反刍与草食动物营养与饲料 RUMINANT AND HERBIVORE NUTRITION AND FEED

添加乳酸菌、糖蜜和无机酸对羊草青贮饲料发酵品质及体外干物质消失率的影响

  • 黄秋连 ,
  • 周昕 ,
  • 王健 ,
  • 张嘉宾 ,
  • 曹阳
展开
  • 黑龙江八一农垦大学动物科技学院, 黑龙江省寒区饲料资源高效利用与营养调控重点实验室, 粮食副产物加工与利用教育部工程研究中心, 大庆 163319
黄秋连(1994-),女,四川南江人,硕士研究生,研究方向为饲料资源开发与利用。E-mail:18328815985@163.com

收稿日期: 2020-06-16

  网络出版日期: 2021-01-18

基金资助

国家自然科学基金项目(31772673);国家重点研发计划项目(2018YFD0502100);黑龙江省饲草饲料协同创新推广体系岗位专家项目(黑农厅函【2019】766号-2019-04-02)

Effects of Lactic Acid Bacteria, Molasses and Inorganic Acid Supplementations on Fermentation Quality and in Vitro Dry Matter Disappearance Rate of Leymus chinensis Silage

  • HUANG Qiulian ,
  • ZHOU Xin ,
  • WANG Jian ,
  • ZHANG Jiabin ,
  • CAO Yang
Expand
  • Engineering Research Center of Processing and Utilization of Grain By-Products, Ministry of Education, Heilongjiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Efficient Utilization of Feed Resources and Nutrition Manipulation in Cold Region, College of Animal Science and Technology, Heilongjiang Bayi Agricultural University, Daqing 163319, China

Received date: 2020-06-16

  Online published: 2021-01-18

摘要

本试验旨在探讨添加乳酸菌、糖蜜和无机酸对羊草青贮饲料发酵品质及体外干物质消失率的影响。采用单因子完全随机设计,在羊草青贮时设置如下5个处理:1)无添加(对照组,C组);2)添加0.000 25%乳酸菌(LAB组);3)添加4%糖蜜(M组);4)添加4%无机酸(IA组);5)添加0.000 25%乳酸菌+4%糖蜜(LAB+M组)。各青贮添加剂的添加量均为鲜重基础,每个处理设置3个重复,青贮120 d后取样分析羊草青贮饲料的发酵品质及体外干物质消失率。结果显示:所有组发酵品质均优良,且均未检测出丁酸、大肠杆菌、霉菌和梭菌;与对照组相比,各添加剂组pH显著降低(P<0.05);LAB+M组的乳酸含量显著高于其他各组(P<0.05);与对照组相比,所有添加剂组的氨态氮/总氮均有不同程度的下降;M组和LAB+M组的干物质含量显著高于对照组(P<0.05);IA组的粗蛋白质含量显著高于其他各组(P<0.05);LAB+M组的中性洗涤纤维含量显著低于其他各组(P<0.05);LAB+M组的产气量最高,显著高于M组(P<0.05);LAB+M组的体外干物质消失率显著高于对照组和LAB组(P<0.05)。综上所述,本试验所使用的青贮添加剂均能在不同程度上改善羊草青贮饲料的发酵品质和体外干物质消失率,综合考虑,以同时添加乳酸菌和糖蜜的效果最好。

本文引用格式

黄秋连 , 周昕 , 王健 , 张嘉宾 , 曹阳 . 添加乳酸菌、糖蜜和无机酸对羊草青贮饲料发酵品质及体外干物质消失率的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2021 , 33(1) : 420 -427 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2021.01.042

Abstract

This experiment was conducted to evaluate the effects of lactic acid bacteria, molasses and inorganic acid supplementations on the fermentation quality and in vitro dry matter disappearance rate (IVDMD) of Leymus Chinensis silage. A Single factor complete random design was adopted, five treatments during silage of Leymus chinensis were designed: 1) additive free (C group, as control group); 2) supplemented with 0.000 25% lactic acid bacteria (LAB group); 3) supplemented with 4% molasses (M group); 4) supplemented with 4% inorganic acid (IA group); 5) supplemented with 0.000 25% lactic acid bacteria+4% molasses (LAB+M group). The supplemental level of each silage additives based fresh weight, and each treatment had 3 replicates. The fermentation quality and the IVDMD of Leymus Chinensis silage were analyzed after silage for 120 days. The results showed that the fermentation quality of all groups was excellent, and butyric acid, Escherichia coli, mold and Clostridium were not detected. The pH of each additive group was significantly decreased compared with control group (P<0.05). The lactic acid content of LAB+M group was significantly higher than that of other groups (P<0.05). Compared with control group, the ammonia nitrogen/total nitrogen of all additive groups was decreased with varying degrees. The dry matter content of M group and LAB+M group was significantly higher than that of control group (P<0.05). The content of crude protein of IA group was significantly higher than that of other groups (P<0.05). The content of neutral detergent fiber of LAB+M group was significantly lower than that of other groups (P<0.05). The gas production of LAB+M group was the highest, and it was significantly higher than that of M group (P<0.05), and the IVDMD of LAB+M group was significantly higher than that of control group and LAB group (P<0.05). The results indicate that silage additives used in this experiment all can improve the fermentation quality and IVDMD of Leymus Chinensis silage. When all the facts are taken together, diets supplemented with lactic acid bacteria and molasses together have the best effect of Leymus chinensis silage.

