Special Economic Animal Nutrition

Effects of Different Protein Source Diets on Nutrient Apparent Digestibility and Fecal Quality of Tibetan Mastiffs during Different Growth Stages

  • WANG Yufei ,
  • DING Limin ,
  • FU Jingjie ,
  • ZHANG Wenzhen ,
  • WANG Jianmei
Expand
  • 1. College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China;
    2. Beijing Jihai Xingye Science and Technology Development Co., Beijing Ltd., 100096, China

Received date: 2013-04-23

  Online published: 2013-09-16

Abstract

The effects of different protein sources [corn gluten meal, soybean meal, poultry meal 65 (low protein content, 65%), poultry meal 80 (high protein content, 65%), fish meal, and duck frame meal] diets on feed intake, nutrient apparent digestibility and fecal quality of Tibetan mastiffs during different growth stages were evaluated in this study. Ten puppies (5 to 6 months old) and ten adult canines (2 or more years old) were selected and randomly divided into 2 groups, respectively. Each group contained 5 replicates and each replicate contained 1 canine. Seven experimental diets were formulated as follows: CGM (only corn gluten meal as the plant protein), SBM (only soybean meal as the plant protein), PMH-FM (both poultry meal 80 and fish meal as the plant protein), PML-FM (both poultry meal 65 and fish meal as the plant protein), DM-FM (both duck frame meal and fish meal as the animal protein), FM (only fish meal as the animal protein) and PML diets (only poultry meal 65 as the animal protein), respectively. Each diet fed one group of young and adult Tibetan mastiffs, respectively. The experiment was divided into 4 periods, and each period lasted for 10 days with 6 days for adaptation and 4 days for the collection of fecal samples. The results showed as follows: for the diets with different protein sources, the average daily feed intake of puppies was not significantly different (P>0.05). The average daily feed intake of adult canines for PML-FM diet was no significant difference compared with PMH-FM diet (P>0.05), but was significantly higher than that for other diets (P<0.05). Under the condition of feeding the same diet, the average daily feed intake of puppies was significantly higher than that of adult canines (P<0.05). For puppies, the dry matter (DM), crude protein (CP), organic matter (OM), calcium (Ca) and total phosphorus (TP) apparent digestibility of PMH-FM diet was the highest, all above nutrient apparent digestibility was significantly higher than that of PML-FM diet (P<0.05), CP apparent digestibility was also significantly higher than that of PML diet (P<0.05), and TP apparent digestibility was also significantly higher than that of DM-FM and FM diets (P<0.05). For adult canines, the DM apparent digestibility of SBM diet was significantly higher than that of PML-FM diet (P<0.05), and the CP apparent digestibility of DM-FM diet was significantly higher than that of PML and PML-FM diets (P<0.05), while the TP apparent digestibility of FM diet was significantly lower than that of SBM and PML-FM diets (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in OM and Ca apparent digestibility for adult canines among all diets (P>0.05). Under the condition of feeding the same diet, the DM, CP and OM apparent digestibility was not significantly different between puppies and adult canines (P>0.05); however, the Ca and TP apparent digestibility for puppies was significantly higher than that for adult canines when fed the PMH-FM diet (P<0.05). When fed the PMH-FM diet, the puppies had the lowest fecal original moisture content, which was significantly lower than that of other diets except PML-FM and DM-FM diets (P<0.05). When fed the FM diet, the adult canines had the highest fecal original moisture content, which was significantly higher than that of other diets (P<0.05). The fecal scores of puppies fed CGM, PMH-FM, PML-FM, DM-FM and FM diets were all about 2.5 (optimal fecal score), while the fecal scores of puppies fed SBM and PML diets were about 2.8. The fecal scores of adult canines fed different diets had no significant difference (P>0.05). Under the condition of feeding the same diet, the fecal original moisture content was not significantly different between puppies and adult canines (P>0.05), but the fecal score of puppies was significantly higher than that of adult canines (P<0.05). It is concluded that diets with different protein sources have some influences on the nutrient apparent digestibility and fecal quality of Tibetan mastiffs, and have greater influences on the puppies. Combined use of the corn gluten meal and soybean meal is better than signal use of them, and the poultry meal 80 with high protein content is a better protein source compared with the fish meal and poultry meal 65 with low protein content for Tibetan mastiffs.

