Short Communications

Quality Characteristics of FeedGrade Monocalcium Phosphate Produced by Different Production Processes

  • WANG Leilei ,
  • LI Yun ,
  • WANG Yuping ,
  • BAI Shiping ,
  • DING Xuemei ,
  • CHEN Hong ,
  • ZHANG Jing ,
  • ZHAO Lijun ,
  • BAI Fan ,
  • ZHANG Keying
Expand
  • 1. Institute of Animal Nutrition, Sichuan Agricultural University, Ya'an 625014, China;
    2. Feed Products Quality Monitoring Center of the Agricultural Ministry of China, Chengdu 610041, China

Received date: 2013-03-27

  Online published: 2013-08-18

Abstract

This study was investigated to research the quality characteristics of feed-grade monocalcium phosphate (MCP) produced by three different production processes (calcium precipitation method, calcium+sodium precipitation method and steam method), and provided an experimental basis for the formulation of the national mandatory standard and the rational use of MCP. The MCP samples were collected from ten manufacturers from the representative areas of China, and the contents of free water, crystal water, calcium, total phosphorus and water-soluble phosphorus, the mass ratio of calcium to phosphorus, fineness, the number of crystal water and pH were detected for comparing differences among the three different production processes and among the samples from the nine manufacturers which used the calcium precipitation method and calcium+sodium precipitation method. The results showed as follows: 1) the comparison of different production processes, the pH of steam method was significantly higher than that of calcium precipitation method and calcium+sodium precipitation method (P<0.05), and the pH of calcium precipitation method was significantly higher than that of calcium+sodium precipitation method (P<0.05). The contents of free water, crystal water, calcium, total phosphorus and water-soluble phosphorus, the mass ratio of calcium to phosphorus and the number of crystal water of the three production processes were not significantly different (P>0.05). The contents of 0.50 and 0.40 mm fineness of steam method were significantly higher than those of calcium+sodium precipitation method (P<0.05). 2) The comparison of different manufacturers, the contents of free water of all samples were significantly different (P<0.05), the content of crystal water and the number of crystal water of sample 4 were significantly lower than those of other samples (P<0.05), and there was no significant difference in pH between sample 5 and samples 8 and 9 (P>0.05), but sample 5 was significantly lower than other samples (P<0.05); all of the fineness of sample 4 were significantly lower than those of other samples (P<0.05); the content of calcium of samples 1 and 6 was significantly higher than that of other samples (P<0.05), and the content of total phosphorus of sample 9 was significantly higher than that of samples 1, 2, 4, 5, 6 and 7 (P<0.05); the content of water-soluble phosphorus of sample 5 was significantly higher than that of other samples (P<0.05), and the content of water-soluble phosphorus of sample 1 was significantly lower than that of other samples (P<0.05); the mass ratio of calcium to phosphorus of sample 1 was significantly higher than that of other samples (P<0.05), and that of sample 9 was significantly lower than that of other samples (P<0.05). It is concluded that in the three production processes, the contents of water-soluble phosphorus, free water and crystal water, the number of crystal water and pH of steam method are the highest; the contents of water-soluble phosphorus and crystal water and the number of crystal water of calcium precipitation method are the lowest, but the mass ratio of calcium to phosphorus is the highest; the contents of total phosphorus and all fineness of calcium+sodium precipitation method are the highest. Because of the different manufacturers and production processes, there are some differences in the quality indicators of MCP. In addition to the quality indicators prescribed by national standards, we should also consider crystal water content, the number of crystal water and mass ratio of calcium to phosphorus, and also propose to reduce the requirements of fineness.

Cite this article

WANG Leilei , LI Yun , WANG Yuping , BAI Shiping , DING Xuemei , CHEN Hong , ZHANG Jing , ZHAO Lijun , BAI Fan , ZHANG Keying . Quality Characteristics of FeedGrade Monocalcium Phosphate Produced by Different Production Processes[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2013 , 25(9) : 2174 -2182 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2013.09.033

References

[1] 国家标准化管理委员会.GB/T 14699.1—2005饲料采样[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2005.

[2] 陈嘉莆,谭光薰.磷酸盐的生产与应用[M].成都:成都科技大学出版社,1989.

[3] 陈百胜.饲料级磷酸氢钙中钙含量偏高的原因[J].磷肥与复肥,2002,17(4):40-41.

[4] 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局,中国国家标准化管理委员会.GB/T 22548—2008饲料级磷酸二氢钙[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2008.

[5] 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局.GB/T6436—2002饲料中钙的测定[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2002.

[6] 马金芝.不同来源饲料级磷酸氢钙的质量及安全研究[D].硕士学位论文.雅安:四川农业大学,2006.

[7] 屠焰,霍启光.饲料中磷的含量及其生物学利用率[J].饲料工业,1997,18(11):27-30.

[8] 于泽荣.饲用磷的利用及其前景[J].黑龙江畜牧兽医,1992(6):21-22.

[9] 唐安江,张林生.饲料添加剂磷酸二氢钙[J].贵州化工,1997(4):20-23.

[10] RUCKER R B,PARKER H E,ROGLER J C.Utilization of calcium and phosphorus from hydrous and anhydrous dicalcium phosphates[J].The Journal of Nutrition,1968,96(4):513-518.

[11] 葛斌.饲料级磷酸氢钙用矿探讨[J].磷肥与复肥,2006,21(2):35-37.

[12] 胡海波.不同钙源生物学效价评定及湘黄鸡真可消化钙需要量的研究[D].硕士学位论文.长沙:湖南农业大学,2008.

[13] 北京佳纬生物技术有限公司.原料粉碎细度的重要性[J].中国水产,2007(8):79.

[14] 胡文琴,孟庆利,王恬.饲料粉碎粒度对畜禽生产性能的影响[J].广东饲料,2004,13(1):20-21.

[15] POTCHANAKORN M,POTTER L M.Biological values of phosphorus from various sources for young turkeys[J].Poultry Science,1987,66(3):505-513.  
Outlines

/