特种经济动物营养与饲料 SPECIAL ECONOMIC ANIMAL NUTRITION AND FEED

饲粮不同比例生姜秸秆替代花生秧对莱芜黑兔胃肠道发育、盲肠发酵和盲肠微生物区系的影响

  • 孙海涛 ,
  • 王勇 ,
  • 刘公言 ,
  • 徐云华 ,
  • 赵桂省 ,
  • 薛海鹏 ,
  • 李萌
展开
  • 1. 山东省农业科学院畜牧兽医研究所, 山东省畜禽疫病防治与繁育重点实验室, 济南 250100;
    2. 山东省济南市畜牧技术推广站, 济南 250100;
    3. 济南市莱芜黑兔种业科技有限公司, 济南 250100
孙海涛(1980-),男,山东郓城人,副研究员,硕士,主要从事家兔生产相关研究。E-mail:wwww8888@163.com

收稿日期: 2020-11-06

  网络出版日期: 2021-05-14

基金资助

山东省现代农业产业技术体系特种经济动物创新团队建设项目(SDAIT-21);山东省农业重大应用技术创新兔舍环境测控设备及大数据分析应用平台项目(SF1805301301);山东省农业良种工程(南种北繁)项目(2017LZN008)

Effects of Different Ratios of Ginger Straw Substituted for Peanut Seedling in Diets on Gastrointestinal Development, Cecal Fermentation and Cecal Microflora of Laiwu Black Rabbits

  • SUN Haitao ,
  • WANG Yong ,
  • LIU Gongyan ,
  • XU Yunhua ,
  • ZHAO Guisheng ,
  • XUE Haipeng ,
  • LI Meng
Expand
  • 1. Shandong Key Laboratory of Animal Disease Control and Breeding, Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Institute, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan 250100, China;
    2. Shandong Province Jinan Animal Husbandry Technology Extension Station, Jinan 250100, China;
    3. Jinan Laiwu Black Rabbit Seed Industry Technology Co., Ltd., Jinan 250100, China

Received date: 2020-11-06

  Online published: 2021-05-14

Supported by

 

摘要

本试验旨在研究饲粮不同比例生姜秸秆替代花生秧对莱芜黑兔胃肠道发育、小肠组织形态结构、盲肠发酵和盲肠内容物微生物区系的影响。试验选取45日龄育肥期莱芜黑兔160只,随机分为4组,分别饲喂以生姜秸秆替代0(A组)、5%(B组)、10%(C组)和15%(D组)花生秧的全价配合饲料,每组5个重复,每个重复8只家兔。预试期7 d,正试期47 d。结果表明:1)饲粮不同比例生姜秸秆替代花生秧对莱芜黑兔胃相对重量、胃内容物相对重量和大肠内容物相对重量有显著影响(P<0.05),其中C组和D组的胃相对重量显著高于A组和B组(P<0.05),D组胃内容物相对重量显著高于其他各组(P<0.05),B组、C组和D组大肠内容物相对重量显著高于A组(P<0.05)。2)饲粮不同比例生姜秸秆替代花生秧对莱芜黑兔小肠肌层厚度有显著影响(P<0.05),D组显著高于其他各组(P<0.05)。3)饲粮不同比例生姜秸秆替代花生秧对莱芜黑兔盲肠内容物中乙酸、丙酸和丁酸含量以及乙酸/(丙酸+丁酸)有显著影响(P<0.05),其中D组乙酸含量以及乙酸/(丙酸+丁酸)显著高于其他各组(P<0.05),丙酸和丁酸含量显著低于A组和B组(P<0.05)。4)莱芜黑兔盲肠内容物微生物组成在门水平上占据主导地位的主要有厚壁菌门(Firmicutes)、拟杆菌门(Bacteroidetes)、软壁菌门(Tenericutes),Shannon指数在D组与A组之间存在显著差异(P<0.05),表明高比例生姜秸秆替代花生秧能够影响盲肠内容物微生物区系。综上所述,饲粮适宜比例(5%~10%)的生姜秸秆替代花生秧对莱芜黑兔的胃肠道发育、小肠组织形态结构、盲肠发酵和盲肠内容物微生物区系无明显不良影响,生姜秸秆可用作家兔粗饲料原料在生产上使用。

