综述 REVIEW

反刍动物瘤胃甲烷产生与排放的主要生物学特征

  • 贾鹏 ,
  • 董利锋 ,
  • 屠焰 ,
  • 刁其玉
展开
  • 1. 中国农业科学院饲料研究所, 奶牛营养学北京市重点实验室, 反刍动物及其幼畜营养代谢中美联合研究中心, 北京 100081;
    2. 兰州大学草地农业科技学院, 兰州 730020
贾鹏(1993—),男,新疆库尔勒人,博士研究生,从事动物营养与饲料科学研究。E-mail:jiazhenpeng123123@163.com

收稿日期: 2021-11-17

  网络出版日期: 2022-06-14

基金资助

反刍动物甲烷测算模型及基于宏基因组学的减排技术(2016YFE0109000);中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费专项(Y2021GH18-2);奶牛产业技术体系北京市创新团队(BAIC06)

Main Biological Characteristics of Methane Production and Emission in Ruminants

  • JIA Peng ,
  • DONG Lifeng ,
  • TU Yan ,
  • DIAO Qiyu
Expand
  • 1. Sino-US Joint Lab on Nutrition and Metabolism of Ruminants, Beijing Key Laboratory for Dairy Cow Nutrition, Feed Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China;
    2. College of Pastoral Agriculture Science and Technology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730020, China

Received date: 2021-11-17

  Online published: 2022-06-14

摘要

畜牧业的甲烷排放使全球气候变暖,世界各国越来越重视甲烷减排,了解反刍动物甲烷排放特点是制定甲烷减排措施的前提。改变饲粮或者使用添加剂是目前最常用的措施,但是其效果不一致或者短暂,了解反刍动物甲烷排放特点,有助于制定针对性、长期性和稳定性的甲烷减排措施,本文主要以牛为代表进行论述。

本文引用格式

贾鹏 , 董利锋 , 屠焰 , 刁其玉 . 反刍动物瘤胃甲烷产生与排放的主要生物学特征[J]. 动物营养学报, 2022 , 34(6) : 3411 -3417 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2022.06.002

Abstract

Methane emissions from animal husbandry have made the global climate warmer. Countries around the world were paying more and more attention to methane emission reduction. Understanding the biological characteristics of methane emission from ruminants is the prerequisite for formulating methane emission reduction measures. Changing diets or using additives are currently the most effective measures, but they have inconsistent or short-term effects. According to the biological characteristics of ruminant methane emissions, targeted, long-term and stable methane emission reduction measures could be formulated, this review mainly focused on cattle.

