1 材料与方法
1.1 试验材料与试验动物
1.2 试验设计与饲养管理
表1 基础饲粮组成及营养水平(干物质基础)Table 1 Composition and nutrient levels of the basal diet (DM basis) % |
| 项目Items | 含量Content | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 原料Ingredients | |||
| 玉米Corn | 38.00 | ||
| 豆粕Soybean meal | 3.00 | ||
| 菜籽粕Rapeseed meal | 2.00 | ||
| 喷浆玉米皮Sprayed corn pell | 4.00 | ||
| 大豆油Soybean oil | 0.80 | ||
| 碳酸氢钠NaHCO3 | 1.00 | ||
| 花生壳粉Peanut shell powder | 23.00 | ||
| 干酒糟及其可溶物DDGS | 4.00 | ||
| 棉籽粕Cottonseed meal | 2.50 | ||
| 氨基酸渣Amino acid residue | 1.00 | ||
| 氯化铵NH4Cl | 1.00 | ||
| 次粉Wheat middlings | 6.00 | ||
| 糖蜜Molasses | 2.00 | ||
| 石粉Limestone | 0.80 | ||
| 磷酸氢钙CaHPO4 | 1.50 | ||
| 食盐NaCl | 0.50 | ||
| 乙氧基喹啉Ethoxyquin | 0.50 | ||
| 玉米芯粉Corn cob meal | 7.00 | ||
| 预混料Premix1) | 1.40 | ||
| 合计Total | 100.00 | ||
| 营养水平Nutrient levels2) | |||
| 代谢能ME/(MJ/kg) | 6.78 | ||
| 粗蛋白质CP | 14.75 | ||
| 中性洗涤纤维NDF | 34.38 | ||
| 酸性洗涤纤维ADF | 23.72 | ||
| 粗脂肪EE | 2.26 | ||
| 粗灰分Ash | 8.81 | ||
| 钙Ca | 1.21 | ||
| 磷P | 0.55 |
1)每千克预混料含有 One kilogram of the premix contained the following:维生素A乙酸酯 VA acetate 633 000 IU,VD3 251 000 IU,DL-α-生育酚乙酸酯 DL-α-tocopherol acetate 3 690 IU,烟酰胺 nicotinamide 1 710 mg,Fe (as ferrous sulfate) 10 500 mg,Cu (as copper sulfate) 640 mg,Zn (as zinc sulfate) 3 900 mg,Mn (as manganese sulfate) 5 800 mg,I (as potassium iodide) 58.8 mg,Se (as sodium selenite) 13.49 mg,Co (as cobalt chloride) 71.2 mg。 2)代谢能为根据《肉羊营养需要量》(NY/T 816—2021)所得计算值,其余为实测值。ME was a calculated value according to Nutrient Requirements of Meat-Type Sheep and Goat (NY/T 816—2021), while the others were measured values. |
1.3 样品采集与指标测定
1.3.1 饲粮营养成分含量
1.3.2 生长性能
1.3.3 养分表观消化率
1.3.4 屠宰性能和器官指数
1.3.5 血清谷丙转氨酶(ALT)、谷草转氨酶(AST)、碱性磷酸酶(ALP)活性
1.3.6 肝脏ALT、AST、ALP活性
1.3.7 肝脏抗氧化指标
1.3.8 肝脏代谢组学分析
1.4 数据统计分析
2 结果与分析
2.1 葡萄籽原花青素对滩羊生长性能和养分表观消化率的影响
表2 葡萄籽原花青素对滩羊生长性能的影响Table 2 Effects of grape seed proanthocyanidins on growth performance of Tan sheep |
| 项目 Items | 组别Groups | P值P-value | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NC | LD | MD | HD | 处理 Treatment | 线性 Linear | 二次 Quadratic | ||||||||||
| 初重IBW/kg | 26.44±0.53 | 25.91±0.48 | 26.46±0.33 | 26.17±1.02 | 0.905 | 0.909 | 0.832 | |||||||||
| 末重FBW/kg | 42.52±0.51Aa | 37.94±0.17Bb | 42.07±0.43Aa | 40.80±1.07Aa | <0.001 | 0.802 | 0.054 | |||||||||
| 平均日增重 ADG/(kg/d) | 0.27±0.01a | 0.22±0.01b | 0.25±0.01ab | 0.23±0.02ab | 0.040 | 0.150 | 0.256 | |||||||||
