1 材料与方法
1.1 试验材料
1.2 试验设计
表1 基础饲粮组成及营养水平(风干基础)Table 1 Composition and nutrient levels of basal diets (air-dry basis)% |
| 项目 Items | 含量Content | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1~30日龄 1 to 30 days of age | 31~60日龄 31 to 60 days of age | 61~90日龄 61 to 90 days of age | |
| 原料Ingredients | |||
| 玉米Corn | 56.41 | 62.96 | 67.33 |
| 麸皮Wheat bran | 1.20 | 5.00 | 5.20 |
| 猪油Pig oils | 2.50 | 2.80 | 2.90 |
| 豆粕Soybean meal | 35.35 | 26.21 | 22.01 |
| 进口鱼粉Imported fish meal | 1.20 | ||
| 磷酸氢钙CaHPO4 | 1.52 | 1.08 | 0.80 |
| 石粉Limestone | 1.10 | 1.15 | 1.13 |
| 食盐NaCl | 0.23 | 0.20 | 0.20 |
| 氯化胆碱Choline chloride | 0.26 | 0.20 | 0.15 |
| 赖氨酸Lys | 0.12 | 0.07 | |
| 蛋氨酸Met | 0.11 | 0.14 | 0.09 |
| 苏氨酸Thr | 0.02 | ||
| 多维Multi-vitamin1) | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 |
| 多矿Multi-mineral1) | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.10 |
| 合计Total | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
| 营养水平Nutrient levels2) | |||
| 代谢能ME/(MJ/kg) | 2.96 | 3.01 | 3.06 |
| 粗蛋白质CP | 21.01 | 17.55 | 16.05 |
| 粗纤维CF | 3.08 | 2.89 | 2.73 |
| 赖氨酸Lys | 1.15 | 0.97 | 0.83 |
| 蛋氨酸Met | 0.44 | 0.41 | 0.35 |
| 苏氨酸Thr | 0.81 | 0.68 | 0.60 |
| 钙Ca | 0.93 | 0.78 | 0.70 |
| 总磷TP | 0.65 | 0.55 | 0.49 |
| 有效磷AP | 0.42 | 0.32 | 0.27 |
1)多维和多矿为每千克饲粮提供 The multi-vitamin and multi-mineral provided the following per kilogram of diets:VA 12 500 IU,VB12 0.025 mg,VD3 3 500 IU,VE 20 IU,VK 2.65 mg,生物素 biotin 0.032 5 mg,叶酸 folic acid 12 mg,尼克酸 nicotinic acid 40 mg,泛酸 pantothenic acid 50 mg,吡哆醇 pyridoxine 4 mg,核黄素 riboflavin 5 mg,硫胺素 thiamine 3 mg,Cu (CuSO4) 6 mg,Zn (ZnSO4) 80 mg,Fe (FeSO4) 80 mg,Mn (MnSO4) 60 mg,I (KI) 0.35 mg,Se (NaSeO3) 0.15 mg。 2)代谢能、赖氨酸、蛋氨酸、苏氨酸和有效磷为计算值,粗蛋白质、粗纤维、钙和总磷为实测值。ME, Lys, Met, Thr and AP were calculated values, while CP, CF, Ca and TP were measured values. |
1.3 饲养管理
1.4 样品采集与指标测定
1.4.1 样品采集
1.4.2 饲粮营养水平测定
1.4.3 生长性能测定
ADG(g/d)=(FBW-IBW)/试验天数;
ADFI(g/d)=总采食量/试验天数;
F/G=ADFI/ADG。
1.4.4 屠宰性能测定
屠宰率(%)=(屠体重/活体重)×100;
半净膛率(%)=(半净膛重/活体重)×100;
全净膛率(%)=(全净膛重/活体重)×100;
胸肌率(%)=(胸肌重/全净膛重)×100;
腿肌率(%)=(腿肌重/全净膛重)×100。
1.4.5 肉品质测定
1.4.6 肌肉风味组分测定
表2 PEN3型电子鼻传感器及响应物质Table 2 PEN3 type electronic nose sensors and responsible substance |
| 编号Number | 传感器Sensors | 响应物质Responsible substance |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | W1C | 苯类及芳香族化合物 |
| 2 | W5S | 氮氧化物 |
