研究论文 RESEARCH PAPER

乳酸杆菌对肉鸡生长性能、消化酶活性和营养物质表观消化率的影响

  • 管乐琪 ,
  • 俞晓蓉 ,
  • 戴政列 ,
  • 刘金松 ,
  • 代兵 ,
  • 杨彩梅 ,
  • 张瑞强 ,
  • 吴艳萍
展开
  • 1. 浙江农林大学动物科技学院·动物医学院, 杭州 311300;
    2. 浙江惠嘉生物科技股份有限公司, 安吉 313300
管乐琪(2002—),男,台州黄岩人,本科生,从事动物营养与饲料科学的研究。E-mail:glq1589631229@163.com

收稿日期: 2022-03-22

  网络出版日期: 2022-10-17

基金资助

浙江省领军型创新创业团队项目(2020R01015);浙江省"尖兵""领雁"研发攻关计划(2022C02043)

Effects of Lactobacillus on Growth Performance, Digestive Enzyme Activities and Nutrient Apparent Digestibility of Broilers

  • GUAN Leqi ,
  • YU Xiaorong ,
  • DAI Zhenglie ,
  • LIU Jinsong ,
  • DAI Bing ,
  • YANG Caimei ,
  • ZHANG Ruiqiang ,
  • WU Yanping
Expand
  • 1. College of Animal Science and Technology·College of Veterinary Medicine, Zhejiang Agricultural and Forestry University, Hangzhou 311300, China;
    2. Zhejiang Vegamax Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Anji 313300, China

Received date: 2022-03-22

  Online published: 2022-10-17

摘要

本试验将类干酪乳杆菌(LPI)和植物乳杆菌(LPM)添加到肉鸡饲粮中,旨在研究其对肉鸡生长性能、消化酶活性和营养物质表观消化率的影响。随机选取1日龄雄性健康黄羽肉仔鸡480只,分为4组,每组8个重复,每个重复15只。对照组(CON组)饲喂基础饲粮,试验组分别饲喂在基础饲粮中添加1 000 mg/kg的LPI (LPI组,活菌数3×109 CFU/g)、1 000 mg/kg的LPM (LPM组,活菌数3.5×108 CFU/g)和2 000 mg/kg的复合益生菌制剂(CL组,LPI活菌数1.5×109 CFU/g,LPM活菌数1.75×108 CFU/g)的试验饲粮。试验期为56 d。结果表明:与CON组相比,LPM组肉鸡末重和平均日增重显著提高(P<0.05),28、56日龄胰腺淀粉酶活性和28日龄胰腺胰蛋白酶活性显著增加(P<0.05),54~56日龄有机物表观消化率和23~25日龄、54~56日龄粗蛋白质表观消化率显著提高(P<0.05);CL组54~56日龄粗蛋白质表观消化率显著提高(P<0.05);LPM组、CL组56日龄胰腺消化器官指数显著提高(P<0.05),56日龄空肠食糜淀粉酶活性和28日龄空肠食糜胰蛋白酶活性显著提高(P<0.05),28和56日龄血清尿素氮含量显著降低(P<0.05);LPI组、LPM组和CL组56日龄胰腺胰蛋白酶活性显著提高(P<0.05),56日龄空肠食糜胰蛋白酶活性显著提高(P<0.05)。综上所述,饲粮中添加LPM和LPI均可提高消化酶活性,且LPM效果更佳,同时LPM具有提高肉鸡生长性能、消化器官发育和改善肉鸡有机物和粗蛋白质表观消化率,降低血清尿素氮含量的作用。此外,LPM和LPI复配未表现出协同益生效果。

本文引用格式

管乐琪 , 俞晓蓉 , 戴政列 , 刘金松 , 代兵 , 杨彩梅 , 张瑞强 , 吴艳萍 . 乳酸杆菌对肉鸡生长性能、消化酶活性和营养物质表观消化率的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2022 , 34(9) : 5721 -5729 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2022.09.027

