Short Communications

Effect of Lactic Acid Bacteria Mixture on Silage Quality of Bamboo Shoots Shell

Expand
  • Key Laboratory of Fruits and Vegetables Postharvest and Processing Technology Research of Zhejiang Province, Institute of Food Science, Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou 310021, China

Received date: 2015-01-05

  Online published: 2015-06-17

Abstract

This experiment was conducted to study the effects lactic acid bacteria (LAB) mixture on silage quality of bamboo shoots shell (BSS). The by-product of fresh bamboo shoots after cooking processed, BSS, was used for silage and was supplemented with 10% wheat bran, 15% LAB mixture (Lactobacillus casei:Lactobacillus casei=1:1, bacteria number≥109 CFU/g), and 10% wheat bran + 15% LAB mixture, respectively, besides, single silage of BSS was carried out as control. After ensilaged for 90 days, the common nutrient composition, organic acid and ammonia nitrogen (NH3-N) contents were determined, the surface structure was observed under electron microscope, and the sensory quality was also evaluated. The results showed that compared with control, the treatment of 10% wheat bran + 15% LAB mixture significantly increased the contents of crude protein and lactic acid (58.5 g/kg) (P<0.05), significantly decreased the contents of water-soluble carbohydrate (WSC) and neutral detergent fiber (NDF) (P<0.05), and significantly decreased pH, NH3-N/total nitrogen and butyric acid content (P<0.05); the BSS silage was bright yellow, with acid aroma, soft texture, no phenomenon of sticky hands. In conclusion, the supplementation of 10% wheat bran and 15% LAB (Lactobacillus casei:Lactobacillus casei=1:1)can improve the nutrient quality of BSS, and get good BSS silage.

Cite this article

LIU Daqun, CHEN Wenxuan, HUA Ying . Effect of Lactic Acid Bacteria Mixture on Silage Quality of Bamboo Shoots Shell[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2015 , 27(6) : 1963 -1969 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2015.06.036

References

[1] 管武太,ASHBELL G,HEN Y,等.微生物添加剂对青贮高粱发酵品质和稳定性的影响[J].中国农业科学,2002,35(11):1401-1405.

[2] 余能富,王玉.我国笋壳开发利用进展[J].江西林业科学,2010(4):51-53.

[3] 赵丽萍,周振明,任丽萍,等.笋壳作为动物饲料利用研究进展[J].中国畜牧杂志,2013,49(13):77-80.

[4] 王力生,齐永玲,陈芳,等.不同添加剂对笋壳青贮品质和营养价值的影响[J].草业学报,2013,22(5):326-332.

[5] 周建钟,刘力,冯炎龙.氨化竹笋加工下脚料饲用价值研究[J].竹子研究汇刊,2001,20(4):52-56.

[6] 贾燕芳,石伟勇.不同添加剂对笋壳青贮发酵品质的影响[J].浙江农业科学,2011(2):341-343.

[7] AOAC.Official methods of analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists[S].Washington,D.C.:AOAC,1990.

[8] VAN SOEST P J,ROBERTSON J B,LEWIS B A.Methods for dietary fiber,neutral detergent fiber,and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition[J].Journal of Dairy Science,1992,74:3583-3597.

[9] DUBOIS M,GILLES K A,HAMILTON J K,et al.Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances[J].Analytical Chemistry,1956,28(3):350-356.  

[10] 浙江大学动物科学学院.青贮饲料质量评定标准(试行)[J].中国饲料,1996(21):5-8.

[11] PEI F,SHI Y,MARIGA A M,et al.Comparison of freeze-drying and freeze-drying combined with microwave vacuum drying methods on drying kinetics and rehydration characteristics of button mushroom (Agaricus bisporus) slices[J].Food Bioprocess Technology,2014,7(6):1629-1639.  

[12] 郜海燕,杨帅,陈杭君,等.蓝莓外表皮蜡质及其对果实软化的影响[J].中国食品学报,2014,14(2):102-108.

[13] WHITER A G,KUNG L,Jr.The effect of a dry or liquid application of Lactobacillus plantarum MTD1 on the fermentation of alfalfa silage [J].Journal of Dairy Science,2001,84(10):2195-2202.  

[14] 刘海燕,于维,邱玉朗,等.秸秆青贮添加乳酸菌的研究进展[J].饲料广角,2011(20):40-44.

[15] DONG X L,MENG Q X,XIONG Y Q.A comparison of buffered propionic acid and Propionibacterium acidipropionici as additives for high oil maize stover silage[J].Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences,2006,15(4):669-683.

[16] 刘建新,杨振海,叶均安,等.青贮饲料的合理调制与质量评定标准(续)[J].饲料工业,1999,20(4):3-6.
Outlines

/