Molecular Nutrition

Ruminal Degradation Characteristics and Small Intestinal Digestibility of Rumen Undegraded Protein of Six Feed Ingredients

Expand
  • 1. Faculty of Animal Science and Technology, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China;
    2. State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China;
    3. Beijing General Station of Animal Husbandry, Beijing 100107, China

Received date: 2016-12-05

  Online published: 2017-06-07

Abstract

This experiment was conducted to determine the ruminal degradation characteristics and small intestinal digestibility of rumen undegraded protein (RUP) of six feed ingredients for dairy cows from Xinjiang, including corn silage, cottonseed hulls, alfalfa meal, alfalfa hay, grape seed meal and tomato sauce residue. Three lactating Holstein cows fitted with permanent rumen fistulas were selected to estimate the ruminal degradation characteristics of dry matter (DM), crude protein (CP), neutral detergent fiber (NDF) and acid detergent fiber (ADF) and small intestinal digestibility and intestinal digestible crude protein (IDCP) content of RUP by nylon-bag technique and modified three-step in vitro method. The results showed as follows:1) DM effective degradability of alfalfa meal and corn silage was higher, which was significantly higher than that of alfalfa hay and tomato sauce residue (P<0.05), and DM effective degradability of grape seed meal and cottonseed hulls was significantly lower than that of the other feed ingredients (P<0.05); CP effective degradability showed tomato sauce residue > alfalfa meal > corn silage > alfalfa hay > cottonseed hulls > grape seed meal with significant differences among feed ingredients (P<0.05); NDF effective degradability showed corn silage > alfalfa meal > cottonseed hulls > alfalfa hay > tomato sauce residue > grape seed meal, and the differences among feed ingredients were significant (P<0.05); ADF effective degradability showed corn silage > cottonseed hulls > alfalfa hay > tomato sauce residue > alfalfa meal > grape seed meal with significant differences among feed ingredients (P<0.05). 2) Small intestinal digestibility and IDCP content of RUP of alfalfa meal were the highest; small intestinal digestibility of alfalfa meal was significantly higher than that of alfalfa hay, corn silage, tomato sauce residue, grape seed meal and cottonseed hulls (P<0.05), which was decreased in order; there was no significant difference of IDCP content of RUP between alfalfa meal and alfalfa hay, which was significantly higher than that of corn silage, tomato sauce residue, grape seed meal and cottonseed hulls (decreased in order) (P<0.05). In conclusion, different feed ingredients have different ruminal degradation characteristics and the efficiency of IDCP production. Effective degradability of DM, NDF and ADF of corn silage is higher, small intestinal digestibility of RUP of corn silage was the highest, and alfalfa meal and alfalfa hay have higher IDCP content.

Cite this article

ZHAO Liansheng, NIU Junli, XU Yuanjun, WANG Fang, ZHENG Chen, LI Fadi, GUO Jiangpeng, BU Dengpan . Ruminal Degradation Characteristics and Small Intestinal Digestibility of Rumen Undegraded Protein of Six Feed Ingredients[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2017 , 29(6) : 2038 -2046 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2017.06.025

References

[1] KAUR R,GARCIA S C,FULKERSON W J,et al.Degradation kinetics of leaves,petioles and stems of forage rape (Brassica napus) as affected by maturity[J].Animal Feed Science and Technology,2011,168(3/4):165-178.

[2] 刁其玉,屠焰.奶牛常用饲料蛋白质在瘤胃的降解参数[J].乳业科学与技术,2005,27(2):70-74.

[3] 么学博,杨红建,谢春元,等.反刍家畜常用饲料蛋白质和氨基酸瘤胃降解特性和小肠消化率评定研究[J].动物营养学报,2007,19(3):225-231.

[4] NRC.Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle[M].7th ed.Washington,D.C.:National Academy Press,2001.

[5] ALI M,VAN DUINKERKEN G,CONE J W,et al.Relationship between chemical composition and in situ rumen degradation characteristics of maize silages in dairy cows[J].Animal,2014,8(11):1832-1838.  

