To investigate the effects of different kinds of acidifier on intestinal development, digestive enzyme activities and microbiota number of broiler chickens, a total of 840 one-day-old male Arbor Acres (AA) broiler chicks were randomly allocated into 7 treatments with 6 replicates per group and 20 broilers per replicate. The control group was fed a basal diet, and test groups were fed the basal diet supplemented with phosphoric acid (PA), coated phosphoric acid (CPA), phosphoric acid+lactic acid (PLA), fumaric acid (FUA), formic acid (FA) and citric acid (CA), respectively (the H+ concentration was 9.18 mmol/kg). The experiment lasted for 42 days. The results showed as follows:1) dietary supplemented with PA significantly increased the activities of trypsin and chymotrypsin in small intestine at 21 and 42 days of age (P<0.05). 2) Dietary supplemented with CPA significantly increased the chymotrypsin activity in small intestine (P<0.05). 3) Dietary supplemented with PLA significantly increased trypsin activity in small intestine at 42 days of age (P<0.05). 4) Dietary supplemented with FUA significantly increased the activities of trypsin and chymotrypsin in the small intestine at 42 days of age (P<0.05), but significantly reduced the number of Escherichia coli in cecal at 42 days of age (P<0.05). 5) Dietary supplemented with FA significantly increased the trypsin activity in the small intestine at 21 and 42 days of age (P<0.05), but significantly reduced the number of Escherichia coli in cecal at 42 days of age (P<0.05). 6) Dietary supplemented with CA significantly increased the activities of trypsin and chymotrypsin in the small intestine at 21 and 42 days of age (P<0.05), but significantly reduced the number of Escherichia coli in cecal at 42 days of age (P<0.05). In conclusion, PA, CPA and PLA can increase small intestinal digestive enzyme activities; FUA, FA and CA can improve small intestinal digestive enzyme activities, and decrease harmful cecal microbiota number of broilers.
ZHAO Xu
,
SHEN Yiru
,
CHEN Jie
,
SHI Shourong
. Effects of Different Kinds of Acidifier on Intestinal Development, Digestive Enzyme Activities and Microbiota Number of Broiler Chickens[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2015
, 27(11)
: 3509
-3515
.
DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2015.11.023
[1] 陈代文, 张克英, 王万祥, 等.酸化剂、益生素和寡糖对断奶仔猪粪中微生物菌群和免疫功能的影响及其互作效应研究[J].动物营养学报, 2006, 18(3):172-178.
[2] 郭鹏, 卢建, 李军, 等.复合酸化剂对肉仔鸡消化道pH值和消化酶活性的影响[J].饲料工业, 2011, 32(11):32-35.
[3] 张相伦, 杨在宾.酸化剂改善动物胃肠道内环境机理的研究[J].饲料博览, 2013(11):22-24.
[4] 张宏福, 张莉, 方路, 等.异麦芽低聚糖对断奶仔猪肠道VFA浓度、pH值及黏膜形态结构的影响[J].动物营养学报, 2002, 14(1):19-24.
[5] 罗四维.复合酸化剂对肉仔鸡生产性能和消化道内环境的影响[D].硕士学位论文.扬州:扬州大学, 2010:28-50.
[6] 孔陆军, 郑雅文, 赖长华, 等.EM和酸化剂配合添加对肉仔鸡消化酶活性和血液生化指标及钙磷代谢的影响[J].山东家禽, 2003(6):10-13.
[7] 朱剑锋, 周海泳, 胡学锋, 等.饲料酸化剂的现状与发展趋势[J].广东饲料, 2013, 22(3):32-34.
[8] 秦圣涛, 张宏福, 唐湘方, 等.酸化剂主要生理功能和复合酸选配依据[J].动物营养学报, 2007, 19(增刊):515-520.
[9] 朱宇旌, 吴芸彤, 季文彦, 等.不同环境下包被酸化剂对肉仔鸡生长性能、消化道内环境及血清生化指标的影响[J].动物营养学报, 2012, 24(5):886-896.
[10] 李军.磷酸-乳酸复合酸化剂对肉仔鸡生产性能的影响[D].硕士学位论文.扬州:扬州大学, 2011:30-38.
[11] 张祥, 张子宏.饲料酸化剂替代抗生素的作用机制[J].饲料研究, 2006(9):22-24.
[12] 冯尚连, 尚建钢, 孙玥滢, 等.乳酸对仔猪肠道大肠杆菌和乳酸杆菌的影响[J].浙江农业学报, 2011, 23(3):506-510.