| 3 | W3C | 氨类、芳香族化合物 |
| 4 | W6S | 对氢化物有选择性 |
| 5 | W5C | 烷烃类芳香成分 |
| 6 | W1S | 短链烷烃类 |
| 7 | W1W | 无机硫化物 |
| 8 | W2S | 醇类、醛类、酮类 |
| 9 | W2W | 芳烃化合物、有机硫化物 |
| 10 | W3S | 长链烷烃类化合物 |
1.4.7 肌肉质构特性测定
1.4.8 肌肉抗氧化能力测定
1.5 数据处理
2 结果与分析
2.1 植物精油与苯甲酸组合对淮北麻鸡生长性能的影响
表3 植物精油与苯甲酸组合对淮北麻鸡生长性能的影响Table 3 Effects of combination of EO and BA on growth performance of Huaibei partridge chickens |
| 项目 Items | 初始体重 IBW/g | 终末体重 FBW/g | 平均日增重 ADG/(g/d) | 平均日采食量 ADFI/(g/d) | 料重比 F/G | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 植物精油EO | 苯甲酸BA | |||||
| ﹣ | ﹣ | 26.02 | 656.16c | 7.00c | 22.99b | 3.94a |
| ﹢ | ﹣ | 25.91 | 746.39ab | 8.00ab | 25.58a | 3.23b |
| ﹣ | ﹢ | 25.98 | 759.53a | 8.15a | 25.69a | 3.09b |
| ﹢ | ﹢ | 25.93 | 714.13b | 7.65b | 24.13b | 3.37b |
| SEM | 0.10 | 10.33 | 0.11 | 0.30 | 0.08 | |
| 植物精油EO | ||||||
| ﹣ | 26.00 | 707.85 | 7.58 | 24.34 | 3.51a | |
| ﹢ | 25.92 | 730.26 | 7.83 | 24.85 | 3.30b | |
| 苯甲酸BA | ||||||
| ﹣ | 25.97 | 701.28b | 7.50b | 24.28 | 3.58a | |
| ﹢ | 25.96 | 736.83a | 7.90a | 24.91 | 3.23b | |
| P值P-value | ||||||
| 植物精油EO | 0.667 | 0.103 | 0.101 | 0.217 | 0.046 | |
| 苯甲酸BA | 0.966 | 0.014 | 0.013 | 0.141 | 0.002 | |
| 植物精油×苯甲酸EO×BA | 0.873 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
“+”表示添加,“-”表示不添加。同列数据肩标不同小写字母表示差异显著(P<0.05),相同或无字母表示差异不显著(P>0.05)。下表同。 | |
“+” mean adding, and “-” mean without adding. In the same column, values with different small letter superscripts mean significant difference (P<0.05), while with the same or no letter superscripts mean no significant difference (P>0.05). The same as below. |
2.2 植物精油与苯甲酸组合对淮北麻鸡屠宰性能的影响
表4 植物精油与苯甲酸组合对淮北麻鸡屠宰性能的影响Table 4 Effects of combination of EO and BA on slaughter performance of Huaibei partridge chickens% |
| 项目 Items | 屠宰率 Dressing percentage | 半净膛率 Semi-eviscerated percentage | 全净膛率 Eviscerated percentage | 胸肌率 Breast muscle percentage | 腿肌率 Leg muscle percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 植物精油EO | 苯甲酸BA | |||||
| ﹣ | ﹣ | 86.79 | 81.58 | 72.85 | 12.67 | 19.21 |
| ﹢ | ﹣ | 87.03 | 81.42 | 74.74 | 12.96 | 19.09 |
| ﹣ | ﹢ | 88.65 | 84.24 | 77.50 | 12.65 | 18.38 |
| ﹢ | ﹢ | 88.56 | 83.80 | 77.91 | 12.77 | 19.41 |
| SEM | 0.29 | 0.42 | 0.79 | 0.21 | 0.29 | |
| 植物精油EO | ||||||
| ﹣ | 87.72 | 83.03 | 75.17 | 12.66 | 18.79 | |
| ﹢ | 87.79 | 82.72 | 76.33 | 12.86 | 19.25 | |
