Comparison of Rumen Degradation Characteristics between Pennisetum sp. and Commonly Used Roughages for Dairy Cows

MA Jian, LIU Yanfang, DU Yun, LI Shengli, YU Xiong

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2016.03.022

Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition >

2016 , Vol. 28 >Issue 3: 816 - 825

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2016.03.022

Feed Resources Development

Comparison of Rumen Degradation Characteristics between Pennisetum sp. and Commonly Used Roughages for Dairy Cows

Expand

1. College of Animal Science and Technology, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China;
2. College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China

Received date: 2015-10-15

Online published: 2016-03-14

Fold

Abstract

This experiment was conducted to determine the rumen degradation characteristics of 7 kinds of roughages including 2 kinds of Pennisetum sp. hay (different cutting height), 2 kinds of Pennisetum sp. silage (different cutting height), dried Chinese wildye, dried alfalfa hay and whole corn silage. Four Holstein cows with permanent ruminal cannulas were used. Nylon-bag technique was used to evaluate the ruminal degradability of dry matter (DM), crude protein (CP), neutral detergent fiber (NDF) and acid detergent fiber (ADF). The results showed as follows: 1) the content of CP in Pennisetum sp. hay was significantly high than that in dried Chinese wildye (P<0.05), but compared with the dried Chinese wildye, the content of NDF was significantly reduced (P<0.05); the contents of CP and NDF in Pennisetum sp. silage were significantly high than those in whole corn silage (P<0.05). 2) The DM effective degradability of dried alfalfa hay was significantly higher than that of whole corn silage, 2.0 m Pennisetum sp. sliage, 2.5 m Pennisetum sp. silage, 2.0 m Pennisetum sp. hay, 2.5 m Pennisetum sp. hay and dried Chinese wildye (P<0.05), which was decreased in the above order, and dried Chinese wildye was significantly lower than others (P<0.05); CP effective degradability of dried alfalfa hay was not significantly different from 2.0 m Pennisetum sp. silage (P>0.05), but was significantly higher than that of 2.5 m Pennisetum sp. silage, 2.0 m Pennisetum sp. hay, whole corn silage, 2.5 m Pennisetum sp. hay and dried Chinese wildye (P<0.05), which was decreased in the above order; NDF effective degradability of whole corn silage was not significantly different from Pennisetum sp. silage (P>0.05), and was significantly higher than that of other roughages (P<0.05); ADF effective degradability of Pennisetum sp. silage at 72 h was significantly higher than that of other roughers (P<0.05). It is concluded that Pennisetum sp. has a potential as a new non-conventional feed resource for ruminants, silage can save the nutrition composition, and can improve the rumen degradation of nutrition composition.

Key words： Pennisetum sp.; nutrition composition; nylon-bag technique; rumen degradation rate

Cite this article

MA Jian, LIU Yanfang, DU Yun, LI Shengli, YU Xiong . Comparison of Rumen Degradation Characteristics between Pennisetum sp. and Commonly Used Roughages for Dairy Cows[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2016 , 28(3) : 816 -825 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2016.03.022

References

[1] 李胜利,范学珊.奶牛饲料与全混合日粮饲养技术[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2011:6-14.

[2] KAUR R,GARCIA S C,FULKERSON W J,et al.Degradation kinetics of leaves,petioles and stems of forage rape (Brassica napus) as affected by maturity[J].Animal Feed Science and Technology,2011,168(3/4):165-178.

[3] 张颖,毛华明.不同牧草在黄牛瘤胃内的降解特性[J].中国饲料,2011(5):14-16,23.

[4] 夏科,姚庆,李富国,等.奶牛常用粗饲料的瘤胃降解规律[J].动物营养学报,2012,24(4):769-777.

[5] 陈艳,张晓明,王之盛,等.6种肉牛常用粗饲料瘤胃降解特性和瘤胃非降解蛋白质的小肠消化率[J].动物营养学报,2014,26(8):2145-2154.

[6] GETACHEW G,ROBINSON P H,DEPETERS E J,et al.Relationships between chemical composition,dry matter degradation and in vitro gas production of several ruminant feeds[J].Animal Feed Science and Technology,2004,111(1/2/3/4):57-71.

[7] 张丽英.饲料分析及饲料质量检测技术[M].3版.北京:中国农业大学出版社,2007:56-56,67-78.

[8] ØRSKOV E R,MCDONALD I.The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighted according to rate of passage[J].The Journal of Agricultural Science,1979,92(2):499-503.

[9] 宫福臣,韩梅琳,杨琼,等.菌糠与奶牛常用粗饲料瘤胃降解特性的对比研究[J].动物营养学报,2013,25(6):1366-1374.

[10] 陈晓琳.肉羊常用粗饲料营养价值和瘤胃降解特性研究[D].硕士学位论文.青岛:青岛农业大学,2014:6.

[11] 余汝华,赵丽华,莫放,等.玉米秸秆青贮饲料中NDF与ADF含量变化规律的研究[J].饲料工业,2003,24(10):19-20.

[12] 张力莉,徐晓峰,金曙光.豆粕蛋白质和玉米蛋白粉蛋白质在绵羊瘤胃内降解规律的比较研究[J].黑龙江畜牧兽医,2010(7):97-98.

[13] 姚庆,张永根,王明君,等.酒精清液发酵玉米秸秆、全株玉米青贮和玉米秸秆瘤胃降解率的研究[J].中国畜牧杂志,2013,49(3):56-60.

[14] SATTER L D.Protein supply from undegraded dietary protein[J].Journal of Dairy Science,1986,69(10):2734-2749.

[15] 裘燕.奶牛常用粗饲料的营养成分及其瘤胃降解率与体外发酵特性[D].硕士学位论文.北京:中国农业大学,2013:5.

[16] 贾海军.奶牛常用饲草瘤胃降解规律的研究[D].硕士学位论文.保定:河北农业大学,2010:6.

[17] 宋伟红,韩欢胜,刘立成,等.北方肉牛常用粗饲料主要营养成分瘤胃有效降解率[J].中国牛业科学,2012,38(6):31-33.

[18] HOFFMAN P C,SIEVERT S J,SHAVER R D,et al.In situ dry matter,protein,and fiber degradation of perennial forages[J].Journal of Dairy Science,1993,76(9):2632-2643.

[19] JUNG H G,ALLEN M S.Characteristics of plant cell walls affecting intake and digestibility of forages by ruminants[J].Journal of Animal Science,1995,73(9):2774-2790.

[20] 王立明,闫素梅,牛峰,等.几种主要粗饲料的瘤胃降解特性比较研究[J].饲料工业,2013,34(1):38-42.

Options

Outlines

模态框（Modal）标题

Abstract

Cite this article

References