Short Communications

Analysis and Evaluation of Nutritional Components in Muscle of Cultured Synechogobius ommaturus

Expand
  • Shanghai Fisheries Research Institute, Shanghai Fisheries Technical Extension Station, Shanghai 200433, China

Received date: 2014-04-21

  Online published: 2014-09-10

Abstract

The nutritional components and quality in muscle of cultured Synechogobius ommaturus were analyzed and evaluated by biochemical analysis methods. The results showed that the moisture, crude protein, crude fat, and crude ash contents of fresh muscle of S. ommaturus were (82.10±0.21)%, (15.34±0.20)%, (0.87±0.13)%, and (1.12±0.03)%, respectively. Glu (12.71%), Asp (8.42%), Lys (8.16%), and Leu (6.51%) were the highest contents in 18 kinds of found amino acids in dry muscle. Total amino acid (TAA), total essential amino acid (EAA), and total delicious amino acid (DAA) contents of dry muscles were 83.36%, 31.40%, and 31.79%, respectively. The EAA/TAA and EAA/NEAA were (37.65±0.63)% and (70.10±1.90)%, respectively; according to nutrition evaluation in amino acids score (AAS) and chemical score (CS), the first limited amino acid was Trp, the second limited amino acid was Val; the essential amino acid index (EAAI) and the ratio of branched chain amino acid to aromatic amino acid (F value) were 70.19% and 2.22, respectively. The saturated fatty acids (∑SFA), poly-unsaturated fatty acids (∑PUFA), ∑n3 PUFA, and EPA+DHA were (30.23±0.48)%, (49.52±0.91)%, (39.54±1.12)%, and (42.47±1.10)%, respectively. Therefore, S. ommaturus is nutritional, delicious, and healthy to human, and is a new potential candidate for aquaculture.

Cite this article

HUANG Wei, ZHANG Zhonghua, SHI Yonghai, ZHANG Genyu, ZHANG Haiming, LU Genhai, XIE Yongde, LUO Zhiqiang . Analysis and Evaluation of Nutritional Components in Muscle of Cultured Synechogobius ommaturus[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2014 , 26(9) : 2866 -2873 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2014.09.051

References

[1] 高天翔,孙希福,宋娜.斑尾复虾虎鱼群体的形态学比较[J].中国海洋大学学报,2009,39(1):35-42.

[2] 孙帼英,陈建国.斑尾复虾虎鱼的生物学研究[J].水产学报,1993,17(2):146-153.

[3] 孙帼英,陈建国,吴引忠.斑尾复虾虎鱼的成熟与产卵[J].水产科技情报,1996,23(3):99-107.

[4] 范海洋,纪毓鹏,张士华,等.黄河三角洲斑尾复虾虎鱼渔业生物学的研究[J].中国海洋大学学报,2005,35(5):733-736.

[5] 宋娜,宋林,高天翔,等.斑尾复虾虎鱼群体遗传多样性比较分析[J].水产学报,2011,35(3):321-326.

[6] 方华华,高天翔.耳石形态在斑尾复虾虎鱼群体鉴别中的研究[J].中国农学通报,2012,28(29):92-97

[7] FAO/WHO Ad Hoe Expert Committee.Energy and protein requirements[M].Rome:FAO Nutrition Meeting Report Series,1973:52.

[8] 桥本芳郎.养鱼饲料学[M].蔡完其译.北京:中国农业出版社,1980:114-115.

[9] 庄平,宋超,章龙珍.长江口安氏白虾与日本沼虾营养成分比较[J].动物学报,2008,54(5):822-829.

[10] 徐钢春,顾若波,张呈祥,等.刀鲚两种生态类群--"江刀"和"海刀"鱼肉营养组成的比较及品质的评价[J].海洋渔业,2009,31(4):401-409.

[11] 施永海,张根玉,刘永士,等.野生及养殖哈氏仿对虾肌肉营养成分的分析与比较[J].水产学报,2013,37(5):768-776.

[12] 唐雪,徐钢春,徐跑,等.野生与养殖刀鲚肌肉营养成分的比较分析[J].动物营养学报,2011,23(3):514-520.

[13] 闻海波,张呈祥,徐钢春,等.长江刀鲚营养成分分析与品质评价[J].广东海洋大学学报,2008,28(6):21-22.

[14] 罗智,李晓东,白海娟,等.野生和养殖矛尾复虾虎鱼营养组成和形态学的比较研究[J].上海水产大学学报,2008,17(2):182-186.

[15] 庄平,宋超,章龙珍,等.舌虾虎鱼肌肉营养成分与品质的评价[J].水产学报,2010,34(4):559-564.

[16] 章龙珍,宋超,庄平,等.长江口斑尾刺虾虎鱼与纹缟虾虎鱼肌肉营养成分比较[J].海洋渔业,2011,33(3):304-309.

[17] 李建军,郑伟强,陈小曲,等.诸氏鲻虾虎鱼含肉率及肌肉营养成分分析[J].中国比较医学杂志,2013,23(12):35-39.

[18] 张昌颖,李亮,李昌甫,等.生物化学[M].2版.北京:人民卫生出版社,1988:305,561.

[19] 周俊,宋代军.赖氨酸营养研究进展[J].饲料工业,2006,27(8):48-50.

[20] 许星鸿,刘翔,阎斌伦,等.日本对虾肌肉营养成分分析与品质评价[J].食品科学,2011,32(13):297-301.

[21] 毛国祥,赵万里.新太湖鹅、太湖鹅和隆昌鹅肌肉品质比较研究[J].动物科学与动物医学,2000,17(1):16-19.

[22] 施永海,张根玉,张海明,等.配合饲料和活饵料喂养刀鲚肌肉营养品质分析与比较[J].动物营养学报,2014,26(2):427-436.
Outlines

/