Short Communications

Effects of Different Rearing System and Stocking Density on Growth Performance and Meat Quality of Broilers

Expand
  • 1. College of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taigu 030801, China;
    2. College of Animal Science & Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China

Received date: 2014-08-25

  Online published: 2015-02-09

Abstract

The effects of rearing system and stocking density on growth performance and carcass composition of broilers were investigated in this experiment. Using a 3×2 factors completely randomized design, a total of 504 seven-day-old male broilers (Ross 308) were divided into 6 groups with 6 replicates per group, respectively. Three rearing systems were designed as battery rearing, floor rearing and net rearing. Two stocking densities were designed as normal density (12 birds/m2) and high density (16 birds/m2). This test lasted for 35 d. The results showed as follows: 1) Rearing system had significant effect on average daily feed intake (ADFI), average daily gain (ADG) and feed to gain ratio (F/G) of broilers aged from 7 to 28 and 29 to 42 days (P<0.001). At 7 to 28 days of age, ADFI of broilers appeared as floor rearing>battery rearing> net rearing, ADG appeared as floor rearing> net rearing> battery rearing, F/G appeared as net rearing< floor rearing< battery rearing. At 29 to 42 days of age, floor rearing significantly enhanced ADFI of broilers compared with battery rearing and net rearing (P<0.05). Battery rearing significantly enhanced ADG of broilers compared with floor rearing and net rearing (P<0.05). F/G appeared as battery rearing> net rearing> floor rearing. High stocking density had the trend to decrease ADFI of broilers aged 7 to 28 days (0.05<P<0.10), significantly decreased BW of broilers aged 28 days (P<0.01), but did not significantly affect F/G (P>0.05). At 29 to 42 days of age, high stocking density had the trend to increase ADFI of broilers (0.05<P<0.10), significantly decreased BW and increased F/G of 42days broilers (P<0.01). 2) Battery rearing significantly decreased breast yields compared with the other two feeding system (P<0.05), high stocking density significantly increased abdominal fat yields (P<0.05). 3) The pH1 of breast muscle at 45 min after slaughter was significantly decreased in battery rearing (P<0.01). High stocking density significantly decreased pH1 and increased water-loss rate of breast muscle (P<0.05). 4) Floor rearing had the highest luminance (L*) and yellowness (b*), and had the trend to decrease redness (a*) of leg muscle, whereas, battery rearing group appeared the contrary effect, had the trend to decrease L* and b*, and increase a*. High stocking density significantly decreased pH1 (P<0.01) and significantly increased the ether extract content of leg muscle (P<0.05). Significant interactive effects between rearing system and stocking density were appeared in pH1 of leg muscle (P<0.01), high stocking density significantly decreased pH1 of leg muscle of broilers in floor rearing and net rearing system (P<0.05) but not in battery rearing system (P>0.05), and the lowest pH1 of leg muscle was appeared in floor rearing with high stocking density group. In conclusion, rearing system and stocking density have affect on the growth performance of broilers with no interaction is found. The interaction is found in meat quality of leg muscle, and high stocking density in floor and net rearing system can significant affect the leg muscle quality.

Cite this article

LI Jianhui, MIAO Zhiqiang, YANG Yu, ZHANG Hua, ZHANG Junzhen, LU Yingjie, YANG Ying . Effects of Different Rearing System and Stocking Density on Growth Performance and Meat Quality of Broilers[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2015 , 27(2) : 569 -577 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2015.02.029

References

[1] DOZIER W A,THAXTON J P,PURSWELL J L,et al.Stocking density effects on male broilers grown to 1.8 kilograms of body weight[J].Poultry Science,2006,85(2):344-351.  

[2] MARTRENCHAR A,BOILLETOT E,HUONNIC D,et al.Risk factors for foot-pad dermatitis in chicken and turkey broilers in France[J].Preventive Veterinary Medicine,2002,52(3/4):213-226.

[3] 张双玲,施云平,陈洪林.不同饲养方式对肉鸡生产性能的影响[J].畜禽业,2010(12):8-9.

[4] 赵芙蓉,李保明,耿爱莲,等.笼底材料、密度和性别组群对肉鸡胸囊肿发生及胸肌成分的影响[J].农业工程学报,2006,22(12):168-171.

[5] AKPOBOME G O,FANGUY R C.Evaluation of cage floor systems for production of commercial broilers[J].Poultry Science,1992,71(2):274-280.  

[6] ANDREWS L D,STAMPS L K,MOORE R W,et al.Effects of different floor types and levels of washing of waterers on broiler performance and bacteria count of drinking water[J].Poultry Science,1993,72(7):1224-1229.  

[7] ZHAO F R,GENG A L,LI B M,et al.Effects of environmental factors on breast blister incidence,growth performance,and some biochemical indexes in broilers[J].The Journal of Applied Poultry Research,2009,18(4):699-706.  

[8] 朱月福,亓岱金,王明新.对大中型蛋鸡场工艺设计的探讨[J].山东畜牧兽医,1994(2):19-20.

[9] GARCIA R G,MENDES A A,GARCIA E A,et al.Effect of stocking density and sex on feathering,body injury and breast meat quality of broiler chikens[J].Revista Brasileira de Ciência Avícola,2002,4(1):8-13.  

[10] BOGOSAVLJEVI?-BOŠKOVI?S,RAKONJAC S,DOSKOVIC V,et al.Broiler rearing systems:a review of major fattening results and meat quality traits[J].Worlds Poultry Science Journal,2012,68(2):217-228.  

[11] FEDDES J J,EMMANUEL E J,ZUIDHOFT M J.Broiler performance,body weight variance,feed and water intake,and carcass quality at different stocking densities[J].Poultry Science,2002,81(6):774-779.  

[12] 袁建敏,张开臣,胡骁飞.环境因素影响肉鸡生长的研究进展[J].家畜生态学报,2007,28(6):135-138.

[13] 陈冬梅,周材权,苏学辉.不同饲养方式对肉用土鸡屠宰性能和肉质的影响[J].饲料工业,2005,26(17):9-10.

[14] 赵旭.丁酸梭菌对肉鸡脂肪代谢的影响及其机理研究[D].博士学位论文.北京:中国农业大学,2014:31.
Outlines

/