Abstract

This experiment was conducted to study the effects of Lactobacillus plantarum (LPM) and Lactobacillus casei (LPI) on growth performance, digestive enzyme activities and nutrient apparent digestibility of broilers. A total of 480 one-day-old healthy yellow feather broilers were randomly selected and classified into four groups, with eight replicates each group, each replicate contained 15 broilers. Control group (CON) was fed a basal diet, experimental groups were fed the basal diets supplemented with 1 000 mg/kg LPI (LPI group, number of viable bacteria was 3×109 CFU/g), 1 000 mg/kg LPM (LPM group, number of viable bacteria was 3.5×108 CFU/g) and 2 000 mg/kg complex-probiotic-preparation (CL group, number of viable bacteria LPI was 1.5×109 CFU/g, number of viable bacteria LPM was 1.75×108 CFU/g), respectively. The feeding trial lasted for 56 days. The results showed as follows:compared with CON group, LPM significantly increased the final weight and average daily gain (P<0.05), enhanced the 28 and 56 days of age amylase activities and 28 days of age trypsin activity of pancreatic (P<0.05), upregulated the apparent digestibilities of 54 to 56 days of age organic matter and 23 to 25 days of age and 54 to 56 days of age crude protein (P<0.05). Adding CL could improve the apparent digestibility of 54 to 56 days of age crude protein (P<0.05). LPM or CL increased 56 days of age pancreas index (P<0.05), enhanced the 56 days of age amylase activity and 28 days of age trypsin activity of jejunum chyme (P<0.05), and decreased the 28 and 56 days of age serum urea nitrogen content (P<0.05). Diet supplemented with LPI, LPM and CL could increase the 56 days of age trypsin activity of pancreatic chyme (P<0.05), and increased the 56 days of age trypsin activity of jejunal chyme (P<0.05). In conclusion, LPM and LPI added to the diet can improve the growth performance and digestive organ indexes, enhance digestive enzyme activities, increase the apparent digestibilities of nutrients, and decrease serum urea nitrogen content. And, data show that LPM has better effect on improving the growth and nutrient metabolism in broilers. The LPM or LPI combination shows no significant synergistic effects in this study.

