研究论文 RESEARCH PAPER

西南喀斯特山区120种野生牧草的常规营养成分含量及其聚类分析

  • 王德凤 ,
  • 韩勇 ,
  • 袁超 ,
  • 张乃锋 ,
  • 崔凯 ,
  • 杨洋
展开
  • 1. 贵州省畜牧兽医研究所, 贵阳 550025;
    2. 中国农业科学院饲料研究所, 北京 100081
王德凤(1981—),女,贵州兴义人,副研究员,硕士,主要从事反刍动物营养研究工作。E-mail:1123031337@qq.com

收稿日期: 2021-09-16

  网络出版日期: 2022-08-11

基金资助

毕节试验区梅花鹿及黑山羊特色产业提质增效配套技术集成与示范应用(黔科合服企[2020]4009);肉羊培育与产业化学科团队建设(黔牧医所团队培育[2018]03号)

Conventional Nutrient Contents of 120 Wild Forages from Southwest Karst Mountainous Areas and Their Clustering Analysis

  • WANG Defeng ,
  • HAN Yong ,
  • YUAN Chao ,
  • ZHANG Naifeng ,
  • CUI Kai ,
  • YANG Yang
Expand
  • 1. Guizhou Institute of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Science, Guiyang 550025, China;
    2. Feed Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science, Beijing 100081, China

Received date: 2021-09-16

  Online published: 2022-08-11

摘要

为促进野生牧草资源科学利用,促进生态环境保护与草牧业持续健康发展双赢,本研究采集了西南喀斯特山区有代表性的120种野生牧草,进行常规营养成分含量测定,并根据营养价值对其进行聚类分析。结果表明:西南喀斯特山区14种野生豆科牧草粗蛋白质(CP)含量在9.93%~27.17%,粗脂肪(EE)、粗灰分(CF)、中性洗涤纤维(NDF)、钙(Ca)、磷(P)含量分别在1.44%~10.38%、13.93%~38.03%、24.44%~66.68%、1.07%~2.64%、0.09%~0.85%;27种野生禾本科牧草CP、EE、CF、NDF、Ca、P含量分别在3.68%~22.70%、0.51%~5.18%、28.18%~47.50%、46.21%~77.87%、0.62%~2.66%、0.08%~0.40%,CP含量与CF含量呈负相关(P<0.01),与P含量呈正相关(P<0.01),二元相关方程为y=22.30-0.44x1+23.49x2(x1=CF含量,x2=P含量;r2=0.85);79种其他科野生牧草CP、EE、CF、NDF、Ca、P含量分别在4.40%~29.02%、0.56%~6.84%、11.74%~51.63%、20.60%~87.51%、0.25%~5.00%、0.06%~1.22%,CP含量与CF含量呈负相关(P<0.01),与P含量呈正相关(P<0.01),二元相关方程为y=21.45-0.36x1+7.17x2(x1=CF含量,x2=P含量;r2=0.72)。120种野生牧草CP含量与CF含量呈负相关(P<0.01),与P含量呈正相关(P<0.01),二元相关方程为y=21.86-0.36x1+8.06x2(x1=CF含量,x2=P含量;r2=0.62)。本研究得出,西南喀斯特山区14种豆科野生牧草中,优等以上牧草有6种,占42.86%;27种禾本科野生牧草中,优等以上牧草有9种,占34.62%;79种其他科野生牧草中,优等以上牧草有65种,占82.28%;120种野生牧草中,鸡树条、稀莶、葛藤、黄花槐、水花生、竹节草、木贼、冬青、蔊菜、多花木兰这10种野生牧草营养价值相似,与其他牧草距离较远。

本文引用格式

王德凤 , 韩勇 , 袁超 , 张乃锋 , 崔凯 , 杨洋 . 西南喀斯特山区120种野生牧草的常规营养成分含量及其聚类分析[J]. 动物营养学报, 2022 , 34(8) : 5255 -5269 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2022.08.047