参考文献

[1] FERNÁNDEZ C, HERNANDO I, MORENO-LATORRE E, et al.Development of a dynamic energy-partitioning model for enteric methane emissions and milk production in goats using energy balance data from indirect calorimetry studies[J].Animal, 2020, 14 (Suppl.2):s382-s395.
[2] 韩立群.碳中和的历史源起、各方立场及发展前景[J].国际研究参考, 2021(7):29-36, 44. HAN L Q.Carbon neutrality:historical origins, positions of various parties and prospects[J].International Study Reference, 2021(7):29-36, 44.(in Chinese)
[3] GERBER P J, STEINFELD H, HENDERSON B, et al.Tackling climate change through livestock:a global assessment of emissions and mitigation opportunities[M].Rome:Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), 2013.
[4] HAQUE M N.Dietary manipulation:a sustainable way to mitigate methane emissions from ruminants[J].Journal of Animal Science and Technology, 2018, 60(1):15.
[5] SMITH P, CLARK H, DONG H, et al.Chapter 11-agriculture, forestry and other land use (AFOLU)[M]//IPCC Working Group Ⅲ Contribution to AR5.Climate Change 2014:Mitigation of Climate Change.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 2014.
[6] HRISTOV A N, KEBREAB E, NIU M, et al.Symposium review:uncertainties in enteric methane inventories, measurement techniques, and prediction models[J].Journal of Dairy Science, 2018, 101(7):6655-6674.  
[7] KNAPP J R, LAUR G L, VADAS P A, et al.Invited review:enteric methane in dairy cattle production:quantifying the opportunities and impact of reducing emissions[J].Journal of Dairy Science, 2014, 97(6):3231-3261.  
[8] THORNTON J H, OWENS F N.Monensin supplementation and in vivo methane production by steers[J].Journal of Animal Science, 1981, 52(3):628-634.  
[9] HOLTER J B, YOUNG A J.Methane prediction in dry and lactating Holstein cows[J].Journal of Dairy Science, 1992, 75(8):2165-2175.  
[10] LYONS T, BIELAK A, DOYLE E, et al.Variations in methane yield and microbial community profiles in the rumen of dairy cows as they pass through stages of first lactation[J].Journal of Dairy Science, 2018, 101(6):5102-5114.  
[11] FAO.FAOSTAT[M].Rome:Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations, 2013.
[12] CANNAS A, TEDESCHI L O, ATZORI A S, et al.How can nutrition models increase the production efficiency of sheep and goat operations?[J].Animal Frontiers, 2019, 9(2):33-44.  
[13] VAN GASTELEN S, DIJKSTRA J, BANNINK A.Are dietary strategies to mitigate enteric methane emission equally effective across dairy cattle, beef cattle, and sheep?[J].Journal of Dairy Science, 2019, 102(7):6109-6130.  
[14] NDAO S, TRAORÉ E H, ICKOWICZ A, et al.Estimation of enteric methane emission factors for Ndama cattle in the Sudanian zone of Senegal[J].Tropical Animal Health and Production, 2020, 52(6):2883-2895.  
[15] DALL-ORSOLETTA A C, LEURENT-COLETTE S, LAUNAY F, et al.A quantitative description of the effect of breed, first calving age and feeding strategy on dairy systems enteric methane emission[J].Livestock Science, 2019, 224:87-95.
[16] THAKURI S, BASKOTA P, KHATRI S B, et al.Methane emission factors and carbon fluxes from enteric fermentation in cattle of Nepal Himalaya[J].Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 746:141184.
[17] PINARES-PATIÑO C S, HICKEY S M, YOUNG E A, et al.Heritability estimates of methane emissions from sheep[J].Animal, 2013, 7(Suppl.2):316-321.
[18] JONKER A, MACLEAN S, WOYIMO WOJU C, et al.Excreta emissions in progeny of low and high enteric methane yield selection line sheep fed pasture of different qualities[J].Animal Feed Science and Technology, 2019, 257:114289.
[19] ROEHE R, DEWHURST R J, DUTHIE C A, et al.Bovine host genetic variation influences rumen microbial methane production with best selection criterion for low methane emitting and efficiently feed converting hosts based on metagenomic gene abundance[J].Plos Genetics, 2016, 12(2):e1005846.
[20] JONKER A, HICKEY S M, MCEWAN J C, et al.Rumen characteristics and total tract digestibility in low and high methane yield selection line sheep offered fresh good or poor quality pasture[C]//Proceedings of the World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production.[s.l.]:[s.n.], 2018.
[21] DONG H M, MANGINO J, MCALLISTE T A, et al.Chapter 10:emissions from livestock and manure management[C]//2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories.[s.l.]:[s.n.], 2006.
[22] JIAO H P, YAN T H, WILLS D A, et al.Development of prediction models for quantification of total methane emission from enteric fermentation of young Holstein cattle at various ages[J].Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, 2014, 183:160-166.
[23] 李斌昌.日粮精粗比对不同月龄后备奶牛甲烷排放与生长性能和营养物质消化的影响[D].硕士学位论文.兰州:甘肃农业大学, 2019. LI B C.Effects of the ratios of concentrates to roughages on methane emission, growth performance and nutrient digestion of replacement heifers at different ages[D].Master's Thesis.Lanzhou:Gansu Agricultural University, 2019.(in Chinese)