| 苯甲酸BA | ||||||
| ﹣ | 86.91b | 81.50b | 73.80b | 12.82 | 19.15 | |
| ﹢ | 88.60a | 84.02a | 77.71a | 12.71 | 18.89 | |
| P值P-value | ||||||
| 植物精油EO | 0.885 | 0.665 | 0.429 | 0.661 | 0.447 | |
| 苯甲酸BA | 0.003 | 0.002 | 0.013 | 0.811 | 0.666 | |
| 植物精油×苯甲酸EO×BA | 0.733 | 0.835 | 0.608 | 0.849 | 0.338 |
2.3 植物精油与苯甲酸组合对淮北麻鸡肉质特性的影响
2.3.1 植物精油与苯甲酸组合对淮北麻鸡肉品质的影响
表5 植物精油与苯甲酸组合对淮北麻鸡胸肌肉品质的影响Table 5 Effects of combination of EO and BA on breast muscle quality of Huaibei partridge chickens |
| 项目 Items | 肉色Muscle color | pH | 滴水损失 Drip loss rate/% | 剪切力 Shear force/kg | 蒸煮损失 Cooking loss rate/% | 失水率 Water loss rate/% | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 亮度L* | 红度a* | 黄度b* | |||||||
| 植物精油EO | 苯甲酸BA | ||||||||
| ﹣ | ﹣ | 56.41 | 3.94 | 15.27 | 6.42a | 5.49 | 1.23b | 31.26 | 35.00 |
| ﹢ | ﹣ | 54.79 | 3.73 | 15.37 | 6.39a | 4.07 | 2.50a | 33.24 | 40.67 |
| ﹣ | ﹢ | 56.97 | 4.05 | 14.06 | 6.27b | 4.79 | 2.06ab | 32.39 | 36.65 |
| ﹢ | ﹢ | 57.02 | 4.89 | 13.57 | 6.38a | 5.58 | 1.80ab | 31.06 | 38.43 |
| SEM | 0.61 | 0.49 | 0.52 | 0.02 | 0.25 | 0.15 | 1.35 | 1.00 | |
| 植物精油EO | |||||||||
| ﹣ | 56.72 | 3.99 | 14.60 | 6.34 | 5.10 | 1.73 | 31.82 | 35.83 | |
| ﹢ | 56.01 | 4.31 | 14.47 | 6.38 | 4.83 | 2.04 | 32.15 | 39.55 | |
| 苯甲酸BA | |||||||||
| ﹣ | 55.60 | 3.83 | 15.33 | 6.40a | 4.72 | 1.78 | 32.25 | 37.84 | |
| ﹢ | 57.00 | 4.47 | 13.79 | 6.32b | 5.19 | 1.93 | 31.72 | 37.54 | |
| P值P-value | |||||||||
| 植物精油EO | 0.542 | 0.764 | 0.856 | 0.098 | 0.462 | 0.074 | 0.910 | 0.068 | |
| 苯甲酸BA | 0.282 | 0.550 | 0.181 | 0.001 | 0.505 | 0.807 | 0.858 | 0.880 | |
| 植物精油×苯甲酸 EO×BA | 0.516 | 0.621 | 0.785 | 0.004 | 0.024 | 0.011 | 0.573 | 0.325 | |
表6 植物精油与苯甲酸组合对淮北麻鸡腿肌肉品质的影响Table 6 Effects of combination of EO and BA on leg muscle quality of Huaibei partridge chickens |
| 项目 Items | 肉色Muscle color | pH | 滴水损失 Drip loss rate/% | 剪切力 Shear force/kg | 蒸煮损失 Cooking loss rate/% | 失水率 Water loss rate/% | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 亮度L* | 红度a* | 黄度b* | |||||||
| 植物精油EO | 苯甲酸BA | ||||||||
| ﹣ | ﹣ | 46.75 | 12.38 | 15.71 | 6.99 | 2.94 | 0.79 | 36.69 | 37.18 |
| ﹢ | ﹣ | 47.50 | 13.79 | 16.61 | 6.88 | 2.38 | 1.11 | 35.80 | 37.27 |
| ﹣ | ﹢ | 49.19 | 12.01 | 16.33 | 6.96 | 3.08 | 1.00 | 33.98 | 37.03 |
| ﹢ | ﹢ | 50.75 | 13.81 | 17.98 | 6.90 | 3.44 | 0.81 | 37.80 | 40.95 |