| 平均日采食量 ADFI/(kg/d) | 1.94±0.08 | 1.68±0.11 | 1.85±0.07 | 1.86±0.07 | 0.218 | 0.910 | 0.122 | |||||||||
| 料重比F/G | 6.48±0.13Bb | 7.80±0.18Aa | 6.82±0.13ABab | 6.52±0.28ABab | <0.001 | 0.146 | <0.001 | |||||||||
同行数据肩标无字母或相同小写字母表示差异不显著(P>0.05),不同小写字母表示差异显著(P<0.05),不同大写字母表示差异极显著(P<0.01)。下表同。 | |
In the same row, values with no letter or the same lowercase letter superscripts mean no significant difference (P>0.05), while with different lowercase letter superscripts mean significant difference (P<0.05), and with different capital letter superscripts mean extremely significant difference (P<0.01). The same as below. |
表3 葡萄籽原花青素对滩羊养分表观消化率的影响Table 3 Effects of grape seed proanthocyanidins on nutrient apparent digestibility of Tan sheep % |
| 项目 Items | 组别Groups | P值P-value | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NC | LD | MD | HD | 处理 Treatment | 线性 Linear | 二次 Quadratic | ||
| 干物质DM | 77.46±1.71 | 77.83±0.32 | 75.17±0.56 | 75.76±1.17 | 0.457 | 0.206 | 0.947 | |
| 粗蛋白质CP | 75.58±1.85Aa | 70.21±0.63ABb | 66.86±1.91BCb | 62.89±1.25Cc | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.622 | |
| 中性洗涤纤维NDF | 54.13±0.50Aa | 44.89±1.51Bb | 41.06±0.27Cc | 36.25±0.50Dd | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.008 | |
| 酸性洗涤纤维ADF | 52.10±1.47Aa | 39.65±0.97Bb | 37.60±1.73BCb | 32.23±1.16Cc | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.018 | |
| 粗脂肪EE | 95.63±0.77 | 94.18±0.65 | 94.24±0.89 | 94.99±0.67 | 0.390 | 0.616 | 0.174 | |
2.2 葡萄籽原花青素对滩羊屠宰性能和器官指数的影响
表4 葡萄籽原花青素对滩羊屠宰性能的影响Table 4 Effects of grape seed proanthocyanidins on slaughter performance of Tan sheep |
| 项目 Items | 组别Groups | P值P-value | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NC | LD | MD | HD | 处理 Treatment | 线性 Linear | 二次 Quadratic | |||
| 宰前活重 Live weight before slaughter/kg | 40.66±0.82Aa | 36.48±0.71Bb | 39.39±0.66Aa | 37.85±1.04Aa | 0.007 | 0.144 | 0.118 | ||
| 胴体重 Carcass weight/kg | 20.24±0.56 | 19.14±0.50 | 20.09±0.63 | 19.59±0.66 | 0.550 | 0.708 | 0.616 | ||
| 屠宰率 Dressing percentage/% | 49.91±1.61 | 52.51±1.25 | 50.92±0.87 | 51.73±0.84 | 0.462 | 0.470 | 0.455 | ||
| GR值GR value/mm | 21.63±1.03 | 18.11±0.85 | 20.97±1.29 | 20.24±0.65 | 0.068 | 0.695 | 0.088 | ||
| 背膘厚度 Backfat thickness/mm | 8.82±0.63 | 7.50±0.70 | 8.84±1.09 | 9.78±0.96 | 0.335 | 0.282 | 0.203 | ||
| 眼肌面积 Eye muscle area/cm2 | 17.79±0.56 | 19.83±2.02 | 19.14±0.75 | 20.10±0.14 | 0.541 | 0.246 | 0.737 | ||
