动物营养学报 >

2021 , Vol. 33 >Issue 4: 2213 - 2223

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2021.04.040

特种经济动物营养与饲料 SPECIAL ECONOMIC ANIMAL NUTRITION AND FEED

被膜态与浮游态植物乳杆菌LR-39对比格犬血清免疫指标及肠道菌群结构的影响

  • 陈则东 ,
  • 郭书玉 ,
  • 朱建平 ,
  • 李子晗 ,
  • 卢炜 ,
  • 刘蕾
展开
  • 1. 江苏农牧科技职业学院宠物科技学院, 泰州 225300;
    2. 西华大学食品与生物工程学院, 成都 610039
陈则东(1985-),男,江苏宿迁人,讲师,硕士,研究方向为动物益生菌产品开发。E-mail:714238040@qq.com

收稿日期: 2020-09-02

  网络出版日期: 2021-04-15

基金资助

中国特色高水平高职学校和专业建设项目（教职成函〔2019〕14号）；江苏农牧科技职业学院校级科研项目（NSF201807）

收起

Effects of Biofilm and Planktonic Lactobacillus plantarum LR-39 on Serum Immune Indexes and Intestinal Microbiota Structure of Beagle Dogs

  • CHEN Zedong ,
  • GUO Shuyu ,
  • ZHU Jianping ,
  • LI Zihan ,
  • LU Wei ,
  • LIU Lei
Expand
  • 1. Department of Pet Science and Technology, Jiangsu Agri-Animal Husbandry Vocational College, Taizhou 225300, China;
    2. School of Food and Biological Engineering, Xihua University, Chengdu 610039, China

Received date: 2020-09-02

  Online published: 2021-04-15

Supported by

 

Fold

摘要

本试验旨在比较被膜态与浮游态植物乳杆菌LR-39对比格犬血清免疫指标及肠道菌群结构的影响。制备被膜态与浮游态植物乳杆菌LR-39，采用平板计数法比较不同生物状态的植物乳杆菌LR-39经酸、胆盐环境处理后的存活率。选取15只3.5月龄比格犬，随机分为被膜组、浮游组及对照组3个组，每组5只。被膜组、浮游组每日早上采食犬粮后分别灌饲被膜态与浮游态植物乳杆菌LR-39菌液1 mL（1×109 CFU/mL），对照组灌饲等体积磷酸盐缓冲液（PBS），连续灌饲28 d。检测血清免疫球蛋白G（IgG）、分泌型免疫球蛋白A（sIgA）、白细胞介素-6（IL-6）、肿瘤坏死因子-α（TNF-α）含量，并对肠道菌群进行16S rDNA高通量测序分析。结果表明：1）经酸性和胆盐环境处理后，被膜态植物乳杆菌LR-39存活率显著或极显著高于浮游态植物乳杆菌LR-39（P<0.05或P<0.01）。2）与对照组相比，被膜组血清IgG和sIgA含量极显著提高（P<0.01）；与浮游组相比，被膜组血清sIgA含量极显著提高（P<0.01），血清IL-6含量有降低趋势（0.05≤P<0.10）；与对照组相比，浮游组血清IgG、sIgA、IL-6、TNF-α含量无显著差异（P>0.05）。3）α多样性分析显示，与对照组相比，被膜组和浮游组Observed species指数、Chao指数、Ace指数均升高，被膜组Shannon指数升高，Simpson指数下降；浮游组Shannon指数下降，Simpson指数升高。主坐标分析（PCoA）结果显示，3组样本间有明显聚类现象。4）在门水平上，与对照组相比，被膜组肠道厚壁菌门（Firmicutes）相对丰度升高，肠道拟杆菌门（Bacteroidetes）、梭杆菌门（Fusobacteria）、变形菌门（Proteobacteria）、放线菌门（Actinobacteria）相对丰度降低；浮游组肠道Bacteroidetes、Fusobacteria相对丰度升高，Firmicutes、Actinobacteria相对丰度降低。5）在属水平上，与对照组相比，被膜组肠道双歧杆菌属（Bifidobacterium）、乳杆菌属（Lactobacillus）、Allobaculum、消化链球菌属（Peptostreptococcus）相对丰度升高；浮游组肠道Lactobacillus、Peptostreptococcus、梭杆菌属（Fusobacterium）、普雷沃菌属（Prevotella）、萨特氏菌属（Sutterella）相对丰度升高。6）LEfSe分析表明，被膜组优势菌属是Lactobacillus，浮游组优势菌属是Fusobacterium，对照组优势菌属包括柯林斯氏菌属（Collinsella）、链型杆菌属（Catenibacterium）、真杆菌属（Eubacterium）。7）Spearman相关性分析显示，血清IgG、sIgA、IL-6、TNF-α含量与肠道富集菌群相对丰度无显著相关性（P>0.05）。由此可见，被膜态与浮游态植物乳杆菌LR-39对犬肠道菌群结构影响不同，被膜态植物乳杆菌LR-39具有更强的耐酸及胆盐能力，可有效调整肠道菌群结构并能提高机体免疫水平。

