Short Communications

Effects of Litter Thickness on Production Performance, Immune Organ Indexes, Serum Biochemical Parameters and Welfare Quality of Yellow-Feathered Broilers

Expand
  • 1. Poultry Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Yangzhou 225125, China;
    2. College of Animal Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China

Received date: 2014-03-24

  Online published: 2014-08-13

Abstract

This trial was conducted to evaluate the effects of litter thickness on production performance, immune organ indexes, serum biochemical parameters and welfare quality of yellow-feathered broilers. A total of 1 600 21-day-old Suqin yellow-feathered male broilers were randomly allocated 4 groups with 5 replicates per group and 80 birds per replicate (8 birds/m2). These birds were assigned to litter thickness treatments for 4, 8, 12 and 16 cm, respectively. Each treatment was represented by 5 replicates. The experiment lasted for 35 days (from 22 to 56 days of age). The results showed that litter thickness had no effects on production performance, blood routine parameters, and serum biochemical parameters (P>0.05). The litter moisture content showed significant response to increasing litter thickness (P<0.05), and there was significant linear correlation between litter moisture content and litter thickness (P<0.001). The plumage pollution, plumage damage, and foot pad dermatitis as well as breast blister displayed significant reply to increasing litter thickness (P<0.05), and they were linearly affected by litter thickness (P=0.005, P<0.001, P=0.007 and P=0.013, respectively). The findings in this study reveal that increasing properly litter thicknesshas beneficial effects on litter quality and welfare quality of yellow-feathered broilers aged 56 days, and the effects of 16 cm litter thickness are best.

Cite this article

SHAO Dan, HE Jiao, WANG Qiang, CHANG Lingling, SHI Shourong, BU Zhu, TONG Haibing . Effects of Litter Thickness on Production Performance, Immune Organ Indexes, Serum Biochemical Parameters and Welfare Quality of Yellow-Feathered Broilers[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2014 , 26(8) : 2357 -2364 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2014.08.042

References

[1] MENCH J, SIEGEL P B.Poultry[C]//Reynnell R D, Eastwood B R, eds.Animal welfare issues compendium, 1997:100-107.

[2] SANOTRA G S, BERG C, LUND J D.A comparison between leg problems in Danish and Swedish broiler production[J].Animal Welfare, 2003, 12(4):677-683.

[3] WATHES C M, HOLDEN M R, SNEATH R W, et al.Concentrations and emission rates of aerial ammonia, nitrous oxide, methane, carbon dioxide, dust and endtoxin in UK broiler and layer houses[J].British Poultry Science, 1998, 38(1):14-28.

[4] KRISTENSEN H H, WATHES C M.Ammonia and poultry welfare:a review[J].World's Poultry Science Journal, 2000, 56(3):235-245.  

[5] HUGHES J J, WARD D.Predation risk and distance to cover affect foraging behavior in Namib Desert gerbils[J].Animal Behaviour, 1993, 46(6):1243-1245.  

[6] BROOM D M.Indicators of poor welfare[J].British Veterinary Journal, 1986, 142(6):524-526.  

[7] FRAESR A F, BROOM D M.Farm animal behaviour and welfare[M].London:Bailliere Tindall, 1989.

[8] ROBINS A, PHILLIPS C J C.International approaches to the welfare of meat chickens[J].World's Poultry Science Journal, 2011, 67(2):351-369.  

[9] 李凯年, 逯德山.垫料质量对肉鸡生产性能的影响[J].家禽科学, 2007(9):24-26.

[10] 李婉平, 杜正智.不同垫料对肉用种鸡舍某些环境卫生学指标及其对种鸡生产性能的影响[J].甘肃农业大学学报, 1989, 60(4):14-21.

[11] KHOSRAVINIA H.Effect of oiling and antimicrobial spray of litter on performance of broiler chickens reared on leaves and corn cob bedding materials under heat stress conditions[J].Asian-Australia Journal of animal Science, 2006, 19(1):42-47.

[12] 李云格.蚯蚓粪作为肉鸡垫料的应用研究[J].安徽农业科学, 2008, 36(31):13643-13645.

[13] MONIRA K N, ISLAM M A, ALAM M J, et al.Effect of litter materials on broiler performance and evaluation of manureal value of used litter in late autumn[J].Asian-Australia Journal of Animal Science, 2003, 16(4):555-557.

[14] 郑培兰.肉鸡平养与垫料[J].黑龙江畜牧兽医, 2003(10):79.

[15] DE PUBLIEKE P.Welfare quality[M]//Welfare Quality® assessment protocol for poultry (broilers, laying hens).Lelystad, the Netherlands:Welfare Quality® Consortium, 2009.

[16] DEMIRULUS H.The effcet of litter type and litter thickness on broiler carcass traits[J].International Journal of Poultry Science, 2006, 5(7):670-672.  

[17] POYRAZ Ö, ÖZCELIK Y, ÇAP S, et al.The effect of reutilization of litter and litter types on the performance in broiler rearing[J].Journal of Ankara University Agriculture Faculty, 1991, 37:233-268.

[18] TOGHYANI M, GHEISARI A, MODARESI M, et al.Effect of different litter material on performance and behavior of broiler chickens[J].Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 2010, 122(1):48-52.  

[19] 张艳云, 李金锋, 姜丹, 等.肉种鸡产蛋后期能量限饲对子代生长性能、血清生化指标和抗氧化能力的影响[J].动物营养学报, 2013, 25(11):2550-2558.

[20] 胡新旭, 周映华, 刘慧知, 等.无抗发酵饲料对断奶仔猪生长性能、肠道菌群、血液生化指标和免疫性能的影响[J].动物营养学报, 2013, 25(12):2989-2997.

[21] SCOTT M L, ESHEIM M C N, YOUG R J.Nutrition of the chicken[M].3rd ed.New York:M L Scott of Ithaca Pub., 1982.

[22] DAWKINS M S, DONNELLY C, JONES T.Chicken welfare is influenced more by housing conditions than by stocking density[J].Nature, 2004, 427(6972):342-344.  

[23] SHEPHERD E M, FAIRCHILD B D.Footpad dermatitis in poultry[J].Poultry Science, 2010, 89(10):2043-2051.  

[24] MARTLAND M F.Wet litter as a cause of plantar pododermatitis, leading to foot ulceration and lameness in fattening turkeys[J].Avian Pathology, 1984, 13(2):241-252.  

[25] MARTLAND M F.Ulcerative dermatitis in broiler chickens:the effects of wet litter[J].Avian Pathology, 1985, 14(3):353-364.  
Outlines

/