Cite this article

WANG Yufei , DING Limin , FU Jingjie , ZHANG Wenzhen , WANG Jianmei . Effects of Different Protein Source Diets on Nutrient Apparent Digestibility and Fecal Quality of Tibetan Mastiffs during Different Growth Stages[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2013 , 25(10) : 2345 -2354 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2013.10.018

References

[1] 崔泰保.藏獒的选择与养殖[M].北京:金盾出版社,2003.
[2] 王永奇,于大永,史丽颖,等.藏獒的研究概况[J].大连大学学报,2004,25(2):84-92.
[3] 刘源,安星红,王志红,等.不同蛋白质来源配合饲料对犬饲喂效果及养分消化率研究[J].实验动物科学与管理,2004,21(4):22-24.
[4] 郑建婷,淡瑞芳,郑中朝,等.宠物犬对3种常规饲料的消化代谢研究[J].甘肃农业大学学报,2009,44(3):22-25.
[5] NRC.Nutrient requirements of dogs and cats[S].Washington,D.C.:National Academy Press,2006.
[6] NERY J,BIOURGE V,TOURNIER C,et al.Influence of dietary protein content and source on fecal quality,electrolyte concentrations,and osmolarity,and digestibility in dogs differing in body size[J].Journal of Animal Science,2010,88(1):159-169.  
[7] 张丽英.饲料分析及饲料质量检测技术[M].2版.北京:中国农业大学出版社,2007.
[8] 崔泰保,兰小平,杨俊年.河曲藏獒生长发育的研究[J].甘肃农业大学学报,2001,36(4):379-382.
[9] IOURNIER M,TAKEDA M,SUZUKI A,et al.Preference for high-fat food in mice:fried potatoes compared with boiled potatoes[J].Appetite,2001,36(3):237-238.  
[10] 丁丽敏,夏兆飞,译.犬猫营养需要[M].北京:中国农业大学出版社,2010.
[11] YAMKA R M,JAMIKORN U,TRUE A D,et al.Evaluation of soyabean meal as a protein source in canine foods[J].Animal Feed Science and Technology,2003,109(1/2/3/4):121-132.
[12] CLAPPER G M,GRIESHOP C M,MERCHEN N R,et al.Ileal and total tract nutrient digestibility and fecal characteristics of dogs as affected by soybean protein inclusion in dry,extruded diets[J].Journal of Animal Science,2001,79(6):1523-1532.
[13] FUNABA M,OKA Y,KOBAYASHI S,et al.Evaluation of meat meal,chicken meal,and corn gluten meal as dietary sources of protein in dry cat food[J].Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research,2005,69(4):299-304.
[14] BACH KNUDSEN K E.The nutritional significance of "dietary fiber" analysis[J].Animal Feed Science and Technology,2001,90(1/2):3-20.
[15] 张艳铭,甄二英,宋智娟.玉米蛋白粉的营养价值及其应用[J].饲料博览,2006(5):18-20.
[16] FOLADOR J F,KARR-LILIENTHAL L K,PARSONS C M,et al.Fish meals,fish components,and fish protein hydrolysates as potential ingredients in pet foods[J].Journal of Animal Science,2006,84(10):2752-2765.  
[17] DUST J M,GRIESHOP C M,PARSONS C M,et al.Chemical composition,protein quality,palatability,and digestibility of alternative protein sources for dogs[J].Journal of Animal Science,2005,83(10):2414-2422.
[18] WEBER M,MARTIN L,BIOURGE V,et al.Influence of age and body size on the digestibility of a dry expanded diet in dogs[J].Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition,2003,87(1/2):21-31.
[19] SHIELDS R G.Digestibility and metabolizable energy measurement in dogs and cats[C]//Petfood Forum 93.Proceedings. Mt.Morris:Watt Publishing Co.,1993:21-35.
Outlines

/