参考文献

[1] YAN R,CHEN S,ZHANG X,et al.Short communication:effects of replacing part of corn silage and alfalfa hay with Leymus chinensis hay on milk production and composition[J].Journal of Dairy Science,2011,94(7):3605-3608.  
[2] 李晶.羊草的营养价值及其应用[J].农业知识(科学养殖),2015(9):55-56. LI J J.Nutritional value and application of Leymus chinensis[J].Agricultural Knowledge:Scientific Breeding,2015(9):55-56.(in Chinese)
[3] 孙力,石风善.黑龙江省牧草产业现状及发展建议[J].现代化农业,2016(2):31-32. SUN L,SHI F S.Current situation and development suggestions of forage industry in Heilongjiang province[J].Modern Agriculture,2016(2):31-32.(in Chinese)
[4] 吉春花.青贮饲料的优点与制作技术[J].当代畜牧,2017(35):23-24. JI C H.Advantages and production technology of silage[J].Contemporary Animal Husbandry,2017(35):23-24.(in Chinese)
[5] CAI Y M,BENNO Y,OGAWA M,et al.Effect of applying lactic acid bacteria isolated from forage crops on fermentation characteristics and aerobic deterioration of silage[J].Journal of Dairy Science,1999,82(3):520-526.  
[6] OHYAMA Y,MORICHI T,MASAKI S.The effect of inoculation with Lactobacillus plantarum and addition of glucose at ensiling on the quality of aerated silages[J].Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture,1975,26(7):1001-1008.  
[7] KUNG L,Jr,RANJIT N K.The effect of Lactobacillus buchneri and other additives on the fermentation and aerobic stability of barley silage[J].Journal of Dairy Science,2001,84(5):1149-1155.  
[8] CAI Y M.The role of lactic acid bacteria in the preparation of high fermentation quality[J].Grassland Science,2001,47(5):527-533.
[9] CAI Y M,FUJITA Y,MURAI M,et al.Application of lactic acid bacteria (Lactobacillus plantarum Chikuso-1) for silage preparation of forage paddy rice[J].Grassland Science,2003,49(5):477-485.
[10] CAO Y,TAKAHASHI T,HORIGUCHI K I,et al.Effect of adding lactic acid bacteria and molasses on fermentation quality and in vitro ruminal digestion of total mixed ration silage prepared with whole crop rice[J].Grassland Science,2010,56(1):19-25.  
[11] CAO Y,CAI Y,TAKAHASHI T,et al.Effect of lactic acid bacteria inoculant and beet pulp addition on fermentation characteristics and in vitro ruminal digestion of vegetable residue silage[J].Journal of Dairy Science,2011,94(8):3902-3912.  
[12] 李苗苗,靳思玉,王立超,等.不同温度下添加乳酸菌对油莎草青贮品质及体外干物质消失率的影响[J].动物营养学报,2020,32(2):827-835. LI M M,JIN S Y,WANG L C,et al.Effects of lactic acid bacteria addition on fermentation quality and dry matter digestibility of Cyperus esculentus silage under different temperatures[J].Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition,2020,32(2):827-835(in Chinese)
[13] ALLI I,FAIRBAIRN R,NOROOZI E,et al.The effects of molasses on the fermentation of chopped whole-plant leucaena[J].Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture,1984,35(3):285-289.  
[14] 靳思玉,王立超,李苗苗,等.添加糖蜜对油莎草青贮发酵品质及黄酮的影响[J].中国乳品工业,2020,48(3):31-37. JIN S Y,WANG L C,LI M M,et al.Effect of adding molasses on fermentation quality and flavone of oil sedge silage[J].China Dairy Industry,2020,48(3):31-37.(in Chinese)
[15] 张志登,蒋再慧,韩雅慧,等.乳酸菌及酸处理对秸秆生物发酵饲料的化学成分及in vitro甲烷生成的影响[J].黑龙江八一农垦大学学报,2016,28(6):8-15. ZHANG Z D,JIANG Z H,HAN Y H,et al.Lactic acid bacteria and acid treatment of straw fermentation feed effect of chemical composition and in vitro methane production[J].Journal of Heilongjiang Bayi Agricultural University,2016,28(6):8-15.(in Chinese)