参考文献

[1] HU Y A, CHENG H F, TAO S.Environmental and human health challenges of industrial livestock and poultry farming in China and their mitigation[J].Environment International, 2017, 107:111-130.
[2] QIAN Y, SONG K H, HU T, et al.Environmental status of livestock and poultry sectors in China under current transformation stage[J].Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 622/623:702-709.
[3] DE VRIES M C, VAUGHAN E E, KLEEREBEZEM M, et al.Lactobacillus plantarum-survival, functional and potential probiotic properties in the human intestinal tract[J].International Dairy Journal, 2006, 16(9):1018-1028.  
[4] 王水泉, 包艳, 董喜梅, 等.植物乳杆菌的生理功能及应用[J].中国农业科技导报, 2010, 12(4):49-55. WANG S Q, BAO Y, DONG X M, et al.Physiological function and application of Lactobacillus plantarum[J].Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2010, 12(4):49-55.(in Chinese)
[5] THU T V, LOH T C, FOO H L, et al.Effects of liquid metabolite combinations produced by Lactobacillus plantarum on growth performance, faeces characteristics, intestinal morphology and diarrhoea incidence in postweaning piglets[J].Tropical Animal Health and Production, 2011, 43(1):69-75.  
[6] HOLZAPFEL W H, HABERER P, GEISEN R, et al.Taxonomy and important features of probiotic microorganisms in food and nutrition[J].The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2001, 73(2):365s-373s.
[7] 李阳.壳寡糖和干酪乳杆菌对肉鸡肉品质和脂肪代谢的影响及其作用机理[D].硕士学位论文.北京:中国农业科学院, 2016. LI Y.Effects of chitosan oligosaccharide and Lactobacillus casei on meat quality and lipid metabolism of broilers and its underlying mechanism[D].Master's Thesis.Beijing:Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2016.(in Chinese)
[8] DALE N.National research council nutrient requirements of poultry-ninth revised edition (1994)[J].Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 1994, 3(1):101.
[9] ZHANG L, YAN R, ZHANG R Q, et al.Effect of different levels of palygorskite inclusion on pellet quality, growth performance and nutrient utilization in broilers[J].Animal Feed Science and Technology, 2017, 223:73-81.
[10] WANG L F, LIU C H, CHEN M, et al.A novel Lactobacillus plantarum strain P-8 activates beneficial immune response of broiler chickens[J].International Immunopharmacology, 2015, 29(2):901-907.  
[11] SHEN X J, YI D, NI X Q, et al.Effects of Lactobacillus plantarum on production performance, immune characteristics, antioxidant status, and intestinal microflora of bursin-immunized broilers[J].Canadian Journal of Microbiology, 2014, 60(4):193-202.  
[12] SONG J, XIAO K, KE Y L, et al.Effect of a probiotic mixture on intestinal microflora, morphology, and barrier integrity of broilers subjected to heat stress[J].Poultry Science, 2014, 93(3):581-588.  
[13] XIE R T, AMENYOGBE E, CHEN G, et al.Effects of feed fat level on growth performance, body composition and serum biochemical indices of hybrid grouper (Epinephelus fuscoguttatus×Epinephelus polyphekadion)[J].Aquaculture, 2021, 530:735813.
[14] BROWN J A, CLINE T R.Urea excretion in the pig:an indicator of protein quality and amino acid requirements[J].The Journal of Nutrition, 1974, 104(5):542-545.  
[15] HAHN J D, BIEHL R R, BAKER D H.Ideal digestible lysine level for early-and late-finishing swine[J].Journal of Animal Science, 1995, 73(3):773-784.  
[16] BUYSE J, JANSSENS G P J, DECUYPERE E.The effects of dietary L-carnitine supplementation on the performance, organ weights and circulating hormone and metabolite concentrations of broiler chickens reared under a normal or low temperature schedule[J].British Poultry Science, 2001, 42(2):230-241.  
[17] 唐志刚.益生菌对饲喂不同营养水平日粮肉鸡消化和免疫功能的影响[D].硕士学位论文.南京:南京农业大学, 2010. TANG Z G.Effect of probiotics on immune and digestive functions of broilers fed diets with different nutrient levels[D].Master's Thesis.Nanjing:Nanjing Agricultural University, 2010.(in Chinese)
[18] 王煜琦, 吴腾龙, 宋春阳, 等.植物乳杆菌与枯草芽孢杆菌对育肥猪生长性能和养分表观消化率及血清生化指标的影响[J].中国畜牧杂志, 2021, 57(8):237-241. WANG Y Q, WU T L, SONG C Y, et al.Effects of Lactobacillu plantarum and Bacillus subtilis on growth performance, nutrient apparent digestibility and serum biochemical indexes of finishing pigs[J].Chinese Journal of Animal Science, 2021, 57(8):237-241.(in Chinese)
[19] SHON K S, HONG J W, KWON O S, et al.Effects of Lactobacillus reuteri-based direct-fed microbial supplementation for growing-finishing pigs[J].Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 2005, 18(3):370-374.  
[20] VIGORS S, O'DOHERTY J V, KELLY A K, et al.The effect of divergence in feed efficiency on the intestinal microbiota and the intestinal immune response in both unchallenged and lipopolysaccharide challenged ileal and colonic explants[J].PloS One, 2016, 11(2):e0148145.
[21] HARDING S V, FRASER K G, WYKES L J.Probiotics stimulate liver and plasma protein synthesis in piglets with dextran sulfate-induced colitis and macronutrient restriction[J].The Journal of Nutrition, 2008, 138(11):2129-2135.  
[22] KHONYOUNG D, YAMAUCHI K E.Effects of heat-killed Lactobacillus plantarum L-137 on morphology of intestinal villi and epithelial cells in broiler chickens[J].Journal of Applied Animal Research, 2012, 40(2):140-147.  
文章导航

/