RUMINANT NUTRITION

Effects of Different Feeding Standards on Growth and Slaughter Performance of Dorper×Thin-Tailed Han Crossbred Meat Lambs

  • WAN Fan ,
  • MA Tao ,
  • MA Chen ,
  • YANG Dong ,
  • TU Yan ,
  • DIAO Qiyu ,
  • YANG Kailun
Expand
  • 1. Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China;
    2. Key Laboratory of Feed Biotechnology of the Ministry of Agriculture, Feed Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China

Received date: 2016-05-12

  Online published: 2016-11-18

Abstract

In order to provide the basis for determination of appropriate feeding standard, this experiment compared the effects of different feeding standards on weight gain, organ development, slaughter performance and meat quality of Dorper×thin-tailed Han crossbred meat lambs. Six hundreds Dorper×thin-tailed Han crossbred male lambs[(28.30±0.86) kg of body weight] were randomly assigned into 4 groups with 3 replicates in each group and 50 lambs per replicate in a single factor experimental design. The experimental diets were formulated according to the following four feeding standards:feeding standard established by our laboratory (key laboratory of feed biotechnology of the ministry of agriculture, feed research institute, Chinese academy of agricultural sciences) based on the study of nutrient requirements of Dorper×thin-tailed Han crossbred sheep (abbreviated to‘CARS’), NRC (2007, USA), AFRC (1993, UK) and Feeding Standard OF Meat-Producing Sheep and Goats of Chinese agricultural industry standards (HB, NY/T 816-2004). The experiment lasted for 81 d, feed intake was recorded every 3 days and lambs were weighed every 20 days. Ten lambs in each group were slaughtered to determine slaughter performance, tissue and organ weight and meat quality after the lambs in CARS group reached 44 kg of average body weight. The results showed as follows:actual dry matter intake showed NRC group > AFRC group > CARS group > HB group, and significant differences were observed between NRC group and CARS or HB groups (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference among the other groups (P>0.05). For average average daily gain and carcass weight, no significant differences were observed among CARS, HB and AFRC groups (P>0.05), but these groups were significantly higher than NRC group (P<0.05). There were significant differences of feed conversion ratio among groups (P<0.05), and CARS group < HB group < AFRC group < NRC group. For dressing percentage, CARS group was significantly higher than NRC group (P<0.05), but no significant differences were found among CARS, AFRC and HB groups (P>0.05). The percentages of heart, kidneys and liver weight of live weight before slaughter in CARS group were significantly higher than those in the other three groups (P<0.05). Water losing rate and meat color's L*, a* and b* values of the longissimus were not significantly different among all groups (P>0.05). In conclusion, the actual average daily gain of Dorper×thin-tailed Han sheep crossbred meat lambs is 200 to 250 g; From weight gain and slaughter performance aspects, the standard of CARS has advantages over foreign feeding standards.

Cite this article

WAN Fan , MA Tao , MA Chen , YANG Dong , TU Yan , DIAO Qiyu , YANG Kailun . Effects of Different Feeding Standards on Growth and Slaughter Performance of Dorper×Thin-Tailed Han Crossbred Meat Lambs[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2016 , 28(11) : 3483 -3492 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2016.11.015