[24] ZEITZ J O, SOLIVA C R, KREUZER M.Swiss diet types for cattle:how accurately are they reflected by the intergovernmental panel on climate change default values?[J].Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences, 2012, 9(Sup-1):199-216.
[25] RAMÍREZ-RESTREPO C A, CLARK H, MUETZEl S.Methane emissions from young and mature dairy cattle[J].Animal Production Science, 2015, 56(11):1897-1905.
[26] COPPA M, JURQUET J, EUGōNE M, et al.Repeatability and ranking of long-term enteric methane emissions measurement on dairy cows across diets and time using GreenFeed system in farm-conditions[J].Methods, 2021, 186:59-67.
[27] BIELAK A, DERNO M, TUCHSCHERER A, et al.Body fat mobilization in early lactation influences methane production of dairy cows[J].Scientific Reports, 2016, 6(1):28135.
[28] GARNSWORTHY P C, CRAIGON J, HERNANDEZ-MEDRANO J H, et al.Variation among individual dairy cows in methane measurements made on farm during milking[J].Journal of Dairy Science, 2012, 95(6):3181-3189.  
[29] PARK A F, DEFRAIN J M, TITGEMEYER E C, et al.Changes in rumen capacity of dairy cows during the periparturient period[J].Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Reports, 2001(2):12-14.
[30] REYNOLDS C K, DVRST B, LUPOLI B, et al.Visceral tissue mass and rumen volume in dairy cows during the transition from late gestation to early lactation[J].Journal of Dairy Science, 2004, 87(4):961-971.  
[31] 王贝.饲粮NDF/NFC对不同泌乳阶段奶牛瘤胃甲烷排放量、营养物质表观消化率及生产性能的影响[D].硕士学位论文.阿拉尔:塔里木大学, 2019. WANG B.Effects of dietary NDF/NFC on rumen methane emissions, nutrient apparent digestibility and production performance of dairy cows during different lactating stages[D].Master's Thesis.Alaer:Tarim University, 2019.(in Chinese)
[32] RISCHEWSKI J, BIELAK A, NVRNBERG G, et al.Rapid communication:ranking dairy cows for methane emissions measured using respiration chamber or GreenFeed techniques during early, peak, and late lactation[J].Journal of Animal Science, 2017, 95(7):3154-3159.
[33] SHI W B, MOON C D, LEAHY S C, et al.Methane yield phenotypes linked to differential gene expression in the sheep rumen microbiome[J].Genome Research, 2014, 24(9):1517-1525.  
[34] GRANDL F, AMELCHANKA S L, FURGER M, et al.Biological implications of longevity in dairy cows:2.Changes in methane emissions and efficiency with age[J].Journal of Dairy Science, 2016, 99(5):3472-3485.  
[35] BAZZOLI I, DE MARCHI M, CECCHINATO A, et al.Factors associated with age at slaughter and carcass weight, price, and value of dairy cull cows[J].Journal of Dairy Science, 2014, 97(2):1082-1091.  
[36] MOSSA A R, JOUANY J P, NEWBOLDC J.Methane production by ruminants:its contribution to global warming[J].Annales de Zootechnie, 2000, 49(3):231-253.  
[37] ULYATT M J.Contribution of chewing during eating and rumination to the clearance of digesta from the ruminoreticulum[J].Control of Digestion and Metabolism in Ruminants, 1986(6):498-515.
[38] ALLEN M S, MERTENS D R.Evaluating constraints on fiber digestion by rumen microbes[J].The Journal of Nutrition, 1988, 118(2):261-270.  
[39] HEGARTY R S, GOOPY J P, HERD R M, et al.Cattle selected for lower residual feed intake have reduced daily methane production[J].Journal of Animal Science, 2007, 85(6):1479-1486.  
[40] BASARAB J A, BEAUCHEMIN K A, BARON V S, et al.Reducing GHG emissions through genetic improvement for feed efficiency:effects on economically important traits and enteric methane production[J].Animal, 2013, 7(S2):303-315.
[41] OKINE E K, MATHISON G W, HARDIN R T.Effects of changes in frequency of reticular contractions on fluid and particulate passage rates in cattle[J].Journal of Animal Science, 1989, 67(12):3388-3396.  
[42] KAMKE J, KITTELMANN S, SONI P, et al.Rumen metagenome and metatranscriptome analyses of low methane yield sheep reveals a Sharpea-enriched microbiome characterised by lactic acid formation and utilisation[J].Microbiome, 2016, 4(1):56.
[43] WALLACE R J, ROOKE J A, MCKAIN N, et al.The rumen microbial metagenome associated with high methane production in cattle[J].BMC Genomics, 2015, 16:839.
[44] KITTELMANN S, PINARES-PATIÑO C S, SEEDORF H, et al.Two different bacterial community types are linked with the low-methane emission trait in sheep[J].Plos One, 2014, 9(7):e103171.
[45] MORITA H, SHIRATORI C, MURAKAMI M, et al.Sharpea azabuensis gen. nov., sp. nov., a Gram-positive, strictly anaerobic bacterium isolated from the faeces of thoroughbred horses[J].International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 2008, 58(Pt.12):2682-2686.
[46] SHABAT S K B, SASSON G, DORON-FAIGENBOIM A, et al.Specific microbiome-dependent mechanisms underlie the energy harvest efficiency of ruminants[J].The ISME Journal, 2016, 10(12):2958-2972.  
[47] YÁÑEZ-RUIZ D R, ABECIA L, NEWBOLD C J.Manipulating rumen microbiome and fermentation through interventions during early life:a review[J].Frontiers in Microbiology, 2015, 6:1133.
文章导航

/