[16] 靳思玉,李苗苗,曹阳.酸处理对苜蓿青贮过程中叶绿素变化的影响[C].2018中国草学会年会论文集.成都:中国草学会,2018:138-141. JIN S Y,LI M M,CAO Y.Effect of acid treatment on chlorophyll content of alfalfa silage[C]//Proceedings of the annual meeting of Chinese grass society in 2018.Chengdu:Chinese Grass Society,2018:138-141.(in Chinese)
[17] 李学光.青贮饲料品质的简易鉴定技术[J].中国畜禽种业,2012,8(7):81-82. LI X G.Simple identification technology of silage quality[J].The Chinese Livestock Breeding,2012,8(7):81-82.(in Chinese)
[18] CAO Y,CAI Y M,HIRAKUBO T,et al.Fermentation characteristics and microorganism composition of total mixed ration silage with local food by-products in different seasons[J].Animal Science Journal,2011,82(2):259-266.  
[19] AOAC.Official methods of analysis[S].15th ed.Arlington,VA:Association of Official Analysis Chemists,1990:33-35.
[20] CAO Y,ZANG Y Q,JIANG Z H,et al.Fermentation quality and nutritive value of fresh and fermented total mixed rations containing Chinese wildrye or corn stover[J].Grassland Science,2016,62(4):213-223.  
[21] VAN SOEST P J,ROBERTSON J B,LEWIS B A.Methods for dietary fiber,neutral detergent fiber,and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition[J].Journal of Dairy Science,1991,74(10):3583-3597.  
[22] 王杰,张养东,郑楠,等.青贮饲料感官评定研究进展[J].中国奶牛,2019(1):1-3. WANG J,ZHANG Y D,ZHENG N,et al.Research rrogress in sensory evaluation of sliage[J].China Dairy Cattle,2019(1):1-3.(in Chinese)
[23] 王莹,玉柱.不同添加剂对紫花苜蓿青贮发酵品质的影响[J].中国草地学报,2010,32(5):80-84. WANG Y,YU Z.Effect of different additives on qualiy of Medicago sativa silage[J].Chinese Journal of Grassland,2010,32(5):80-84.(in Chinese)
[24] 吴金彩,刘婷婷,岳春旺,等.添加不同水平糖蜜对全株"张杂谷"青贮体外瘤胃发酵特性和营养物质降解率的影响[J].中国畜牧兽医,2018,45(10):2752-2760. WU J C,LIU T T,YUE C W,et al.Effects of different molasses levels on in vitro ruminal fermentation characteristics and nutrient degradation of whole "Zhang Hybrid Millet" silage[J].China Animal Husbandry & Veterinary Medicine,2018,45(10):2752-2760.(in Chinese)
[25] 孙肖慧,原现军,郭刚,等.添加乙醇和糖蜜对西藏地区燕麦和紫花苜蓿混合青贮发酵品质的影响[J].畜牧兽医学报,2014,45(3):417-425. SUN X H,YUAN X J,GUO G J,et al.Effect of adding ethanol and molasses on fermentation quality of mixed silage of oat and alfalfa in Tibet[J].Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica,2014,45(3):417-425.(in Chinese)
[26] CHEN L,GUO G,YUAN X J,et al.Effect of applying molasses and propionic acid on fermentation quality and aerobic stability of total mixed ration silage prepared with whole-plant corn in Tibet[J].Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences,2014,27(3):349-356.  
[27] ADESOGAN A T,SALAWU M B.The effect of different additives on the fermentation quality,aerobic stability and in vitro digestibility of pea/wheat bi-crop silages containing contrasting pea to wheat ratios[J].Grass and Forage Science,2002,57(1):25-32.  
[28] 王潍波,赵国琦,郭熠洁.体外条件下葡萄糖处理大豆粕对瘤胃内环境参数的影响[J].饲料工业,2009,30(17):34-37. WANG W B,ZHAO G Q,GUO Y J.Effects of soybean meal deal with glucose on environment parameter in the rumen in vitro[J].Feed Industry,2009,30(17):34-37.(in Chinese)
[29] 张棋炜,张政,杨晶晶,等.体外法研究酵母发酵饲料对瘤胃发酵参数及瘤胃细菌数量的影响[J].中国畜牧杂志,2017,53(12):79-85. ZHANG Q W,ZHANG Z,YANG J J,et al.Study on effects of yeast fermented feed on rumen fermentation parameters and rumen bacteria in vitro method[J].Chinese Journal of Animal Science,2017,53(12):79-85.(in Chinese)
[30] 程鹏辉,廖新俤,吴银宝.利用猪粪液为菌源体外发酵产气法评价牧草纤维品质[J].草业学报,2007,16(5):61-69. CHENG P H,LIAO X D,WU Y B.Studies on evaluation of fiber quality of fodder grass[J].Acta Prataculturae Sinica,2007,16(5):61-69.(in Chinese)
文章导航

/