This experiment was conducted to investigate the effects of raffinose on growth performance, nutrient digestion and metabolism, intestinal microflora and immune function of minks. Fifty healthy male minks were randomly divided into 5 groups, and each group had 10 replicates and each replicate had 1 mink. The minks in control group was fed a basal diet, and the minks in test groups Ⅰ, Ⅱ, Ⅲ and Ⅳ were fed the experimental diets supplemented with 0.5, 1.0, 2.0 and 4.0g/kg raffinose, respectively. The experiment lasted for 45 days. The results showed as follows: raffinose supplementation had no significant effects on average daily feed intake (ADFI), average daily gain (ADG) and feed/gain (P>0.05), but there had a trend to improve ADFI and ADG. Raffinose supplementation had no significant effects on indices of nutrient digestion and metabolism, and organ (liver, spleen and kidney) indices (P>0.05). The number of intestinal Escherichia coli in the test groups was lower than that in the control group, but the difference was not significant (P>0.05). The number of intestinal Lactobacillus was not significantly affected by raffinose supplementation (P>0.05). The supplementation of 0.5 g/kg raffinose improved the number of intestinal Bifidobacterium bifidum (P<0.05). No significant differences were found in the contents of total protein, albumin, globulin, complement 3, complement 4, immunoglobulin M, total thyroxine (TT4) and total triiodothyronine (TT3) in serum among all groups (P>0.05). Compared with the control group, serum immunoglobulin A content in the group supplemented with 0.5 g/kg raffinose was significantly increased (P<0.05), while serum immunoglobulin A content in the group supplemented with 2.0 g/kg raffinose was significantly decreased (P<0.05). Considering above all indices, the optimal level of raffinose in diets for minks is 0.5 g/kg.
LIU Baiyang
,
LI Guangyu
,
BAO Kun
,
LIU Hanlu
,
LI Danli
,
GU Dong
,
ZHANG Tao
. Effects of Raffinose on Growth Performance, Nutrient Digestion and Metabolism, Intestinal Microflora and Immune Function of Minks[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2013
, 25(5)
: 1123
-1130
.
DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2013.05.030
[1] 焦洋,白卫华,张家红,等.棉籽低聚糖[J].中国棉花加工,2007(1):34-36.
[2] HYMOWITZ T,COLLINS F I,PANCZER J,et al.Relationship between the content of oil,protein,and sugar in soybean seed[J].Agronomy Journal,1972,64:613-616.
[3] 袁美兰,温辉梁,黄绍华.功能性低聚糖——棉籽糖的开发应用现状[J].中国食品添加剂,2002(4):54-57.
[4] 周冬丽,宋伟光,郭文峰,等.棉籽低聚糖——棉籽糖研究概况[J].粮食与油脂,2010(12):39-41.
[5] 杨海英,林化成,杨良,等.益生素和低聚木糖对仔猪的饲养效果[J].饲料与畜牧,2008(8):57-58.
[6] 张丽英.饲料分析及饲料质量检测技术[M].北京:中国农业大学出版社,2003.
[7] 王惠英.棉籽低聚糖对水貂的饲养效果[J].饲料博览,2009(1):26-27.
[8] 滑静,何欣,杨佐君,等.棉籽糖对肉仔鸡生化指标、生产性能和肠道主要菌群的影响[J].饲料博览,2011(5):7-10.
[9] 王继成,潘灵辉,李淑云,等.低聚木糖对断奶仔猪生产性能、肠道菌群及免疫水平影响的研究[J].中国畜牧兽医,2006(5):3-7.
[10] 张振红.大豆低聚糖对肉鸡生产性能、血液指标及肠道菌群的影响[M].硕士学位论文.保定:河北农业大学,2006.
[11] 罗佳捷,李丽立,张彬,等.大豆低聚糖对樱桃谷鸭肠道微生物群落结构的影响[J].广东畜牧兽医科技,2010(5):17-20.
[12] 许梓荣,胡彩虹.寡果糖对肥育猪生长性能、肠道菌群和免疫功能的影响[J].中国兽医学报,2003(1):69-71.
[13] 周映华,张石蕊.甘露寡糖对肉鸡生产性能和肠道微生物以及免疫机能的影响[J].湖南农业大学学报:自然科学版,2003(6):250-253.