SHORT COMMUNICATIONS

Effects of Extraction Solution and Solid-Liquid Separation Method on the Activities of Non-Starch Polysaccharide Enzymes

  • LIAO Rui ,
  • ZHAO Feng ,
  • QI Zhili ,
  • ZHANG Hongfu
Expand
  • 1. State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agriculture Sciences, Beijing 100193, China;
    2. College of Animal Sciences and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China

Received date: 2016-04-01

  Online published: 2016-10-17

Abstract

This experiment was conducted to investigate appropriate extract solution and solid-liquid separation method for evaluating enzyme in solid feed enzyme product. Extract solution of deionized water, acetic acid-sodium acetate buffer solution (0.1 mol/L, pH 5.50), phosphate buffer solution (0.05 mol/L, pH 6.00) or 0.9% NaCl solution and solid-liquid separation method of no separation, 3 000 r/min of centrifugation for 3 min or filtration were used in a 4×3 factorial arrangement. Each treatment contained 5 replicates with 2 determination in each. The activities of enzymes in the products were determined. Then, the effects of the types of extract solution on the contents of solute and protein were investigated for the enzyme products (excluding α-galactosidase) dissolved and centrifuged. The results showed that the highest determined activity of xylanase was presented in the phosphate buffer solution buffer solution (P<0.05). The similar determined activities of β-glucanase were observed in acetic acid-sodium acetate buffer solution, phosphate solution and 0.9% NaCl solution (P>0.05), and were significantly higher than that in deionized water (P<0.05). The greatest and greater determined activities of β-mannanase were observed in deionized water and acetic acid-sodium acetate buffer solution, respectively, and were significantly greater than those in phosphate solution or 0.9% NaCl solution (P<0.05). The type of extract solution had no significant effect on the determined activity of α-galactosidase (P>0.05). The solid-liquid separation method had no significant effect on the determined activity of xylanase (P>0.05). The greater determined activity of β-glucanase was observed in centrifugation or filtration (P<0.05). The greatest determined activity of β-mannanase was presented in centrifugation (P<0.05). However, the highest determined activity of α-galactosidase product was observed in no separation (P<0.05). There was a significant interaction between the type of extract solution and solid-liquid separation method in the determined activities of 4 enzyme products (P<0.01). The highest dry matter solubility of xylanase product was observed in acetic acid-sodium acetate buffer solution (P<0.05). The highest dry matter solubility of β-glucanase and β-mannanase was presented in deionized water and 0.9% NaCl solution (P<0.05). However, the lowest protein contents of xylanase, β-glucanase and β-mannanase were observed in acetic acid-sodium acetate buffer solution (P<0.05). It is concluded that acetic acid-sodium acetate buffer solution is the most efficient to extract the enzyme protein from the product. After dissolved, the α-galactosidase product is not suitable to separate, but the other enzymes can be separated with centrifugation.

Cite this article

LIAO Rui , ZHAO Feng , QI Zhili , ZHANG Hongfu . Effects of Extraction Solution and Solid-Liquid Separation Method on the Activities of Non-Starch Polysaccharide Enzymes[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2016 , 28(10) : 3352 -3358 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2016.10.040

References

[1] 王在贵,张宏福.饲用木聚糖酶、β-葡聚糖酶活力测定方法的调研[J].饲料广角,2002(15):21-23.
[2] 薛梅,史雪萍,张廷荣,等.肉鸡小麦型饲粮4种单酶复配效应的体外法评定[J].动物营养学报,2014,26(12):3747-3756.
[3] DE VRIES S,PUSTJENS A M,SCHOLS H A,et al.Effects of processing technologies combined with cell wall degrading enzymes on in vitro degradability of barley[J].Journal of Animal Science,2012,90(Suppl.4):331-333.
[4] 徐君飞,顾佳佳,刘正初,等.木聚糖酶酶活测定条件的优化[J].农产品加工:学刊,2007(7):7-10.
[5] 陆文清,何丽花,曹云鹤.饲料用木聚糖酶活力测定的研究[J].饲料工业,2009,30(4):16-20.
[6] GOMES J E G,DA SILVA NASCIMENTO T C E,DE FRANÇA QUEIROZ A E S,et al.Production,characterization and evaluation of in vitro digestion of phytases,xylanases and cellulases for feed industry[J].African Journal of Microbiology Research,2014,8(6):551-558. 
[7] 熊晓燕,訾乃涛.饲用酶制剂载体的选择和使用[J].饲料工业,2010,31(18):25-28.
[8] BEDFORD M R,PARTRIDGE G G.Enzymes in farm animal nutrition[M].2nd ed.Oxford:CABI Publishing,2010:248-251.
[9] 吕艳春.微量饲料添加剂载体的选择和使用[J].中国饲料,2008(12):22-23,28.
[10] 叶国清,李海龙.载体和稀释剂的正确选择[J].当代畜牧,2002(10):26-27.
[11] 胡小玲,郭小青,管萍,等.在离子液体中蛋白质溶解性和稳定性的研究进展[J].功能材料,2013,44(12):1679-1685,1689.
[12] 高玲,刘美玲,孙晓红,等.抽提条件对酶制剂中β-葡聚糖酶活力的影响[J].黑龙江畜牧兽医,2008(12):58-59.
[13] 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局.GB/T 23874-2009饲料添加剂木聚糖酶活力的测定分光光度法[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2009.
[14] 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局,中国国家标准化管理委员会.GB/T 18634-2009饲用植酸酶活性的测定分光光度法[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2009.
[15] 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局,中国国家标准化管理委员会.GB/T 23881-2009饲用纤维素酶活性的测定滤纸法[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2009.
Outlines

/