1 材料与方法
1.1 试验材料
1.2 主要设备
1.3 试验方法
1.3.1 MTT法检测LPS、CBD对HC11细胞活力的影响
1.3.2 CBD对LPS诱导的HC11细胞内ROS和MDA含量的影响
1.3.3 CBD对LPS诱导的HC11细胞内GSH-Px、SOD活性及T-AOC的影响
1.3.4 实时荧光定量PCR(qRT-PCR)检测CBD对LPS诱导的HC11细胞内抗氧化相关基因mRNA表达的影响
表1 实时荧光定量PCR引物序列Table 1 Primer sequences for qRT-PCR |
| 基因 Genes | 登录号 Accession No. | 引物序列 Primer sequences (5'—3') | 产物大小 Product size/bp |
|---|---|---|---|
| 转录因子E2相关因子2 Nrf2 | NM_010902.5 | F:CAGCATAGAGCAGGACATGGAG R:GAACAGCGGTAGTATCAGCCAG | 107 |
| 血红素加氧酶-1 HO-1 | NM_010442.2 | F:CCTCACTGGCAGGAAATCATC R:CCTCGTGGAGACGCTTTACATA | 67 |
| NAD(P)H醌氧化还原酶1 NQO1 | NM_008706.5 | F:GGTTTGGAGTCCCTGCCATT R:GCCTTCTTACTCCGGAAGGG | 112 |
| 超氧化物歧化酶1 SOD1 | XM_021209691.2 | F:ATGGGTTCCACGTCCATCAGTA R:CATTGCCCAGGTCTCCAACA | 132 |
| β-肌动蛋白 β-actin | NM_007393.5 | F:ACCGTGAAAAGATGACCCAG R:AGCCTGGATGGCTACGTACA | 71 |
1.3.5 Western blot检测CBD对LPS诱导的HC11细胞内抗氧化相关蛋白表达的影响
1.4 数据处理与分析
2 结果与分析
2.1 LPS、CBD对HC11细胞活力的影响
图1 LPS和CBD对HC11细胞活力的影响A:CBD对HC11细胞活力的影响;B:LPS与CBD+LPS对HC11细胞活力的影响。CON:对照组;CBD:CBD组;LPS:LPS组;CBD+LPS:CBD+LPS组;2、4、6、8、10、20:CBD作用浓度(μmol/L)。各组数据柱上的数值为与对照组相比较的P值。 Fig.1 Effects of LPS and CBD on viability of HC11 cells A: effects of CBD on viability of HC11 cells; B: effects of LPS and CBD+LPS on viability of HC11 cells. CON: control group; CBD: CBD group; LPS: LPS group; CBD+LPS: CBD+LPS group; 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 20: CBD action concentrations (μmol/L). The numeric value on the data column of each group was the P-value compared with CON group. |
2.2 CBD对LPS诱导的HC11细胞内ROS、MDA含量的影响
图2 CBD对LPS诱导的HC11细胞内ROS含量的影响(标尺为20 μm)A:对照组;B:LPS组;C:维生素E+LPS组;D:2 μmol/L CBD+LPS组;E:4 μmol/L CBD+LPS组;F:6 μmol/L CBD+LPS组。 Fig.2 Effects of CBD on ROS content in LPS-induced HC11 cells (scale bar=20 μm) A: control group; B: LPS group; C: VE+LPS group; D: 2 μmol/L CBD+LPS group; E: 4 μmol/L CBD+LPS group; F: 6 μmol/L CBD+LPS group. |
表2 CBD对LPS诱导的HC11细胞内MDA含量的影响Table 2 Effects of CBD on MDA content in LPS-induced HC11 cellsnmol/mg prot |
| 项目 Item | 组别 Groups | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 对照 Control | LPS | 2 μmol/L CBD+LPS | 4 μmol/L CBD+LPS | 6 μmol/L CBD+LPS | |
| 丙二醛 MDA | 0.86±0.19 | 1.94±0.07* | 1.50±0.05# | 1.19±0.06# | 0.85±0.07# |
“*”表示与对照组相比差异显著(P<0.05),“#”表示与LPS组相比差异显著(P<0.05)。 | |
“*” mean significant difference compared with control group (P<0.05), and “#” mean significant difference compared with LPS group (P<0.05). |
2.3 CBD对LPS诱导的HC11细胞内GSH-Px、SOD活性及T-AOC的影响
表3 CBD对LPS诱导的HC11细胞内GSH-Px、SOD活性及T-AOC的影响Table 3 Effects of CBD on activities of GSH-Px, SOD and T-AOC of LPS-induced HC11 cellsU/mg prot |
| 项目 Items | 组别 Groups | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 对照 Control | LPS | 2 μmol/L CBD+LPS | 4 μmol/L CBD+LPS | 6 μmol/L CBD+LPS | |
| 谷胱甘肽过氧化物酶GSH-Px | 103.10±3.57 | 35.41±3.81** | 46.95±2.19 | 64.36±7.21## | 81.10±8.94## |
| 超氧化物歧化酶SOD | 17.55±0.51 | 6.21±0.25** | 9.74±0.39## | 11.10±0.70## | 13.26±0.43## |
| 总抗氧化能力 T-AOC | 0.74±0.02 | 0.41±0.04** | 0.92±0.10# | 11.10±0.70## | 13.26±0.43## |
“**”表示与对照组相比差异极显著(P<0.01),“#”表示与LPS组相比差异显著(P<0.05),“##”表示与LPS组相比差异极显著(P<0.01)。 | |
“**” mean extremely significant difference compared with control group (P<0.01), “#” mean significant difference compared with LPS group (P<0.05), and “##” mean extremely significant difference compared with LPS group (P<0.01). |
2.4 CBD对LPS诱导的HC11细胞内抗氧化相关基因mRNA表达的影响
图3 CBD对LPS诱导的HC11细胞内抗氧化相关基因mRNA表达的影响“*”表示与对照组相比差异显著(P<0.05),“**”表示与对照组相比差异极显著(P<0.01),“#”表示与LPS组相比差异显著(P<0.05),“##”表示与LPS组相比差异极显著(P<0.01)。下图同。 Fig.3 Effects of CBD on expression of antioxidant-related genes in LPS-induced HC11 cells “*” mean significant difference compared with control group (P<0.05), “**” mean extremely significant difference compared with control group (P<0.01), “#” mean significant difference compared with LPS group (P<0.05), and “##” mean extremely significant difference compared with LPS group (P<0.01). The same as below. |

京公网安备 11010802041926号