关键词： 植物乳杆菌; 生物被膜; 犬; 免疫指标; 肠道菌群; 高通量测序

本文引用格式

陈则东 , 郭书玉 , 朱建平 , 李子晗 , 卢炜 , 刘蕾 . 被膜态与浮游态植物乳杆菌LR-39对比格犬血清免疫指标及肠道菌群结构的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2021 , 33(4) : 2213 -2223 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2021.04.040

Abstract

This experiment was to compare the effects of biofilm and planktonic Lactobacillus plantarum LR-39 on serum immune indexes and intestinal microbiota structure of beagle dogs. The planktonic and biofilm Lactobacillus plantarum LR-39 were prepared, and the survival rates of two different biological states of Lactobacillus plantarum LR-39 treated with acid and bile salt environment were compared by colony counting method. Fifteen 3.5-month-old beagle dogs were selected and randomly divided into biofilm group, planktonic group and control group,each group contained 5 dogs. The biofilm group and the planktonic group were gavaged with 1 mL (1×109 CFU/mL) biofilm and planktonic Lactobacillus plantarum LR-39 after feeding dog food every morning, respectively, and the control group was gavaged with equal volume phosphate buffered saline (PBS), continuous gavage 28 days. The contents of immunoglobulin G (IgG), secretory immunoglobulin A (sIgA), interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) in serum were detected, and intestinal microbiota were detected by 16S rDNA high throughput sequencing analysis. The results showed as follows:1) after treated with acid and bile salt environment, the survival rate of biofilm Lactobacillus plantarum LR-39 was significantly higher than planktonic Lactobacillus plantarum LR-39 (P<0.05 or P<0.01). 2) Compared with the control group, the contents of IgG and sIgA in serum of biofilm group were significantly increased (P<0.01); compared with the planktonic group, the serum sIgA content of biofilm group was significantly increased (P<0.01), and the serum IL-6 content was tend to decrease (0.05≤P<0.10); compared with the control group, the contents of IgG, sIgA, IL-6 and TNF-α in serum of planktonic group were no significant difference (P>0.05). 3) The α diversity analysis showed that compared with the control group, the Observed species index, Chao index and Ace index of biofilm group and planktonic group were increased, the Shannon index of biofilm group was increased, and the Simpson index was decreased; the Shannon index of planktonic group was decreased, and the Simpson index was increased. The principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) results showed that there was obvious clustering among three groups of samples. 4) At the phylum level, compared with the control group, the relative abundances of Firmicutes in intestinal tract of biofilm group were increased, and the relative abundances of Bacteroidetes, Fusobacteria, Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria in intestinal tract were decreased; the relative abundances of Bacteroidetes and Fusobacteria in intestinal tract of planktonic group were increased, and the relative abundances of Firmicutes and Actinobacteria in intestinal tract were decreased. 5) At the genus level, compared with the control group, the relative abundances of Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus, Allobaculum and Peptostreptococcus in intestinal tract of biofilm group were increased; the relative abundances of Lactobacillus, Peptostreptococcus, Fusobacterium, Prevotella, Sutterella in intestinal tract of planktonic group were increased. 6) LEfSe analysis showed that the dominant genus of biofilm group was Lactobacillus, the dominant genus of planktonic group was Fusobacterium, and the dominant genera of control group included Collinsella, Catenibacterium and Eubacterium. 7) Spearman correlation analysis showed that there was no significant correlation between the contents of IgG, sIgA, IL-6 and TNF-α and the relative abundance of intestinal enriched flora (P>0.05). In conclusion, biofilm and planktonic Lactobacillus plantarum LR-39 have different effects on intestinal microbiota structure of dogs, the biofilm Lactobacillus plantarum LR-39 has stronger acid and bile salt resistance, and can effectively adjust the intestinal microbiota structure and improve the body immune level.