| SEM | 0.78 | 0.85 | 0.60 | 0.09 | 0.26 | 0.08 | 0.64 | 0.91 | |
| 植物精油EO | |||||||||
| ﹣ | 48.08 | 12.18 | 16.05 | 6.97a | 3.02 | 0.90 | 35.21 | 37.10 | |
| ﹢ | 49.12 | 13.80 | 17.16 | 6.89b | 2.86 | 0.96 | 36.80 | 39.11 | |
| 苯甲酸BA | |||||||||
| ﹣ | 47.15 | 13.15 | 16.25 | 6.93 | 2.60 | 0.96 | 36.21 | 37.23 | |
| ﹢ | 49.97 | 12.91 | 17.06 | 6.93 | 3.26 | 0.90 | 35.89 | 38.99 | |
| P值P-value | |||||||||
| 植物精油EO | 0.457 | 0.381 | 0.332 | 0.024 | 0.848 | 0.670 | 0.240 | 0.280 | |
| 苯甲酸BA | 0.077 | 0.922 | 0.449 | 0.956 | 0.286 | 0.773 | 0.771 | 0.342 | |
| 植物精油×苯甲酸 EO×BA | 0.792 | 0.913 | 0.771 | 0.521 | 0.410 | 0.114 | 0.066 | 0.302 | |
2.3.2 植物精油与苯甲酸组合对淮北麻鸡肌肉质构特性的影响
表7 植物精油与苯甲酸组合对淮北麻鸡胸肌质构特性的影响Table 7 Effects of combination of EO and BA on breast muscle texture characteristics of Huaibei partridge chickens |
| 项目 Items | 黏力 Adhesion/ g | 黏性 Viscous/ mJ | 硬度 Hardness/ g | 弹力 Elasticity | 内聚性 Cohesiveness | 弹性 Springiness/ mm | 胶着性 Gumminess/ g | 咀嚼性 Chewiness/ mJ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 植物精油EO | 苯甲酸BA | ||||||||
| ﹣ | ﹣ | 5.00 | 0.05 | 216.33 | 0.21 | 1.06 | 3.42 | 220.00 | 7.53 |
| ﹢ | ﹣ | 3.33 | 0.03 | 188.17 | 0.19 | 1.01 | 3.83 | 194.50 | 7.72 |
| ﹣ | ﹢ | 3.00 | 0.03 | 156.50 | 0.25 | 0.83 | 3.07 | 166.17 | 5.22 |
| ﹢ | ﹢ | 4.50 | 0.12 | 221.50 | 0.21 | 1.02 | 3.21 | 213.17 | 6.97 |
| SEM | 0.61 | 0.02 | 9.70 | 0.01 | 0.06 | 0.15 | 12.76 | 0.67 | |
| 植物精油EO | |||||||||
| ﹣ | 4.00 | 0.04 | 186.42 | 0.23 | 0.94 | 3.24 | 193.08 | 6.38 | |
| ﹢ | 3.92 | 0.08 | 204.83 | 0.20 | 1.01 | 3.52 | 203.83 | 7.34 | |
| 苯甲酸BA | |||||||||
| ﹣ | 4.17 | 0.04 | 202.25 | 0.20 | 1.03 | 3.63 | 207.25 | 7.63 | |
| ﹢ | 3.75 | 0.08 | 189.00 | 0.23 | 0.92 | 3.14 | 189.67 | 6.09 | |
| P值P-value | |||||||||
| 植物精油EO | 0.948 | 0.386 | 0.299 | 0.174 | 0.580 | 0.357 | 0.681 | 0.486 | |
| 苯甲酸BA | 0.745 | 0.386 | 0.452 | 0.199 | 0.380 | 0.118 | 0.502 | 0.274 | |
| 植物精油× 苯甲酸 EO×BA | 0.224 | 0.199 | 0.014 | 0.662 | 0.333 | 0.653 | 0.174 | 0.572 |
表8 植物精油与苯甲酸组合对淮北麻鸡腿肌质构特性的影响Table 8 Effects of combination of EO and BA on leg muscle texture characteristics of Huaibei partridge chickens |
| 项目 Items | 黏力 Adhesion/ g | 黏性 Viscous/ mJ | 硬度 Hardness/ g | 弹力 Elasticity | 内聚性 Cohesiveness | 弹性 Springiness/ mm | 胶着性 Gumminess/ g | 咀嚼性 Chewiness/ mJ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 植物精油EO | 苯甲酸BA | ||||||||