Abstract

In order to promote scientific utilization for wild forage resources, and to promote the ecological environment protection and sustainable and healthy development of grass husbandry, a total of 120 representative wild forages from southwest karst mountainous areas were collected in this experiment, and the conventional nutrient contents of them were measured, and clustering analysis was carried out according to nutritional value. The results showed that, the crude protein (CP) content of 14 wild leguminous forages ranged from 9.93% to 27.17%, and the contents of ether extract (EE), crude fiber (CF), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), calcium (Ca) and phosphorus (P) ranged from 1.44% to 10.38%, 13.93% to 38.03%, 24.44% to 66.68%, 1.07% to 2.64%, 0.09% to 0.85%, respectively. The contents of CP, EE, CF, NDF, Ca and P in 27 wild gramineous forages ranged from 3.86% to 22.70%, 0.51% to 5.18%, 28.18% to 47.50%, 46.21% to 77.87%, 0.62% to 2.66%, 0.08% to 0.40%, respectively, and the CP content was negatively correlated with CF content (P<0.01), while it was positively correlated with P content (P<0.01), the binary correlation equation was y=22.30-0.44x1+23.49x2 (x1=CF content, x2=P content; r2=0.85). The contents of CP, EE, CF, NDF, Ca and P in 79 other families wild forages ranged from 4.40% to 29.02%, 0.56% to 6.84%, 11.74% to 51.63%, 20.60% to 87.51%, 0.25% to 5.00%, 0.06% to 1.22%, respectively, and the CP content was negatively correlated with CF content (P<0.01), while it was positively correlated with P content (P<0.01), the binary correlation equation was y=21.45-0.36x1+7.17x2 (x1=CF content, x2=P content; r2=0.72). For all tested 120 wild forages, the CP content was negatively correlated with CF content (P<0.01), while it was positively correlated with P content (P<0.01), the binary correlation equation was y=21.86-0.36x1+8.06x2 (x1=CF content, x2=P content; r2=0.62). The conclusion of this study is that, of the 14 tested wild leguminous forages from southwest karst mountainous areas, the superior forages are 6 (42.86%); of the 27 tested wild gramineous forages, the superior forages are 9 (34.62%); of the 79 tested other families wild forages, the superior forages are 65 (82.28%); of the 120 tested wild forages, nutritive value of Viburnum opulus Linn. var. calvescens (Rehd.) Hara, Siegesbeckia orientalis Linn., Argyreia seguinii (Levl.) Van. ex Levl., Sophora xanthantha C. Y. Ma, Alternanthera Philoxeroides (Mart.) Griseb., Chrysopogon aciculatus (Retz.) Trin., Hippochaete hiemale (L.) Boerner, Ilex chinensis Sims, Rorippa indica (L.) Hiern, Magnolia multiflora M. C. Wang et C. L. Min are similarity, and they are farther away to other tested forages.

