEDERSEN J F,MASTERSON S D,et al.Evaluation of a filter bag system for NDF,ADF,and IVDMD forage analysis[J].Crop Science,1999,39(1):276-279.  
[2] VAN SOEST P J,ROBERTSON J B,LEWIS B A.Methods for dietary fiber,neutral detergent fiber,and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition[J].Journal of Dairy Science,1991,74(10):3583-3597.  
[3] 张丽英.饲料分析及饲料质量检测技术[M].4版.北京:中国农业大学出版社,2016:79-86.
[4] 王晓娜,徐春城,温定英,等.不同测定方法对青贮饲料中NDF和ADF含量的影响[J].草业科学,2012,29(1):144-149.
[5] 薛红枫,孟庆翔.不同方法测定反刍动物饲料NDF、ADF和木质素含量的比较[J].中国畜牧杂志,2006,42(19):41-45.
[6] 朱立涛,范志勇,杨丹丹,等.用滤袋测定饲料粗纤维含量的试验研究[J].饲料工业,2012,33(7):56.
[7] 闫贵龙,程成,曹春梅,等.煮沸时间对滤袋法测定青贮玉米NDF和ADF含量的影响[J].畜牧兽医学报,2012,43(3):404-409.
[8] 苏玲玲,申煜,张志军.纤维袋法测定饼粕类饲料原料中性洗涤纤维和酸性洗涤纤维含量的研究[J].饲料博览,2013(8):1-5.
[9] 张桂英.改进饲料中粗纤维的测定方法[J].民营科技,2018(5):10.
[10] 苏玲玲,申煜,张志军,等.不同方法测定饲料中NDF和ADF的比较[J].饲料研究,2013(11):80-82.
[11] 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局,中国国家标准化管理委员会.GB/T 20195-2006动物饲料试样的制备[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2006.
[12] 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局,中国国家标准化管理委员会.GB/T 14014-2008合成纤维筛网[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2009.
[13] 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局,中国国家标准化管理委员会.GB/T 20806-2006饲料中中性洗涤纤维(NDF)的测定[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2007.
[14] 中华人民共和国农业部.NY/T 1459-2007饲料中酸性洗涤纤维的测定[S].北京:农业出版社,2008.
[15] 张丽英,王宗义,李德发.滤袋技术在饲料纤维素分析中的应用[J].饲料工业,2001(5):9-10.
[16] 姜慧新,柏杉杉,王兆凤,等.粉碎细度与滤袋对饲草NDF与ADF含量的影响[J].草地学报,2018,26(2):467-473.
[17] 魏涛,蒲俊华,王文强,等.Ankom滤袋法测定粗纤维含量过程中样品脱脂与不脱脂处理的比较[J].黑龙江畜牧兽医,2017(15):275-277.
[18] 姜慧新,柏杉杉,刘栋,等.不同方法测定饲草中NDF与ADF含量的比较[J].山东畜牧兽医,2017,38(8):6-7.
[19] 山东省质量技术监督局.DB37/T 3372-2018饲料中中性洗涤纤维含量的测定-聚酯网袋法[S].济南:山东省市场监督管理局,2018.
[20] 山东省质量技术监督局.DB 37/T 3371-2018饲料中酸性洗涤木质素含量的测定-聚酯网袋法[S].济南:山东省市场监督管理局,2018.
文章导航

/