| ﹣ | ﹣ | 5.00 | 0.10 | 146.50 | 0.21 | 0.86 | 4.20 | 146.17b | 6.03 |
| ﹢ | ﹣ | 3.83 | 0.07 | 162.50 | 0.23 | 0.85 | 3.96 | 173.40a | 5.66 |
| ﹣ | ﹢ | 4.17 | 0.05 | 152.80 | 0.24 | 0.96 | 3.74 | 195.67a | 4.48 |
| ﹢ | ﹢ | 5.83 | 0.10 | 161.50 | 0.21 | 1.09 | 4.58 | 181.60a | 8.38 |
| SEM | 0.76 | 0.02 | 6.38 | 0.01 | 0.06 | 0.14 | 5.73 | 0.50 | |
| 植物精油EO | |||||||||
| ﹣ | 4.58 | 0.08 | 149.36 | 0.22 | 0.91 | 3.97 | 162.67 | 5.33 | |
| ﹢ | 4.83 | 0.08 | 162.00 | 0.22 | 0.97 | 4.27 | 177.50 | 7.02 | |
| 苯甲酸BA | |||||||||
| ﹣ | 4.42 | 0.08 | 154.50 | 0.22 | 0.85 | 4.08 | 158.55b | 5.86 | |
| ﹢ | 5.00 | 0.08 | 157.55 | 0.22 | 1.02 | 4.16 | 186.88a | 6.43 | |
| P值P-value | |||||||||
| 植物精油EO | 0.876 | 0.815 | 0.369 | 0.954 | 0.571 | 0.250 | 0.463 | 0.052 | |
| 苯甲酸BA | 0.716 | 0.815 | 0.846 | 0.954 | 0.152 | 0.771 | 0.005 | 0.499 | |
| 植物精油× 苯甲酸 EO×BA | 0.381 | 0.250 | 0.789 | 0.493 | 0.562 | 0.049 | 0.032 | 0.020 |
2.4 植物精油与苯甲酸组合对淮北麻鸡肌肉风味组分的影响
2.4.1 植物精油与苯甲酸组合下淮北麻鸡肌肉风味组分的PCA
图1 植物精油与苯甲酸组合下淮北麻鸡肌肉风味组分的PCAA:胸肌 breast muscle;B:腿肌 leg muscle。CON:对照组 control group;EO:植物精油组 essential oil group;BA:苯甲酸组 benzoic acid group;EO+BA:复合植物精油+苯甲酸组 essential oil+benzoic acid group。 Fig.1 PCA of combination of EO and BA on muscle odor components of Huaibei partridge chickens |
表9 植物精油与苯甲酸组合对淮北麻鸡胸肌区分度的影响Table 9 Effects of combination of EO and BA on differentiation of breast muscle of Huaibei partridge chickens |
| 项目 Items | 对照组 CON group | 植物精油组 EO group | 苯甲酸组 BA group | 植物精油+苯甲酸组 EO+BA group |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 对照组CON group | 0.061 | 0.066 | 0.189 | |
| 植物精油组EO group | 0.061 | 0.050 | 0.012 | |
| 苯甲酸组BA group | 0.066 | 0.050 | 0.192 | |
| 植物精油+苯甲酸组EO+BA group | 0.189 | 0.012 | 0.192 |
表10 植物精油与苯甲酸组合对淮北麻鸡腿肌区分度的影响Table 10 Effects of combination of EO and BA on differentiation of leg muscle of Huaibei partridge chickens |
| 项目 Items | 对照组 CON group | 植物精油组 EO group | 苯甲酸组 BA group | 植物精油+苯甲酸组 EO+BA group |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 对照组CON group | 0.232 | 0.327 | 0.238 | |
| 植物精油组EO group | 0.232 | 0.422 | 0.246 | |
| 苯甲酸组BA group | 0.327 | 0.422 | 0.335 | |
| 植物精油+苯甲酸组EO+BA group | 0.238 | 0.246 | 0.335 |
2.4.2 植物精油与苯甲酸组合对淮北麻鸡肌肉风味组分的Loading分析