[6] 熊本海.国际反刍动物饲料成分及营养价值表[M].北京:中国农业科学技术出版社,2013.

[7] GARGALLO S,CALSAMIGLIA S,FERRET A.Technical note:a modified three-step in vitro procedure to determine intestinal digestion of protein[J].Journal of Animal Science,2006,84(8):2163-2167.  

[8] VAN SOEST P J,ROBERTSON J B,LEWIS B A.Methods for dietary fiber,neutral detergent fiber,and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition[J].Journal of Dairy Science,1991,74(10):3583-3597.  

[9] ØRSKOV E R,MCDONALD I.The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighted according to rate of passage[J].The Journal of Agricultural Science,1979,92(2):499-503.  

[10] 颜品勋,冯仰廉,王燕兵,等.青粗饲料通过牛瘤胃外流速度的研究[J].动物营养学报,1994,6(2):20-22.

[11] 刘华.新疆地区23种饲料营养成分及其瘤胃降解特性比较研究[D].硕士学位论文.乌鲁木齐:新疆农业大学,2012.

[12] 杜道全,杨文华.葡萄籽粕在奶牛日粮中的应用研究[J].河南畜牧兽医,2009(8):28-29.

[13] 院江.棉籽壳发酵脱毒及其奶牛应用效果研究[D].硕士学位论文.石河子:石河子大学,2006:6.

[14] 贾海军.奶牛常用饲草瘤胃降解规律的研究[D].硕士学位论文.保定:河北农业大学,2010.

[15] 许丽,韩友文,张淑芳.不同处理方法对玉米秸秆干物质和粗纤维瘤胃降解率的影响[J].黑龙江畜牧与兽医,2002(5):15-16.

[16] 冯仰廉,陆治年.奶牛营养需要和饲料成分[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2007.

[17] 余梅,毛华明,赵刚,等.肉牛饲料瘤胃降解规律研究[J].黑龙江畜牧兽医,2010(7):64-67.

[18] 冷静,张颖,朱仁俊,等.云南黄牛对6种牧草瘤胃降解规律的研究[J].中国农学通报,2011,27(1):398-402.

[19] 张子仪.中国饲料学[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2000:10.

[20] 陈艳,张晓明,王之盛,等.6种肉牛常用粗饲料瘤胃降解特性和瘤胃非降解蛋白质的小肠消化率[J].动物营养学报,2014,26(8):2145-2154.

[21] 夏科,姚庆,李富国,等.奶牛常用粗饲料的瘤胃降解规律[J].动物营养学报,2012,24(4):769-777.

[22] 李洋,李春雷,赵洪波,等.不同产地全株玉米青贮的瘤胃降解特性与小肠消化率的研究[J].动物营养学报,2015,27(5):1641-1649.

[23] 苗树君,曲永利,杨柳,等.不同收获期玉米青贮营养成分在奶牛瘤胃内降解率的研究[J].动物营养学报,2007,19(2):172-176.

[24] 李占臻,李晓燕,雷耀庚,等.饲料蛋白在陕北白绒山羊小肠的消化率[J].草业科学,2014,31(1):173-179.

[25] 刘欣.葡萄籽粕在饲料中的应用研究[J].饲料研究,2011(7):83-84.

[26] TAGHIZADEH A,MESGARAN M D,VALIZADEH R,et al.Digestion of feed amino acids in the rumen and intestine of steers measured using a mobile nylon bag technique[J].Journal of Dairy Science,2005,88(5):1807-1814.  

[27] 阎春轩,黄素珍.瘤胃降解蛋白和瘤胃非降解蛋白在反刍家畜日粮中的应用[J].山西农业大学学报,1993,13(4):354-356.

[28] CHALUPA W,SNIFFEN C J.Protein and amino acid nutrition of lactating dairy cattle-today and tomorrow[J].Animal Feed Science and Technology,1996,58(1/2):65-75.
Outlines

/