表5 葡萄籽原花青素对滩羊器官指数的影响Table 5 Effects of grape seed proanthocyanidins on organ indices of Tan sheep |
| 项目 Items | 组别Groups | P值P-value | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NC | LD | MD | HD | 处理 Treatment | 线性 Linear | 二次 Quadratic | ||
| 器官重Organ weight/g | ||||||||
| 肝脏Liver | 802.50±24.18 | 744.29±25.90 | 772.50±24.84 | 755.00±41.40 | 0.560 | 0.384 | 0.535 | |
| 肺脏Lung | 402.50±28.89 | 337.50±20.59 | 455.00±28.35 | 367.50±36.04 | 0.119 | 0.954 | 0.966 | |
| 心脏Heart | 170.00±7.79 | 165.00±6.81 | 182.50±10.81 | 168.75±17.87 | 0.737 | 0.794 | 0.710 | |
| 肾脏Kidney | 126.25±10.61 | 117.50±19.82 | 122.50±16.69 | 115.00±13.09 | 0.478 | 0.249 | 0.910 | |
| 器官指数Organ indices/% | ||||||||
| 肝脏Liver | 1.97±0.03 | 2.04±0.08 | 1.96±0.06 | 1.99±0.08 | 0.815 | 0.933 | 0.756 | |
| 肺脏Lung | 0.99±0.07 | 0.92±0.05 | 1.12±0.07 | 0.98±0.11 | 0.454 | 0.692 | 0.727 | |
| 心脏Heart | 0.42±0.02 | 0.45±0.02 | 0.47±0.03 | 0.44±0.04 | 0.715 | 0.499 | 0.353 | |
| 肾脏Kidney | 0.31±0.01 | 0.32±0.02 | 0.31±0.01 | 0.30±0.01 | 0.780 | 0.573 | 0.484 | |
2.3 葡萄籽原花青素对滩羊血清和肝脏ALT、AST、ALP活性的影响
表6 葡萄籽原花青素对滩羊血清和肝脏ALT、AST、ALP活性的影响Table 6 Effects of grape seed proanthocyanidins on activities of ALT, AST and ALP in serum and liver of Tan sheep |
| 项目 Items | 组别Groups | P值P-value | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NC | LD | MD | HD | 处理 Treatment | 线性 Linear | 二次 Quadratic | |||
| 血清Serum/(U/L) | |||||||||
| 丙氨酸氨基转移酶 ALT | 21.00±1.18 | 20.67±1.20 | 19.50±0.88 | 16.80±1.52 | 0.238 | 0.054 | 0.545 | ||
| 天门冬氨酸 氨基转移酶 AST | 126.16±7.07b | 148.57±7.53a | 133.33±3.34ab | 123.00±5.37b | 0.038 | 0.422 | 0.019 | ||
| 碱性磷酸酶 ALP | 357.50±23.86 | 310.00±13.17 | 338.60±15.89 | 274.40±28.39 | 0.070 | 0.037 | 0.698 | ||
| 肝脏Liver/(U/g prot) | |||||||||
| 丙氨酸氨基转移酶 ALT | 129.64±1.64Aa | 127.19±3.39Aa | 124.76±1.78Ba | 117.33±2.53Bb | 0.009 | <0.001 | 0.281 | ||
| 天门冬氨酸 氨基转移酶 AST | 359.20±20.08Aa | 321.25±11.98ABab | 316.23±9.94ABab | 281.84±9.92Bb | 0.008 | <0.001 | 0.902 | ||
| 碱性磷酸酶 ALP | 214.39±18.50Aa | 129.59±12.27Bb | 215.68±5.17Aa | 214.08±17.14Aa | <0.001 | 0.029 | <0.001 | ||
2.4 葡萄籽原花青素对滩羊肝脏抗氧化指标的影响
表7 葡萄籽原花青素对滩羊肝脏抗氧化指标的影响Table 7 Effects of grape seed proanthocyanidins on antioxidant indices in liver of Tan Sheep |
| 项目 Items | 组别Groups | P值P-value | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NC | LD | MD | HD | 处理 Treatment | 线性 Linear | 二次 Quadratic | |||
