研究论文 RESEARCH PAPER

鸡体内小肠液和模拟小肠液对饲料蛋白质消化的比较研究

  • 徐蔼宣 ,
  • 于耀 ,
  • 王钰明 ,
  • 解竞静 ,
  • 邹轶 ,
  • 谭会泽 ,
  • 黄艳玲 ,
  • 赵峰
展开
  • 1. 西南民族大学畜牧兽医学院, 青藏高原动物遗传资源保护与利用重点实验室, 成都 610041;
    2. 中国农业科学院 北京畜牧兽医研究所, 动物营养学国家重点实验室, 北京 100193;
    3. 温氏食品集团股份有限公司, 云浮 527400
徐蔼宣(1996-),女,辽宁丹东人,硕士研究生,从事动物营养与饲料科学研究。E-mail:1136033667@qq.com

收稿日期: 2021-07-18

  网络出版日期: 2022-02-15

基金资助

国家自然科学基金项目(31972586);西南民族大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目(2021PYXM01);温氏食品集团股份有限公司与中国农业科学院北京畜牧兽医研究所合作项目(2019-YF-06)

Comparative Study on Endogenous and Simulated Small Intestinal Fluid to Digest Protein in Feed for Chicken

  • XU Aixuan ,
  • YU Yao ,
  • WANG Yuming ,
  • XIE Jingjing ,
  • ZOU Yi ,
  • TAN Huize ,
  • HUANG Yanling ,
  • ZHAO Feng
Expand
  • 1. Key Laboratory of Qinghai-Tibet Plateau Animal Genetic Resource and Utilization, College of Animal and Veterinary Science, Southwest Minzu University, Chengdu 610041, China;
    2. State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China;
    3. Wen's Food Group Co., Ltd., Yunfu 527400, China

Received date: 2021-07-18

  Online published: 2022-02-15

摘要

本试验旨在比较鸡体内小肠液(ESIF)和模拟小肠液(SSIF)对饲料蛋白质进行仿生消化后残渣中蛋白质分解产物片段分布的差异。采用两样本比较试验设计,其中小肠液分别为ESIF和SSIF,以豆粕、棉籽粕、菜籽粕、玉米蛋白粉和酪蛋白为蛋白质饲料原料的代表性底物。在单胃动物仿生消化系统中,以2种小肠液对每个饲料原料进行仿生消化,每个处理5个重复,每个重复1根消化管。以生理盐水提取残渣的蛋白质,然后进行十二烷基硫酸钠聚丙烯酰胺凝胶电泳(SDS-PAGE)分析,使用GS-900成像系统搭配Image Lab进行蛋白质分子量分布计算及采用Quantity One软件进行相似性分析。结果表明:ESIF和SSIF对豆粕、棉籽粕、菜籽粕、玉米蛋白粉和酪蛋白的消化残渣蛋白质分子量分布的相似性分别为69.9%、30.8%、90.1%、77.7%和74.2%(P<0.01)。ESIF消化残渣在13~74 ku低分子量蛋白质的分布上显著高于SSIF (P<0.05),而在104~132 ku高分子量蛋白质的分布上显著低于SSIF (P<0.05),这一差异在棉籽粕上更加明显。由此可见,ESIF与SSIF水解饲料后残渣中蛋白质分子量分布的相似性因饲料来源的不同而呈现较大的差异;ESIF水解饲料后残渣中分子量相对低的蛋白质占比高,而SSIF水解残渣中分子量相对高的蛋白质占比高。

本文引用格式

徐蔼宣 , 于耀 , 王钰明 , 解竞静 , 邹轶 , 谭会泽 , 黄艳玲 , 赵峰 . 鸡体内小肠液和模拟小肠液对饲料蛋白质消化的比较研究[J]. 动物营养学报, 2022 , 34(2) : 1325 -1333 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2022.02.064