图2 植物精油与苯甲酸组合对淮北麻鸡肌肉风味组分的Loading分析A~D:胸肌,依此为CON组、EO组、BA组、EO+BA组;E~H:腿肌,依次为CON组、EO组、BA组、EO+BA组。 Fig.1 Loading analysis of combination of EO and BA on muscle odor components of Huaibei partridge chickens A to D: breast muscle, in order of CON group, EO group, BA group, EO+BA group; E to H: leg muscle, in order of CON group, EO group, BA group, EO+BA group. |
2.5 植物精油与苯甲酸组合对淮北麻鸡肌肉抗氧化能力的影响
表11 植物精油与苯甲酸组合对淮北麻鸡胸肌肌肉抗氧化指标的影响Table 11 Effects of combination of EO and BA on breast muscle antioxidant indexes of Huaibei partridge chickens |
| 项目 Items | 总抗氧 化能力 T-AOC/ (U/mg prot) | 总超氧化物 歧化酶 T-SOD/ (U/mg prot) | 过氧化氢酶 CAT/ (U/mg prot) | 丙二醛 MDA/ (nmol/mg prot) | 谷胱甘肽过 氧化物酶 GSH-Px/ (U/mg prot) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 植物精油EO | 苯甲酸BA | |||||
| ﹣ | ﹣ | 0.49 | 40.23 | 0.72b | 2.28 | 14.06 |
| ﹢ | ﹣ | 0.61 | 42.90 | 1.24a | 2.63 | 23.04 |
| ﹣ | ﹢ | 0.56 | 38.44 | 0.94b | 2.67 | 22.37 |
| ﹢ | ﹢ | 0.40 | 42.46 | 0.89b | 2.36 | 21.04 |
| SEM | 0.03 | 0.88 | 0.06 | 0.12 | 2.64 | |
| 植物精油EO | ||||||
| ﹣ | 0.53 | 39.42 | 0.85b | 2.43 | 18.21 | |
| ﹢ | 0.49 | 42.68 | 1.06a | 2.49 | 22.04 | |
| 苯甲酸BA | ||||||
| ﹣ | 0.55 | 41.56 | 1.03 | 2.45 | 18.96 | |
| ﹢ | 0.47 | 40.63 | 0.92 | 2.48 | 21.65 | |
| P值P-value | ||||||
| 植物精油EO | 0.722 | 0.067 | 0.023 | 0.935 | 0.493 | |
| 苯甲酸BA | 0.320 | 0.524 | 0.501 | 0.800 | 0.571 | |
| 植物精油×苯甲酸EO×BA | 0.041 | 0.699 | 0.007 | 0.194 | 0.359 |
表12 植物精油与苯甲酸组合对淮北麻鸡腿肌肌肉抗氧化指标的影响Table 11 Effects of combination of EO and BA on leg muscle antioxidant indexes of Huaibei partridge chickens |
| 项目 Items | 总抗氧 化能力 T-AOC/ (U/mg prot) | 总超氧化物 歧化酶 T-SOD/ (U/mg prot) | 过氧化氢酶 CAT/ (U/mg prot) | 丙二醛 MDA/ (nmol/mg prot) | 谷胱甘肽过 氧化物酶 GSH-Px/ (U/mg prot) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 植物精油EO | 苯甲酸BA | |||||
| ﹣ | ﹣ | 0.41 | 59.92 | 1.24c | 6.50 | 35.99 |
| ﹢ | ﹣ | 0.25 | 62.09 | 3.57a | 6.00 | 46.17 |
| ﹣ | ﹢ | 0.34 | 57.95 | 3.05ab | 6.16 | 34.73 |
| ﹢ | ﹢ | 0.25 | 61.58 | 2.29bc | 6.25 | 53.91 |
| SEM | 0.03 | 0.78 | 0.26 | 0.42 | 3.05 | |
| 植物精油EO | ||||||
| ﹣ | 0.37a | 58.94 | 2.23 | 6.33 | 35.43b | |
| ﹢ | 0.25b | 61.84 | 2.93 | 6.13 | 50.04a | |
| 苯甲酸BA | ||||||
| ﹣ | 0.32 | 61.01 | 2.51 | 6.25 | 41.55 | |
| ﹢ | 0.30 | 59.77 | 2.67 | 6.20 | 46.24 | |
| P值P-value | ||||||
| 植物精油EO | 0.049 | 0.069 | 0.061 | 0.825 | 0.016 | |
| 苯甲酸BA | 0.577 | 0.421 | 0.507 | 0.958 | 0.563 | |
| 植物精油×苯甲酸EO×BA | 0.579 | 0.634 | 0.001 | 0.743 | 0.425 |

京公网安备 11010802041926号