参考文献

[1] 许留兴,熊康宁,张锦华,等.西南喀斯特地区草地生态系统面临的问题及对策[J].草业科学,2015,32(5):828-836.XU L X,XIONG K N,ZHANG J H,et al.The problems and resolutions of grassland ecosystem in karst of southwest China[J].Pratacultural Science,2015,32(5):828-836.(in Chinese)
[2] 王天生.贵州草地生态畜牧业可持续发展问题探讨[J].贵州农业科学,2006,34(增刊1):109-112.WANG T S.Discussion on sustainable development of pasture ecological livestock husbandry in Guizhou[J].Guizhou Agricultural Sciences,2006,34(Suppl.1):109-112.(in Chinese)
[3] 马丽,董建芳,莎依热木古丽.野生牧草种质资源在生态环境中的地位和保护措施[J].新疆畜牧业,2014(8):62-63,59.MA L,DONG J F,SHA Y R M G L.Status and protection measures of wild forage germplasm resources in ecological environment[J].Animal Husbandry in Xinjiang,2014(8):62-63,59.(in Chinese)
[4] 方精云,李凌浩,蒋高明,等.如何理解"草牧业"?[J].环境经济,2015(18):29.FANG J Y,LI L H,JIANG G M,et al.How to understand "grass husbandry"?[J].Environmental Economy,2015(18):29.(in Chinese)
[5] 李新一,孙研.对草牧业的理解与认识[J].中国草食动物科学,2016,36(3):65-69.LI X Y,SUN Y.Understanding and understanding of grassland and animal husbandry[J].China Herbivore Science,2016,36(3):65-69.(in Chinese)
[6] SHARIFF A R,BIONDINI M E,GRYGIEL C E.Grazing intensity effects on litter decomposition and soil nitrogen mineralization[J].Journal of Range Manage,1994,47(6):444-449.
[7] OJIMA D S,DIRKS B O M,GLENN E P,et al.Assessment of C budget for grasslands and drylands of the world[J].Water,Air,and Soil Pollution,1993,70(1):95-109.
[8] 陈洪波."产业生态化和生态产业化"的逻辑内涵与实现途径[J].生态经济,2018,34(10):209-213,220.CHEN H B.Logical connotation and implementation way of "industrial ecologicalization and ecological industrialization"[J].Ecological Economy,2018,34(10):209-213,220.(in Chinese)
[9] AOAC.Official methods of analysis[M].15th ed.Artington:Association of Official Analytical Chemists,1990.
[10] 张丽英.饲料分析及饲料质量检测技术[M].4版.北京:中国农业大学出版社,2010:48-150.ZHANG L Y.Feed analysis and quality test technology[M].4th ed.Beijing:China Agricultural University Press,2010:48-150.(in Chinese)
[11] 李志强,艾琳,张海南.苜蓿干草质量分级:T/CAAA 001-2018[S].北京:中国畜牧业协会,2018.LI Z Q,AI L,ZHANG H N.Alfalfa hay quality grade:T/CAAA 001-2018[S].Beijing:China Animal Agriculture Association,2018.(in Chinese)
[12] 皇甫江云,卢欣石,赵熙贵,等.贵州草地资源现状及开发利用对策[J].草业科学,2009,26(9):70-76.HUANGFU J Y,LU X S,ZHAO X G,et al.The present situation of natural grassland resource in Guizhou Province and its development and utilization strategy[J].Pratacultural Science,2009,26(9):70-76.(in Chinese)
[13] 张桂杰,王红梅,罗海玲,等.应用体外产气与体外消化法评定不同生育期豆科牧草营养价值[J].动物营养学报,2011,23(3):387-394.ZHANG G J,WANG H M,LUO H L,et al.Evaluation of nutritional values of leguminous forages in different growing periods by in vitro gas production and in vitro digestion techniques[J].Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition,2011,23(3):387-394.(in Chinese)
[14] 余梅,钟声,吴文荣,等.几种优质豆科饲用灌木营养价值评定[J].草业与畜牧,2015(3):29-31,59.YU M,ZHONG S,WU W R,et al.Evaluation of nutritional value of several high quality leguminous forage shrubs[J].Prataculture&Animal Husbandry,2015(3):29-31,59.(in Chinese)
[15] 秦彧,李晓忠,姜文清,等.西藏主要作物与牧草营养成分及其营养类型研究[J].草业学报,2010,19(5):122-129.QIN Y,LI X Z,JIANG W Q,et al.An investigation of nutrition components and types in Tibet main crop straws and pastures[J].Acta Prataculturae Sinica,2010,19(5):122-129.(in Chinese)
[16] 满其贤,魏时来,闫继弘,等.地域和收获期对天然牧草营养价值的影响[J].中国草食动物科学,2019,39(4):18-24.MAN Q X,WEI S L,YAN J H,et al.Effects of regionals and harvest periods on the nutritional value of natural pasture[J].China Herbivore Science,2019,39(4):18-24.(in Chinese)
[17] 李志强,艾琳,张海南.燕麦干草质量分级:T/CAAA 002-2018[S].北京:中国畜牧业协会,2018.LI Z Q,AI L,ZHANG H N.Oats hay quality grade:T/CAAA 002-2018[S].Beijing:China Animal Agriculture Association,2018.(in Chinese)
[18] 陈晓琳.肉羊常用粗饲料营养价值和瘤胃降解特性研究[D].硕士学位论文.青岛:青岛农业大学,2014.CHEN X L.Study on nutritive value and ruminal degradability characteristics of roughage in sheep[D].Master's Thesis.Qingdao:Qingdao Agricultural University,2014.(in Chinese)
[19] 田兵,冉雪琴,薛红,等.贵州42种野生牧草营养价值灰色关联度分析[J].草业学报,2014,23(1):92-103.TIAN B,RAN X Q,XUE H,et al.Evaluation of the nutritive value of 42 kinds of forage in Guizhou Province by grey relational grade analysis[J].Acta Prataculturae Sinica,2014,23(1):92-103.(in Chinese)
[20] 张胜权.三江源地区草甸草场13种典型牧草营养价值评定研究[D].硕士学位论文.西宁:青海大学,2013.ZHANG S Q.Nutrient assessment of 13kinds of typical pastures in meadow grassland of Sanjiangyuan region[D].Master's Thesis.Xining:Qinghai University,2013.(in Chinese)
[21] 帕明秀,黄志伟.广西38种牧草的化学成分分析及营养价值评定[J].广西畜牧兽医,2014,30(6):287-289.PA M X,HUANG Z W.Chemical composition analysis and nutritional value evaluation of 38 forages in Guangxi[J].Guangxi Journal of Animal Husbandry&Veterinary Medicine,2014,30(6):287-289.(in Chinese)
文章导航

/