Key words： Lactobacillus plantarum; biofilm; dogs; immune indexes; intestinal microbiota; high-throughput sequencing

参考文献

[1] SALAS-JARA M J,ILABACA A,VEGA M,et al.Biofilm forming Lactobacillus:new challenges for the development of probiotics[J].Microorganisms,2016,4(3):35.
[2] 刘蕾,武瑞赟,李军,等.基于AI-2介导的类植物乳杆菌生物被膜态与浮游态抗胁迫能力比较与分析[J].食品科学,2017,38(22):41-47. LIU L,WU R Y,LI J,et al.Stress resistance of biofilm and planktonic cells of Lactobacillus paraplantarum regulated by autoinducer 2[J].Food Science,2017,38(22):41-47.(in Chinese)
[3] 刘蕾,武瑞赟,李军,等.类植物乳杆菌L-ZS9生物被膜态的黏附能力及形成影响因素[J].食品科学,2016,37(15):136-143. LIU L,WU R Y,LI J,et al.Adhesion ability of Lactobacillus paraplantarum L-ZS9 and influencing factors of its biofilm formation[J].Food Science,2016,37(15):136-143.(in Chinese)
[4] TRUSH E A,POLUEKTOVA E A,BENIASHVILLI A G,et al.The evolution of human probiotics:challenges and prospects[J].Probiotics and Antimicrobial Proteins,2020,doi:10.1007/s12602-019-09628-4.
[5] WATTERS C,FLEMING D,BISHOP D,et al.Host responses to biofilm[J].Progress in Molecular Biology and Translational Science,2016,142:193-239.
[6] FLEMMING H C,WINGENDER J.The biofilm matrix[J].Nature Reviews Microbiology,2010,8(9):623-633.  
[7] NAVARRO J B,MASHBURN-WARREN L,BAKALETZ L O,et al.Enhanced probiotic potential of Lactobacillus reuteri when delivered as a biofilm on dextranomer microspheres that contain beneficial cargo[J].Frontiers in Microbiology,2017,8:489.
[8] LIU Z Q,ZHANG Z H,QIU L,et al.Characterization and bioactivities of the exopolysaccharide from a probiotic strain of Lactobacillus plantarum WLPL04[J].Journal of Dairy Science,2017,100(9):6895-6905.  
[9] SCHLOSS P D,WESTCOTT S L,RYABIN T,et al.Introducing mothur:open-source,platform-independent,community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities[J].Applied and Environmental Microbiology,2009,75(23):7537-7541.  
[10] LOZUPONE C,KNIGHT R.UniFrac:a new phylogenetic method for comparing microbial communities[J].Applied and Environmental Microbiology,2005,71(12):8228-8235.  
[11] LOZUPONE C,LLADSER M E,KNIGHTS D,et al.UniFrac:an effective distance metric for microbial community comparison[J].The ISME Journal,2011,5(2):169-172.  
[12] LOZUPONE C A,HAMADY M,KELLEY S T,et al.Quantitative and qualitative β diversity measures lead to different insights intofactors that structure microbial communities[J].Applied and Environmental Microbiology,2007,73(5):1576-1585.  
[13] COTTER P D,HILL C.Surviving the acid test:responses of Gram-positive bacteria to low Ph[J].Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews,2003,67(3):429-453.  
[14] NOH D O,GILLILAND S E.Influence of bile on cellular integrity and β-galactosidase activity of Lactobacillus acidophilus[J].Journal of Dairy Science,1993,76(5):1253-1259.  
[15] SECOR P R,JAMES G A,FLECKMAN P,et al.Staphylococcus aureus biofilm and planktonic cultures differentially impact gene expression,mapk phosphorylation,and cytokine production in human keratinocytes[J].BMC Microbiology,2011,11:143.
[16] BRADY R A,MOCCA C P,PLAUT R D,et al.Comparison of the immune response during acute and chronic Staphylococcus aureus infection[J].PLoS One,2018,13(3):e0195342.
[17] 满成连.鸡白痢沙门菌LPS合成和生物被膜形成相关基因缺失株的构建及免疫效力评价[D].硕士学位论文.江苏:扬州大学,2018. MAN C L.Construction of Salmonella entericaserovar pullorum deletion mutations with LPS and biofilm systhesis genes and evaluation of their immune efficacy[D].Master's Thesis.Yangzhou:Yangzhou University,2018.(in Chinese)
[18] 冯富.嗜水气单胞菌生物被膜疫苗诱导的免疫反应[D].硕士学位论文.杭州:浙江大学,2018. FENG F.The immune response induced by Aeromonas hydrophila biofilm[D].Master's Thesis.Hangzhou:Zhejiang University,2018.(in Chinese)
[19] OLENDER A,BOGUT A,MAGRYŚ A,et al.Cytokine levels in the in vitro response of T cells to planktonic and biofilm Corynebacterium amycolatum[J].Polish Journal of Microbiology,2019,68(4):457-464.  
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉

    联系我们

  • 地址：北京市海淀区圆明园西路2号
    　　　中国农业大学动科动医大楼153室
  • 邮编：100193
  • 电话：010－62817823
  • 网址：http://www.chinajan.com
  • E-mail：cjan@chinajan.com
京公网安备 11010802041926号    京ICP备17050989号-2