Abstract

This experiment was conducted to compare the fragment distribution of protein decomposition products in residues of feed protein biomimetic digestion with endogenous small intestinal fluid (ESIF) and simulated small intestinal fluid (SSIF) in chicken. A two-sample experiment design was adopted to compare small intestine fluid of ESIF and SSIF. Soybean meal, cottonseed meal, rapeseed meal, corn gluten meal and casein were used as the representative substrates of protein feed. In the simulated digestion system for monogastric animal, each feed ingredient was digested with 2 kinds of small intestinal fluids. Each treatment contained 5 replicates with 1 digestive tube per replicate. Sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) was performed for proteins extracted with physiological saline in residues. GS-900 imaging system with Image Lab and Quantity One software were used to calculate the molecular weight distribution and perform similarity analysis for proteins. The results showed that the similarity of molecular weight distribution of proteins in residues from soybean meal, cottonseed meal, rapeseed meal, corn gluten meal and casein digested with ESIF and SSIF were 69.9%, 30.8%, 90.1%, 77.7% and 74.2% (P<0.01), respectively. The distribution of low molecular weight of 13 to 74 ku proteins in residues digested with ESIF was significantly higher than that with SSIF (P<0.05), the distribution of high molecular weight of 104 to 132 ku proteins in residues digested with ESIF was significantly lower than that with SSIF group (P<0.05), and this difference was more obvious in cottonseed meal. In conclusion, the similarity of molecular weight distribution of proteins in residues from feed ingredients digested with ESIF and SSIF was a great difference in different sources of feed; in proteins in residues from feed ingredients digested by small intestinal fluid, a greater proportion of relatively low molecular weight was observed in ESIF, whereas a greater proportion of relatively high molecular weight was observed in SSIF.