本文引用格式

孙海涛 , 王勇 , 刘公言 , 徐云华 , 赵桂省 , 薛海鹏 , 李萌 . 饲粮不同比例生姜秸秆替代花生秧对莱芜黑兔胃肠道发育、盲肠发酵和盲肠微生物区系的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2021 , 33(5) : 2875 -2886 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2021.05.045

Abstract

This experiment was conducted to investigate the effects of different ratios of ginger straw substituted for peanut seedling in diets on gastrointestinal development, histological structure of small intestine, cecal fermentation and cecal microflora of Laiwu black rabbits. A total of 160 fattening Laiwu black rabbits at 45 days of age were randomly divided into 4 groups with 5 replicates in each group and each replicate contained 8 rabbits. Rabbits in the 4 groups were fed diets with 0 (group A), 5% (group B), 10% (group C) and 15% (group D) ginger straws replacing peanut seedlings diets, respectively. The trial lasted for 7 days for adaptation, and 47 days for test. The results showed as follows:1) different ratios of ginger straw substituted for peanut seedling in diets had significant effects on the relative weight of stomach, stomach contents and large intestine contents (P<0.05), among which the relative weight of stomach in group C and group D was significantly higher than that in group B and group A (P<0.05); the relative weight of gastric content in group D was significantly higher than that in other groups (P<0.05); the relative weight of large intestine content in groups B, C and D was significantly higher than that in group A (P<0.05). 2) Different ratios of ginger straw substituted for peanut seedling in diets had significant effects on the thickness of intestinal muscle layer (P<0.05), and group D was significantly higher than others groups (P<0.05). 3) The contents of acetic acid, propionic acid, butyric acid and acetic acid/(propionic acid+butyric acid) in cecal contents of Laiwu black rabbits were significantly different (P<0.05). The acetic acid content and acetic acid/(propionic acid+butyric acid) in group D were significantly higher than those in other groups (P<0.05), while the contents of propionic acid and butyric acid were significantly lower than those in groups A and B (P<0.05). 4) The dominant microbial composition of cecal contents in Laiwu black rabbits was Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Tenericutes, and there were significant differences in Shannon index between group D and group A (P<0.05), indicating that high level of ginger straw instead of peanut seedling could affect the microflora of cecal contents. In conclusion, replacing peanut seedling with the optimum level (5% to 10%) of ginger straw in diets has no obvious adverse effects on gastrointestinal development, intestinal histological structure, cecal fermentation and cecal content microflora of Laiwu black rabbits. Therefore, ginger straw can be used as a raw material for rabbit feed.