| 谷胱甘肽过氧化物酶 GSH-Px/ (U/mg prot) | 53.65±4.12 | 42.58±0.91 | 48.67±3.31 | 50.67±4.52 | 0.264 | 0.930 | 0.120 | ||
| 过氧化氢酶 CAT/(U/mg prot) | 191.86±21.06Bb | 164.28±20.81Bb | 221.85±17.65ABab | 282.06±13.46Aa | 0.006 | 0.002 | 0.037 | ||
| 超氧化物歧化酶 SOD/(U/mg prot) | 39.29±2.28 | 46.99±2.48 | 42.95±2.40 | 42.63±1.74 | 0.160 | 0.781 | 0.099 | ||
| 丙二醛 MDA/ (nmol/mg prot) | 0.46±0.03 | 0.48±0.07 | 0.42±0.02 | 0.41±0.03 | 0.705 | 0.347 | 0.749 | ||
| 总抗氧化能力 T-AOC/ (U/mg prot) | 1.31±0.21 | 1.25±0.32 | 1.04±0.21 | 1.37±0.14 | 0.839 | 0.968 | 0.507 | ||
2.5 葡萄籽原花青素对滩羊肝脏代谢组的影响
2.5.1 肝脏代谢物主成分分析
2.5.2 肝脏差异代谢物筛选
图2 肝脏差异代谢物火山图和韦恩图A:LD组vs NC组差异代谢物火山图;B:MD组vs NC组差异代谢物火山图;C:HD组vs NC组差异代谢物火山图;D:LD组vs NC组、MD组vs NC组、HD组vs NC组差异代谢物韦恩图。 Fig.2 Volcano plots and Venn diagram of differential metabolites in liver A: volcano plot of differential metabolites in LD group vs NC group; B: volcano plot of differential metabolites in MD group vs NC group; C: volcano plot of differential metabolites in HD group vs NC group; D: Venn diagram of differential metabolites in LD group vs NC group, MD group vs NC group, and HD group vs NC group. |
表8 肝脏差异代谢物的一级分类统计Table 8 Statistics on primary classification of differential metabolites in liver |
| 一级分类 Primary classification | LD组vs NC组 LD group vs NC group | MD组vs NC组 MD group vs NC group | HD组vs NC组 HD group vs NC group | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 甘油磷脂类Glycerophospholipids | 20(29.0%) | 5(15.6%) | 66(33.0%) | ||||
| 氨基酸及其代谢物Amino acids and metabolites | 11(15.9%) | 3(9.4%) | 28(14.0%) | ||||
| 杂环化合物Heterocyclic compounds | 8(11.6%) | 3(9.4%) | 11(5.5%) | ||||
| 苯及其衍生物Benzene and derivatives | 6(8.7%) | 2(6.2%) | 21(10.5%) | ||||
| 醛、酮、酯类Aldehydes, ketones and esters | 6(8.7%) | 6(18.8%) | 12(6.0%) | ||||
| 醇、胺类Alcohols and amines | 4(5.8%) | 1(3.1%) | 9(4.5%) | ||||
| 核苷酸及其代谢物Nucleotides and metabolites | 3(4.3%) | 3(9.4%) | 2(1.0%) | ||||
| 有机酸及其衍生物Organic acids and derivatives | 3(4.3%) | 3(9.4%) | 15(7.5%) | ||||
| 辅酶和维生素Coenzymes and vitamins | 1(1.5%) | 1(3.1%) | 1(0.5%) | ||||
| 脂肪酰类Fatty acyls | 0(0.0%) | 1(3.1%) | 8(4.0%) | ||||
| 激素及激素相关物质 Hormones and hormone-related substances | 0(0.0%) | 1(3.1%) | 3(1.5%) | ||||
| 鞘脂类Sphingolipids | 1(1.5%) | 0(0.0%) | 2(1.0%) | ||||
| 甘油脂类Glycerolipids | 1(1.5%) | 0(0.0%) | 6(3.0%) | ||||
| 胆汁酸Bile acids | 0(0.0%) | 0(0.0%) | 2(1.0%) | ||||
| 黄酮Flavonoids | 0(0.0%) | 0(0.0%) | 1(0.5%) | ||||