参考文献

[1] BOISEN S, FERNÁNDEZ J A.Prediction of the apparent ileal digestibility of protein and amino acids in feedstuffs and feed mixtures for pigs by in vitro analyses[J].Animal Feed Science and Technology, 1995, 51(1/2):29-43.
[2] BRYAN D D S L, ABBOTT D A, CLASSEN H L.Digestion kinetics of protein sources determined using an in vitro chicken model[J].Animal Feed Science and Technology, 2019, 248:106-113.
[3] BOISEN S.In vitro analyses for predicting standardised ileal digestibility of protein and amino acids in actual batches of feedstuffs and diets for pigs[J].Livestock Science, 2007, 109(1/3):182-185.
[4] ROCHELL S J, KUHLERS D L, DOZIER W A 3RD.Relationship between in vitro assays and standardized ileal amino acid digestibility of animal protein meals in broilers[J].Poultry Science, 2013, 92(1):158-170.  
[5] SHEEN H, ALI-KHAN Z.Protein sample concentration by repeated loading onto SDS-PAGE[J].Analytical Biochemistry, 2005, 343(2):338-340.  
[6] KIES A K, DE JONGE L H, KEMME P A, et al.Interaction between protein, phytate, and microbial phytase.In vitro studies[J].Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2006, 54(5):1753-1758.  
[7] SADEGHI A A, NIKKHAH A, SHAWRANG P, et al.Protein degradation kinetics of untreated and treated soybean meal using SDS-PAGE[J].Animal Feed Science and Technology, 2006, 126(1/2):121-133.
[8] ARTE E, RIZZELLO C G, VERNI M, et al.Impact of enzymatic and microbial bioprocessing on protein modification and nutritional properties of wheat bran[J].Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2015, 63(39):8685-8693.  
[9] THOMAS K, AALBERS M, BANNON G A, et al.A multi-laboratory evaluation of a common in vitro pepsin digestion assay protocol used in assessing the safety of novel proteins[J].Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, 2004, 39(2):87-98.  
[10] BRYAN D D S L, ABBOTT D A, CLASSEN H L.Development of an in vitro protein digestibility assay mimicking the chicken digestive tract[J].Animal Nutrition, 2018, 4(4):401-409.  
[11] ROSA-SIBAKOV N, RE M, KARSMA A, et al.Phytic acid reduction by bioprocessing as a tool to improve the in vitro digestibility of faba bean protein[J].Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2018, 66(40):10394-10399.  
[12] SOUSA R, PORTMANN R, DUBOIS S, et al.Protein digestion of different protein sources using the INFOGEST static digestion model[J].Food Research International, 2020, 130:108996.
[13] 党方坤.生长猪肠内消化酶的纯化与肠液体外模拟的研究[D].硕士学位论文.北京:中国农业科学院, 2018. DANG F K.Study on purification of digestive enzymes in intestinal tract and in vitro simulation of intestinal fluid for growing pigs[D].Master's Thesis.Beijing:Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2018.(in Chinese)
[14] DAHLQVIST A.A method for the determination of amylase in intestinal content[J].Scandinavian Journal of Clinical & Laboratory Investigation, 1962, 14(2):145-151.  
[15] RICK W.Chymotrypsin:measurements with N-benzoyl-L-tyrosine ethyl ester as substrate[M]//BERGMEYER H U.Methods of enzymatic analysis.2nd ed.Pittsburgh:Academic Press, 1974:1009-1012.
[16] RICK W.Trypsin:measurement with Nα-p-toluenesulfonyl-L-arginine methyl ester as substrate[M]//BERGMEYER H U.Methods of enzymatic analysis.2nd ed.Pittsburgh:Academic Press, 1974:1021-1024.
[17] 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 中国国家标准化管理委员会.饲料中水分的测定:GB/T 6435-2014[S].北京:中国标准出版社, 2014. General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China, Standardization Administration of the People's Republic of China.Determination of moisture in feedstuffs:GB/T 6435-2014[S].Beijing:Standards Press of China, 2014.(in Chinese)
[18] 国家市场监督管理总局, 国家标准化管理委员会.饲料中粗蛋白的测定 凯氏定氮法:GB/T 6432-2018[S].北京:中国标准出版社, 2018. State Administration for Market Regulation, Standardization Administration of the People's Republic of China.Determination of crude protein in feeds-Kjeldahl method:GB/T 6432-2018[S].Beijing:Standards Press of China, 2018.(in Chinese)
[19] 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 中国国家标准化管理委员会.饲料中粗脂肪的测定:GB/T 6433-2006[S].北京:中国标准出版社, 2006. General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China, Standardization Administration of the People's Republic of China.Determinaiion of crude fat in feeds:GB/T 6433-2006[S].Beijing:Standards Press of China, 2006.(in Chinese)
[20] 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 中国国家标准化管理委员会.饲料中中性洗涤纤维 (NDF) 的测定:GB/T 20806-2006[S].北京:中国标准出版社, 2006. General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China, Standardization Administration of the People's Republic of China.Determination of neutral detergent fiber in feedstuffs:GB/T 20806-2006[S].Beijing:Standards Press of China, 2006.(in Chinese)