References

[1] 柴建民,刁其玉,屠焰,等.早期断奶时间对湖羊羔羊组织器官发育、屠宰性能和肉品质的影响[J].动物营养学报,2014,26(7):1838-1847.
[2] 许贵善,刁其玉,纪守坤,等.不同饲喂水平对肉用绵羊生长性能、屠宰性能及器官指数的影响[J].动物营养学报,2012,24(5):953-960.
[3] 许贵善.20-35 kg杜寒杂交羔羊能量与蛋白质需要量参数的研究[D].博士学位论文.北京:中国农业科学院,2013.
[4] XU G S,MA T,JI S K,et al.Energy requirements for maintenance and growth of early-weaned Dorper crossbred male lambs[J].Livestock Science,2015,177:71-78.
[5] DENG K D,DIAO Q Y,JIANG C G,et al.Energy requirements for maintenance and growth of Dorper crossbred ram lambs[J].Livestock Science,2012,150(1/2/3):102-110.
[6] 邓凯东.育肥绵羊的能量和蛋白质需要量研究[R]//中国农业科学院博士后研究工作报告.北京:中国农业科学院,2010.
[7] 徐平.羔羊早期断奶应用研究[D].硕士学位论文.兰州:甘肃农业大学,2008.
[8] 陈喜斌,金公亮.生长期莎能奶山羊能量代谢研究——Ⅲ.不同环境温度、不同体重和不同代谢能采食量对生长期莎能奶山羊日增重的影响[J].动物营养学报,1997,9(4):56-60.
[9] 王磊,陈文武,吴荷群,等.冬季不同饲养密度对肉羊生产性能的影响[J].西北农业学报,2015,24(7):23-27.
[10] CROMWELL G L.Trace minerals in pig production.Part 2.Setting the NRC standards for minerals[J].Animal Science Abroad:Pig and Poultry,2008,24(4):15-17.
[11] MA T,DENG K D,JIANG C G,et al.The relationship between microbial N synthesis and urinary excretion of purine derivatives in Dorper×thin-tailed Han crossbred sheep[J].Small Ruminant Research,2013,112(1/2/3):49-55.
[12] 杨红建.肉牛和肉用羊饲养标准起草与制定研究[R]//中国农业科学院博士后学位论文.北京:中国农业科学院,2003.
[13] 蔡建森,刁其玉.合饲肉羊的营养需要量[C]//2006中国羊业进展:第三届中国羊业发展大会论文集.兰州:中国畜牧业协会,2006.
[14] ALVAREZ-RODRIGUEZ J,SANZ A,DELFA R,et al.Performance and grazing behaviour of Churra Tensing sheep stocked under different management systems during lactation on Spanish mountain pastures[J].Livestock Science,2007,107(2/3):152-161.
[15] CLOETE S W P,SNYMAN M A,HERSELMAN M J.Productive performance of Dorper sheep[J].Small Ruminant Research,2000,36(2):119-135. 
[16] 聂海涛,王子玉,应诗家,等.采食量水平对杜湖F1代羊肉品质的影响[J].江苏农业科学,2012,40(1):179-181.
[17] 王德芹,王金文,崔绪奎,等.杜泊绵羊与小尾寒羊杂交后代生产性能研究[J].中国草食动物,2010,30(3):32-35.
[18] NAPOLITANO F,CIFUNI G F,PACELLI C,et al.Effect of artificial rearing on lamb welfare and meat quality[J].Meat Science,2002,60(3):307-315. 
[19] ZAPOTOCZNY P,SZCZYPINSKI P M,DASZKIEWICZ T.Evaluation of the quality of cold meats by computer-assisted image analysis[J].LWT:Food Science and Technology,2016,67:37-49.
[20] AGUAYO-ULLOA L A,DE LA LAMA G C M,PASCUAL-ALONSO M,et al.Effect of feeding regime during finishing on lamb welfare,production performance and meat quality[J].Small Ruminant Research,2013,111(1/2/3):147-156.
[21] 张晋青,岳度兵,罗海玲,等.日粮中维生素E水平对敖汉细毛羊内脏器官生长发育的影响[J].中国畜牧杂志,2010,46(17):43-46.
[22] 孙丽莎,赵睿,崔慧慧,等.饲粮不同水平蚕沙对绵羊生长性能、屠宰性能、器官发育和血清生化指标的影响[J].动物营养学报,2015(3):941-947.
[23] 岳喜新,刁其玉,邓凯东,等.饲喂代乳粉对羔羊生长性能和体组织参数的影响[J].饲料工业,2010,31(19):43-46.
Outlines

/