Special Economic Animal Nutrition

Effects of Acidifier on Performance and Serum Biochemical Indices of Racoon Dogs

  • WANG Kaiying ,
  • BAO Kun ,
  • XU Chao ,
  • LIU Hanlu ,
  • LIU Xueqing ,
  • LI Guangyu
Expand
  • 1. Institute of Special Economic Animal and Plant Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Changchun 130112, China;
    2. State Key Laboratory of Special Economic Animal Molecular Biology, Changchun 130112, China

Received date: 2014-06-20

  Online published: 2014-12-05

Abstract

This experiment was conducted to study the effects of acidifier on performance and serum biochemical indices of racoon dogs. One hundred healthy male Wusuli raccoon dogs with similar body weight were randomly divided into 10 groups with 10 raccoon dogs per group. The control group (group Ⅰ) was fed a basal diet, and the experimental groups (groups Ⅱ to Ⅹ) were fed the experimental diets supplemented with 0.4%, 0.6% and 0.8% phosphoric acid, 0.5%, 1.0% and 1.5% citric acid, 0.5%, 1.0% and 1.5% lactic acid, respectively. The experiment lasted for 125 days. The results showed as follows: 1) compared with the control group, the acidifier had significantly effect on the pH of diet and gastric juice (P<0.01), the acidifier had no significantly effect on intestine juice pH (P>0.05), the dry matter intake was firstly increased and then decreased with the acidifier supplemented level increasing. 2) Compared with the control group, the acidifier had no significantly effects on body weight, average daily gain, carcass weight, body length, fur length and fur weigh (P>0.05). 3) There were no significant differences in the contents of urea nitrogen, glucose, immunoglobulin M, triiodothyronine and thyroxine in serum among all groups (P>0.05). Serum total protein content showed a negative correlation with phosphoric acid supplemented level, and it was firstly decreased and then increased with the citric acid and lactic acid supplemented levels increasing. Serum albumin content showed a decreased tendency with the citric acid and lactic acid supplemental levels increasing. Serum immunoglobulin G content showed a negative correlation with phosphoric acid and citric acid supplemented levels, and it was firstly increased and then decreased with the lactic acid supplemented level increasing. In conclusion, 1.0% lactic acid group can get the optimal effect under this experimental condition.

Cite this article

WANG Kaiying , BAO Kun , XU Chao , LIU Hanlu , LIU Xueqing , LI Guangyu . Effects of Acidifier on Performance and Serum Biochemical Indices of Racoon Dogs[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2014 , 26(12) : 3717 -3722 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2014.12.022

References

[1] LIU S T,HOU W X,CHENG S Y,et al.Effects of dietary citric acid on performance,digestibility of calcium and phosphorus,milk composition and immunoglobulin in sows during late gestation and lactation[J].Animal Feed Science and Technology,2014,191:67-75.

[2] LEE D N,LIU S R,CHEN Y T,et al.Effects of diets supplemented with organic acids and nucleotides on growth,immune responses and digestive tract development in weaned pigs[J].Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition,2007,91(11/12):508-518.

[3] NAMKUNG H,LI M,GONG J,et al.Impact of feeding blends of organic acids and herbal extracts on growth performance,gut microbiota and digestive function in newly weaned pigs[J].Canadian Journal of Animal Science,2004,84(4):697-704.  

[4] GERRITSEN R,VAN DIJK A J,RETHY K,et al.The effect of blends of organic acids on apparent faecal digestibility in piglets[J].Livestock Science,2010,134(1/2/3):246-248.

[5] HANSEN C F,RIIS A L,BRESSON S,et al.Feeding organic acids enhances the barrier function against pathogenic bacteria of the piglet stomach[J].Livestock Science,2007,108(1/2/3):206-209.

[6] 王淑琴.柠檬酸对肉仔鸡生长、免疫、消化道及血液相关指标的影响[D].硕士学位论文.呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2010.

[7] 王凯英,李光玉,鲍坤,等.琥珀酸对水貂胃蛋白酶活性、营养物质消化率及生产性能的影响[J].东北农业大学学报,2011,42(9):67-71.

[8] ZHU K H,XU X R,SUN D F,et al.Effects of drinking water acidification by organic acidifier on growth performance,digestive enzyme activity and caecal bacteria in growing rabbits[J].Animal Feed Science and Technology,2014,190:87-94.

[9] LUCKSTADT C.Synergistic acidifiers to fight salmonella[J].Feed Mix,2005,13(1):28-30.

[10] GUNAL M,YAYLI G,KAYA O,et al.The effects of antibiotic growth promoter,probiotic or organic acid supplementation on performance,intestinal microflora and tissue of broilers[J].International Journal of Poultry Science,2006,5(2):149-155.  

[11] VALENCIA Z,SC M,CHAVEZ E R,et al.Phytase and acetic acid supplementation in the diet of early weaned piglets:effect on performance and apparent nutrient digestibility[J].Nutrition Research,2002,22(5):623-632.  

[12] 王凯英,李光玉,毕世丹,等.琥珀酸对水貂冬毛生长期生长发育性状和某些血液生化指标影响的研究[J].特产研究,2009(4):9-12,15.

[13] 王凯英,鲍坤,徐超,等.饲料酸化剂对冬毛期水貂生产性能和血清生化指标的影响[J].东北农业大学学报,2012,43(12):78-85.

[14] BORG B S,LIBAL G W,WAHLSTROM R C.Tryptophan and threonine requirements of young pigs and their effects on serum calcium,phosphorus and zinc concentrations[J].Journal of Animal Science,1987,64(4):1070-1078.

[15] MALMLOF K.Amino acid in farm animal nutrition metabolism,partition and consequences of imbalance[J].Swedish Journal of Agriculture Research,1988,18(4):191-193.

[16] 刁慧,郑萍,余冰,等.苯甲酸对断奶仔猪生长性能、血清生化指标、养分消化率和空肠食糜消化酶活性的影响[J].动物营养学报,2013,25(4):768-777.

[17] GRIMINGER P.Lipid metabolism[M]//STURKIE P D.Avian physiology.New York:Springer-Verlag,1986.
Outlines

/