[21] 中华人民共和国农业部.饲料中酸性洗涤纤维的测定:NY/T 1459-2007[S].北京:农业出版社, 2007. The ministry of agriculture of the People's Republic of China.Determination of acid detergent fiber in feedstuff (ADF):NY/T 1459-2007[S].Beijing:Agricultural Publishing House, 2007.(in Chinese)
[22] International Organization for Standardization.Animal feeding stuffs, animal products, and faeces or urine-determination of gross calorific value-Bomb calorimeter method:US ISO 9831:1998[S].Geneva:ISO, 1998.
[23] ZHAO F, REN L Q, MI B M, et al.Developing a computer-controlled simulated digestion system to predict the concentration of metabolizable energy of feedstuffs for rooster[J].Journal of Animal Science, 2014, 92(4):1537-1547.  
[24] 傅淑宏, 魏开华, 李晓霞, 等.胃腺癌患者粪便蛋白质的提取及初步质谱分析[J].现代检验医学杂志, 2015(4):14-20. FU S H, WEI K H, LI X X, et al.Protein extraction and preliminary research on proteins in stools from patients with gastric adenocarcinoma[J].Journal of Modern Laboratory Medicine, 2015(4):14-20.(in Chinese)
[25] 彭运智, 谭会泽, 刘松柏, 等.基于仿生消化系统估测肉鸭饲料原料代谢能的研究[J].动物营养学报, 2020, 32(2):881-889. PENG Y Z, TAN H Z, LIU S B, et al.A study of feed ingredient metabolisable energy of meat ducks predicted with simulated digestion system[J].Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2020, 32(2):881-889.(in Chinese)
[26] 魏杰, 谢明, 赵峰, 等.豆粕的鸭代谢能与酶水解能相关性研究[C]//中国畜牧兽医学会2018年学术年会禽病学分会第十九次学术研讨会论文集.南宁:中国畜牧兽医学会, 2018:311. WEI J, XIE M, ZHAO F, et al.Correlation between metabolizable energy and enzymatic hydrolysis energy of soybean meal in ducks[C]//Proceedings of the 19th Symposium of Avian Epidemiology Branch of the Chinese Society of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine.Nanning:Chinese Association of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, 2018:311.(in Chinese)
[27] 张莉, 赵峰, 卞国志, 等.两种模拟肠液在仿生消化法估测鸭饲料能量消化率中的比较研究[C]//中国畜牧兽医学会动物营养学分会第七届中国饲料营养学术研讨会论文集.郑州:中国畜牧兽医学会动物营养学分会, 2014:254-255. ZHANG L, ZHAO F, BIAN G Z, et al.Comparative study of two kinds of simulated intestinal fluids in estimating energy digestibility of duck feed by bionic digestion method[C]//Proceedings of the 7th Chinese Feed Nutrition Academic Symposium, Animal Nutrition Branch, Chinese Society of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine.Zhengzhou:Animal Nutrition Branch of China Institute of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, 2014:254-255.(in Chinese)
[28] 王亚.基于模拟生长猪胃-小肠消化过程测定谷实类饲料原料蛋白质效价的研究[D].硕士学位论文.北京:中国农业科学院, 2019. WANG Y.Study on determination of protein availability in cereal g rains based on simulated gastro-small intestinal digestion process for growing pigs[D].Master's Thesis.Beijing:Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2019.(in Chinese)
[29] DUODU K G, TAYLOR J R N, BELTON P S, et al.Factors affecting sorghum protein digestibility[J].Journal of Cereal Science, 2003, 38(2):117-131.  
[30] COLLIER K, BARBER L, LOTT J N A.A study of indigestible protein fractions of rice (Oryza sativa, L.) endosperm fed to mice (Mus musculus) and sheep (Ovis musimon):a qualitative and quantitative analysis[J].Journal of Cereal Science, 1998, 27(1):95-101.  
[31] NURFAIDAH, METUSALACH, MAHENDRADATTA M, et al.Analysis of molecular weight albumin concentrate on various types of freshwater fish using SDS-page electrophoresis method[J].IOP Conference Series:Earth and Environmental Science, 2020, 564:012057.
[32] ELKIN R G, FREED M B, HAMAKER B R, et al.Condensed tannins are only partially responsible for variations in nutrient digestibilities of sorghum grain cultivars[J].Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 1996, 44(3):848-853.  
[33] VALDES E V, LEESON S.Measurement of metabolizable energy in poultry feeds by an in vitro system[J].Poultry Science, 1992, 71(9):1493-1503.  
[34] BOISEN S, FERNÁNDEZ J A.Prediction of the total tract digestibility of energy in feedstuffs and pig diets by in vitro analyses[J].Animal Feed Science and Technology, 1997, 68(3/4):277-286.
[35] ZHANG L, ZHAO F, ZHANG H, et al.Validation of in vitro digestion using simulated small intestinal fluid with specific digestive activity to predict the metabolizable energy of feed ingredients for duck[J].Poultry Science, 2019, 98(3):1280-1287.  
[36] 任立芹.仿生法评定黄羽肉鸡常用饲料代谢能和可消化氨基酸研究[D].博士学位论文.北京:中国农业科学院, 2012. REN L Q.Study on the method to predict the metabolizable energy and digestible amino acid of ingredients in yellow chickens using the simulative digestion system[D].Ph.D.Thesis.Beijing:Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2012.(in Chinese)
文章导航

/