Feed Science and Technology

Nutritive Value Evaluation of Different Types of Feeds by in Vitro Ruminal Fermentation Method

  • LI Yuanfei ,
  • HAO Jianxiang ,
  • MA Yanyan ,
  • CHENG Yanfen ,
  • ZHU Weiyun
Expand
  • Laboratory of Gastrointestinal Microbiology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China

Received date: 2013-04-16

  Online published: 2013-09-16

Abstract

This experiment was conducted to evaluate the nutritive value of different feeds by in vitro ruminal fermentation method. Experiment 1 was used to compare the in vitro fermentation characteristics of different forages (wheat husk, Chinese wildrye hay, rice straw, high-energy forage, American alfalfa, Chinese alfalfa, whole-plant corn silage, peanut vine silage, corn straw silage and hybrid sorghum silage), experiment 2 was used to compare the in vitro fermentation characteristics of different protein feeds (soybean meal, cottonseed meal, rapeseed meal, sesame meal and palm meal), and experiment 3 was used to compare the in vitro fermentation characteristics of different feed combinations (rice straw combination, alfalfa combination, Chinese wildrye hay combination and wheat husk combination, and the concentrate in those combinations was the same). The results showed as follows: after 48 h in vitro fermentation, the corn silages (including whole-plant corn silage and corn straw silage) and alfalfas (including American alfalfa and Chinese alfalfa) had higher gas production (GP), dry matter degradability (DMD) and total volatile fatty acid (TVFA) concentration compared with other forages (P<0.05), while the GP and DMD of wheat husk were significantly lower than those of other forages (P<0.05). After 48 h in vitro fermentation, soybean meal had the highest GP and the fastest fermentation rate. There were greater differences in organic matter degradability (OMD) and DMD among different protein feeds, and the OMD and DMD of soybean meal were the highest and significantly higher than those of other protein feeds (P<0.05); the microbial crude protein (MCP) concentration of soybean meal was also the highest and significantly higher than that of sesame meal and palm meal (P<0.05). For different feed combinations, the smaller neutral detergent fiber/crude protein (NDF/CP), the faster fermentation rate, and the higher degradability. The correlation analysis showed that the NDF/CP was negatively correlated to DMD (P<0.05). These results suggest that, 1) for forages, corn silages and alfalfas have the higher GP and faster fermentation rate, while the wheat husk has the lower GP and the slower fermentation rate; 2) for protein feeds, the GP, fermentation rate and MCP concentration of soybean meal are higher than those of other protein feeds; 3) for feed combinations, NDF/CP affect the in vitro fermentation characteristics of feeds, which is manifested as the smaller NDF/CP, the shorter fermentation lag phase, the faster fermentation rate, and the higher degradability.

Cite this article

LI Yuanfei , HAO Jianxiang , MA Yanyan , CHENG Yanfen , ZHU Weiyun . Nutritive Value Evaluation of Different Types of Feeds by in Vitro Ruminal Fermentation Method[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2013 , 25(10) : 2403 -2413 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2013.10.024

References

[1] 雷冬至,金曙光,乌仁塔娜.用体外产气法评价不同粗饲料与相同精料间的组合效应[J].饲料工业,2009,30(3):30-33.
[2] 邓露芳,范学珊,王加启.微生物发酵粕类蛋白质饲料的研究进展[J].中国畜牧兽医,2011,38(6):26-27.
[3] 张子仪.中国饲料学[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2000:289-290.
[4] MENKE K H,RAAB L,SALEWSLI A,et al.The estimation of the digestibility and metabolizable energy content of ruminant feedingstuffs from the gas production when they are incubated with rumen liquor in vitro[J].Journal of Agriculture Science,1979,93(1):217-222.  
[5] 杨胜.饲料分析及饲料质量检测技术[M].北京:北京农业大学出版社,1993:58-64.
[6] THEODOROU M K,WILLIAMS B A,DHANOA M S,et al.A simple gas production method using a pressure transducer to determine the fermentation kinetics of ruminant feeds[J].Animal Feed Science and Technology,1994,48(3/4):185-197.
[7] 朱伟云,毛胜勇,王全军,等.厌氧真菌体外发酵筛选技术的研究[J].南京农业大学学报,2001,24(3):44-48.
[8] 秦为琳.应用气相色谱测定瘤胃挥发性脂肪酸方法的研究改进[J].南京农学院学报,1982(4):110-116.
[9] MAKKAR H P S,SHAVMA O P,DAWRA R K,et al.Simple determination of microbial protein in rumen liquor[J].Journal of Dairy Science,1982,65(11):2170-2173.  
[10] BRODERICK G A,KANG J H.Automated simultaneous determination of ammonia and total amino acids in ruminal fluid and in vitro media[J].Journal of Dairy Science,1980,63(1):64-75.  
[11] ROCHA J L,BAKER J F,WOMACK J E,et al.Statistical associations between restriction fragment length polymorphisms and quantitative traits in beef cattle[J].Journal of Animal Science,1992,70(11):3360-3370.
[12] 王成章,王恬.饲料学[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2003:151-154.
[13] 张桂杰,罗海玲,张英俊,等.应用体外产气与活体外消化率法评定盛花期白三叶牧草营养价值[J].中国农业大学学报,2010,15(2):53-57.
[14] MURPHY J J,KENNELLY J J.Effect of protein concentration and protein source on the degradability of dry matter and protein in situ[J].Journal of Dairy Science,1987,70(9):1841.
[15] 马慧,苗树君,刘君,等.反刍动物日粮正组合效应的调控及优化配制[J].黄牛杂志,2005,31(6):47-50.
[16] 史良,刁其玉.体外产气法评定不同来源中性洗涤纤维与粗蛋白质间组合效应[J].中国饲料,2008(14):18-21.
[17] 陈福财,吴秋珏,周占琴.绵羊日粮中不同来源NDF与粗蛋白组合物的体外消化率和氨氮水平的研究[J].中国农学通报,2011,27(20):19-23.
Outlines

/