This experiment was conducted to compare the nutritional value in domestic double-low rapeseed meal and imported common rapeseed meal. Two experiments were conducted in this study. Experiment 1: eighteen castrated barrows with similar initial body weight of (48.3±2.4) kg were used in a completely randomized design. The total collection method was used. The barrows were randomly allocated to 3 groups with 6 replicates per group and 1 pig per replicate. The barrows in 3 groups were fed a basal diet or two other experimental diets. The basal diet was formulated to meet requirements of growing pigs and two other experimental diets were formulated by substituting 20% of the basal diet with domestic double-low rapeseed meal or imported common rapeseed meal, respectively. The test lasted for 14 days (9 day for adaptation and 5 day for collection). Experiment 2: eighteen castrated barrows (fitted with simple T-cannulas) with similar initial body weight of (35.3 ± 3.8) kg were used in this experiment. The indicator method was used. The barrows were randomly allocated to 3 groups with 6 replicates per group and 1 pig per replicate. The barrows in 3 groups were fed a N-free diet or two other experimental diets. The two experimental diets were formulated with domestic double-low rapeseed meal or imported common rapeseed meal as the sole source of protein and amino acids. The test lasted for 7 days (5 day for adaptation and 2 day for collection). The results showed that the apparent digestible energy and the apparent digestibility of energy in domestic double-low rapeseed meal were significantly lower than those in imported common rapeseed meal (P<0.01), and the apparent metabolizable energy in domestic double-low rapeseed meal was significantly lower than that in imported common rapeseed meal (P<0.05). The standardized ileal digestibility of amino acids in domestic double-low rapeseed meal was lower. In conclusion, the nutritional value in domestic double-low rapeseed meal is lower than that in imported common rapeseed meal.
WANG Fengli
,
LIU Ling
,
ZANG Jianjun
,
LAI Changhua
. Comparison of Nutritional Value in Domestic Double-Low Rapeseed Meal and Imported Common Rapeseed Meal for Growing Pigs[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2013
, 25(6)
: 1324
-1331
.
DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2013.06.025
[1] 赵青松,郭万正,魏金涛,等.油菜籽的营养价值及养殖应用分析[J].养殖与饲料,2011(10):41-44.
[2] 陈付琴,徐福海.双低油菜的推广与产业化开发[J].现代农业科技,2009(14):63-64.
[3] 谢伦定,陆齐波.双低菜籽粕在中国饲料业应用前景展望[J].中国油脂,2000,25(6):163-166.
[4] 袁莉,马英,李爱科.双低菜籽饼粕在饲料中的应用[J].粮油食品科技,2003,11(2):34-36.
[5] 彭健,CAMPBELL L D,GUENTER W,等.品种和加工方式对双低菜粕有效能和氨基酸有效性的影响[J].中国粮油学报,2002,17(3):22-26.
[6] NRC.Nutrient requirements of swine[S].Washington,D.C.:National Academy Press,1998.
[7] ADEOLA O.Digestion and balance techniques in pigs[M]//LEWIS A J,SOUTHERN L L.Swine nutrition.Washington,D.C.:CRC Press,2001:903-916.
[8] BELL J M,KEITH M O,HUTCHESON D S.Nutritional evaluation of very low glucosinolate canola meal[J].Canadian Journal of Animal Science,1991,73:679-697.
[9] WOYENGO T A,KIARIE E,NYACHOTI C M.Energy and amino acid utilization in expeller-extracted canola meal fed to growing pigs[J].Journal of Animal Science,2010,88:1433-1441.
[10] 唐春艳,齐德生.双低菜粕在饲料中的研究[J].畜牧与兽医,2006,38(5):48-50.
[11] 中华人民共和国农业部.NY/T 65—2004猪饲养标准[S].北京:中国农业出版社,2004.
[12] BELL J M.Factors affecting the nutritional value of canola meal:a review[J].Canadian Journal of Animal Science,1993,73:679-697.
[13] NOBLET J,GOFF G L.Effect of dietary fiber on the energy value of feeds for pigs[J].Animal Feed Science and Technology,2001,90:35-52.
[14] STEIN H H,KIM S W,NIELSEN T T,et al.Standardized ileal protein and amino acid digestibility by growing pigs and sows[J].Journal of Animal Science,2001,79:2113-2122.
[15] FAN M Z,SAUER W C,GABERT V M.Variability of apparent ileal amino acid digestibility in canola meal for growing-finishing pigs[J].Canadian Journal of Animal Science,1996,76:563-569.
[16] DE LANGE C F,GABERT V M,GILLIS D,et al.Digestible energy contents and apparent ileal amino acid digestibilities in regular or partial mechanically dehulled canola meal samples fed to growing pigs[J].Canadian Journal of Animal Science,1998,78:641-648.
[17] CLASSEN H L,NEWKIRK R W,MAENZ D D.Effects of conventional and novel processing on the feed value of canola meal for poultry[J].Proceedings of the Australian Poultry Science Symposium,2004,16:1-8.