参考文献

[1] 高强,孙志民,张成保.大姜秸秆的应用现状、对策及技术展望[J].农业装备与车辆工程,2019,57(增刊):178-181. GAO Q,SUN Z M,ZHANG C B.Current situation,countermeasures and technology prospect of ginger straw[J].Agricultural Equipment and Vehicle Engineeing,2019,57(Suppl.):178-181.(in Chinese)
[2] 陆小虹,冯清泉.花生秧粉代替苜蓿草粉对兔饲养效果的初步观察[J].上海实验动物科学,1995,15(4):233-234. LU X H,FENG Q Q.Preliminary observation on the feeding effect of peanut seedling powder instead of alfalfa powder on rabbits[J].Shanghai Laboratory Animal Science,1995,15(4):233-234.(in Chinese)
[3] 田小蜜,苏加义.用花生藤粉饲喂繁殖獭兔的应用研究[J].安徽农学通报,2009,15(9):189,211. TIAN X M,SU J Y.Study on the application of peanut vine powder in breeding Rex rabbits[J].Anhui Agricultural Bulletin,2009,15(9):189,211.(in Chinese)
[4] 马佳,郭东新,田河,等.花生秧在肉兔中的表观消化能和主要养分消化率的评定[J].饲料工业,2010,31(21):62-64. MA J,GUO D X,TIAN H,et al.Evaluation of apparent digestibility and digestibility of main nutrients of peanut seedlings in meat rabbits[J].Feed Industry,2010,31(21):62-64.(in Chinese)
[5] 杨在宾,于彩云,周雪梅,等.生姜粉在饲料储藏和畜禽生产中应用研究进展[J].饲料工业,2018,39(18):1-8. YANG Z B,YU C Y,ZHOU X M,et al.Research progress of application of ginger powder in feed storage and livestock production[J].Feed Industry,2018,39(18):1-8.(in Chinese)
[6] 刘公言,王勇,赵桂省,等.饲粮不同生姜秸秆替代花生秧比例对莱芜黑兔生长性能、屠宰性能和肌肉品质的影响[J/OL].动物营养学报:1-10[2021-01-17].http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.5461.S.20201218.0938.002.html. LIU G Y,WANG Y,ZHAO G S,et al.Effects of different ginger straws replacing peanut seedlings diets on growth performance,slaughter performance and meat quality of Laiwu black rabbits[J/OL].Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 1-10[2021-01-17].http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.5461.S.20201218.0938.002.html.(in Chinese)
[7] NRC.Nutrient requirements of rabbits[S].2nd ed.Washington,D.C.:National Academy Press,1977.
[8] DE BLAS C,WISEMAN J.The nutrition of the rabbit[M].New York:CABI Publishing,1998:297-308.
[9] MARGÜENDA I,NICODEMUS N,VADILLO S,et al.Effect of dietary type and level of fibre on rabbit carcass yield and its microbiological characteristics[J].Livestock Science,2012,145(1/2/3):7-12.
[10] 刘磊,李福昌.肉兔营养需要量研究进展[J].动物营养学报,2020,32(10):4765-4769. LIU L,LI F.Research progress of nutrient requirements of meat rabbits[J].Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition,2020,32(10):4765-4769.(in Chinese)
[11] TAO Z Y,LI F C.Effects of dietary neutral detergent fibre on production performance,nutrient utilization,caecum fermentation and fibrolytic activity in 2- to 3-month-old New Zealand rabbits[J].Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition,2006,90(11/12):467-473.
[12] CHAO H Y,LI F C.Effect of level of fibre on performance and digestion traits in growing rabbits[J].Animal Feed Science and Technology,2008,144(3/4):279-291.
[13] GARCÍA J,CARABAÑO R,DE BLAS J C.Effect of fiber source on cell wall digestibility and rate of passage in rabbits[J].Journal of Animal Science,1999,77(4):898-905.  
[14] YU B,PETER W S.Effects of crude fibre level in the diet on the intestinal morphology of growing rabbits[J].Laboratory Animal,1996,30(2):143-148.  
[15] CHIOU P W S,YU B,LIN C.Effect of different components of dietary fiber on the intestinal morphology of domestic rabbits[J].Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A:Physiology,1994,108(4):629-638.  
[16] XICCATO G,TROCINO A,CARRARO L,et al.Digestible fibre to starch ratio and antibiotic treatment time in growing rabbits affected by epizootic rabbit enteropathy[C]//Proceedings of the 9th World Rabbit Congress.Verona,Italy:[s.n.],2008:847-851.
[17] VAAHTOVUO J,KORKEAMÄKI M,MUNUKKA E,et al.Microbial balance index-A view on the intestinal microbiota[J].Livestock Science,2007,109(1/2/3):174-178.
[18] 武帅,郭东新.饲粮中添加花生秧对伊拉兔肠道菌群的影响[J].动物营养学报,2019,31(6):2735-2744. WU S,GUO D X.Effects of adding peanut seedlings in diet on intestinal microflora of Ira rabbits[J].Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition,2019,31(6):2735-2744.(in Chinese)
[19] 郑建婷,冯国亮,曹亮,等.柠檬酸对伊拉肉兔盲肠微生物多样性及代谢产物的影响[J].动物营养学报,2020,32(8):3808-3818. ZHENG J T,FENG G L,CAO L,et al.Effects of citric acid on caecal microbial diversity and metabolites of Ira rabbits[J].Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition,2020,32(8):3808-3818.(in Chinese)
[20] MONTEILS V,CAUQUIL L,COMBES S,et al.Potential core species and satellite species in the bacterial community within the rabbit caecum[J].FEMS Microbiology Ecology,2008,66(3):620-629.  
[21] WU Z Y,ZHOU H J,LI F C,et al.Effect of dietary fiber levels on bacterial composition with age in the cecum of meat rabbits[J].MicrobiologyOpen,2018,8(5):e00708.
[22] ABECIA L,RODRÍGUEZ-ROMERO N,YAÑEZ-RUIZ D R,et al.Biodiversity and fermentative activity of caecal microbial communities in wild and farm rabbits from Spain[J].Anaerobe,2012,18(3):344-349.  
文章导航

/