Short Communications

Research of Associative Effects of Soybean Stalk, Peanut Vine and Corn Stalk Silage

Expand
  • College of Animal Science and Technology, Qingdao Agricultural University, Qingdao 266109, China

Received date: 2014-09-05

  Online published: 2015-02-09

Abstract

This experiment was conducted to investigate the associative effects of soybean stalk (SS), peanut vine (PV) and corn stalk silage (CS). CS and SS, PV and SS, CS and PV were mixed in rations of 0:100, 20:80, 40:60, 60:40, 80:20 and 100:0 with 3 replicates, respectively. The associative effects of CS, SS and PV were assessed by the in vitro rumen fermentation technology to monitor gas production (GP), gas parameters, pH, ammonia nitrogen (NH3-N), microbial crude protein (MCP), single-factor associative effects index (SFAEI) and multiple-factors associative effects index (MFAEI). The results showed as follows: there were significant differences in gas production among different combinations (P<0.05), both SS-PV and SS-CS in ration of 20:80 had the maximum gas production, and PV-CS in ration of 60:40 had the maximum gas production. There were no significant differences in pH among different combinations (P>0.05). The NH3-N concentration of different combinations had significant difference (P<0.05), changed in the range of 39 to 64 mg/dL. The MCP concentration of SS-PV and PV-CS was increased with PV increased. The SS-CS ration of highest MCP concentration was 20:80. It is include from MFAEI that the combination of SS-PV, SS-CS and PV-CS in rations of 20:80, 60:40 are appropriate, respectively.

Cite this article

YUAN Cuilin, YU Ziyang, WANG Wendan, WANG Lihua, LIN Yingting . Research of Associative Effects of Soybean Stalk, Peanut Vine and Corn Stalk Silage[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2015 , 27(2) : 647 -654 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2015.02.038

References

[1] SILVA A T,ØRSKOV E R.The effect of five different supplements on the degradation of straw in sheep given untreated barley straw[J].Animal Feed Science and Technology,1988,19(3):289-298.  

[2] HADDAD S G.Associative effects of supplementing barley straw diets with alfalfa hay on rumen environment and nutrient intake and digestibility for ewes[J].Animal Feed Science and Technology,2000,87(3/4):163-171.

[3] 卢德勋.饲料的组合效应[M]//张子仪.中国饲料学.北京:中国农业出版社,2000:289-294.

[4] 郭冬生.反刍动物日粮组合效应对瘤胃发酵和可利用粗蛋白的影响研究[D].硕士学位论文.北京:中国农业大学,2004.

[5] SCHOFIELD P,PITT R E,PELL A N.Kinetics of fiber digestion from in vitro gas production[J].Journal of Animal Science,1994,72(11):2980-2991.

[6] COTTA M A,RUSSELL J B.Effect of peptides and amino acids on efficiency of rumen bacterial protein synthesis in continuous culture[J].Journal of Dairy Science,1982,65(2):226-234.  

[7] 王旭.利用GI技术对粗饲料进行科学搭配及绵羊日粮配方系统优化技术的研究[D].硕士学位论文.呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2003.

[8] 雷冬至,金曙光,乌仁塔娜.用体外产气法评价不同粗饲料与相同精料间的组合效应[J].饲料工业,2009,30(3):30-33.

[9] ZHAO G Y,XUE Y,ZHANG W.Relationship between in vitro gas production and dry matter and organic matter digestibility of rations for sheep[J].Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences,2007,16(Suppl.2):229-234.

[10] SEBATA A,NDLOVU L R,DUBE J S.Chemical composition,in vitro dry matter digestibility and in vitro gas production of five woody species browsed by Matebele goats (Capra hircus L.) in a semi-arid savanna,Zimbabwe[J].Animal Feed Science and Technology,2011,170(1/2):122-125.

[11] 金海,刘桂瑞,薛树媛,等.利用体外发酵多项指标综合评定法优选泌乳牛日粮配方[J].畜牧与饲料科学,2010,31(6/7):438-440.

[12] 孙国强,吕永艳,张杰杰.利用体外瘤胃发酵法研究全株玉米青贮与花生蔓和羊草间的组合效应[J].草业学报,2014,23(3):224-231.

[13] 冯仰廉.反刍动物营养学[M].北京:科学出版社,2004:84-94.

[14] 丁健.不同结构日粮对肉用山羊瘤胃内环境参数及细菌氨态氮利用的影响[D].硕士学位论文.扬州:扬州大学,2003.

[15] 吴仙,李莉娜,粟朝芝,等.常用牧草对山羊瘤胃内环境参数的影响[J].饲料研究,2014(3):37-41.

[16] 张吉鹍,李龙瑞,吴文旋,等.稻草补饲苜蓿对山羊瘤胃发酵的组合效应[J].草业科学,2014,31(2):313-320.

[17] HOOVER W H.Chemical factors involved in ruminal fiber digestion[J].Journal of Dairy Science,1986,69(10):2755-2766.  

[18] 彭点懿.不同品质粗饲料组合对体外发酵参数、夏季奶牛生产性能及血液生化指标的影响[D].硕士学位论文.雅安:四川农业大学,2010.

[19] 吴仙.不同饲料山羊瘤胃降解率及其对瘤胃内环境影响研究[D].硕士学位论文.贵阳:贵州大学,2009.

[20] 布同良.体外产气法评定青贮玉米、羊草和苜蓿草之间的组合效应[D].硕士学位论文.杭州:浙江大学,2006.
Outlines

/