| 生物碱Alkaloids | 0(0.0%) | 0(0.0%) | 1(0.5%) | ||||
| 萜类Terpenoids | 0(0.0%) | 0(0.0%) | 2(1.0%) | ||||
| 碳水化合物及其代谢物Carbohydrates and their metabolites | 0(0.0%) | 0(0.0%) | 2(1.0%) | ||||
| 其他Others | 5(7.2%) | 3(9.4%) | 8(4.0%) | ||||
| 合计Total | 69(100%) | 32(100%) | 200(100%) |
括号外数据为差异代谢物数量,括号内数据为该类别差异代谢物占总差异代谢物的百分比。 | |
The data outside the brackets represented the number of differential metabolites, while the data inside the brackets represented the percentage of each category in the total differential metabolites. |
表9 LD组vs NC组、MD组vs NC组、HD组vs NC组共有的差异代谢物Table 9 Common differential metabolites in LD group vs NC group, MD group vs NC group and HD group vs NC group |
| 物质 Compounds | 代谢物编号 Metabolite ID | KEGG通路 KEGG pathways | 类型Type | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LD组vs NC组 LD group vs NC group | MD组vs NC组 MD group vs NC group | HD组vs NC组 HD group vs NC group | |||||||||
| 1,2-二十四烷酰基-sn- 甘油-3-磷酸胆碱 1,2-tetracosanoyl-sn- glycero-3-phosphocholine | C00157 | ko00564(甘油磷脂代谢), ko00590(花生四烯酸代谢), ko00591(亚油酸代谢), ko00592(α-亚麻酸代谢), ko01100(代谢通路), ko04723(逆行内源性大麻素信号), ko05231(癌症中的胆碱代谢) | 上调 | 上调 | 上调 | ||||||
| 卡泊三醇Calcipotriol | - | - | 下调 | 下调 | 下调 | ||||||
| 2'-O-甲基腺苷 2'-O-methyladenosine | - | - | 上调 | 上调 | 上调 | ||||||
| 甲萘醌 Menadione | C00828 | ko00130(泛醌和其他萜 烯醌生物合成), ko01100(代谢通路), ko01240(辅因子的生物合成), ko04977(维生素的消化与吸收) | 上调 | 上调 | 上调 | ||||||
| 双去甲氧基姜黄素 Bisdemethoxycurcumin | - | - | 下调 | 下调 | 下调 | ||||||
| 右雷佐生 Dexrazoxane | - | - | 上调 | 上调 | 上调 | ||||||
| (2S)-2-羟基-3,4- 二酮戊基磷酸酯 (2S)-2-hydroxy-3,4- dioxopentyl phosphate | C20959 | - | 上调 | 上调 | 上调 | ||||||
| 磷脂酰甘油(16∶0/18∶1(9Z) PG(16∶0/18∶1(9Z)) | - | - | 下调 | 下调 | 下调 | ||||||
“-”表示无对应的代谢物编号或KEGG通路。KEGG通路中,括号外为通路编号,括号内为通路名称。 | |
“-” indicated no corresponding metabolite ID or KEGG pathway. In KEGG pathways, codes outside the brackets represented pathway ID, and those inside indicated the corresponding pathway names. |
2.5.3 肝脏差异代谢物的生物学功能分析
图3 肝脏差异代谢物KEGG通路富集图A:LD组vs NC组差异代谢物KEGG通路富集图;B:MD组vs NC组差异代谢物KEGG通路富集图;C:HD组vs NC组差异代谢物KEGG通路富集图。A: KEGG pathway enrichment plot of differential metabolites in LD group vs NC group; B: KEGG pathway enrichment plot of differential metabolites in MD group vs NC group; C: KEGG pathway enrichment plot of differential metabolites in HD group vs NC group. Fig.3 KEGG pathway enrichment plots of differential metabolites in liver |

京公网安备 11010802041926号