Feed Science and Technology

Clostridium butyricum: Effects on Intestinal Microflora, Morphology and Mucosal Immunity-Associated Cells in Egg-Laying Male Chicks

  • LIU Tingting ,
  • HUA Jing ,
  • WANG Xiaoxia ,
  • LIU Liru ,
  • HAI Peng
Expand
  • 1. College of Animal Science and Technology, Beijing Agricultural University, Beijing 102206, China;
    2. College of Biotechnology, Beijing Agricultural University, Beijing 102206, China;
    3. District Commission of Beijing’s Changping District, Beijing 102200, China;
    4. College of Animal Science, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China;
    5. Fuxin City Animal Health Inspection of Liaoning Province, Fuxin 123000, China

Received date: 2012-05-14

  Online published: 2012-11-01

Abstract

This experiment was conducted to study the effects of Clostridium butyricum on intestinal microflora, morphology and mucosal immunity-associated cells in egg-laying male chicks. Two hundred and forty one-day-old Hy-Line egg-laying male chicks were randomly divided into 6 groups with 4 replicates in each group and 10 chicks in each replicate. The diets were supplemented with 0 (control group), 150 mg/kg aureomycin (antibiotic group), 250 (EG250), 500 (EG500), 750 (EG750) and 1 000 (EG1000) mg/kg Clostridium butyricum, respectively. The results showed as follows: 1) the number of E. coli in EG750 and EG1000 was significantly less than that of control group and antibiotic group (P<0.05), and except for EG250, the number of Lactobacillus in the other Clostridium butyricum groups was larger than that of control group and antibiotic group (P<0.05). 2)The villus height of small intestine of EG1000 was significantly higher than that of control group and antibiotic group, villus length/crypt depth (V/C) was significantly higher than that of control group, and mucosa thickness of jejunum was significantly higher than that of the other groups (P<0.05). 3) The number of intraepithelial lymphocyte of jejunum and ileum of EG1000 was significantly increased compared with that of control group (P<0.05), but was not significantly different from that in antibiotic group (P>0.05), the number of goblet cell of jejunum and ileum of EG1000 was significantly higher than that of control group and antibiotic group (P<0.05). The number of immunoglobulin A positive (IgA+) of duodenum and jejunum of EG1000 was significantly increased compared with that of control group (P<0.05), and not significantly different from that of antibiotic group (P>0.05). In conclusion, Clostridium butyricum can promote growth and maintain intestine health, and the optimum supplemental level is 1 000 mg/kg under the condition of this experiment.

Cite this article

LIU Tingting , HUA Jing , WANG Xiaoxia , LIU Liru , HAI Peng . Clostridium butyricum: Effects on Intestinal Microflora, Morphology and Mucosal Immunity-Associated Cells in Egg-Laying Male Chicks[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2012 , (11) : 2210 -2221 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2012.11.020

References

[1] MACKIE R I,WHITE B A,ISAACSON R E,et al.Gastrointestinal microbes and host interactions:gastrointestinal microbes and host interactions[M].New York:Chapma & Hall,1997.

[2] 倪学勤,JOSHUA G,HAI Y,等.采用PCR-DGGE技术分析蛋鸡肠道细菌种群结构及多样性[J].畜牧兽医学报,2008,39(7):955-961.

[3] 唐宝英,朱晓慧,刘佳.丁酸梭菌对动物肠道致病菌体外拮抗作用的研究[J].生物技术,2005,15(1):37-39.

[4] 赵熙,冉陆,杨宝兰,等.丁酸梭菌活菌制剂对肠道菌群影响的研究[J].中国微生态杂志,1999,11(6):332-338.

[5] 韩正康.家畜营养生理学[M].北京:北京农业出版社,1991:16-17.

[6] 王子旭,佘锐萍,陈越,等.日粮锌硒水平对肉鸡小肠黏膜结构的影响[J].中国兽医科技,2003,33(7):18-21.

[7] VAREL V H,ROBINSON I M,POND W G.Effect of dietary copper sulfate,Aureo SP250,or clinoptilolite on ureolytica bacteria found in the pig large intestine[J].Applied and Environmental Microbiology,1987,53(9):2009-2012.

[8] 刘婷婷,张帅,邓斐月,等.谷氨酰胺与丁酸梭菌对断奶仔猪生长性能、免疫功能、小肠形态和肠道菌群的影响[J].动物营养学报,2011,23(6):998-1005.

[9] REYNOLDS J V.Gut barrier function in the surgical patients[J].British Journal of Surgery,1996,83:1668-1671.

[10] SWANK G M,DEITCH E A.Role of the gut in multiple organ failure:bacterial translocation and permeability changes[J].World Journal of Surgery,1996,20(4):411-417.

[11] 方芳,陈冬梅,张博芬.肠上皮内淋巴细胞及其免疫学进展[J].沈阳医学院学报,2004,6(2):121-124.

[12] ASAI K,KOMINE Y,KOZUTSUMI T,et a1.Predominant subpopulations of T lymphocytes in the mammary gland secretions during lactation and intraepithelial T lymphocytes in the intestine of dairy cows[J].Veterinary Immuno1ogy and Immunopathology,2000,73(3/4):233-240.

[13] 杨慧.芽孢杆菌制剂对小鼠小肠黏膜结构及黏膜免疫的影响研究.硕士学位论文.雅安:四川农业大学,2007:29-30.

[14] 杨倩,张小飞.淋巴细胞在黏膜上皮中的运动[J].解剖学杂志,2005,28:145-148.

[15] 赵太平,徐玉东,魏岚,等.大鼠小肠、大肠上皮及固有层淋巴细胞的分布差异[J].哈尔滨医科大学学报,2004,38(1):42-44.

[16] 李霄凌,李公启,徐玉东.免疫大鼠肠道上皮内淋巴细胞的实验研究[J].齐齐哈尔医学院学报,2005,26(3):241-242.

[17] 孙莉.组织学与胚胎学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2007.

[18] 史玉兰,段相林.杯状细胞的研究进展[J].解剖科学进展,2001,7(4):358-341.

[19] PODOLSKY D K V.Innate mechanisms of mucosal defense and repair:the best offense is a good defense[J].American Journal of Physiology,1999,277(3):495-499.

[20] 童晓莉,周勤飞,王永才.动物肠道免疫研究进展[J].现代畜牧兽医,2005(9):48-50.

[21] ROBINSON J K,BLANCHARD T G,LEVINE A D,et al.A mucosal IgA-mediated excretory immune system in vivo[J].The Journal of Immunology,2001,166(6):3688-3692.
Outlines

/